共基质对10株细菌降解芘的作用

应用生态学报

共基质对10株细菌降解芘的作用

苏丹^1,2;李培军¹;王鑫³

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所，沈阳 110016;
²中国科学院研究生院，北京 100039;
³沈阳大学沈阳环境工程重点实验室，沈阳 110044

收稿日期:2006-03-01 修回日期:2007-01-09 出版日期:2007-03-18 发布日期:2007-03-18

Effects of co-substrates on biodegradation of pyrene by ten bacterial strains

SU Dan^1,2; LI Pei-jun¹; WANG Xin³

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²Gradate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
³Shenyang Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China

Received:2006-03-01 Revised:2007-01-09 Online:2007-03-18 Published:2007-03-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从石油污染的污泥中分离出10株细菌(SB01—SB10)，研究了有(或无)共基质(葡萄糖Glu，或菲PHE)对细菌降解芘(PYR)的影响.结果表明：当以PYR为唯一碳源和能源时(MS₁)，SB01的PYR降解率最高，5 d可降解30.4%；以Glu为共代谢基质时(MS₂)，SB09的PYR降解率最高，可达37.7%；以PHE为共代谢基质时(MS₃)，SB10的PYR降解率为50.2%.Glu抑制SB01、SB03对PYR的降解，对SB01抑制作用最明显，使SB01的PYR降解率降低7.9%；Glu对SB02、SB07、SB08、SB10降解率无明显促进或抑制作用.PHE对细菌降解PYR均有促进作用，对SB10的促进作用最明显，使其降解率提高298%.Glu与PHE对SB04和SB09降解PYR的促进作用无显著差异，而对其它各菌株而言，PHE对PYR降解的促进作用大于Glu.

关键词: 科尔沁沙地, 土地利用, 时空动态变化

Abstract: A total of 10 bacterial strains represented as from SB01 to SB10 were isolated from a petrolium-contaminated sludge, and their potential of degrading pyrene (PYR) was investigated on the substrates pyrene (MS₁), pyrene plus glucose (MS₂), and pyrene plus phenanthrene (MS₃). The results showed that on MS₁, the degradation rate of PYR by SB01 was the highest, with 30.4% of PYR degraded after 5 days. On MS₂, the degradation rate of PYR by SB09 was the highest, being 37.7% after 5 days, while on MS₃, 50.2% of PYR was removed by SB01. The degradation of PYR by SB01 and SB03 was inhibited by glucose, which was more obvious for SB01, but no significant difference was observed among SB02, SB07, SB08 and SB10. The biodegradation rate of PYR by all the ten bacterial strains was enhanced on MS₃, and that by SB10 was increased by 29.8%. For SB04 and SB09, the biodegradation rate of PYR had no significant difference between MS₁ and MS₂, but for other strains, the stimulation effect of phenanthrene on PYR degradation was higher than that of glucose.

Key words: Horqin desert land, Land use, Temporal and spatial change

苏丹^1,2;李培军¹;王鑫³. 共基质对10株细菌降解芘的作用[J]. 应用生态学报.

SU Dan^1,2; LI Pei-jun¹; WANG Xin³. Effects of co-substrates on biodegradation of pyrene by ten bacterial strains[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology.

[1]	刘慧民, 钱文琦, 唐路嘉, 巫溢涵, 曾佳颖. 城市生态绿楔土地利用变化及冷岛效应评估——以武汉市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 480-488.
[2]	张铜会, 丛安琪, 连杰, 徐远志, 王宁. 从科尔沁草原到科尔沁沙地的思考 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 25-30.
[3]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[4]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[5]	马扩, 郝丽娜, 童新, 段利民, 曹文梅, 康雪儿, 刘小勇, 刘廷玺. 科尔沁沙丘-草甸相间地区生态安全格局的时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2215-2225.
[6]	付建新. 1980—2020年汾河流域“三生空间”土地利用功能变化及其驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1901-1911.
[7]	李久林, 胡大卫, 储金龙, 尹海伟. 基于未来情景模拟的安徽省潜山市生态网络构建与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1474-1482.
[8]	徐彩瑶, 任燕, 孔凡斌. 浙江省土地利用变化对生态系统固碳服务的影响及其预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1610-1620.
[9]	苟国花, 樊军, 王茜, 周明星, 杨学亭. 基于最小数据集的青藏高原南北部不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1360-1366.
[10]	王佳楠, 贾燕锋, 范昊明. 辽西低山棕壤丘陵区小流域泥沙连通性与土壤侵蚀的空间分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 726-732.
[11]	叶静, 关瑜, 陈影. 滨海盐碱区土地利用功能权衡与协同关系及分区——以河北省黄骅市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 423-432.
[12]	王宏雪, 武玮, 王琦琨, 杨雪琪, 殷旭旺. 不同河岸缓冲区尺度下土地利用方式对嘎呀河流域水质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3203-3213.
[13]	万翔宇, 肖孔操, 李德军, 张玉玲, 段鹏鹏. 桂西北岩溶区不同土地利用方式下土壤反硝化基因丰度及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3340-3346.
[14]	王想, 王春雨, 吕飞南, 陈水灵, 宇振荣. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的区县碳储量时空格局变化与碳汇提升策略——以延庆区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3373-3384.
[15]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.