欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3575-3584.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202512.024

• 山水林田湖草沙保护修复专栏(专栏策划: 岳文泽、肖武) • 上一篇    下一篇

基于全域土地综合整治的生态占补平衡实现机制

曹宇1,2*, 王雅娟1, 程诺1, 邓卜洋1   

  1. 1浙江大学公共管理学院, 杭州 310058;
    2浙江大学土地与国家发展研究院, 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-01 修回日期:2025-10-13 出版日期:2025-12-18 发布日期:2026-07-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: caoyu@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:曹宇, 男, 1976年生, 教授, 博士生导师。主要从事土地资源管理、景观生态学、国土整治与生态修复、耕地保护等研究。E-mail: caoyu@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42371295)

Mechanism for implementing the ecological loss-compensation balance under comprehensive land consolidation

CAO Yu1,2*, WANG Yajuan1, CHENG Nuo1, DENG Boyang1   

  1. 1School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    2Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Received:2025-04-01 Revised:2025-10-13 Online:2025-12-18 Published:2026-07-18

摘要: 生态占补平衡以实现生境质量“零净损失”为核心目标,通过对生境价值进行科学核算并建立标准化交易机制,为平衡土地开发与生态保护提供关键政策工具。本文运用案例归纳与逻辑推演方法,系统阐释了生态占补平衡的内涵和国际实践,并着重论证了其与全域土地综合整治在目标导向、项目需求及技术路径层面的协同潜力。将生态占补平衡机制融入全域土地综合整治,能够显著提升整治项目的综合效益和生态环境保护成效。据此,本文提出在全域土地综合整治框架下的生态占补平衡创新机制:首先,亟须完善自然资源产权制度和生态占补平衡的顶层法律框架;其次,应通过科学的国土空间规划,对区域生态空间进行功能分区和差异化管控;最后,依托多样化的生境补偿模式,并结合与生态成效挂钩的指标奖励体系,系统性地实现生态占补平衡。本文旨在为全域土地综合整治实践中深化生态保护、创新生态产品价值实现路径提供理论参考和实践借鉴。

关键词: 全域土地综合整治, 生态占补平衡, 生态补偿, 生态产品价值实现, 全域自然资源规划

Abstract: Ecological loss-compensation balance (ELCB), with achieving “no net loss” of habitat quality as the core objective, has emerged as a key international policy tool for balancing land development and ecological conservation by scientifically accounting for habitat values and establishing standardized trading mechanisms. Employing case studies and logical deduction, we systematically elucidated the concept and international practices of ELCB. We further analyzed the synergistic potential between ELCB and comprehensive land consolidation (CLC) in terms of goal orientation, project demands, and technical pathways. Integrating the ELCB mechanism into CLC projects can significantly enhance the overall benefits and the efficacy of ecological conservation. We further proposed an innovative mechanism for achieving the ELCB within the CLC framework. First, it would be imperative to strengthen the natural resource property rights system and the top-level legal framework for ELCB. Second, scientific national spatial planning should be employed to implement functional zoning and differentiated management of regional ecological spaces. Finally, ELCB should be systematically achieved by leveraging diversified habitat compensation models, coupled with an indicator-based reward system linked to ecological performance. This work aimed to provide theoretical insights and practical guidance for enhancing ecological conservation and for innovating pathways to realize the value of ecosystem products within the practice of CLC.

Key words: comprehensive land consolidation, ecological loss-compensation balance, ecological compensation, ecological product value-realization, comprehensive natural resource planning