采伐剩余物不同处理方式对杉木幼林土壤有机氮组分的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采伐剩余物不同处理方式会改变输入土壤的有机质数量和质量,直接或间接影响土壤的养分组成与含量。氮作为重要的土壤养分之一,其有机氮组分对采伐剩余物不同处理方式的响应仍不明确。本研究在福建省三明市格氏栲自然保护区内,对50多年生的杉木成熟林皆伐后的采伐剩余物分别进行清除、保留、火烧处理,并种植杉木5年时,采用H₂SO₄水解法对不同土层(0～10、10～20 cm)土壤有机氮组分及其影响因素进行研究。结果表明: 保留处理显著提高了土壤有机氮及活性组分的含量。0～10 cm土层中,保留处理土壤有机氮含量(3.36 g·kg^-1)分别是清除处理、火烧处理的1.5和1.3倍,活性氮Ⅰ、Ⅱ含量也以保留处理最高;10～20 cm土层中,保留处理土壤有机氮和活性氮Ⅱ含量(2.20、0.73 g·kg^-1)也显著高于清除和火烧处理,而且保留处理的活性氮指数Ⅱ(33.9%)显著高于火烧处理(26.1%)。两个土层均以保留处理的总碳、可溶性有机碳、可溶性有机氮含量,以及微生物生物量碳、氮最高。与清除处理相比,保留处理显著提高0～10 cm土层细菌(革兰氏阳性菌、阴性菌)含量;10～20 cm土层中,保留处理的真菌含量最高,放线菌含量最低。相关分析表明,土壤有机氮及活性组分与土壤总碳、可溶性有机碳、可溶性有机氮、微生物生物量及土壤细菌(革兰氏阳性菌、阴性菌)、真菌呈显著正相关,与放线菌呈显著负相关。保留处理有利于提高土壤有机氮及活性氮组分含量,改善土壤生化性质,对土壤微生物群落组成具有积极的影响,是维持土壤肥力和提高森林生产力的有效经营管理措施。

关键词: 林地管理, 采伐剩余物, 土壤有机氮组分, 杉木

Abstract: Different treatments of harvest residues will change the quantity and quality of soil organic matter, with direct or indirect effects on the composition and content of soil nutrient. Nitrogen is one of the most important soil nutrients. However, the response of soil organic nitrogen fractions to different harvest residue treatments is still unclear. In this study, harvest residue treatments, including harvest residue removed, residue retained and residue burnt, were set up after clear-cutting a 50-year-old mature Cunninghamia lanceolata forest in Sanming City, Fujian, China. The H₂SO₄ hydrolysis method was used to determine soil organic nitrogen fractions and their driving factors in the 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm soil layers after 5 years of harvest residue treatments. The results showed that residue retained treatment significantly enhanced the contents of soil organic nitrogen and its liable fractions. In the 0-10 cm soil layer, soil organic nitrogen content under residue retained treatment (3.36 g·kg^-1) was 1.5 and 1.3 times as those of residue removed and residue burnt treatments, respectively. Residue retained treatment had the highest contents of labile nitrogen Ⅰ and Ⅱ fractions. In 10-20 cm soil layer, the contents of soil organic nitrogen and labile nitrogen Ⅱ fraction were also significantly higher in residue retained treatment (2.20, 0.73 g·kg^-1) than that in residue removed and residue burnt treatments. The labile nitrogen index Ⅱ in residue retained treatment (33.9%) was significantly higher than in residue burnt treatment (26.1%). The contents of total carbon, dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, microbial biomass under residue retained treatment were the highest in both soil layers. Compared with residue removed treatment, residue retained treatment significantly enhanced the abundance of soil bacteria (Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria) in 0-10 cm soil layer. In 10-20 cm soil layer, residue retained treatment had the highest content of fungi and the lowest content of actinomycetes. Pearson analysis showed that there were significant positive correlations of labile fractions of soil organic nitrogen with total carbon, dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen, bacteria (Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria), and fungi, and negative correlations with actinomycetes. It was concluded that the retention of harvest residue was beneficial to increase the content of soil organic nitrogen and labile fractions, improve soil biochemical properties and had a positive effect on soil microbial community composition. Retention of harvest residue was an effective management measure to maintain soil fertility and improve forest productivity.

Key words: forest management, harvest residue, soil organic nitrogen fraction, Cunninghamia lanceolata

王海珍, 陆宇明, 张磊, 李啸灵, 林伟盛, 郭剑芬. 采伐剩余物不同处理方式对杉木幼林土壤有机氮组分的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1199-1206.

WANG Hai-zhen, LU Yu-ming, ZHANG Lei, LI Xiao-ling, LIN Wei-sheng, GUO Jian-fen. Effects of harvest residue management on soil organic nitrogen fractions in young Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1199-1206.

参考文献

[1] Thiffaul E, Béchard A, Paré D, et al. Recovery rate of harvest residues for bioenergy in boreal and temperate forests: A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews and Energy and Environment, 2015, 4: 429-451
[2] Wang YZ, Xu ZH, Zhou QX. Impact of fire on soil gross nitrogen transformations in forest ecosystems. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2014, 14: 1030-1040
[3] 王玉哲, 刘俊第, 严强, 等. 马尾松林采伐迹地火烧黑炭对土壤活性碳氮库的影响. 生态学报, 2018, 38(20): 53-62
[4] Maier CA, Johnsen KH, Dougherty P, et al. Effect of harvest residue management on tree productivity and carbon pools during early stand development in a loblolly pine plantation. Forest Science, 2012, 58: 430-445
[5] Hu ZH, He ZM, Huang ZQ, et al. Effects of harvest residue management on soil carbon and nitrogen processes in a Chinese fir plantation. Forest Ecology and Mana-gement, 2014, 326: 163-170
[6] 殷睿, 许振峰, 吴福忠, 等. 川西亚高山不同海拔森林土壤活性氮库及净氮矿化的季节动态. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(12): 3347-3353
[7] 常晨晖, 苟小林, 吴福忠, 等. 利用海拔差异模拟增温对高山森林土壤溶解性有机碳和有机氮含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 663-671
[8] Wu HQ, Du SY, Zhang YL, et al. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on greenhouse soil organic nitrogen fractions and soil-soluble nitrogen pools. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 216: 415-424
[9] Belay-Tedla A, Zhou XH, Su B, et al. Labile, recalcitrant, and microbial carbon and nitrogen pools of a tallgrass prairie soil in the US Great Plains subjected to experimental warming and clipping. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 110-116
[10] Tesfaye MA, Bravo F, Ruiz-Peinado R, et al. Impact of changes in land use, species and elevation on soil orga-nic carbon and total nitrogen in Ethiopian Central Highlands. Geoderma, 2016, 261: 70-79
[11] Chen CR, Xu ZH. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools and microbial properties in a 6-year-old slash pine plantation of subtropical Australia: Impacts of harvest residue mana-gement. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 206: 237-247
[12] Kuypers MMM, Marchant HK, Kartal B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2018, 16: 263-276
[13] Veresoglou SD, Chen B, Rilling MC, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and soil nitrogen cycling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 46: 53-62
[14] 芦光新, 李宗仁, 李希来, 等. 三江源区高寒草地不同生境土壤可培养纤维素分解真菌群落结构特征研究. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 76-87
[15] Enggrob KL, Larsen T, Peixoto L, et al. Gram-positive bacteria control the rapid anabolism of protein-sized soil organic nitrogen compounds questioning the present paradigm. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 15840
[16] Rovira P, Vallejo VR. Labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen in organic matter decomposing at different depths in soil: An acid hydrolysis approach. Geoderma, 2002, 107: 109-141
[17] Pastore G, Tobin B, Nieuwenhuis M. Quantifying carbon and nitrogen losses by respiration and leaching from decomposing woody debris in reforested coniferous stands in Ireland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 265: 195-207
[18] Štursová M, Žifčáková L, Leigh MB, et al. Cellulose utilization in forest litter and soil: Identification of bacterial and fungal decomposers. FEMS Microbiology Eco-logy, 2020, 80: 1-12
[19] Preusser S, Marhan S, Poll C, et al. Microbial community response to changes in substrate availability and habitat conditions in a reciprocal subsoil transfer experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 105: 138-152
[20] Smolander A, Kitunen V, Kukkola M, et al. Response of soil organic layer characteristics to logging residues in three Scots pine thinning stands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 66: 51-59
[21] Jin HM, Sun OJ, Liu JF. Changes in soil microbial biomass and community structure with addition of contrasting types of plant litter in a semiarid grassland ecosystem. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 3: 209-217
[22] Farrel M, Prendergast-Miller M, Jones DL, et al. Soil microbial organic nitrogen uptake is regulated by carbon availability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 77: 261-267
[23] Schaeffer SM, Evans RD. Pulse additions of soil carbon and nitrogen affect soil nitrogen dynamics in an arid Colorado Plateau shrubland. Oecologia, 2005, 145: 425-433
[24] Parolari AJ, Porporato A. Forest soil carbon and nitrogen cycles under biomass harvest: Stability, transient response, and feedback. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 239: 64-76
[25] Tian J, He NP, Hala L, et al. Soil organic matter availa-bility and climate drive latitudinal patterns in bacterial diversity from tropical to cold temperate forests. Functio-nal Ecology, 2018, 32: 61-70
[26] Zhang YL, Zhang MY, Tang L, et al. Long-term harvest residue retention could decrease soil bacterial diversities probably due to favouring oligotrophic lineages. Microbial Ecology, 2018, 76: 771-781
[27] Nuccio EE, Hodge A, Pett-Ridge J, et al. An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus significantly modifies the soil bacterial community and nitrogen cycling during litter decom-position. Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 15: 1870-1881
[28] Strickland MS, Rousk J. Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils: Methods, controls, and ecosystem implications. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42: 1385-1395
[29] Deng Q, Cheng XL, Hui DF, et al. Soil microbial community and its interaction with soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following afforestation in central China. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 541: 230-237
[30] Xu G, Chen J, Berninger F, et al. Labile, recalcitrant, microbial carbon and nitrogen and the microbial community composition at two Abies faxoniana forest elevations under elevated temperatures. Soil Biology and Bioche-mistry, 2015, 91: 1-13
[31] Fanin N, Kardol P, Farrell M, et al. The ratio of Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacterial PLFA markers as an indicator of carbon availability in organic soils. Soil Bio-logy and Biochemistry, 2019, 128: 111-114