科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤化学计量特征

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202212.014

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 3312-3320.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202212.014

科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤化学计量特征

曹雯婕^1,3, 李玉强^1,2,3,4*, 陈银萍⁵, 陈云^1,3, 王旭洋^1,4, 龚相文^1,3

¹中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院, 兰州 730000;
²自然资源部黄河上游战略性矿产资源重点实验室, 兰州 730000;
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
⁴中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院奈曼沙漠化研究站, 内蒙古通辽 028300;
⁵兰州交通大学环境与市政工程学院, 兰州 730070

收稿日期:2022-02-21 接受日期:2022-09-29 出版日期:2022-12-15 发布日期:2023-07-05
通讯作者: * E-mail: liyq@lzb.ac.cn
作者简介:曹雯婕, 女, 1996年生, 博士研究生。主要从事恢复生态学研究。E-mail: caowenjie1127@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31971466)和国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFA0604803)

Soil stoichiometry characteristics under different land use types in the Horqin Sandy Land, China

CAO Wen-jie^1,3, LI Yu-qiang^1,2,3,4*, CHEN Yin-ping⁵, CHEN Yun^1,3, WANG Xu-yang^1,4, GONG Xiang-wen^1,3

¹Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
²Key Laboratory of Strategic Mineral Resources of the Upper Yellow River, Ministry of Natural Resources, Lanzhou 730000, China;
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
⁴Naiman Desertification Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tongliao 028300, Inner Mongolia, China;
⁵School of Environment and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2022-02-21 Accepted:2022-09-29 Online:2022-12-15 Published:2023-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)化学计量是衡量土壤质量及生态系统元素限制的重要指标,探讨土地利用和土层深度对土壤化学计量特征的影响有利于揭示科尔沁沙地土壤元素循环规律。本研究以科尔沁沙地5种土地利用类型(灌溉农田、旱作农田、沙质草地、固定沙丘、流动沙丘)土壤为对象,分析不同土地利用类型和不同土层土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)含量及其化学计量特征。结果表明: 1)科尔沁沙地0～10 cm SOC(3.23 g·kg^-1)、TN(0.37 g·kg^-1)、TP(0.15 g·kg^-1)含量及化学计量比(C:N、C:P、N:P分别为9.07、25.56、2.97)远低于中国陆地土壤。2)土地利用变化显著改变了SOC、TN、TP含量及其化学计量特征,0～100 cm SOC、TN、TP含量均表现为灌溉农田>沙质草地>旱作农田>固定沙丘>流动沙丘;沙质草地、灌溉农田、旱作农田C:N显著高于固定沙丘和流动沙丘,沙质草地、固定沙丘、灌溉农田、旱作农田C:P显著高于流动沙丘,5种土地利用类型N:P无显著差异。3)随土层深度增加,沙质草地、固定沙丘、灌溉农田、旱作农田SOC和TN含量显著降低,流动沙丘SOC、TN含量和C:P在各土层间无显著差异;总体上,各土地利用类型TP含量和C:N受土层影响较小;沙质草地、固定沙丘、灌溉农田、旱作农田C:P和沙质草地N:P随土层深度增加而降低。4)SOC、TN、TP、C:N与中砂粒、细砂粒、土壤容重呈显著负相关,与黏粉粒和极细砂粒呈显著正相关。沙漠化导致科尔沁沙地SOC和养分流失,加剧土壤N缺乏,水肥投入有助于耕地维持相对较高的土壤养分水平。

关键词: 化学计量特征, 土地利用类型, 科尔沁沙地, 垂直分布特征

Abstract: The stoichiometry characteristics of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) is an important indicator of soil quality and ecosystem nutrient limitations. Exploring the effects of land use type and soil depth on soil nutrient stoichiometry can clarify soil nutrient cycling. In this study, we collected soil samples from sites with five different land use types (irrigated cropland, rainfed cropland, sandy grassland, fixed dunes, and mobile dunes) in the Horqin Sandy Land, and evaluated the influences of land use type and soil depth on the contents and stoichiometry characteristics of soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP). We found that: 1) SOC (3.23 g·kg^-1), TN (0.37 g·kg^-1), and TP (0.15 g·kg^-1) contents and stoichiometry characteristics (C:N, C:P, N:P was 9.07, 25.56, 2.97, respectively) to a depth of 10 cm in the Horqin Sandy Land were significantly lower than the mean values of soils in China. 2) Soil stoichiometry characteristics differed significantly among land use types. The contents of SOC, TN, and TP to a depth of 100 cm were highest in irrigated cropland, followed by sandy grassland, rainfed cropland, fixed dunes, and mobile dunes. The C:N ratios in sandy grassland, irrigated cropland, and rainfed cropland were significantly higher than those in the fixed dune and mobile dune sites. C:P ratios in the sandy grassland, fixed dunes, irrigated cropland, and rainfed cropland were significantly higher than that in the mobile dunes. The N:P ratio differed little among the five land use types. 3) SOC and TN contents in the sandy grassland, fixed dunes, irrigated cropland, and rainfed cropland decreased with increasing soil depth. SOC, TN, and C:P in the mobile dunes and TP and C:N in all land use types showed no variation among depths. The C:P ratio of sandy grassland, fixed dunes, irrigated cropland, and rainfed cropland and the N:P ratio of sandy grassland decreased with increasing soil depth. 4) SOC, TN, and TP contents and the C:N ratio were significantly negatively correlated with the contents of medium and fine sands and with soil bulk density, but significantly positively correlated with silt+clay, and very fine sand contents. Desertification led to losses of SOC and nutrients in the Horqin Sandy Land, and exacerbated soil N deficiency. Inputs of water and ferti-lizer helped cropland to maintain a relatively high level of soil nutrients.

Key words: stoichiometry characteristic, land use type, Horqin Sandy Land, vertical distribution characteristic

曹雯婕, 李玉强, 陈银萍, 陈云, 王旭洋, 龚相文. 科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3312-3320.

CAO Wen-jie, LI Yu-qiang, CHEN Yin-ping, CHEN Yun, WANG Xu-yang, GONG Xiang-wen. Soil stoichiometry characteristics under different land use types in the Horqin Sandy Land, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(12): 3312-3320.

参考文献

[1] 牛书丽, 陈卫楠. 全球变化与生态系统研究现状与展望. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 449-460
[2] Zhu GF, Qiu DD, Zhang ZX, et al. Land-use changes lead to a decrease in carbon storage in arid region, China. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 127: 107770
[3] Li CS, Frolking S, Crocker GJ, et al. Stimulating trends in soil organic carbon in long term experiments using the DNDC model. Geoderma, 1997, 81: 45-60
[4] Don A, Schumacher J, Freibauer A. Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17: 1658-1670
[5] Liu X, Ma J, Ma ZW, et al. Soil nutrient contents and stoichiometry as affected by land-use in an agro-pastoral region of northwest China. Catena, 2017, 150: 146-153
[6] 庄媛, 闫瑞瑞, 熊军波, 等. 三种土地利用方式下南方高山土壤温室气体通量特征及其影响因子研究. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2294-2302
[7] 徐省超, 赵雪雁, 宋晓谕. 退耕还林(草)工程对渭河流域生态系统服务的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3893-3904
[8] 高亮, 高永, 王静, 等. 土地覆盖类型对科尔沁沙地南缘土壤有机碳储量的影响. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(5): 1357-1364
[9] 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947
[10] 陶冶, 张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠4种草本植物叶片与土壤的化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(3): 659-665
[11] 温晨, 杨智姣, 杨磊, 等. 半干旱黄土小流域不同植被类型植物与土壤生态化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2021, 41(5): 1824-1834
[12] 刘爽, 王雅, 刘兵兵, 等. 晋西北不同土地管理方式对土壤碳氮、酶活性及微生物的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12): 4376-4389
[13] 杨文, 周脚根, 王美慧, 等. 亚热带丘陵小流域土壤碳氮磷生态计量特征的空间分异性. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(6): 1336-1344
[14] 赵哈林. 科尔沁沙地草原的生产特性及其利用改良. 草业科学, 1992, 9(1): 38-41
[15] Li FR, Zhao LY, Zhang H, et al. Wind erosion and airborne dust deposition in farmland during spring in the Horqin Sandy Land of eastern Inner Mongolia, China. Soil & Tillage Research, 2004, 75: 121-130
[16] 朱震达, 陈广庭. 中国土地沙质荒漠化. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994
[17] 王涛, 吴薇. 我国北方的土地利用与沙漠化. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(4): 355-358
[18] 赵哈林, 周瑞莲, 苏永中, 等. 科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程中土壤有机碳和全氮含量变化. 生态学报, 2008, 28(3): 976-982
[19] 张继义, 王娟, 赵哈林. 沙地植被恢复过程土壤颗粒组成变化及其空间变异特征. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(3): 153-157
[20] 苏永中, 赵哈林, 文海燕. 退化沙质草地开垦和封育对土壤理化性状的影响. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(4): 5-8
[21] Li YQ, Brandle J, Awada T, et al. Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen in the plant-soil system after afforestation of active sand dunes in China's Horqin Sandy Land. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 177: 75-84
[22] 王涛, 吴薇, 赵哈林, 等. 科尔沁地区现代沙漠化过程的驱动因素分析. 中国沙漠, 2004, 24(5): 3-12
[23] Li YQ, Zhang JP, Zhao XY, et al. Comparison of soil physico-chemical properties under different land-use and cover types in northeastern China's Horqin Sandy Land. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2016, 8: 495-506
[24] 赵哈林, 大黑俊哉, 李玉霖, 等. 科尔沁沙质草地植物群落的放牧退化及其自然恢复过程. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(2): 229-235
[25] Li YQ, Han JJ, Wang SK, et al. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage under different land uses in the Naiman Banner, a semiarid degraded region of northern China. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2014, 94: 9-20
[26] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000
[27] Tian HQ, Chen GS, Zhang C, et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China's soils: A synthesis of observational data. Biogeochemistry, 2010, 98: 139-151
[28] Cleveland CC, Liptzin D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85: 235-252
[29] 刘志鹏. 黄土高原地区土壤养分的空间分布及其影响因素. 博士论文. 杨凌: 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 2013
[30] 陶冶, 刘耀斌, 吴甘霖, 等. 准噶尔荒漠区域尺度浅层土壤化学计量特征及其空间分布格局. 草业学报, 2016, 25(7): 13-23
[31] 陈宇轩, 丁国栋, 高广磊, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙地风沙土有机质和碳酸钙含量特征. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4): 104-111
[32] 王玉婷, 查轩, 陈世发, 等. 红壤侵蚀退化马尾松林下不同治理模式土壤化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 17-24
[33] 赵哈林, 周瑞莲, 赵学勇, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草地土壤理化特性的沙漠化演变规律及机制. 草业学报, 2012, 21(2): 1-7
[34] 李玉强, 赵哈林, 赵学勇, 等. 科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程中土壤碳氮特征分析. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(5): 73-76, 182
[35] Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, et al. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater foodwebs. Nature, 2000, 408: 578-580
[36] Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Keiblinger KM, Mooshammer M, et al. The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant-microbial-soil organic matter transformations. Ecological Monographs, 2015, 85: 133-155
[37] 张怡颖, 谷丰, 刘泉, 等. 华北农牧交错带不同土地利用类型的土壤养分特征: 以张北县为例. 草业科学, 2020, 37(7): 1239-1248
[38] 白一茹, 张兴, 包维斌, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤碳氮磷及其生态化学计量特征. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(4): 117-123
[39] 刘新民, 赵哈林, 赵爱芬. 科尔沁沙地风沙环境与植被. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996
[40] 胡亚伟, 孙若修, 申明爽, 等. 晋西黄土区土地利用方式对土壤C:N:P化学计量特征及土壤理化性质的影响. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 990-999
[41] 赵哈林, 周瑞莲, 赵学勇, 等. 科尔沁沙地沙漠化正、逆过程的地面判别方法. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(1): 8-15
[42] Li XR, He MZ, Duan ZH, et al. Recovery of topsoil physicochemical properties in revegetated sites in the sand-burial ecosystems of the Tengger Desert, northern China. Geomorphology, 2007, 88: 254-265
[43] 高君亮, 罗凤敏, 高永, 等. 农牧交错带不同土地利用类型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2019, 39(15): 5594-5602
[44] 冯德枫, 包维楷. 土壤碳氮磷化学计量比时空格局及影响因素研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(2): 400-408
[45] 孙小东, 宁志英, 杨红玲, 等. 中国北方典型风沙区土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(6): 1209-1218
[46] Ge NN, Wei XR, Wang X, et al. Soil texture determines the distribution of aggregate-associated carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous under two contrasting land use types in the Loess Plateau. Catena, 2019, 172: 148-157
[47] Bronick CJ, Lal R. Soil structure and management: A review. Geoderma, 2005, 124: 3-22
[48] Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, et al. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil, 2002, 241: 155-176
[49] John B, Yamashita T, Ludwig B, et al. Storage of organic carbon in aggregate and density fractions of silty soils under different types of land use. Geoderma, 2005, 128: 63-79
[50] Mbagwu JSC, Piccolo A. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in aggregates of organic waste-amended soils. Biological Wastes, 1990, 31: 97-111
[51] 王超, 董玉清, 卢瑛, 等. 粤北低山林地改建梯田对土壤碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2440-2448
[52] 卓志清, 李勇, 兴安, 等. 东北旱作区土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征及其影响因素. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(10): 259-268
[53] 熊瑛楠, 冯天骄, 王平, 等. 晋西黄土区长期人工林恢复对土壤水分和养分性质的影响. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(2): 228-237, 246
[54] 李森, 李玲, 樊华, 等. 川西北高寒沙地不同生态治理模式下土壤碳氮磷储量及生态化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2567-2573

科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤化学计量特征

Soil stoichiometry characteristics under different land use types in the Horqin Sandy Land, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张铜会, 丛安琪, 连杰, 徐远志, 王宁. 从科尔沁草原到科尔沁沙地的思考 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 25-30.
[2]	上官虹玉, 王传宽, 全先奎. 兴安落叶松叶化学计量特征与光合性状的权衡及其种源差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1483-1490.
[3]	徐贺光, 李娅丽, 何国兴, 柳小妮, 纪童, 肖蓉. 陇中地区温性草原土壤化学计量特征对气候因子的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3003-3010.
[4]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[5]	刘玉祯, 刘文亭, 杨晓霞, 李彩弟, 冯斌, 俞旸, 张春平, 董全民. 放牧对全球草地生态系统碳氮磷化学计量特征影响的Meta分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1251-1259.
[6]	杨克彤, 陈国鹏. 红豆杉幼树异龄叶的功能性状 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 329-336.
[7]	蒋丛泽, 受娜, 高玮, 马仁诗, 沈禹颖, 杨宪龙. 青藏高原东北缘不同土地利用类型土壤质量综合评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3279-3286.
[8]	刘志民, 余海滨, 汪海洋. 科尔沁沙地“山水林田湖草沙”一体化治理原理及实施重点 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3441-3447.
[9]	滕慧颖, 耿艳楼, 张恒硕, 查同刚. 冀北土石山区不同土地利用类型土壤质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3046-3054.
[10]	王超, 董玉清, 卢瑛, 李博, 唐贤, 邱竞驰, 胡家帅. 粤北低山林地改建梯田对土壤碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2440-2448.
[11]	陈旋, 李玉娥, 万运帆, 高清竹, 王斌, 秦晓波. 基于¹³C、¹⁵N和C/N识别南岳小流域沉积有机质的来源 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 1998-2006.
[12]	赵楚, 盛茂银, 白义鑫, 刘树西. 喀斯特石漠化地区不同土地利用类型土壤氮磷有效性及其环境影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1383-1392.
[13]	陈佳瑞, 王国梁, 孟敏, 王润超. 干旱胁迫对3种灌木不同器官化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 73-81.
[14]	林力涛, 韩潇潇, 于占源, 孙学凯, 黄月, 曾德慧. 施氮处理下植物光合对沙质草地土壤呼吸的调控作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 3019-3027.
[15]	杨巧云, 赵允格, 包天莉, 丁倩, 刘广亮. 黄土丘陵区不同类型生物结皮下的土壤生态化学计量特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2699-2706.