亚热带常见造林树种对土壤细菌及微生物功能群的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202212.034

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示亚热带人工林常见造林树种对森林土壤微生物群落的影响,本研究选取马尾松、米老排、枫香、冬青、火力楠、麻栎和光皮桦7个树种为研究对象,采用16S rRNA高通量测序和实时荧光定量PCR技术,探究不同树种土壤细菌的多样性、群落构成以及微生物功能群基因丰度。结果表明: 变形菌门、酸杆菌门和放线菌门是亚热带造林树种的优势细菌门,不同树种细菌多样性和丰富度指数无显著差异。冗余分析表明,土壤容重、土壤C/N、凋落物氮和凋落物C/N是影响土壤细菌组成的主要环境因子。不同造林树种土壤中氨氧化古菌、氨氧化细菌和完全氨氧化菌amoA基因丰度均具有显著差异。完全氨氧化菌在数量上占据优势地位,但只有氨氧化古菌amoA基因丰度与土壤硝态氮呈显著正相关关系,表明氨氧化古菌在亚热带酸性森林土壤自养硝化作用中可能发挥主要作用。相关分析表明,凋落物氮是不同树种影响氨氧化微生物丰度变化的关键驱动因子。本研究表明,土壤微生物功能群对树种的响应比细菌群落结构更加敏感,未来应从微生物功能群角度深入探究不同造林树种对森林生态系统功能的影响机制。

关键词: 树种, 土壤细菌群落, 微生物功能群, 氨氧化微生物, 凋落物氮

Abstract: To understand the effects of common afforestation tree species on soil microbial community in subtropical forests, seven different tree species were selected as the research object, including Pinus massoniana, Mytilaria laosensis, Liquidambar formosana, Ilex chinensis, Michelia macclurei, Quercus acutissima and Betula luminifera. Based on 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing and real-time quantitative PCR techniques, we explored the effects of different tree species on soil bacterial community composition, diversity and microbial functional guilds. The results showed that Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla, and that there was no significant difference in bacterial diversity or richness index among different tree species. Results of redundancy analysis suggested that soil bulk density, soil C/N, litter nitrogen content, and litter C/N were the predominant factors determining soil bacterial community composition. The afforestation tree species had significant effects on functional gene abundances of ammonia oxidizing archaea, ammonia oxidizing bacteria and complete ammonia oxidation. Comammox were dominant in abundance. Ammonia oxidizing archaea amoA gene was the only type whose abundance showed significant correlation with soil nitrate content, suggesting that ammonia oxidizing archaea could play a dominant role in the autotrophic nitrification in the acidic subtropical forest soils. The afforestation tree species had significant effects on functional gene abundances of ammonia oxidizing microorganisms. Results of correlation analysis showed that litter nitrogen content was the driving factor for the abundance of ammonia oxidizing microorganisms. Our study provided strong evidence that the responses of soil microbial functional guilds to tree species were more sensitive than bacterial community composition. Future studies should explore the mechanisms of tree plantations on forest ecosystem functioning from the perspective of microbial functional guilds.

Key words: tree species, soil bacterial community, microbial functional guilds, ammonia oxidizing microorga-nisms, litter nitrogen.

邵亚军, 王丽燕, 谭云燕, 冷鹏, 王建青, 许敬华, 施秀珍. 亚热带常见造林树种对土壤细菌及微生物功能群的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 235-241.

SHAO Ya-jun, WANG Li-yan, TAN Yun-yan, LENG Peng, WANG Jian-qing, XU Jing-hua, SHI Xiu-zhen. Effects of common afforestation tree species on soil bacterial community and microbial functional guilds in subtropical forests[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 235-241.

参考文献

[1] Ampoorter E, Barbaro L, Jactel H, et al. Tree diversity is key for promoting the diversity and abundance of forest-associated taxa in Europe. Oikos, 2020, 129: 133-146
[2] 国家林业和草原局. 中国森林资源概况—第九次全国森林资源清查报告[EB/OL]. (2019-05-16) [2022-02-08]. 2019 http://www.forestdata.cn/
[3] 夏丽丹, 张虹, 杨靖宇, 等. 杉木凋落物土壤生态功能研究进展. 世界林业研究, 2019, 32(2): 7-12
[4] 丁国昌, 万晓华, 杨起帆, 等. 亚热带树种转换对林地土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11): 3751-3758
[5] 杨静, 张耀艺, 谭思懿, 等. 亚热带不同树种土壤水源涵养功能. 生态学报, 2020, 40(13): 4594-4604
[6] Dukunde A, Schneider D, Schmidt M, et al. Tree species shape soil bacterial community structure and function in temperate deciduous forests. Frontiers in Micro-biology, 2019, 10: 1519
[7] Hallin S, Jones CM, Schloter M, et al. Relationship between N-cycling communities and ecosystem functioning in a 50-year-old fertilization experiment. The ISME Journal, 2009, 3: 597-605
[8] Liu YR, Eldridge DJ, Zeng XM, et al. Global diversity and ecological drivers of lichenised soil fungi. New Phytologist, 2021, 231: 1210-1219
[9] Shi X, Wang J, Lucas-Borja ME, et al. Microbial diversity regulates ecosystem multifunctionality during natural secondary succession. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 58: 2833-2842
[10] Purkhold U, Pommerening-Röser A, Juretschko S, et al. Phylogeny of all recognized species of ammonia oxidizers based on comparative 16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: Implications for molecular diversity surveys. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66: 5368-5382
[11] Liu YR, Zheng YM, Shen JP, et al. Effects of mercury on the activity and community composition of soil ammonia oxidizers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2010, 17: 1237-1244
[12] Shi XZ, Hu HW, He JZ, et al. Effects of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) on nitrification and the abundance and community composition of soil ammonia oxidizers in three land uses. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2016, 52: 927-939
[13] Hassan MK, McInroy JA, Kloepper JW. The interactions of rhizodeposits with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in the rhizosphere: A review. Agriculture, 2019, 9: 142
[14] Bárta J, Tahovská K, Šantrůčková H, et al. Microbial communities with distinct denitrification potential in spruce and beech soils differing in nitrate leaching. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 1-15
[15] Malmivaara-Lámsá M, Fritze H. Effects of wear and above ground forest site type characteristics on the soil microbial community structure in an urban setting. Plant and Soil, 2003, 256: 187-203
[16] 路颖, 李坤, 倪瑞强, 等. 泰山4种优势造林树种细根分解对细菌群落结构的影响. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(12): 1200-1210
[17] Fender AC, Gansert D, Jungkunst HF, et al. Root-induced tree species effects on the source/sink strength for greenhouse gases (CH₄, N₂O and CO₂) of a tempe-rate deciduous forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 57: 587-597
[18] Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, et al. Impact of seve-ral common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Annals of Forest Science, 2002, 59: 233-253
[19] Hartman WH, Richardson CJ, Vilgalys R, et al. Environmental and anthropogenic controls over bacterial communities in wetland soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105: 17842-17847
[20] Andrianarisoa KS, Zeller B, Poly F, et al. Control of nitrification by tree species in a common-garden experiment. Ecosystems, 2010, 13: 1171-1187
[21] Florio A, Marechal M, Legout A, et al. Influence of biological nitrification inhibition by forest tree species on soil denitrifiers and N₂O emissions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 155: 108164
[22] 王涛, 万晓华, 程蕾, 等. 杉木采伐迹地营造阔叶树种对土壤微生物生态化学计量特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3851-3858
[23] 王磊, 梁艺凡, 杨军钱, 等. 亚热带主要造林树种土壤氮保留及相关功能的微生物特征. 林业科学, 2020, 56(8): 27-37
[24] Tourna M, Freitag TE, Nicol GW, et al. Growth, acti-vity and temperature responses of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in soil microcosms. Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 10: 1357-1364
[25] Rotthauwe JH, Witzel KP, Liesack W. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: Molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 63: 4704-4712
[26] Fowler SJ, Palomo A, Dechesne A, et al. Comammox Nitrospira are abundant ammonia oxidizers in diverse groundwater-fed rapid sand filter communities. Environmental Microbiology, 2018, 20: 1002-1015
[27] Wear EK, Wilbanks EG, Nelson CE, et al. Primer selection impacts specific population abundances but not community dynamics in a monthly time-series 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis of coastal marine bacterioplankton. Environmental Microbiology, 2018, 20: 2709-2726
[28] 李敏, 郝伟. 大兴安岭4个树种根围土壤细菌群落结构. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 2057-2066
[29] Chen J, Shen W, Xu H, et al. The composition of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms correlates with soil nitrogen content during reforestation: A comparison between legume and non-legume plantations. Frontiers in Micro-biology, 2019, 10: 508
[30] Yang H. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on leaf nutrient characteristics in a subtropical forest. Trees, 2018, 32: 383-391
[31] 丁新景, 敬如岩, 黄雅丽, 等. 基于高通量测序的4种不同树种人工林根际土壤细菌结构及多样性. 林业科学, 2018, 54(1): 81-89
[32] 王改萍, 阿依古丽·托乎提, 王茹, 等. 新疆乌尔禾地区盐渍土壤耐盐细菌多样性与群落结构研究. 微生物学杂志, 2021, 41(2): 17-26
[33] Ribbons K, Lea R, Schofield PW, et al. Anxiety levels are independently associated with cognitive performance in an Australian multiple sclerosis patient cohort. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2017, 29: 128-134
[34] 宋战超, 王晖, 刘世荣, 等. 南亚热带混交人工林树种丰富度与土壤微生物多样性和群落组成的关系. 生态学报, 2020, 40(22): 8265-8273
[35] 吴希慧, 王蕊, 高长青, 等. 土地利用驱动的土壤性状变化影响微生物群落结构和功能. 生态学报, 2021, 41(20): 7989-8002
[36] 覃鑫浩, 梁艳, 陈超凡, 等. 南亚热带不同树种人工林对土壤细菌群落多样性的影响. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(4): 120-127
[37] Osburn ED, Barrett JE. Abundance and functional importance of complete ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (comammox) versus canonical nitrifiers in temperate forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 145: 107801
[38] Shi X, Hu HW, Wang J, et al. Niche separation of comammox Nitrospira and canonical ammonia oxidizers in an acidic subtropical forest soil under long-term nitrogen deposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 126: 114-122