欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耕作措施下春小麦和豌豆叶水势变化及其与环境因子的关系

张鸣;张仁陟;蔡立群   

  1. 甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院, 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2007-11-26 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-20 发布日期:2008-07-20

Leaf water potential of spring wheat and field pea under different tillage patterns and its relationships with environmental factors.

ZHANG Ming;ZHANG Ren-zhi;CAI Li-qun   

  1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultura
    l University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2007-11-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-07-20 Published:2008-07-20

摘要: 以长期定位试验为基础,对不同耕作措施下春小麦和豌豆叶水势的变化特征及其与环境因子的关系进行了研究,并对叶片相对含水量和水分饱和亏的变化规律进行了探讨.结果表明:豌豆在整个生育期内的叶水势都明显高于春小麦,它们在不同生育期的日变化趋势大致相同,均为清晨最高,然后随着时间的推移而下降,在持续一段低谷后逐渐回升.春小麦各处理的叶水势在拔节和抽穗期相对较高,孕穗和开花期次之,灌浆期最低;豌豆各处理的叶水势在现蕾期达到最大值,分枝和开花期次之,结荚鼓粒期最低.春小麦各处理的叶片相对含水量在抽穗期最高,拔节和开花期次之,灌浆期最低,水分饱和亏的变化正好相反;豌豆各处理的叶片相对含水量随生育进程呈下降趋势,水分饱和亏的变化也与之相反.春小麦和豌豆各处理的叶水势与土壤含水量、气温、太阳辐射、大气相对湿度、大气水势均有显著的相关关系.通径分析表明,对春小麦和豌豆叶水势日变化影响最强的气象因子分别为大气水势和大气温度.与传统耕作相比,免耕、免耕秸秆覆盖、传统耕作秸秆还田3种保护性耕作措施可不同程度地提高作物叶水势和叶片相对含水量,其中免耕秸秆覆盖的优势最明显.

关键词: 黄土丘陵区-山杏, 光合作用, 水分胁迫, CO2-响应

Abstract: Based on a longterm experiment, the leaf water potential of spring wheat and field pea, its relationships with environmental factors, and the diurnal variations of leaf relative water content and water saturation deficient under different tillage patterns were studied. The results showed that during whole growth period, field pea had an obviously higher leaf water potential than spring wheat, but the two crops had similar diurnal variation trend of their leaf water potential, i.e., the highest in early morning, followed by a descent, and a gradual ascent after the descent. For spring wheat, the maximum leaf water potential appeared at its jointing and heading stages, followed by at booting and flowering stages, and the minimum appeared at filling stage. For field pea, the maximum leaf water potential achieved at squaring stage, followed by at branching and〖HJ*6〗 flowering stages, and the minimum was at podding stage. The leaf relative water content of spring wheat was the highest at heading stage, followed by at jointing and flowering stages, and achieved the minimum at filling stage; while the water saturation deficient was just in adverse. With the growth of field pea, its leaf relative water content decreased, but leaf water saturation deficient increased. The leaf water potential of both spring wheat and field pea had significant correlations with environmental factors, including soil water content, air temperature, solar radiation, relative air humidity, and air water potential. Path analysis showed that the meteorological factor which had the strongest effect on the diurnal variation of spring wheat’s and field pea’s leaf water potential was air water potential and air temperature, respectively. Compared with conventional tillage, the protective tillage patterns no-till, notill plus straw mulching, and conventional tillage plus straw returning increased the leafwater potential and relative water content of test crops, and the effect of no-till plus straw mulching was most significant.

Key words: loess hilly region, Prunus sibirica, potosynthesis, water stress, CO2 response.