内蒙古灌丛化草原小叶锦鸡儿的种群特征及其土壤影响因子

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202406.001

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1525-1533.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202406.001

内蒙古灌丛化草原小叶锦鸡儿的种群特征及其土壤影响因子

文艺瑶^1,2, 朱江^2,3, 王欢^2,4, 张梦迪^2,5, 鲁顺保¹, 郑淑霞^2*

¹江西师范大学生命科学学院, 南昌 330022;
²中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093;
³内蒙古大学生态与环境学院, 呼和浩特 010021;
⁴山东农业大学生命科学学院, 山东泰安 271018;
⁵内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院,呼和浩特 010018

收稿日期:2023-12-04 接受日期:2024-04-06 出版日期:2024-06-18 发布日期:2024-12-18
通讯作者: ^*E-mail: zsx@ibcas.ac.cn
作者简介:文艺瑶, 女, 1999年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事草原灌丛化研究。E-mail: 243570275@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFF1305301)和国家自然科学基金项目(32371779)

Population characteristics of Caragana microphylla and the influencing soil factors in shrub-encroached grassland of Inner Mongolia, China

WEN Yiyao^1,2, ZHU Jiang^2,3, WANG Huan^2,4, ZHANG Mengdi^2,5, LU Shunbao¹, ZHENG Shuxia^2*

¹College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China;
³School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
⁴College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China;
⁵College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Received:2023-12-04 Accepted:2024-04-06 Online:2024-06-18 Published:2024-12-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文对内蒙古锡林郭勒草原不同灌丛化阶段(轻度、中度、重度)下小叶锦鸡儿的种群特征及其土壤影响因子进行研究。结果表明: 在草原轻度-中度-重度灌丛化的发展过程中,小叶锦鸡儿的密度和高度逐渐增加,两阶段密度和高度分别增长196.0%、34.5%和25.4%、 17.6%。小叶锦鸡儿的冠幅、基径、每丛分蘖数和地上生产力均呈先减少后增加的趋势,地上生物量向叶片的分配比例减少。小叶锦鸡儿在中度灌丛化阶段与草本植物之间的竞争最为强烈,其通过减少横向生长如冠幅、基径和每丛分蘖数,增加密度和高度以获取竞争优势。在不同灌丛化阶段小叶锦鸡儿所受到的土壤限制因子明显不同。在轻度灌丛化阶段,土壤因子对小叶锦鸡儿生长的限制作用较小;在中度灌丛化阶段,深层(20～50 cm)土壤水分和土壤pH是限制小叶锦鸡儿密度的关键因素;在重度灌丛化阶段,深层土壤水分和pH限制小叶锦鸡儿纵向生长的主要因素,浅层(0～20 cm)土壤水分和养分是限制灌从横向扩张的主要因素。

关键词: 灌丛化, 种群特征, 小叶锦鸡儿, 土壤理化性质, 内蒙古草原

Abstract: We studied the population characteristics of Caragana microphylla and related soil factors across diffe-rent stages of shrub encroachment (i.e., light, moderate, and severe) on the Xilingol Grassland of Inner Mongolia. The results showed that the density and height of C. microphylla gradually increased during the process of grassland shrub-encroachment from light to moderate to severe. The density and height were increased by 196.0% and 34.5% from light to moderate stage of shrub encroachment, and were increased by 25.4% and 17.6% from moderate to severe stage. Crown size, basal diameter, tiller number per clump, and aboveground productivity of C. microphylla tented to decrease first and then increase, while the proportion of aboveground biomass allocation to leaves decreased across the stages of shrub encroachment. The competition between C. microphylla and herbaceous species was strongest in the moderate encroachment stage. C. microphylla reduced its lateral growth (such as crown size, basal diameter, and tiller number per clump) and increased density and height to get competitive advantage. Limi-ting soil factors for C. microphylla varied significantly at different stages of shrub encroachment. In the light encroachment stage, soil factors had little effect on the growth of C. microphylla. In the moderate encroachment stage, soil moisture in the deep layer (20-50 cm) and soil pH were the key factors limiting shrub density. In the severe encroachment stage, soil moisture in the deep layer and pH limited the vertical growth of C. microphylla, while soil moisture of shallow layer (0-20 cm) and nutrients were the limiting factors for the lateral expansion of shrubs.

Key words: shrub encroachment, population characteristics, Caragana microphylla, soil physical and chemical property, Inner Mongolia grassland

文艺瑶, 朱江, 王欢, 张梦迪, 鲁顺保, 郑淑霞. 内蒙古灌丛化草原小叶锦鸡儿的种群特征及其土壤影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1525-1533.

WEN Yiyao, ZHU Jiang, WANG Huan, ZHANG Mengdi, LU Shunbao, ZHENG Shuxia. Population characteristics of Caragana microphylla and the influencing soil factors in shrub-encroached grassland of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(6): 1525-1533.

参考文献

[1] White RP, Murray S, Rohweder M. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Grassland Ecosystems. Washington DC: World Resources Institute, 2000
[2] Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Collins SL, et al. Shrub encroachment in North American grasslands: Shifts in growth form dominance rapidly alters control of ecosystem carbon inputs. Global Change Biology, 2008, 14: 615-623
[3] Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Puche MD, et al. Shrub encroachment can reverse desertification in semi-arid Mediterranean grasslands. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 930-941
[4] Li XY, Zhang SY, Peng HY, et al. Soil water and temperature dynamics in shrub encroached grasslands and climatic implications: Results from Inner Mongolia steppe ecosystem of north China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 171-172: 20-30
[5] 郭灵辉, 郝成元, 吴绍洪, 等. 21世纪上半叶内蒙古草地植被净初级生产力变化趋势. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 803-814
[6] Archer SR, Schimel D, Holland EA. Mechanisms of shrub land expansion: land use, climate or CO₂? Climatic Change, 1995, 9: 91-99
[7] Van Auken OW. Shrub invasions of North American semiarid grasslands. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000, 31: 197-215
[8] Chen LY, Li H, Zhang PJ, et al. Climate and native grassland vegetation as drivers of the community structures of shrub-encroached grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30: 1627-1641
[9] Eldridge, DJ, Bowker, MA, Maestre, FT, et al. Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: Towards a global synthesis. Ecology Letters, 2011, 14: 709-722
[10] 彭海英, 李小雁, 童绍玉. 干旱半干旱区草原灌丛化研究进展. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 313-322
[11] 高琼, 刘婷. 干旱半干旱区草原灌丛化的原因及影响: 争议与进展. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(6): 1202-1212
[12] 陈广生, 曾德慧, 陈伏生, 等. 干旱和半干旱地区灌木下土壤“肥岛”研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(12): 2295-2300
[13] 张桐瑞, 金轲, 王珍, 等. 草地土壤健康的内涵及其评价. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(5): 102-113
[14] Wang J, Cai YJ, An ZS, et al. The distribution changes of alpine shrub and its climatic driving forces in Junhe sub-watershed based on remote sensing. Resources Science, 2013, 35: 1300-1309
[15] 潘军, 安超平, 吴旭东, 等. 荒漠草原2种锦鸡儿灌丛化过程中土壤养分分布规律. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(6): 131-136
[16] 熊小刚, 韩兴国, 白永飞, 等. 锡林河流域草原小叶锦鸡儿分布增加的趋势、原因和结局. 草业学报, 2003, 12(3): 57-62
[17] 郑元润, 来利明, 蔡文涛, 等. 鄂尔多斯高原灌丛化草地恢复机制解析. 山西大学学报: 自然科学版, 2022, 45(3): 844-852
[18] 林燕, 白永飞. 内蒙古典型草原小叶锦鸡儿灌丛地上净初级生产力和种群结构对火烧的响应. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 170-178
[19] Ding JY, Eldridge D. The success of woody plant removal depends on encroachment stage and plant traits. Nature Plants, 2023, 9: 58-67
[20] 刘涛宇, 赵霞, 沈海花, 等. 灌丛化草原灌木和草本植物光谱特征及灌木盖度反演: 以内蒙古镶黄旗为例. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(10): 969-979
[21] 彭海英, 李小雁, 童绍玉. 内蒙古典型草原灌丛化对生物量和生物多样性的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33(22): 7221-7229
[22] 张璞进, 清华, 张雷, 等. 内蒙古灌丛化草原毛刺锦鸡儿种群结构和空间分布格局. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(2): 165-174
[23] 熊小刚, 韩兴国. 运用状态与过渡模式讨论锡林河流域典型草原的灌丛化. 草业学报, 2006, 15(2): 9-13
[24] 熊小刚, 韩兴国. 内蒙古半干旱草原灌丛化过程中小叶锦鸡儿引起的土壤碳、氮资源空间异质性分布. 生态学报, 2005, 25(7): 1678-1683
[25] Yang XJ, Xiang GH, Sun WC, et al. Shrub encroachment drives different responses of soil respiration to increased precipitation and N enrichment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 325: 109155
[26] 丁威, 王玉冰, 向官海, 等. 小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 33-43
[27] 向官海. 季节性降水改变和氮添加对灌丛化草地植物功能性状、群落组成及生产力的影响. 博士论文. 北京: 中国科学院植物研究所, 2023
[28] 王迎新, 陈先江, 娄珊宁, 等. 草原灌丛化入侵:过程、机制和效应. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 219-227
[29] Zhou LH, Shen HH, Chen LY, et al. Ecological consequences of shrub encroachment in the grasslands of northern China. Landscape Ecology, 2018, 34: 119-130
[30] D’Odorico P, Okin GS, Bestelmeyer BT. A synthetic review of feedbacks and drivers of shrub encroachment in arid grasslands. Ecohydrology, 2012, 5: 520-530
[31] Okin GS, D’Odorico P, Archer, SR. Impact of feedbacks on Chihuahuan desert grasslands: Transience and metastability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2009, 114, DOI: 10.1029/2008jg000833
[32] 图雅, 刘艳书, 朱媛君, 等. 锡林郭勒草原灌丛化对灌丛间地草本群落物种多样性和生物量的影响. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(10): 57-67
[33] Poorter AH, Nagel O. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO₂, nutrients and water: A quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2000, 27: 595-607
[34] 杨昊天, 李新荣, 刘立超, 等. 荒漠草地4种灌木生物量分配特征. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(5): 1340-1348
[35] 詹瑾, 李玉霖, 韩丹, 等. 半干旱沙区3种优势固沙灌木生物量分配及其生态学意义. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(5): 149-157
[36] 牛存洋, 阿拉木萨, 宗芹, 等. 科尔沁沙地小叶锦鸡儿地上-地下生物量分配格局. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(8): 1980-1986
[37] Blaum N, Rossmanith E, Popp A, et al. Shrub encroachment affects mammalian carnivore abundance and species richness in semiarid rangelands. Acta Oecologica, 2007, 31: 86-92
[38] 闫宝龙, 吕世杰, 王忠武, 等. 草地灌丛化成因及其对生态系统的影响研究进展. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(2): 95-101
[39] Koyama A, Sasaki T, Jamsran U, et al. Shrub cover regulates population dynamics of herbaceous plants at individual shrub scale on the Mongolian steppe. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2015, 26: 441-451

内蒙古灌丛化草原小叶锦鸡儿的种群特征及其土壤影响因子

Population characteristics of Caragana microphylla and the influencing soil factors in shrub-encroached grassland of Inner Mongolia, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕晶花, 赵旭燕, 陆梅, 李聪, 杨志东, 刘攀, 陈志明, 冯峻. 氮沉降下纳帕海草甸植被与土壤变化对微生物生物量碳氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1525-1532.
[2]	张昆凤, 王邵军, 王平, 张路路, 樊宇翔, 解玲玲, 肖博, 王郑钧, 郭志鹏. 蚂蚁筑巢对热带次生林土壤N₂O排放季节动态的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1218-1224.
[3]	张晓伟, 杨显贺, 车豪杰, 秦竞, 毕焕改, 艾希珍. 腐熟玉米秸秆对设施土壤环境及黄瓜产量和品质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1290-1296.
[4]	奎国娴, 史常青, 杨建英, 李瑞鹏, 魏广阔, 刘佳琪. 内蒙古草原区植被覆盖度时空演变及其驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2713-2722.
[5]	高军, 杨建英, 史常青, 公博, 刘子敬. 密云水库上游油松人工水源涵养林林下植物多样性与土壤理化特性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2305-2313.
[6]	赖丽华, 张申增, 陆丽仪, 林坤, 吕少梁, 曾嘉维, 陈海刚, 王学锋. 2017—2020年珠江口棘头梅童鱼的种群特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1413-1419.
[7]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 苏世锋, 董怡玲. 调控措施对祁连山中度退化高寒草甸土壤的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 988-994.
[8]	刘建康, 冯湘, 张克斌, 刘淑琴, 刘新月. 荒漠草原优势种群油蒿空间分布格局对封育恢复的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 720-726.
[9]	李志丽, 王红梅, 孙忠超, 马彦平, 赵亚楠, 李雪颖,. 宁夏东部荒漠草原-灌丛地转变过程土壤氮素响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1230-1240.
[10]	李媛媛, 徐婷婷, 艾喆, 马飞. 半干旱区锦鸡儿属植物根际土壤真菌群落多样性及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4289-4297.
[11]	陈津赛,孙玮皓,王广帅,Abubakar Sunusi Amin,高阳. 不同施氮量对麦田土壤水稳性团聚体和N₂O排放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3961-3968.
[12]	郭晓睿,宋涛,邓丽娟,张卫峰,焦小强. 果园生草对中国果园土壤肥力和生产力影响的整合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 4021-4028.
[13]	郑世群, 杨皖乔, 方镇福, 郑柠, 刘金福, 林凯琴, 肖丽芳, 李霖. 极小种群植物白果蒲桃种群现状与保护评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 103-112.
[14]	兰航宇, 段文标, 陈立新, 曲美学, 王亚飞, 杨习锋, 孟思静, 陈佳. 不同林型树倒林隙内微立地类型的土壤微团聚体组成及其分形特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1097-1105.
[15]	张琦, 王浩, 王淑兰, 张元红, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 深松轮耕模式对黄土旱塬春玉米土壤理化性质和作物产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 459-466.