欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (08): 2084-2090.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于SRP概念模型的沂蒙山区生态环境脆弱性评价

刘正佳1,2,4,于兴修1**,李蕾3,4,黄玫4   

  1. 1临沂大学化学与资源环境学院山东省水土保持与环境保育重点实验室, 山东临沂 276005;2山东师范大学人口资源与环境学院, 济南 250014;3北京林业大学林学院, 北京 100083; 4中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101
  • 出版日期:2011-08-18 发布日期:2011-08-18

Vulnerability assessment of eco-environment in Yimeng mountainous area of Shandong Province based on SRP conceptual model.

LIU Zheng-jia1,2,4, YU Xing-xiu1, LI Lei3,4, HUANG Mei4   

  1. 1Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Soil & Water Conservation and Environment Protection, College of Chemistry & Resources Environment, Linyi University, Linyi 276005, Shandong, China; 2College of Population, Resource and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan 250014, China;3 College of Forestry Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;4Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • Online:2011-08-18 Published:2011-08-18

摘要: 基于生态敏感性-生态恢复力-生态压力度(SRP)概念模型,选取景观多样性指数、土壤侵蚀、高程等13个评价指标,在GIS环境下,结合空间主成分分析法和层次分析法,对沂蒙山区生态环境脆弱性进行评价,并根据生态环境脆弱性指数(EVI)值,将研究区生态环境脆弱度分为5级:微度脆弱(<1.8)、轻度脆弱(1.8~2.8)、中度脆弱(2.8~3.5)、重度脆弱(3.5~4.0)和极度脆弱(>4.0).结果表明:沂蒙山区生态环境脆弱性以中度脆弱性为主,其中,微度、轻度、中度、重度和极度脆弱区面积分别占研究区总面积的6.1%、33.8%、43.3%、15.9%和0.9%,重度和极度脆弱区主要集中在地形较复杂的山地丘陵区或人类活动强度较大的丘陵和平原过渡交错带.

关键词: 生态环境, 脆弱性, 地理信息系统, 生态敏感性-生态恢复力-生态压力度(SRP)概念模型, 沂蒙山区

Abstract: Based on the ecological sensitivity-resilience-pressure (SRP) conceptual model, and selecting 13 indices including landscape diversity index, soil erosion, and elevation, etc., the vulnerability of the eco-environment in Yimeng mountainous area of Shandong Province was assessed under the support of GIS and by using principal component analysis and hierarchy analytical method. According to the eco-environmental vulnerability index (EVI) values, the eco-environment vulnerability of study area was classified into 5 levels, i.e., slight (<1.8), light (1.8-2.8), moderate (2.8-3.5), heavy (3.5-4.0), and extreme vulnerability (>4.0). In the study area, moderately vulnerable area occupied 43.3% of the total, while the slightly, lightly, heavily, and extremely vulnerable areas occupied 6.1%, 33.8%, 15.9%, and 0.9%, respectively. The heavily and extremely vulnerable areas mainly located in the topographically complicated hilly area or the hill-plain ecotone with frequent human activities.

Key words: eco-environment, vulnerability, GIS, ecological sensitivity-resilience-pressure (SRP) conceptual model, Yimeng mountainous area