欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 3126-3138.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202510.028

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

河北坝上草原天路风景道景观格局特征

李金煜, 余青*   

  1. 北京交通大学经济管理学院, 风景道与旅游交通研究中心, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-03 修回日期:2025-08-13 发布日期:2026-05-04
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: qyu@bjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李金煜, 男, 1996年生, 博士研究生。主要从事旅游移动与旅游交通研究。E-mail: 944050610@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家风景道标准修订项目(B22I00010)

Landscape pattern characteristics of scenic byway in the Grass Skyline of Bashang Grassland, Hebei Pro-vince, China

LI Jinyu, YU Qing*   

  1. Scenic Byway and Tourism Transportation Research Center, School of Econo-mics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2025-02-03 Revised:2025-08-13 Published:2026-05-04

摘要: 探究风景道沿线景观格局演变及未来发展趋势,有利于统筹生态安全保护,并科学引导旅游业发展。本研究以河北坝上草原天路为例,构建风景道景观格局指标体系,运用Fragstats、最优参数地理探测器、ARIMA-MOP-PLUS模型,对比建设前(2000—2010年)和建设后(2010—2020年)景观格局的演变差异,揭示建设后演变的驱动因素,预测2035年旅游经济优先发展、惯性发展、生态优先发展和生态旅游发展情景下的景观格局变化。结果表明:耕地、林地和草地是坝上草原天路风景道沿线5 km缓冲区内的主要景观类型。与建设前相比,建设后,沿线区域景观整体连通性降低,形状复杂度和分布均匀度上升,破碎化加剧,干扰度增加了4.6%。旅游开发和道路交通对建设用地扩张的作用最大,贡献度为60.0%;地形土壤和社会经济是景观干扰度空间分异的主要驱动因素,q值为39.9%,坡度和其余因素的交互作用最强。2035年,在4类情景中,生态优先发展和生态旅游发展情景的干扰度低于其他情景,分别为0.52、0.53。生态旅游发展情景通过平衡生态用地和建设用地比例,使干扰度分布范围缩减了3.21 km2。研究结果可为优化草原天路沿线旅游资源配置、减轻旅游开发对坝上高原生态环境的负面影响提供决策支持。

关键词: 景观格局, 草原天路, PLUS模型, 多情景预测, 驱动因素

Abstract: Exploring the evolution of landscape patterns along scenic byways and future development trends is beneficial for coordinating ecological security protection and scientifically guiding tourism development. With the Grass Skyline of Bashang Grassland, Hebei Province as an example, we constructed a landscape pattern indicator system for scenic byways, and used Fragstats, optimal parameters-based geographical detector, and ARIMA-MOP-PLUS models to compare the evolutionary differences in landscape patterns before (2000-2010) and after the construction (2010-2020). We further examined the driving factors of post-construction evolution, and predicted landscape pattern changes under four scenarios for 2035: tourism-economic-priority development, inertial development, ecological-priority development, and ecotourism development. Results showed that cultivated land, forest, and grassland were the main landscape types within the 5 km buffer zone along the Grass Skyline scenic byway. Compared to the pre-construction period, the overall landscape connectivity in the corridor area decreased, shape complexity and distribution evenness increased, fragmentation intensified, and disturbance degree increased by 4.6% during the post-construction period. Tourism development and road transportation had the strongest impacts on construction land expansion, with a contribution rate of 60.0%. Topographic-soil and socio-economic factors were the main driving forces for spatial differentiation of landscape disturbance degree, with a q-value of 39.9%. The interaction between slope and other factors was the strongest. By 2035, ecological-priority development and ecotourism development scenarios showed lower disturbance degrees than other scenarios, at 0.52 and 0.53, respectively. The ecotourism development scenario reduced the disturbance degree distribution range by 3.21 km2 by balancing the proportion of ecological land and construction land. Our results could provide decision support for optimizing tourism resource allocation along the Grass Skyline and mitigating the negative impacts of tourism development on the environment of the Bashang Plateau.

Key words: landscape pattern, the Grass Skyline, PLUS model, multi-scenario prediction, driving factor