华北落叶松和白杄径向生长对干旱的生态弹性差异

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.007

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1779-1786.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.007

华北落叶松和白杄径向生长对干旱的生态弹性差异

解萍萍¹, 张博奕¹, 董一博¹, 吕鹏程¹, 杜明超¹, 张先亮^1,2,3*

¹河北农业大学林学院, 河北保定 071001;
²河北省城市森林健康技术创新中心, 河北保定 071001;
³国家林业与草原局塞罕坝森林培育国家长期科研基地, 河北承德 068456

收稿日期:2023-03-10 接受日期:2023-05-19 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: zhxianliang85@gmail.com
作者简介:解萍萍, 女, 2000年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事树木年轮研究。E-mail: 2697297303@qq.com
基金资助:
河北省省级科技计划项目(226Z6801G)和亚太森林组织项目(2021P2-CHN)

Differences in ecological resilience of radial growth between Larix principis-rupprechtii and Picea meyeri after drought

XIE Pingping¹, ZHANG Boyi¹, DONG Yibo¹, LYU Pengcheng¹, DU Mingchao¹, ZHANG Xianliang^1,2,3*

¹College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, Hebei, China;
²Urban Forest Healthy Technology Innovation Center in Hebei Province, Baoding 071001, Hebei, China;
³National Forestry and Grassland Bureau Saihanba Forest Cultivation National Long-term Scientific Research Base, Chengde 068456, Hebei, China

Received:2023-03-10 Accepted:2023-05-19 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示混交林中阳性树种华北落叶松和阴性树种白杄径向生长对气候因子的响应及对干旱的生态弹性差异,构建河北塞罕坝头道沟和山西宁武县、岢岚县3个混交林中华北落叶松和白杄的标准年表,分析气候因子与各年表之间的相关性,研究华北落叶松和白杄应对干旱胁迫的抵抗力(R_c)、恢复力(R_t)、恢复弹力(R_s)差异。结果表明: 在3个混交林中,华北落叶松和白杄径向生长与当年5—7月的平均气温、最高气温呈显著负相关,并且均与5—9月的帕默尔干旱指数(PDSI)呈显著正相关。干旱胁迫导致的树木径向生长下降在不同树种间具有明显差异,这种差异在树种间不同的生理生态调节策略中有所体现。在3个研究地点,白杄的抵抗力均显著高于华北落叶松,而华北落叶松的恢复力、恢复弹力显著高于白杄。因此,白杄比华北落叶松表现出更好的抗旱能力。在全球变暖背景下,相较于白杄,该地区华北落叶松可能面临更大的生长波动风险。

关键词: 径向生长, 华北落叶松, 白杄, 干旱事件, 生态弹性

Abstract: To understand the responses of radial growth to climatic factors and the differences in ecological resilience to drought between a heliophilous species Larix principis-rupprechtii and a shade species Picea meyeri in mixed forests, we developed the tree-ring width chronologies of L. principis-rupprechtii and P. meyeri in three mixed forests based on the samples collected from Toudaogou of Saihanba in Hebei, Ningwu County and Kelan County in Shanxi Province. We analyzed the correlation between climatic factors and various chronologies and examined the differences in resistance (R_c), recovery (R_t), and resilience (R_s) of L. principis-rupprechtii and P. meyeri in response to drought stress. The results showed that the radial growth of L. principis-rupprechtii and P. meyeri was negatively correlated with the mean and maximum air temperature from May to July in three mixed forests, and was positively correlated with the Palmer drought index (PDSI) from May to September. Radial growth decline in trees due to drought stress was significantly different between the two species among the three sites, indicating different physiological and ecological regulation strategies. The resistance of P. meyeri was stronger than that of L. principis-rupprechtii at the three study sites, with stronger resilience and resilient elasticity of L. principis-rupprechtii than P. meyeri. As a result, P. meyeri exhibited greater drought resistance than L. principis-rupprechtii. Under global warming condition, L. principis-rupprechtii might be at greater risk of growth decline than P. meyeri in this region.

Key words: radial growth, Larix principis-rupprechtii, Picea meyeri, drought event, ecological resilience

解萍萍, 张博奕, 董一博, 吕鹏程, 杜明超, 张先亮. 华北落叶松和白杄径向生长对干旱的生态弹性差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1779-1786.

XIE Pingping, ZHANG Boyi, DONG Yibo, LYU Pengcheng, DU Mingchao, ZHANG Xianliang. Differences in ecological resilience of radial growth between Larix principis-rupprechtii and Picea meyeri after drought[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(7): 1779-1786.

参考文献

[1] Vicente-Serrano SM, Quiring SM, Pena-Gallardo M, et al. A review of environmental droughts: Increased risk under global warming? Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 201: 102953
[2] Goulden ML, Bales RC. California forest die-off linked to multi-year deep soil drying in 2012-2015 drought. Nature Geoscience, 2019, 12201: 632-637
[3] Tang ZM, Sayer MAS, Chambers JL, et al. Interactive effects of fertilization and throughfall exclusion on the physiological responses and whole-tree carbon uptake of mature loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Botany, 2004, 82: 850-861
[4] Seidl R, Thom D, Kautz M, et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7: 395-402
[5] Lloret F, Keeling EG, Sala A. Components of tree resilience: Effects of successive low-growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests. Oikos, 2011, 120: 1909-1920
[6] Vitasse Y, Bottero A, Cailleret M, et al. Contrasting resistance and resilience to extreme drought and late spring frost in five major European tree species. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25: 3781-3792
[7] Pretzsch H, Schütze G, Uhl E. Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in mixedversus pure forests: Evidence of stress release by inter-specific faci-litation. Plant Biology, 2013, 15: 483-495
[8] 肖健宇, 张文艳, 牟玉梅, 等. 树木年轮揭示的东灵山主要树种间干旱耐受性差异. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3487-3496
[9] 曹新光, 胡红兵, 李颖俊, 等. 亚热带人工和天然马尾松、杉木林生长对干旱的生态弹性差异. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3531-3538
[10] Alessandra B, David IFM. Growth resistance and resilience of mixed silver fir and Norway spruce forests in central Europe: Contrasting responses to mild and severe droughts. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27: 4403-4419
[11] 张文涛, 江源, 王明昌, 等. 芦芽山阳坡不同海拔华北落叶松径向生长对气候变化的响应. 生态学报, 2015, 35(19): 6481-6488
[12] 熊千志, 杜恩在, 薛峰, 等. 塞罕坝地区人工针叶林径向生长对水热条件的响应. 生态学报, 2022, 42(13): 5371-5380
[13] 江源, 杨艳刚, 董满宇, 等. 芦芽山林线白杄与华北落叶松径向生长特征比较. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(6): 1271-1277
[14] Holmes RL. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-ring Bulletin, 1983, 43: 69-78
[15] Cook ER, Holmes RL. Program ARSTAN User’s Manual. Tucson, USA: Laboratory of Tree-ring Research, University of Arizona, 1984, 15: 50-65
[16] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.气象干旱等级(GB/T 20481—2017). 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017
[17] Yuan S, Quiring SM. Drought in the US Great Plains (1980-2012): A sensitivity study using different me-thods for estimating potential evapotranspiration in the Palmer drought severity index. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2014, 119: 10996-11010
[18] 李晓琴, 张凌楠, 曾小敏, 等. 黄土高原中部针叶树与灌木径向生长对气候的响应差异. 生态学报, 2020, 40(16): 5685-5697
[19] 张晓, 潘磊磊, Semyung Kwon, 等. 沙地天然樟子松径向生长对干旱的响应. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(7): 27-35
[20] Lv P, Rademacher T, Huang X, et al. Prolonged drought duration, not intensity, reduces growth recovery and prevents compensatory growth of oak trees. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 326: 109183
[21] Wu XC, Liu HY, Li X, et al. Differentiating drought legacy effects on vegetation growth over the temperate Northern Hemisphere. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24: 504-516
[22] 徐贺年, 王江林, 彭小梅, 等. 青藏高原东北部祁连圆柏径向生长对不同类型干旱的响应. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2097-2104
[23] 王婷, 于丹, 李江风, 等. 树木年轮宽度与气候变化关系研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(1): 23-33
[24] Liu Y, Linderholm HW, Song HM, et al. Temperature variations recorded in Pinus tabuliformis tree rings from the southern and northern slopes of the central Qinling Mountains, central China. Boreas, 38: 285-291
[25] 杨婧雯, 张秋良, 宋文琦, 等. 大兴安岭兴安落叶松和樟子松径向生长对气候变化的响应差异. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3415-3427
[26] Takahashi K, Aoki K. Effects of climatic conditions on annual shoot length and tree-ring width of alpine dwarf pine Pinus pumila in central Japan. Journal of Plant Research, 2015, 128: 553-562
[27] 陈峰, 袁玉江, 魏文寿, 等. 腾格里沙漠南缘近315年5—6月PDSI指数变化. 地理科学, 2011, 31(4): 434-439
[28] Gruber A, Pirkebner D, Florian C, et al. No evidence for depletion of carbohydrate pools in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) under drought stress. Plant Biology, 2012, 14: 142-148
[29] Anderegg WR, Plavcová L, Anderegg LD, et al. Drought’s legacy: Multiyear hydraulic deterioration underlies widespread aspen forest die-off and portends increased future risk. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19: 1188-1196
[30] Grossiord C, Buckley TN, Cernusak LA, et al. Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit. New Phytologist, 2020, 226: 1550-1566
[31] McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist, 2008, 178: 719-739
[32] Vitali V, Büntgen U, Bauhus J. Silver fir and Douglas fir are more tolerant to extreme droughts than Norway spruce in south-western Germany. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23: 5108-5119
[33] Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Guo Y, et al. Intra-annual xylem growth of Larix principis-rupprechtii at its upper and lo-wer distribution limits on the Luyashan Mountain in north-central China. Forests, 2015, 6: 3809-3827
[34] Zhang X, Li X, Manzanedo RD, et al. High risk of growth cessation of planted larch under extreme drought. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16: 014040
[35] Rennenberg H, Loreto F, Polle A, et al. Physiological responses of forest trees to heat and drought. Plant Bio-logy, 2006, 8: 556-571
[36] Zhang LN, Jiang Y, Zhao SD, et al. Relationships between tree age and climate sensitivity of radial growth in different drought conditions of Qilian Mountains, Northwestern China. Forests, 2018, 9: 135
[37] 申佳艳, 李帅锋, 黄小波, 等. 金沙江流域不同海拔处云南松生态弹性及生长衰退过程. 林业科学, 2020, 56(6): 1-11
[38] Augustaitis A, Bytnerowicz A, Paoletti E. Biological reactions of forests to climate change and air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 184: 657-658
[39] Martinez-Vilalta J, Lopez BC, Loepfe L, et al. Stand- and tree-level determinants of the drought response of Scots pine radial growth. Oecologia, 2012, 168: 877-888
[40] Castellano PL, Srur AM, Bianchi LO. Climate-growth relationships of deciduous and evergreen Nothofagus species in Southern Patagonia, Argentina. Dendrochronologia, 2019, 58: 125646

华北落叶松和白杄径向生长对干旱的生态弹性差异

Differences in ecological resilience of radial growth between Larix principis-rupprechtii and Picea meyeri after drought

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵怡, 李福明, 朱景康, 常晨隆, 冯泳翰, 梁文俊, 魏曦. 华北落叶松人工林林隙大小对其更新的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2039-2046.
[2]	冯泳翰, 闫珏, 郭钰, 赵怡, 董媛, 梁文俊, 魏曦, 毕华兴. 间伐强度对华北落叶松天然更新的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1169-1177.
[3]	任倩茹, 毛晓雅, 齐晓君, 刘晋仙, 贾彤, 吴铁航, 柴宝峰. 芦芽山华北落叶松林不同深度土壤原生动物群落分布格局及驱动机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1395-1403.
[4]	王恒, 王小雪, 贾建恒, 张子航, 郭明明. 华北落叶松径向生长对升温突变的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2629-2636.
[5]	汪椿凯, 黄选瑞, 李雪, 姜雨, 王小雪, 张先亮. 不同林分类型林缘华北落叶松细胞特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1191-1198.
[6]	张慧, 付培立, 林友兴, 格桑, 杨建强, 格茸取扎, 范泽鑫. 滇西北白马雪山长苞冷杉和大果红杉年内径向生长动态及其对环境因子的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 2881-2888.
[7]	卫舒平, 梁文俊, 魏曦, 卜瑞瑛, 姚佳峰. 不同密度华北落叶松林天然更新及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2687-2694.
[8]	董雪婷, 张静, 张志东, 黄选瑞. 树种相互作用、林分密度和树木大小对华北落叶松生产力的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2722-2728.
[9]	贾汉森, 高峻, 张劲松, 孟平, 孙守家. 太行山南麓不同径级栓皮栎生长对气候要素及干旱事件的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2857-2865.
[10]	秦颢萍, 刘泽彬, 郭建斌, 王彦辉, 于松平, 王蕾. 环境和冠层结构对华北落叶松林树干液流的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1681-1689.
[11]	王淳, 董雪婷, 杜瑞鹏, 张志东, 黄选瑞. 华北落叶松与阔叶树种混合凋落叶分解过程中养分释放和酶活性变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1709-1716.
[12]	孙悦燕, 王秀丽, 高润梅, 李进. 干旱胁迫下华北落叶松幼苗接种木霉的生理变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 853-859.
[13]	郭雪梅, 王兆鹏, 张楠, 张冬有. 樟子松和落叶松径向生长对气候变化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3405-3414.
[14]	赵莹, 蔡立新, 靳雨婷, 李俊霞, 崔迪, 陈振举. 暖干化加剧东北半干旱地区油松人工林径向生长的水分限制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3459-3467.
[15]	毛沂新, 张慧东, 王睿照, 颜廷武, 魏文俊, 云丽丽, 潘文利, 尤文忠. 辽东山区蒙古栎径向生长对林分密度和气候因子的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3477-3486.