Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 2459-2466.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201608.040

• CONTENTS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Response of water status indicators in apple saplings to drought stress under shelter from rain.

GAO Mu-wang1, NIE Pei-xian2, SUN Ying1,3, JIANG Yuan-mao1, ZHANG Jin-chun1, ZHANG Ji-xiang1*   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/National Research Center of Apple Engineering and Technology/College of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China;
    2Shandong Institute of Pomology, Tai’an 271000, Shandong, China;
    3College of Science and Information, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-01-11 Published:2016-08-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: zhangjx365@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Modern Apple Industry Technical System Program of Ministry of Agriculture (CARS-28), the National Science and Technology Support Project (2011BAD32B03-02) and the Special Fund for the Scientific Research in the Public Interest (Meteorology) of China (GYHY201206023-03).

Abstract: The main tree water status indicators which sensitively responded to drought stress and related to tree water balance were investigated in treatment of progressive decrease of soil water potential under shelter from rain. The results showed that stem maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) and midday stem water potential (Ψstem) were most sensitive to drought stress among all the water status indicators. MDS not only significantly responded to reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0), but also was sensitive to soil drought stress. MDS was significantly positively related to ET0, and the correlation between relative stem daily maximum shrinkage (MDSr) and relative soil water potential (Ψr soil) was highly significant. Moreover, the stems could be measured in succession and recorded automatically. Midday Ψstem was also sensitive to soil drought stress, and significantly negatively related to ET0. The correlation between relative midday stem potential (Ψr stem) and Ψr soil was significant. But so far, it is difficult to automatically measure either leaf or stem water potential. Predawn leaf water potential (Ψpd), daily stem growth (DG) or stomatal conductance (gs) also responded to drought stress to some extent under moderate or heavy drought stress, but they were not sensitive.

Key words: water status indicator., apple tree, drought stress