基施控释掺混肥对夏玉米生长期活性氮损失和碳氮足迹的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.012

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 3322-3332.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.012

基施控释掺混肥对夏玉米生长期活性氮损失和碳氮足迹的影响

高玮^1,2,3, 李子双⁴, 谢建治², 周晓琳⁴, 杜梦扬⁴, 王学霞^1,3, 陈延华^1,3, 曹兵^1,3*

¹北京市农林科学院植物营养与资源环境研究所, 北京 100097;
²河北农业大学资源与环境科学学院, 河北保定 071000;
³北京市缓控释肥料工程技术研究中心, 北京 100097;
⁴德州市农业科学研究院, 山东德州 253015

收稿日期:2023-08-23 修回日期:2023-10-20 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2024-06-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: 609284507@qq.com
作者简介:高玮, 男, 1999年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事农田氮素损失研究。E-mail: 1933747813@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD170060504)、北京市农林科学院创新能力建设专项(KJCX20230304)、北京市农林科学院创新平台建设项目(PT2023-47)和新型肥料研发与评价科技能力提升项目(ZHS202301)

Effect of single basal application of controlled-release blended fertilizer on reactive nitrogen loss, carbon and nitrogen footprint during summer maize growth period

GAO Wei^1,2,3, LI Zishuang⁴, XIE Jianzhi², ZHOU Xiaolin⁴, DU Mengyang⁴, WANG Xuexia^1,3, CHEN Yanhua^1,3, CAO Bing^1,3*

¹Institute of Plant Nutrition, Resource and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China;
²College of Resources & Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China;
³Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center for Slow/Controlled-Release Fertilizer, Beijing 100097, China;
⁴Dezhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dezhou 253015, Shandong, China

Received:2023-08-23 Revised:2023-10-20 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2024-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究控释掺混肥减量一次性基施在夏玉米上的农学和环境效应,优化我国华北地区粮食生产的氮肥管理措施,在山东省德州市现代农业科技园区开展田间试验,设不施氮对照(CK)、常规施氮(施氮量240 kg·hm^-2,FFP)、优化施氮(施氮量210 kg·hm^-2,OPT)和控释掺混肥一次性基施(施氮量210 kg·hm^-2,CRBF)4个处理,对比分析了不同处理的夏玉米产量和活性氮损失(氨挥发、N₂O排放、硝酸盐淋溶)差异,并采用生命周期评价法,定量评估了不同处理的碳、氮足迹。结果表明: 与CK相比,施氮显著增加了夏玉米产量;与FFP相比,OPT和CRBF处理的夏玉米产量分别提高0.7%和2.9%,氨挥发、N₂O排放、硝酸盐淋溶总量分别显著降低13.0%和72.7%、13.3%和37.5%、20.5%和23.5%。与CK相比,施氮显著增加了夏玉米生产的全球增温潜势(GWP);与FFP相比,OPT处理的GWP和温室气体排放强度分别降低3.8%和4.2%,CRBF处理分别显著降低8.7%和12.0%。施氮较CK显著增加了夏玉米生产的碳、氮足迹,氮肥的生产运输和土壤温室气体排放是碳足迹的主要贡献因子,贡献率分别为54%～60%和24%～31%;硝酸盐淋溶是氮足迹的主要贡献因子,贡献率高达57%～94%;与FFP相比,OPT和CRBF处理的碳、氮足迹分别显著降低11.0%和16.5%、19.6%和28.4%。综合考虑作物产量、活性氮损失和碳氮足迹,一次性减量基施控释掺混肥能够发挥更大的环境效益,可推荐为促进华北平原粮食清洁生产的有效氮肥管理措施。

关键词: 控释掺混肥, 氨挥发, 硝酸盐淋溶, 温室气体排放, 生命周期评价, 碳氮足迹

Abstract: To elucidate the agronomic and environmental effects of single basal application of controlled-release blended fertilizer in summer maize, and optimize management measures of nitrogen fertilizer for grain production in North China Plain, we conducted a field experiment in Dezhou Modern Agricultural Science and Technology Park in Shandong Province. There were four treatments: CK (no N fertilizer), FFP (farmer’s fertilizing practice, 240 kg N·hm^-2), OPT (optimized nitrogen application, 210 kg N·hm^-2), and CRBF (controlled-release blended fertilizer with single basal application, 210 kg N·hm^-2). We compared maize yield and reactive nitrogen loss, and quantitatively evaluated the carbon and nitrogen footprints by using life cycle assessment method. The results showed that nitrogen application significantly increased summer maize yield. Compared with FFP, OPT and CRBF increased summer corn yield by 0.7% and 2.9%, respectively, decreased the total amount of ammonia volatilization, N₂O emission, and nitrate leaching by 13.0% and 72.7%, 13.3% and 37.5%, 20.5% and 23.5% respectively. Compared with CK, nitrogen application significantly increased the global warming potential (GWP) of summer maize production. Compared with FFP, GWP and greenhouse gas emission intensity of OPT decreased by 3.8% and 4.2%, while the reduction of CRBF were 8.7% and 12.0%, respectively. Compared with CK, nitrogen application significantly increased the carbon and nitrogen footprint of summer maize production. The production and transportation of nitrogen fertilizer and soil greenhouse gas emission were the main contributing factors of the carbon footprint, with contribution rates of 54%-60% and 24%-31%, respectively. Nitrate leaching was the main contributing factor of nitrogen footprint, with contribution rate of 57%-94%. Compared with FFP, the carbon and nitrogen footprints of OPT and CRBF were reduced by 11.0% and 16.5%, 19.6% and 28.4%, respectively. Considering the yield, reactive nitrogen loss and carbon and nitrogen footprint, we recommended the single basal application of controlled-release blended fertilizer as an effective nitrogen fertilizer management measure to promote grain clean production in the North China Plain.

Key words: controlled-release blended fertilizer, ammonia volatilization, nitrate leaching, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment, carbon and nitrogen footprint

高玮, 李子双, 谢建治, 周晓琳, 杜梦扬, 王学霞, 陈延华, 曹兵. 基施控释掺混肥对夏玉米生长期活性氮损失和碳氮足迹的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3322-3332.

GAO Wei, LI Zishuang, XIE Jianzhi, ZHOU Xiaolin, DU Mengyang, WANG Xuexia, CHEN Yanhua, CAO Bing. Effect of single basal application of controlled-release blended fertilizer on reactive nitrogen loss, carbon and nitrogen footprint during summer maize growth period[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(12): 3322-3332.

参考文献

[1] 巨晓棠, 谷保静. 我国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4): 783-795
[2] Wang HT, Köbke S, Dittert K. Use of urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce gaseous nitrogen emissions from fertilizers containing ammonium nitrate and urea. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 22: e00933
[3] Tian D, Zhang YY, Mu YJ, et al. The effect of drip irrigation and drip fertigation on N₂O and NO emissions, water saving and grain yields in a maize field in the North China Plain. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 575: 1034-1040
[4] 和骅芸, 胡琦, 李子怡, 等. 华北平原夏玉米不同施氮措施的综合增温潜势研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(6): 73-87
[5] Zhang L, Zhang WS, Cui ZL, et al. Environmental, human health, and ecosystem economic performance of long-term optimizing nitrogen management for wheat production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 311: 127620
[6] Liu CR, Ren DY, Liu HR, et al. Optimizing nitrogen management diminished reactive nitrogen loss and acquired optimal net ecosystem economic benefit in a wheat-maize rotation system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 331: 129964
[7] Zou HT, Ba C, Hou ZH, et al. How optimizing application of coated controlled-release urea affects crop yield in China. Agronomy Journal, 2022, 114: 991-999
[8] Yang M, Zhu XQ, Bai Y, et al. Coated controlled-release urea creates a win-win scenario for producing more staple grains and resolving N loss dilemma worldwide. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 288: 125660
[9] 冯小杰, 战秀梅, 王雪鑫, 等. 包膜尿素不同配比减施对土壤无机氮含量及玉米氮素吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(10): 1733-1745
[10] 曹兵, 倪小会, 陈延华, 等. 包膜尿素和普通尿素混施对夏玉米产量、氮肥利用率和土壤硝态氮残留的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(5): 695-701
[11] Yao Z, Zhang WS, Wang XB, et al. Agronomic, environmental, and ecosystem economic benefits of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers for maize production in Southwest China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 312: 127611
[12] 陈中督, 徐春春, 纪龙, 等. 长江中游地区稻麦生产系统碳足迹及氮足迹综合评价. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(7): 1125-1133
[13] Pei Y, Chen XW, Niu ZH, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer substitution by cow manure on yield, net GHG emissions, carbon and nitrogen footprints in sweet maize farmland in the Pearl River Delta in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 399: 136676
[14] 郝小雨, 王晓军, 高洪生, 等. 松嫩平原不同秸秆还田方式下农田温室气体排放及碳足迹估算. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 318-325
[15] 庞茹月, 王明辉, 孔洁, 等. 湖北省不同花生轮作种植体系碳氮足迹. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3997-4003
[16] 李春喜, 刘晴, 邵云, 等. 有机物料还田和减施氮肥对麦-玉周年农田碳氮水足迹及经济效益的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(4): 527-536
[17] Zhang L, Liang ZY, Hu YC, et al. Integrated assessment of agronomic, environmental and ecosystem economic benefits of blending use of controlled-release and common urea in wheat production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 287: 125572
[18] Xu XB, Ma F, Zhou JM, et al. Control-released urea improved agricultural production efficiency and reduced the ecological and environmental impact in rice-wheat rotation system: A life-cycle perspective. Field Crops Research, 2022, 278: 108445
[19] 王朝辉, 刘学军, 巨晓棠, 等. 田间土壤氨挥发的原位测定——通气法. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(2): 205-209
[20] 乔丹, 张树清, 陈延华, 等. 基施控释氮肥提高华北露地大白菜产量并减少土壤NH₃和N₂O排放. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(6): 1122-1133
[21] 林志敏, 李洲, 翁佩莹, 等. 再生稻田温室气体排放特征及碳足迹. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1340-1351
[22] 王大鹏, 郑亮, 吴小平, 等. 旱地土壤硝态氮的产生、淋洗迁移及调控措施. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(12): 1731-1741
[23] Zhang SG, Shen TL, Yang YC, et al. Controlled-release urea reduced nitrogen leaching and improved nitrogen use efficiency and yield of direct-seeded rice. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 220: 191-197
[24] 石宁, 李彦, 张英鹏, 等. 控释肥对小麦/玉米农田土壤硝态氮累积和迁移的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20): 3920-3927
[25] 张英鹏, 李洪杰, 刘兆辉, 等. 农田减氮调控施肥对华北潮土区小麦-玉米轮作体系氮素损失的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1179-1187
[26] 谢勇, 荣湘民, 张玉平, 等. 控释氮肥减量施用对春玉米土壤N₂O排放和氨挥发的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(3): 596-603
[27] 刘楚桐, 陈松岭, 金鑫鑫, 等. 控释氮肥减量配施对土壤氮素调控及夏玉米产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2): 108-115
[28] Xiao YS, Peng FT, Zhang YF, et al. Effect of bag-controlled release fertilizer on nitrogen loss, greenhouse gas emissions, and nitrogen applied amount in peach production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 234: 258-274
[29] 徐芳蕾, 张杰, 李阳, 等. 施肥方式对黄土高原旱作春玉米农田土壤氨挥发的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2360-2371
[30] Guo JJ, Fan JL, Zhang FC, et al. Blending urea and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer increases dryland maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency while mitigating ammonia volatilization. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 790: 148058
[31] 胡瞒瞒, 董文旭, 王文岩, 等. 华北平原氮肥周年深施对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系土壤氨挥发的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2020, 28(12): 1880-1889
[32] 赵瑞, 冯雁辉, 马千里, 等. 不同施肥方案对华南地区菜心种植氨挥发损失的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(3): 681-690
[33] Ma Q, Qian YS, Yu QQ, et al. Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application mitigated N losses and modified microbial community while improving wheat yield and N use efficiency. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2023, 349: 108445
[34] Shen YZ, Wang BC, Zhu SX, et al. Single application of a new polymer-coated urea improves yield while mitigates environmental issues associated with winter wheat grown in rice paddy soil. Field Crops Research, 2022, 285: 108592
[35] 肖强, 李鸿雁, 衣文平, 等. 控释与稳定尿素配施对土壤氮素迁移及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2020, 28(10): 1591-1599
[36] 朱永昶, 李玉娥, 姜德锋, 等. 基于生命周期评估的冬小麦-夏玉米种植系统碳足迹核算——以山东省高密地区为例. 农业资源与环境学报, 2017, 34(5): 473-482
[37] Yin MH, Li YN, Xu YB. Comparative effects of nitrogen application on growth and nitrogen use in a winter wheat/summer maize rotation system. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 16: 2062-2072

基施控释掺混肥对夏玉米生长期活性氮损失和碳氮足迹的影响

Effect of single basal application of controlled-release blended fertilizer on reactive nitrogen loss, carbon and nitrogen footprint during summer maize growth period

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄宏俊, 孙然好, 李佳蕾, 相均泳. 全生命周期视角下清洁能源碳中和贡献及区域差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1450-1458.
[2]	胡旺, 赵杭, 周旋, 王艺哲, 张含丰, 张玉平. 施用南荻生物炭对不同类型土壤氨挥发的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1919-1926.
[3]	林志敏, 李洲, 翁佩莹, 吴冬青, 邹京南, 庞孜钦, 林文雄. 再生稻田温室气体排放特征及碳足迹 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1340-1351.
[4]	安文博, 孙焱鑫, 李占台, 王激清, 邹国元, 杨俊刚. 不同缓控释肥对鲜食玉米产量、品质及氨挥发的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2422-2430.
[5]	许云翔, 何莉莉, 陈金媛, 刘玉学, 吕豪豪, 汪玉瑛, 杨生茂. 生物炭对农田土壤氨挥发的影响机制研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 4312-4320.
[6]	俞祥群, 姜振辉, 王江怀, 林景东, 刘益珍, 杨京平. 减氮施肥对春玉米-晚稻生产系统碳足迹的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1397-1403.
[7]	刘威, 周剑雄, 谢媛圆, 薛欣欣, 熊汉锋, 徐芳森, 袁家富, 熊又升. 控释尿素条施深度对鲜食玉米田间氨挥发和氮肥利用率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1295-1302.
[8]	罗伟, 程于真, 陈竹君, 周建斌. 日光温室番茄-西瓜轮作系统不同水氮处理氨挥发特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1278-1286.
[9]	王磊,董树亭,刘鹏,张吉旺,赵斌,郑凤霞. 水氮互作对冬小麦田氨挥发损失和产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 1919-1927.
[10]	刘建粲, 王泽林, 岳善超, 李世清. 地膜覆盖和施氮量对旱作春玉米农田净温室效应的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1197-1204.
[11]	邹晓霞, 张晓军, 王月福, 王铭伦. 山东省小麦-夏直播花生种植体系碳足迹 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 850-856.
[12]	郑蕾,王学东,郭李萍,张馨月,汪东炎,牛晓光,云安萍,李迎春. 施肥对露地菜地氨挥发和氧化亚氮排放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4063-4070.
[13]	薛欣欣, 吴小平, 张永发, 罗雪华, 邹碧霞, 王大鹏, 王文斌. 控失尿素对稻田氨挥发、氮素转运及利用效率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 133-140.
[14]	赵进, 赵旭, 王慎强, 邢光熹. 长期秸秆黑炭施加对石灰性潮土肥力、固碳及氨挥发的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 176-184.
[15]	侯颖, 李红, 赵敏, 熊俊, 戴圣骐, 赵斌, 胡静, 郭海强. 从湿地到农田:围垦对生态系统碳排放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2517-2526.