基于“敏感性-重要性-连通性”框架的区域生态安全格局构建: 以贵州省为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202410.019

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2822-2832.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202410.019

基于“敏感性-重要性-连通性”框架的区域生态安全格局构建: 以贵州省为例

高祖桥^1,2, 李常斌^1,2*, 杨致远³, 王逸飞^1,2, 申娜^1,2, 张旭阳^1,2, 李美静^1,2, 刘源文^1,2

¹兰州大学资源环境学院, 兰州 730030;
²兰州大学西部环境教育部重点实验室, 兰州 730030;
³甘肃省城乡规划设计研究院, 兰州 730030

收稿日期:2024-01-18 接受日期:2024-06-28 出版日期:2024-10-18 发布日期:2025-04-18
通讯作者: * E-mail: licb@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:高祖桥, 男, 1995年生, 博士研究生。主要从事生态水文和生态风险评价研究。E-mail: geogzq@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(42371024)、甘肃省科技重大专项计划项目(20ZD7FA005,21ZD4FA008)、兰州大学双碳专项计划项目(lzujbky-2021-sp70)和甘肃省哲学社会科学规划重点项目(2021ZD004)

Construction of regional ecological security pattern based on the “sensitivity-importance-connectivity” framework: A case study of Guizhou Province

GAO Zuqiao^1,2, LI Changbin^1,2*, YANG Zhiyuan³, WANG Yifei^1,2, SHEN Na^1,2, ZHANG Xuyang^1,2, LI Meijing^1,2, LIU Yuanwen^1,2

¹College of Earth and Environment Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China;
²Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China;
³Gansu Institute of Urban and Rural Planning and Design, Lanzhou 730030, China

Received:2024-01-18 Accepted:2024-06-28 Online:2024-10-18 Published:2025-04-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态安全格局构建有利于生态系统健康和稳定,对区域可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究按“生态源地-阻力面-廊道”研究范式,根据“敏感性-重要性-连通性”指标框架进行生态源地识别,通过下垫面因子分级赋权和兴趣点(POI)方法修正生成生态阻力面,运用电路理论厘定生态廊道、夹点和障碍区,基于此构建贵州省生态安全格局。结果表明: 贵州省石漠化、水土流失极敏感区以及水源涵养、水土保持、生物多样性极重要区面积较小,空间异质性显著,分别占贵州总面积的1.6%、3.7%、25.2%、6.1%和10.4%;关键生态功能区中,生态极敏感、服务极重要和强景观连通地域分别占贵州总面积的5.3%、34.2%和27.9%;全省共有生态源地210块,面积27574.38 km²,占比15.6%;共有生态廊道463条,总长10049.81 km;共有生态夹点490个,生态障碍区117处,面积分别为22.08和91.04 km²;生态高阻力区主要分布在高频人类活动地域。基于以上构建贵州省生态安全格局,进行生态安全分区,并针对性提出了保护修复措施。本研究成果可为贵州省国土空间规划和区域生态保护提供科学参考。

关键词: 生态安全格局, 敏感性, 重要性, 连通性, 贵州省

Abstract: The construction of an ecological security pattern is crucial to maintain ecosystem health and stability, with great significance for regional sustainable development. Following the research paradigm of “ecological source areas-ecological resistance surfaces-ecological corridors”, based on the index framework of “sensitivity-importance-connectivity”, we identified the ecological source areas, generated the ecological resistance surface through graded weighting of underlying surface factors and point of interest (POI) method, determined the ecological corridor, pinch point, and obstacle area using circuit theory, and constructed the ecological security pattern of Guizhou Pro-vince. Results showed that the areas of extremely sensitive of rocky desertification and soil erosion and the areas of extremely important areas of water resources forming, soil and water conservation and biodiversity in Guizhou Pro-vince were generally small and distributed differently, accounting for 1.6%, 3.7%, 25.2%, 6.1%, and 10.4% of the total area, respectively. The key ecological functional areas of the extremely sensitive to external disturbance, most important in ecosystem service and strongly connective in landscape accounted for 5.3%, 34.2%, and 27.9%, respectively. A total of 210 ecological source areas were identified, covering 27574.38 km² and with an area ratio of 15.6%. The number of the ecological corridor was counted into 463, with a total length of 10049.81 km. The amount of ecological pinch points was 490, while that of the ecological barrier was 117, area of the both were computed into 22.08 and 91.04 km², respectively. Ecologically high-resistance areas were mainly distributed in regions with highly frequent human activities. Based on the above construction, we assessed the ecological security pattern in Guizhou Province, conducted ecological security zoning, and proposed targeted protection and restoration mea-sures. The study could provide scientific references for the spatial planning of land and regional ecological protection in Guizhou Province.

Key words: ecological security pattern, sensitivity, importance, connectivity, Guizhou Province

高祖桥, 李常斌, 杨致远, 王逸飞, 申娜, 张旭阳, 李美静, 刘源文. 基于“敏感性-重要性-连通性”框架的区域生态安全格局构建: 以贵州省为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(10): 2822-2832.

GAO Zuqiao, LI Changbin, YANG Zhiyuan, WANG Yifei, SHEN Na, ZHANG Xuyang, LI Meijing, LIU Yuanwen. Construction of regional ecological security pattern based on the “sensitivity-importance-connectivity” framework: A case study of Guizhou Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(10): 2822-2832.

参考文献

[1] WMO. WMO Provisional Report on the State of the Global Climate 2020 [EB/OL]. (2020-12-12) [2024-01-12]. https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21804
[2] UN-DESA. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results [EB/OL]. (2020-11-15) [2024-01-12]. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/World-Population-Prospects-2022
[3] Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Aca-demy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109: 16083-16088
[4] Li Q, Zhou Y, Yi SQ. An integrated approach to constructing ecological security patterns and identifying ecological restoration and protection areas: A case study of Jingmen, China. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 137: 108723
[5] Dai YC. Identifying the ecological security patterns of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29: 45837-45847
[6] 马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等. 区域生态安全格局: 概念与理论基础. 生态学报, 2004, 24(4): 761-768
[7] 闫玉玉, 孙彦伟, 刘敏. 基于生态安全格局的上海国土空间生态修复关键区域识别与修复策略. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3369-3378
[8] 俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局. 生态学报, 1999, 19(1): 8-15
[9] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明, 等. 景观生态学原理及应用. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001
[10] 李久林, 徐建刚, 储金龙. 基于Circuit理论的城市生态安全格局研究: 以安庆市为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(8): 1812-1824
[11] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419
[12] 潘竟虎, 李磊. 利用OWA和电路模型优化黄河流域甘肃段生态安全格局. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(3): 259-268
[13] Yu KJ. Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 36: 1-17
[14] 李涛, 巩雅博, 戈健宅, 等. 基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建: 以湖南省衡阳市为例. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2555-2564
[15] Zhang HT, Li JL, Tian P, et al. Construction of ecolo-gical security patterns and ecological restoration zones in the city of Ningbo, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32: 663-681
[16] 王崑, 马春旭, 郑伊含, 等. 基于MSPA模型和生态保护重要性评价的市域生态空间网络构建及优化. 水土保持通报, 2023, 43(4): 220-228
[17] 杜悦悦, 胡熠娜, 杨旸, 等. 基于生态重要性和敏感性的西南山地生态安全格局构建: 以云南省大理白族自治州为例. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24): 8241-8253
[18] Ding MM, Liu W, Xiao L, et al. Construction and optimization strategy of ecological security pattern in a rapidly urbanizing region: A case study in central-south China. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 136: 108604
[19] 曹秉帅, 单楠, 顾羊羊, 等. 呼伦湖流域生态安全评价及时空分布格局变化趋势研究. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(4): 801-811
[20] 陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 基于“重要性-敏感性-连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 471-484
[21] Jiang H, Peng J, Liu M, et al. Integrating patch stability and network connectivity to optimize ecological security pattern. Landscape Ecology, 2024, 39: 54
[22] 祁强强, 徐占军. 生态安全格局时空演变分析: 以太原城市群为例. 中国环境科学, 2023, 43(11): 5987-5997
[23] 刘瑞宽, 杨林朋, 李同昇, 等. 基于ERA和MCR模型的生态安全格局构建: 以陕西沿黄地区为例. 中国环境科学, 2024, 44(2): 1053-1063
[24] 赵宇豪, 罗宇航, 易腾云, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484
[25] 张平江, 党国锋. 基于MCR模型与蚁群算法的洮河流域生态安全格局构建. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 481-491
[26] 冯碧鸥, 岳文泽, 夏皓轩. 生态安全格局视角下的生态保护红线评估: 以浙江省为例. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2466-2474
[27] 黄俊杰, 冯秀丽, 董毓伊, 等. 基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2489-2497
[28] 潘越, 龚健, 杨建新, 等. 基于生态重要性和MSPA核心区连通性的生态安全格局构建: 以桂江流域为例. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(4): 86-95
[29] 周烨. 国家生态文明试验区建设标准体系研究: 结合贵州实践. 标准科学, 2019(3): 106-115
[30] 罗旭玲, 王世杰, 白晓永, 等. 西南喀斯特地区石漠化时空演变过程分析. 生态学报, 2021, 41(2): 680-693
[31] Li Y, Geng HC. Evolution of land use landscape patterns in Karst watersheds of Guizhou Plateau and its ecological security evaluation. Land, 2022, 11: 2225
[32] 杨青, 杨广斌, 戴丽, 等. 喀斯特地区石漠化与土壤类型的空间相关分析: 以贵州省为例. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(1): 80-87
[33] 杨秋婷. 基于SWOT分析的贵州省发展山地旅游农业策略选择研究. 经济研究导刊, 2021(2): 33-36
[34] Zhu M, Zhou ZF, Wu XP, et al. Response of vegetation carbon sequestration potential to the effectiveness of vege-tation restoration in Karst ecologically fragile areas in Guizhou, southwest China. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 158: 111495
[35] 李刚, 杨林, 汤天然, 等. 滇黔静止锋减弱北抬期间环流特征分析. 热带地理, 2022, 42(6): 1018-1026
[36] Ying B, Liu T, Ke L, et al. Identifying the landscape security pattern in Karst rocky desertification area based on ecosystem services and ecological sensitivity: A case study of Guanling County, Guizhou Province. Forests, 2023, 14: 613
[37] 刘荣萍, 周忠发, 朱孟, 等. 易地扶贫搬迁驱动下喀斯特山区乡村聚落时空演变特征. 地理科学, 2023, 43(11): 2024-2032
[38] Li L, Huang XJ, Wu DF, et al. Optimization of ecological security patterns considering both natural and social disturbances in China’s largest urban agglomeration. Ecological Engineering, 2022, 180: 106647
[39] Cao C, Luo YT, Xu LP, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern based on InVEST-Conefor-MCRM: A case study of Xinjiang, China. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 159: 111647
[40] Fu YJ, Shi XY, He J, et al. Identification and optimization strategy of county ecological security pattern: A case study in the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 112: 106030
[41] Xin F, Rong YJ, Tian CX, et al. Construction of an ecological security pattern in an urban-lake symbiosis area: A case study of Hefei Metropolitan Area. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14: 2498
[42] 唐常春, 陈珈琪, 谢昀霏, 等. 基于多源大数据的长株潭城市群城镇建成区综合集成识别与空间分异机制. 经济地理, 2024, 44(1): 66-76
[43] 李国煜, 林丽群, 伍世代, 等. 生态源地识别与生态安全格局构建研究: 以福建省福清市为例. 地域研究与开发, 2018, 37(3): 120-125
[44] Zhao SM, Ma YF, Wang JL, et al. Landscape pattern analysis and ecological network planning of Tianjin City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 46: 126479
[45] 曾黎, 杨庆媛, 杨人豪, 等. 三峡库区生态屏障区景观格局优化: 以重庆市江津区为例. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5): 1364-1373
[46] 王晓峰, 朱梦娜, 张欣蓉, 等. 基于“源地-阻力-廊道”的三江源区生态安全格局构建. 生态学报, 2024, 44(11): 1-15
[47] 代磊. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的贵州省生态安全格局构建与优化. 硕士论文. 贵州: 贵州大学, 2023
[48] Huang KX, Li P, Wang XH, et al. Integrating landscape connectivity and natural-anthropogenic interaction to understand Karst vegetation restoration: A case study of Guizhou Province, China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 10: 844437
[49] 贵州省自然资源厅. 贵州省国土空间规划(2021—2035年) [EB/OL]. (2021-07-14)[2024-01-12]. https://zrzy.guizhou.gov.cn/IGI/upload/file/2021/07/14/20210714055606130TEd.pdf

基于“敏感性-重要性-连通性”框架的区域生态安全格局构建: 以贵州省为例

Construction of regional ecological security pattern based on the “sensitivity-importance-connectivity” framework: A case study of Guizhou Province

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘淼, 史思雪, 张廷爽, 李迪康, 宇阳, 张智斌. 景观生态学在国土空间规划中的应用与展望 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2372-2381.
[2]	阚恒, 丁冠乔, 郭杰, 刘疆, 欧名豪. 基于生态安全格局分析的国土空间生态修复关键区域识别: 以环太湖城市群为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2217-2227.
[3]	朱宗斌, 彭佳新, 姚龙杰, 潘卫涛, 朱玲, 朱宗珍, 姜婧, 岳邦瑞. 整合结构连通与功能提升的黄土高原县域生态安全格局构建: 以延安市安塞区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(7): 1915-1924.
[4]	杨文越, 徐子豪, 叶泓妤, 李涛. 粤港澳大湾区道路基础设施对生态网络的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1653-1660.
[5]	丁康, 王嘉, 于淼, 李帅, 孟宇飞, 李运远. 邯郸市矿业废弃地的生态修复关键区识别: 基于生态功能与空间的重要性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1671-1680.
[6]	丁启东, 王怡婧, 张俊华, 贾科利, 黄华雨. 利用CARS算法联合协变量估算盐碱农田土壤水分和有机质含量 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(5): 1321-1330.
[7]	窦寒梅, 赵锐锋, 陈喜东, 石晶, 王景发, 刘福寿. 西北干旱区国土空间生态修复优先区识别——以黑河流域张掖市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 469-479.
[8]	刘亦晟, 侯鹏, 王平, 朱健. 生态系统水源涵养服务功能定量评估方法研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 275-288.
[9]	黄俊杰, 冯秀丽, 董毓伊, 张驰, 谢立建, 程俊恺, 高天宇. 基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2489-2497.
[10]	陈浈雄, 张超, 李全, 宋新章, 施曼. 土壤有机碳分解温度敏感性的影响机制研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2575-2584.
[11]	马扩, 郝丽娜, 童新, 段利民, 曹文梅, 康雪儿, 刘小勇, 刘廷玺. 科尔沁沙丘-草甸相间地区生态安全格局的时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2215-2225.
[12]	田宁, 黄雪梅, 陈龙池, 黄苛, 陶晓. 施石灰对杉木人工林土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1194-1202.
[13]	邱可睿, 李景功, 刘文, 王小平. 昆虫敏感波长测定的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1430-1440.
[14]	金银丽, 周冬梅, 周凡, 杨静, 朱小燕, 马静, 张军. 疏勒河流域生态安全网络构建及优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1063-1072.
[15]	王玉, 顾炎斌, 郭皓, 曹林泉, 金媛. 中国北方海星暴发灾害研究进展和展望 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1146-1152.