欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于SolVES模型的生态系统服务社会价值评估——以吴淞炮台湾湿地森林公园为例

王玉1,傅碧天1,吕永鹏2,杨凯1,车越1*
  

  1. (1华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院 上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室, 上海 200062; 2上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司, 上海 200092)
  • 出版日期:2016-06-18

Assessment of the social values of ecosystem services based on SolVES model: A case study of Wusong Paotaiwan Wetland Forest Park, Shanghai, China.

WANG Yu1, FU Bi-tian1, LYU Yong-peng2, YANG Kai1, CHE Yue1*#br#   

  1. (1Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and EcoRestoration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; 2Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China).
  • Online:2016-06-18

摘要: 人类活动对生态系统不同服务的多样化需求日益增长,传统的生态系统服务价值评估实践多以经济学方法为主,较少关注社会属性和空间异质性.本文选取上海市吴淞炮台湾湿地森林公园作为研究对象,采用SolVES模型对其美学、生物多样性、文化、娱乐等服务的社会价值进行量化和空间分析.结果表明: 公园的热点区域集中在草坪乐园、吴淞炮台纪念广场、临江观景台等视野开阔或临近水景观的区域;游客对公园内美学、历史、生物多样性、娱乐、文化、康体健身价值较为偏好;水景观和路网布局影响游客对不同社会价值的偏好程度,美学、生物多样性、娱乐和康体健身价值高低与距水体远近在一定范围内呈显著负相关关系,美学和康体健身价值高低与距道路远近呈显著负相关关系;游憩频率影响游客对生物多样性价值和康体健身价值的感受及偏好;SolVES模型在评估中小尺度生态系统服务社会价值方面具有较好的可行性.

关键词: SolVES模型, 社会价值, 游客偏好, 空间分析, 生态系统服务

Abstract: Human demand for various ecosystem services continues to increase. The previous studies focused mainly on using economic methods to assess ecosystem service values, but few studies took social attributes and spatial heterogeneity into consideration. In this paper, we selected Wusong Paotaiwan Wetland Forest Park in Shanghai as the study area, and used Social Values for Ecosystem services (SolVES) model to assess the social values of several ecosystem services, such as aesthetic, biodiversity, cultural, recreation, etc. The results showed that the “hotspots” were situated in the places which were close to the water landscape with a broad vision such as the lawn park, Wusong Fort memorial square and waterfront observation deck. Aesthetic, historic, biodiversity, cultural, recreation and therapeutic values were the visitors’ preference values. Visitors’ preferences could be influenced by the water landscape and the roads significantly. The value indexes of aesthetic, biodiversity, recreation and therapeutics had a significant negative correlation with the distance to water (DTW) and the value indexes of aesthetic and therapeutics had a significant negative correlation with the distance to roads (DTR). Visit frequency could influence visitors’ attitudes and preferences towards biodiversity and therapeutics. SolVES had the potential to explicitly assess the social values of ecosystem services at a small scale.

Key words: social value, spatial analysis., SolVES model, visitor’s preference, ecosystem services