黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性——以子午岭区为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.030

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1623-1632.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.030

黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性——以子午岭区为例

靳甜甜, 张云霞, 朱月华, 巩杰^*, 燕玲玲

兰州大学资源环境学院/西部环境教育部重点实验室, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2020-12-31 接受日期:2021-02-25 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-11-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:靳甜甜,女,1998年生,硕士研究生。主要从事GIS应用和景观生态学研究。E-mail:1624034613@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大项目(4179420015)资助

Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem service values and landscape ecological risk and their correlation in forest area of Loess Plateau, China:A case study of Ziwuling region.

JIN Tian-tian, ZHANG Yun-xia, ZHU Yue-hua, GONG Jie^*, YAN Ling-ling

College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University/Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Western China's Environmental Systems, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2020-12-31 Accepted:2021-02-25 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-11-15
Contact: *E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (4179420015).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当前,人们对自然景观提供的生态系统服务保护意识正在加强,但将生态系统服务价值纳入生态风险管控的研究和实践相对较少。本研究以子午岭区为例,基于2.5 km×2.5 km的评价小区,开展了1980、1990、2000、2010和2017年黄土高原林区——子午岭区景观格局类型格网化和重采样,定量评价了生态系统服务价值和景观生态风险,揭示了二者时空变化及其关联性。结果表明: 1980—2017年,子午岭区生态系统服务价值从其中心地带向外缘递减,总量由123.45亿元增长为126.33亿元;子午岭区景观生态风险从其中心地带向外缘递增,子午岭区的景观生态风险有所降低,生态状况总体好转。子午岭区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险之间存在显著的负相关关系及明显的负向空间关联性;高价值-低风险区主要为子午岭林区,未来其生态系统服务价值可能会保持不变。

关键词: 生态系统服务价值, 景观生态风险, 时空变化, 关联性, 子午岭

Abstract: Although the awareness of ecosystem services provided by natural landscape is increa-sing, few studies integrate ecosystem services value (ESV) into ecological risk management and its control. With Ziwuling region as an example, we carried out the gridding resampling of landscape pattern types in the forest area of Ziwuling region in 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2017. We quantified the ESV and landscape ecological risk and their spatiotemporal variations, based on the 2.5 km×2.5 km grid. The spatial correlation between the ESV and landscape ecological risk was examined. The results showed that the ESV decreased from the center to the outside of Ziwuling region, which increased from 12.345 to 12.633 billion yuan from 1980 to 2017. The landscape ecological risk increased from the center to the outside edge of Ziwuling region, indicating that the landscape ecological risk of Ziwuling region was reduced and the overall ecological situation was improved. There was a significant negative correlation and negative spatial correlation between ESV and landscape ecological risk in this area. The high value-low risk area was mainly located in Ziwu-ling forest area, while the ESV might be maintained in the future.

Key words: ecosystem service value, landscape ecological risk, spatiotemporal change, correlation, Ziwuling region

靳甜甜, 张云霞, 朱月华, 巩杰, 燕玲玲. 黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性——以子午岭区为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1623-1632.

JIN Tian-tian, ZHANG Yun-xia, ZHU Yue-hua, GONG Jie, YAN Ling-ling. Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem service values and landscape ecological risk and their correlation in forest area of Loess Plateau, China:A case study of Ziwuling region.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1623-1632.

参考文献

[1] Lin Y, Chen JS, Jin ZF, et al. Impacts of human activities on coastal ecological environment during the rapid urbanization process in Shenzhen, China. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2018, 154: 121-132
[2] Gideon B, Hirotaka M. A perception-based estimation of the ecological impacts of livelihood activities: The case of rural Ghana. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 93: 424-433
[3] 孙东琪, 张京祥, 朱传耿, 等. 中国生态环境质量变化态势及其空间分异分析. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1599-1610 [Sun D-Q, Zhang J-X, Zhu C-G, et al. An assessment of China's ecological environment quality change and its spatial Variation . Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(12): 1599-1610]
[4] 秦晓楠, 卢小丽 ,武春友. 国内生态安全研究知识图谱——基于Citespace的计量分析. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13): 3693-3703 [Qin X-N, Lu X-L, Wu C-Y. The knowledge mapping of domestic ecological security research: Bibliometric analysis based on Citespace. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(13): 3693-3703]
[5] 彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序, 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 664-677 [Peng J, Dang W-X, Liu Y-X, et al. Review on landscape ecological risk assessment. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(4): 664-677]
[6] 康鹏, 陈卫平, 王美娥. 基于生态系统服务的生态风险评价研究进展. 生态学报, 2016, 36(5): 1192-1203 [Kang P, Chen W-P, Wang M-E. Advances in ecosystem service-based ecological risk assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(5): 1192-1203]
[7] Xing L, Hu MS, Wang Y. Integrating ecosystem ser-vices value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: A case study of Hubei Province, Central China. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140126
[8] 汤峰, 殷彦玲, 张蓬涛, 等. 基于土地利用变化的高阳县生态系统服务价值和碳排放风险研究. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(4): 265-271 [Tang F, Yin Y-L, Zhang P-T, et al. Research on ecosystem service value and carbon emission risk of Gaoyang county based on land use change. Research of Soil Water Conservation, 2019, 26(4): 265-271]
[9] 谢丽霞, 白永平, 车磊, 等. 基于价值—风险的黄河上游生态功能区生态分区建设. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 196-207 [Xie L-X, Bai Y-P, Che L, et al. Construction of ecological zone based on value-risk ecological function area in the Upper Yellow River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(1): 196-207]
[10] 林婉妮, 王诺, 吴暖. 基于沉积物污染风险与生态系统服务价值的环境管理优先级初步研究——以渤海为例. 海洋科学, 2018, 42(3): 46-52 [Lin W-N, Wang N, Wu N. Preliminary establishment of environment management priorities based on sediment pollution risk and ecosystem service values: Bohai Sea. Marine Science, 2018, 42(3): 46-52]
[11] 蒋蕾, 杜明月. 基于生态系统服务的农安县景观生态风险评价. 环境生态学, 2019, 1(3): 39-45 [Jiang L, Du M-Y. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Nong'an County based on ecosystem services. Environmental Ecology, 2019, 1(3): 39-45]
[12] Galic N, Schmolke A, Forbes V, et al. The role of ecological models in linking ecological risk assessment to ecosystem services in agroecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 415: 93-100
[13] Deacon S, Norman S, Nicolette J, et al. Integrating ecosystem services into risk management decisions: Case study with Spanish citrus and the insecticide chlorpyrifos. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 505: 732-739
[14] Gong J, Cao EJ, Xie YC, et al. Integrating ecosystem services and landscape ecological risk into adaptive mana-gement: Insights from a western mountain-basin area, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111817
[15] 曹祺文, 张曦文, 马洪坤, 等. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架:ESRISK. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 843-855 [Cao Q-W, Zhang X-W, Ma H-K, et al. Review of landscape ecological risk and an assessment framework based on ecological services: ESRISK. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 843-855]
[16] 刘立品. 子午岭木本植物志. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 1998 [Liu L-P. Woody Flora of Ziwuling. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University Press, 1998]
[17] 陕西省统计局. 陕西统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2006 [Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Yearbook of Shaanxi. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2006]
[18] 甘肃年鉴编委会. 甘肃年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2006 [Editorial Board of Gansu Yearbook. Gansu Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2006]
[19] 苏海民, 何爱霞. 基于RS和地统计学的福州市土地利用分析. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1): 91-99 [Su H-M, He A-X. Analysis of land use based on RS and geostatistics in Fuzhou city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(1): 91-99]
[20] 谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖, 等. 我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 10-13 [Xie G-D, Xiao Y, Zhen L, et al. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 10-13]
[21] 徐超平, 夏斌. 资源型城市土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(12): 2887-2891 [Xu C-P, Xia B. Land use changes and its influences on ecosystem service value of resources-based city. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(12): 2887-2891]
[22] 巩杰, 赵彩霞, 谢余初, 等. 基于景观格局的甘肃白龙江流域生态风险评价与管理. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(7): 2041-2048 [Gong J, Zhao C-X, Xie Y-C, et al. Ecological risk assessment and its management of Bailongjiang watershed, southern Gansu based on landscape pattern. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(7): 2041-2048]
[23] 张小强, 王云燕, 黄娟. 2010—2015年江苏省环太湖及沿海地区土地利用变化和生态风险分析. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(17): 97-103 [Zhang X-Q, Wang Y-Y, Huang J. Land use change and ecological risk analysis around Taihu Lake and coastal areas in Jiangsu Province from 2010 to 2015. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(17): 97-103]
[24] 侯蕊, 李红波, 高艳丽. 基于景观格局的武汉市江夏区土地利用生态风险评价. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(1): 323-330 [Hou R, Li H-B, Gao Y-L. Ecological risk assessment of land use in Jiangxia District of Wuhan based on landscape pattern. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(1): 323-330]
[25] 李俊翰, 高明秀. 滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性. 生态学报, 2019, 39(21): 7815-7828 [Li J-H, Gao M-X. Spatiotemporal evolution and correlation analysis of ecosystem service values and ecological risk in Binzhou. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(21): 7815-7828]
[26] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919 [Xie G-D, Zhen L, Lu C-X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919]
[27] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254 [Xie G-D, Zhang C-X, Zhang L-M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254]

黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性——以子午岭区为例

Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem service values and landscape ecological risk and their correlation in forest area of Loess Plateau, China:A case study of Ziwuling region.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[2]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[3]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[4]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[5]	邱瑶, 罗涛, 王琼, 蒋思雨. 夏热冬暖地区绿量构成对城市热环境的影响——以福州居住区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1932-1940.
[6]	王世豪, 徐新良, 黄麟, 赵广. 1980s—2010s东北农田土壤养分时空变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 865-875.
[7]	于水, 张晓龙, 刘志娟, 王妍, 沈彦军. 1961—2020年松花江流域极端气候指数的时空变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1091-1101.
[8]	谈旭, 王承武. 伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2747-2756.
[9]	张峻铭, 孙永玉, 周姗, 邱昕腾, 孙仕仙, 欧朝蓉. 2000—2020年金沙江干热河谷景观生态风险的时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2767-2776.
[10]	谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 刘梦迪, 王浩, 王江. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787.
[11]	潘卫涛, 岳邦瑞, 姚龙杰, 薛建锋, 李军峰. 耦合风险与服务的市域生态安全格局构建——以陕西省咸阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 178-186.
[12]	邱婧, 韩安霞, 何春梅, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 罗颖, 李晨璐, 郝占庆. 秦岭优势乔木锐齿槲栎的空间分布格局及种内关联 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2035-2042.
[13]	黄卓男, 陈颖彪, 吴志峰. 珠三角城市群地表热环境与生态系统服务价值解耦的时空特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1993-2000.
[14]	崔茜琳, 何云玲, 李宗善. 青藏高原植被水分利用效率时空变化及与气候因子的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1525-1532.
[15]	朱润苗, 陈松林. 1980—2020年福建省景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值的空间关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1599-1607.