欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 411-417.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202502.002

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

健康与衰退樟子松和杨树径向生长响应气候及其生态弹性差异

袁超峰1,2, 王文志1*, 吴喆虹1,2, 苏勇1,2, 罗玲卓1,2   

  1. 1中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都 610299;
    2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-10 接受日期:2024-11-30 出版日期:2025-02-18 发布日期:2025-08-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: wzwang@imde.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:袁超峰, 男, 1999年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事树木年轮稳定同位素生态学研究。E-mail: yuanchaofeng@imde.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41977396)

Differences in radial growth responses to climate and ecological resilience between healthy and declining Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Populus L.

YUAN Chaofeng1,2, WANG Wenzhi1*, WU Zhehong1,2, SU Yong1,2, LUO Lingzhuo1,2   

  1. 1Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China;
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2024-09-10 Accepted:2024-11-30 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-08-18

摘要: 随着全球气候变暖和降水格局改变,我国三北防护林近年来出现了不同程度的衰退,成为当前防护林建设面临的首要问题。然而目前对于森林衰退生理机制的了解仍然有限。本文通过树木年轮学方法,测定了健康与衰退樟子松和杨树的断面积增量(BAI)和年轮宽度,并建立了相应的标准年表(STD),分析对气候要素的响应及其在干旱期间的生态弹性,揭示樟子松和杨树衰退的气候变化作用机制及其对干旱的适应能力差异。结果表明: 1978以来,健康樟子松径向生长显著增加,而且健康樟子松平均BAI显著高于衰退樟子松。两者均与全年的帕尔默干旱指数(PDSI)呈显著正相关,健康樟子松对降水的敏感性较低并在干旱期间表现出更强的抵抗力和弹性。1983年以来,健康与衰退杨树径向生长均无显著变化趋势,且健康杨树平均BAI显著高于衰退杨树。健康杨树与降水、PDSI及水汽压差(VPD)之间的相关性较低,并在干旱期间表现出较强的抵抗力。樟子松出现衰退的时间早于杨树,其对PDSI的敏感性较高,但抵抗力和弹性均高于杨树。综上,干旱和降水是导致樟子松和杨树衰退的主要气候因素,衰退树木响应气候变化更为敏感,樟子松相比杨树对累积干旱的适应能力更强,在未来气候变暖引起的干旱加剧情景下可能更适合生存。本研究为三北防护林工程的树种选育提供了数据支持和科学参考。

关键词: 樟子松, 杨树, 三北防护林, 森林衰退, 生态弹性

Abstract: With global climate warming and the alteration of precipitation regime, the Three-North Shelter Forest in China has been degraded in recent years, which is a primary challenge for shelterbelt construction. Our understan-ding of the physiological mechanisms behind forest decline remains limited. In this study, we employed dendrochronological methods to measure the basal area increment (BAI) and tree-ring width of both healthy and degraded Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Populus L. We developed corresponding standardized chronologies (STD) to analyze their responses to climatic factors and ecological resilience during drought periods, and to elucidate the mechanisms of degradation in P. sylvestris var. mongolica and Populus L. under climate change, as well as their differences in drought adaptability. The results showed that radial growth in healthy P. sylvestris var. mongolica had significantly increased since 1978, with higher mean BAI of healthy trees than the degraded trees. They both exhibited a significant positive correlation with the annual palmer drought severity index (PDSI). Healthy P. sylvestris var. mongolica was less sensitive to precipitation and more resistant and resilient during drought periods. Since 1983, there had been no significant trend in radial growth for either healthy or degraded Populus L., though the mean BAI of healthy Populus L. was significantly higher than that of declining trees. Healthy Populus L. trees exhi-bited weaker correlations with precipitation, PDSI, and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) compared to the degraded trees, yet they showed higher resistance and resilience during droughts. P. sylvestris var. mongolica showed signs of decline earlier than Populus L. and demonstrated greater sensitivity to the PDSI. Nevertheless, it exhibited higher resistance and resilience than Populus L. In conclusion, drought and precipitation emerge as the primary climatic factors contributing to the decline of P. sylvestris var. mongolica and Populus L., with degraded trees being more sensitive to climate change. P. sylvestris var. mongolica demonstrated stronger adaptability to cumulative drought than Populus L., making it more likely to survive under future scenarios of increased drought caused by climate warming. This study provided data support and scientific insights for species selection in the Three-North Shelter Forest Project.

Key words: Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica; Populus L.; the Three-North Shelterbelt; forest declining; ecological resilience.