欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3585-3594.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202512.029

• 山水林田湖草沙保护修复专栏(专栏策划: 岳文泽、肖武) • 上一篇    下一篇

“水-土”关系扰动下的新安江流域生态补偿机制

陈前虎1, 缪妍1*, 柴舟跃2, 高正2   

  1. 1浙江工业大学设计与建筑学院, 杭州 310023;
    2浙江省城乡规划设计研究院, 杭州 310030
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-15 修回日期:2025-10-27 出版日期:2025-12-18 发布日期:2026-07-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: 2972363590@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈前虎, 男, 1971年生, 博士, 教授。主要从事水敏性城市土地利用研究。E-mail: 1147396290@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(52278083)和国家重大社会科学基金项目(16ZDA018)

Ecological compensation mechanism of Xin’an River Watershed under the disturbance of the “water-land”relationship

CHEN Qianhu1, MIAO Yan1*, CHAI Zhouyue2, GAO Zheng2   

  1. 1School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;
    2Zhejiang Urban and Rural Planning Design Institute, Hangzhou 310030, China
  • Received:2025-08-15 Revised:2025-10-27 Online:2025-12-18 Published:2026-07-18

摘要: 流域作为以水资源为核心的自然地理单元,是统筹国土空间开发保护格局的关键载体。构建基于“水-土”关系变化的生态补偿机制,已成为协调流域生态保护与社会经济发展矛盾的重要途径,对推进流域治理现代化和实现绿色高质量发展具有重要意义。本研究以全国首个跨省生态补偿试点——新安江流域为例,采用情景分析和逻辑推演等综合研究方法,系统梳理其机制演进脉络,诊断现有补偿制度困境,构建了基于“水-土”关系扰动下的流域动态补偿框架。结果表明: 现行补偿机制存在“事后补偿”下的全过程管控缺位与单一补偿模式“造血”功能不足等问题。基于水质“效应值”“实测值”“目标值”三值联动的流域综合评估体系可以突破传统依赖单一实测值的判定局限,实现水土环境问题的精准溯源;基于水土关系诊断结果提供的差异化靶向补偿路径选择有助于提升治理措施的针对性和可持续性;系统构建的动态补偿框架推动了生态补偿机制从“事后补救”向“全过程治理”的制度转型。本研究为流域国土空间统筹治理提供了新的视角、思路和方法。

关键词: 流域, 生态补偿机制, 水环境, 国土空间治理

Abstract: As a natural geographical unit centered on water resources, watersheds serve as critical entities for coordinating the development and protection of territorial spaces. Establishing an ecological compensation mechanism based on the “water-land” relationship has become a vital approach to reconcile the conflicts between environmental conservation and socio-economic development in watersheds. It plays a significant role in advancing mo-dern watershed governance and achieving green, high-quality development. Xin’an River Watershed is the first cross-provincial ecological compensation pilot in China. With it as a case, we adopted a comprehensive research approach centered on scenario analysis and logical deduction to systematically examine the evolutionary trajectory of the compensation mechanism, diagnose shortcomings in the existing compensation system, and construct a dynamic compensation framework based on the disturbance of the “water-land” relationship. We found that the current compensation mechanism was lacking in whole-process management under the “post-event compensation” model and was insufficient for self-sustaining development due to its unitary compensation approach. An integrated watershed assessment system, based on the linkage of water quality “effect value”, “measured value”, and “target value”, could overcome the limitations of traditional evaluations that rely solely on measured values and thus enable precise tracing of water and land environmental issues. Differentiated targeted compensation pathways, informed by diagnostic results from water and land environment assessments, could help enhance the focus and sustainability of governance measures. The systematically constructed dynamic compensation framework would facilitate the institutional transition of the ecological compensation mechanism from “post-event remediation” to “whole-process governance”. This study would provide new perspectives, ideas, and methodologies for the integrated governance of watersheds and territorial spaces.

Key words: watershed, ecological compensation mechanism, water environment, territorial spatial governance