生态系统可持续性的一个测度框架

应用生态学报 ›› 1997, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2): 213-217.

生态系统可持续性的一个测度框架

胡聃

中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100080

收稿日期:1995-07-28 修回日期:1995-10-06 出版日期:1997-03-25 发布日期:1997-03-25
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(39470145)

An indicating framework for ecosystem sustainability

Hu Dan

Research Center for Eco Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100080

Received:1995-07-28 Revised:1995-10-06 Online:1997-03-25 Published:1997-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态系统可持续性是指生态系统持久地维持或支持其内在组份、组织结构和功能动态健康及其进化发展的潜在和显在能动性的总和.它是由生态整合性、自维持活力、自调节力和自组织力所构成的1个四元能力体系.生态系统持续性是由系统自身的组份、结构和功能动态来体现的.因此,对系统组份、结构和功能动态的辨识和评估是测度生态系统持续性的方法论基础.本文提出了1个由12项测度内容和30多类测度变量组成的生态系统可持续性的指标度量框架,反映了生态系统持续性的基本特点.从测度方法上看,基于指标的测度方法是生态系统持续性的基本测度方法,但它需要和整合测度方法相结合,以便提供一个完整的测度途径.

关键词: 生态系统, 可持续性, 测度指标, 地表径流, 土体构型, 产流机制, 壤中流, 氢氧稳定同位素

Abstract: Ecosystem sustainability is defined as the capacity of ecosystem in sustaining or maintaining the health and evolution of its components, structures and functions which consists of the capacities of ecological integrity, self maintenance, self regulating and self organization. As ecosystem sustainability is emerged by its components, structures and functions, a methodological basis of measurement should be established by their identification and assessment. In this paper, an indicator based framework of measurement with 12 items and more than 30 variables is presented to indicate the essential dynamic attributes of sustainable ecosystem. Although such an indicator based approach is very necessary for the measurement of ecosystem sustainability, it needs to be combined with integrated methods of measurement to establish a complete system for measuring ecosystems of sustainability.

Key words: Ecosystems, Sustainability, Indicators, hydrogen and oxygen isotope, overland flow, soil architecture, interflow, runoff gene-ration mechanism

胡聃. 生态系统可持续性的一个测度框架[J]. 应用生态学报, 1997, 8(2): 213-217.

Hu Dan . An indicating framework for ecosystem sustainability[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997, 8(2): 213-217.

参考文献

1 胡聃. 1994. 城市绿地综合效益评价方法研究. 城市环境与城市生态,7 (1): 18～22.

2 Christcnscn, V. 1994. On the bchavior of some proposedgoal functions for ccosystem developmcnt Ecological Modelling, 75: 37～49.

3 Constanza, R. 1992. Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. In: Ecosystem Health: New goals for Environmental Management (Costanza, R. , et al .) . Island Press,Washington D. C. ,4

Finn, J . T. 1976. Measures of ecosystem structure andfunction derived from analysis of flow. J . Theor. Biol . ,56: 363～380。

5 Holling,S. C. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 1～23.

6 Jorgenson, S. E. 1992. Exergy and ecology. Ecological Modelling,63: 185～214.

7 Karr, J. R. et al . 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environ. Manage. ,5: 55～68.

8 Kay,J. J. 1989. A thermodynamic perspective of the selforganization of living system. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of ISSS (Eds. ,W. J. Ledington) . Ecological .

9 Landres, P. B. 1992. Ecological indicators: panacca of liability ? Ecological Indicator (D. H. Mekenzie, et al . eds) . Elsvier Science Publishers. England.

10 Levin, S. A. 1993. Science and sustainability. Ecological Application,3 (4): 548～549.

11 Odum, H. T. 1983. Fundamentals of Ecology. Saunders,Philadelphia.

12 Odum, H. T. 1983. Systems Ecology: An Introduction. Wiley,New York.

13 Orians, G. H. 1975. Diversity, stability and maturity innatural ecosystems (W. H. van dobben et al eds) . Unifying Concepts in Ecology. Junk the Hague.

14 Rapport,D. J . 1989. What constitutes ecosystem hcalth ?perspective in Biology and Medicine,33,1.

15 Ulannowicz, R . E. 1986. Growth and Development: Ecosystem Phenomenology. Springer - Verlag,London.

16 Vester,F. 1980. Scnsitivitats modell,Regionale Planungs gemeinwchaft Untermain,Frankurft, Germany.

17 Westman, W. E. 1978. Measuring the inertia and resilience of ecosystems. BioScience,28 (11): 705～710.

18 Wulff,F. et al . 1989. Network analysis in marine ccosystem. Coastal and Estuarine Studies,Vol . 32. Springer -Verlag, London.

[1]	王进, 周广胜, 何奇瑾, 周莉. 内蒙古克氏针茅草原净生态系统碳交换的物候特征及遥感监测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 659-668.
[2]	梁华秋, 沈梦晗, 邵明, 姚朋. 基于生态系统服务供需的临沂市固碳生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 759-768.
[3]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[4]	蔡露露, 孙守家, 施光耀, 杜灵通, 倪细炉, 张劲松, 孟平. 自然状态下栓皮栎林空气负离子与PM_2.5的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 347-353.
[5]	路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468.
[6]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[7]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[8]	熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248.
[9]	孔东彦, 杨灵芳, 刁静文, 郭鹏. 不同生境下氮沉降对土壤N₂O通量影响的整合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2171-2177.
[10]	黄庆阳, 谢立红, 曹宏杰, 王立民, 杨帆, 王继丰, 刘赢男, 倪红伟. 细菌对五大连池火山森林凋落物早期分解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1941-1948.
[11]	庞丹波, 吴梦瑶, 赵娅茹, 杨娟, 董立国, 吴旭东, 陈林, 李学斌, 倪细炉, 李静尧, 梁咏亮. 贺兰山东坡不同海拔土壤微生物群落特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1957-1967.
[12]	韦昊延, 陆彦玮, 李敏, 李培月, 程文青, 司炳成. 渭河流域秋雨异常氢氧稳定同位素特征及其水汽来源 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1737-1744.
[13]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[14]	陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922.
[15]	晨阳, 李慧融, 李冬楠, 孙鹏飞, 宿江华. 锡林浩特草原净生态系统碳交换量特征及源区分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1509-1516.