基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202309.027

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 2489-2497.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202309.027

基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建

黄俊杰, 冯秀丽^*, 董毓伊, 张驰, 谢立建, 程俊恺, 高天宇

宁波大学地理与空间信息技术系, 浙江宁波 315211

收稿日期:2023-04-12 修回日期:2023-07-19 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2024-03-16
通讯作者: *E-mail: fengxiuli@nbu.edu.cn
作者简介:黄俊杰, 男, 1998年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事生态遥感应用研究。E-mail: 2111087026@nbu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42171255)

Construction of ecological security pattern in Ningbo based on remote sensing ecological index and graph theory knowledge

HUANG Junjie, FENG Xiuli^*, DONG Yuyi, ZHANG Chi, XIE Lijian, CHENG Junkai, GAO Tianyu

Department of Geography and Spatial Information Techniques, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China

Received:2023-04-12 Revised:2023-07-19 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2024-03-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构建生态安全格局、识别生态重要区域是目前区域生态安全研究的重点。本研究以宁波市为例,利用遥感生态指数识别生态源地,利用电路理论模型识别生态廊道和生态夹点,利用图论算法识别最小生成树和割边。结果表明: 宁波市共有生态源地203处,土地覆被类型以林地为主,也包括少量的水田和水淹植被;生态廊道共368条,总长度为573.42 km,整体呈西南密、东北疏的趋势;生态夹点91处,夹点主要分布在海涂区域和联系紧密的生态源地之间。根据现状提出优化策略,确定一级廊道187条,二级廊道181条,生态修复优先区50处,远期生态修复区 59处。结合图论与电路理论模型的优化策略为生态安全格局的构建提供了科学依据。

关键词: 生态安全格局, 遥感生态指数, 电路理论, 图论

Abstract: Constructing ecological security pattern and identifying ecological important areas are the focus of current research on regional ecological security. With Ningbo City as a case study area, we identified ecological sources by remote sensing ecological index, the ecological corridors and pinch point by circuit theory model, and the minimum spanning tree and cuts by graph theory algorithm. The results showed that there were 203 ecological sources in Ningbo, and that the main type of land cover was forest, including a small amount of paddy fields and flooded vegetation. There were 368 ecological corridors with a total length of 573.42 km, being dense in the southwest and sparse in the northeast. There were 91 ecological pinch points, which mainly distributed between coastal areas and closely related ecological sources. According to current situation, we put forward the optimization strategy with 187 primary corridors, 181 secondary corridors, 50 ecological restoration priority areas and 59 long-term ecological restoration areas. The optimization strategy combined with graph theory and circuit theory model would provide a refe-rence for the constructing of ecological security pattern.

Key words: ecological security pattern, remote sensing ecological index, circuit theory, graph theory

黄俊杰, 冯秀丽, 董毓伊, 张驰, 谢立建, 程俊恺, 高天宇. 基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2489-2497.

HUANG Junjie, FENG Xiuli, DONG Yuyi, ZHANG Chi, XIE Lijian, CHENG Junkai, GAO Tianyu. Construction of ecological security pattern in Ningbo based on remote sensing ecological index and graph theory knowledge[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(9): 2489-2497.

参考文献

[1] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419
[2] Knaapen JP, Scheffer M, Harms B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1992, 23: 1-16
[3] 潘竟虎, 刘晓. 疏勒河流域景观生态风险评价与生态安全格局优化构建. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(3): 791-799
[4] McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, et al. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 2008, 89: 2712-2724
[5] Carroll C, McRAE BH, Brookes A, et al. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conservation Biology, 2012, 26: 78-87
[6] 王戈, 于强, Yang D, 等. 包头市层级生态网络构建方法研究. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(9): 235-242
[7] Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N, et al. Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 95: 16-27
[8] 刘世梁, 侯笑云, 尹艺洁, 等. 景观生态网络研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(12): 3947-3956
[9] 王子琳, 李志刚, 方世明. 基于遗传算法和图论法的生态安全格局构建与优化——以武汉市为例. 地理科学, 2022, 42(10): 1685-1694
[10] Luo Y, Wu J. Linking the minimum spanning tree and edge betweenness to understand arterial corridors in an ecological network. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 1549-1565
[11] 徐涵秋. 城市遥感生态指数的创建及其应用. 生态学报, 2013, 33(24): 7853-7862
[12] 彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 等. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):701-710
[13] 徐涵秋, 邓文慧. MRSEI指数的合理性分析及其与RSEI指数的区别. 遥感技术与应用, 2022, 37(1): 1-7
[14] Wu Q. geemap: A Python package for interactive mapping with Google Earth Engine. Journal of Open Source Software, 2020, 51: 2305
[15] Goward SN, Xue Y, Czajkowski KP. Evaluating land surface moisture conditions from the remotely sensed temperature/vegetation index measurements: An exploration with the simplified simple biosphere model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 79: 225-242
[16] Shi T, Xu H. Derivation of tasseled cap transformation coefficients for Sentinel-2 MSI at-sensor reflectance data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2019, 12: 4038-4048
[17] Xu H. A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008, 29: 4269-4276
[18] Rikimaru A, Roy PS, Miyatake S. Tropical forest cover density mapping. Tropical Ecology, 2002, 43: 39-47
[19] Ermida SL, Soares P, Mantas V, et al. Google earth engine open-source code for land surface temperature estimation from the Landsat series. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12: 1471
[20] Duguay-Tetzlaff A, Bento VA, Göttsche FM, et al. Meteosat land surface temperature climate data record: Achievable accuracy and potential uncertainties. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7: 13139-13156
[21] Agam N, Kustas WP, Anderson MC, et al. A vegetation index based technique for spatial sharpening of thermal imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 107: 545-558
[22] Wang Q, Shi W, Li Z, et al. Fusion of Sentinel-2 images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 187: 241-252
[23] Peng J, Yang Y, Liu Y, et al. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 644: 781-790
[24] Kruskal JB. On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1956, 7: 48-50
[25] Tarjan R. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing, 1972, 1: 146-160
[26] Cook EA. Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 58: 269-280
[27] Fabos JG. Greenway planning in the United States: Its origins and recent case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 68: 321-342
[28] 王海珍, 张利权. 基于GIS、景观格局和网络分析法的厦门本岛生态网络规划. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(1): 144-152
[29] 宁波市规划局总体规划管理处. 宁波市生态保护红线 (批前公示)[EB/OL]. (2016-01-07)[2016-01-07]. http://zgj.ningbo.gov.cn/art/2016/1/7/art_1229036868_45515347.html
[30] 闫玉玉, 孙彦伟, 刘敏. 基于生态安全格局的上海国土空间生态修复关键区域识别与修复策略. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3369-3378
[31] 于梦林, 刘平辉, 朱传民. 基于MCR模型的宁波市生态安全网络构建. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(1): 217-224
[32] Han Y, Yu C, Feng Z, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on spatial syntax classification: Taking Ningbo, China, as an example. Land, 2021, 10: 380

基于遥感生态指数和图论知识的宁波市生态安全格局构建

Construction of ecological security pattern in Ningbo based on remote sensing ecological index and graph theory knowledge

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贾丁一, 郭荣朋, 丘伟国, 巫志龙, 林森, 胡喜生. 不同等级道路对生态网络的影响——以福州市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 489-500.
[2]	马扩, 郝丽娜, 童新, 段利民, 曹文梅, 康雪儿, 刘小勇, 刘廷玺. 科尔沁沙丘-草甸相间地区生态安全格局的时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2215-2225.
[3]	金银丽, 周冬梅, 周凡, 杨静, 朱小燕, 马静, 张军. 疏勒河流域生态安全网络构建及优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1063-1072.
[4]	冯平, 杨妮娟, 李建柱. 滦河流域遥感生态指数改进及生态环境质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3195-3202.
[5]	马彩虹, 刘园园, 杨航, 李聪慧, 杨中华. 宁夏灵武市“生态-经济”双网格局演变及互作关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3095-3104.
[6]	潘卫涛, 岳邦瑞, 姚龙杰, 薛建锋, 李军峰. 耦合风险与服务的市域生态安全格局构建——以陕西省咸阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 178-186.
[7]	冯碧鸥, 岳文泽, 夏皓轩. 生态安全格局视角下的生态保护红线评估——以浙江省为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2466-2474.
[8]	赵宇豪, 罗宇航, 易腾云, 王振宇, 王娜, 吴健生. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484.
[9]	任堃, 罗漫雅, 赵永华, 韩玲, 张磊, 杨舒媛. 西安市生态环境及城市发展质量评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2485-2492.
[10]	岳奕帆, 陈国鹏, 王立, 杨钧, 杨克彤. 基于Google Earth Engine云平台的甘肃舟曲县生态环境质量动态监测与评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1608-1614.
[11]	闫玉玉, 孙彦伟, 刘敏. 基于生态安全格局的上海国土空间生态修复关键区域识别与修复策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3369-3378.
[12]	李晓明, 孙从建, 孙九林, 陈伟, 李新功. 基于遥感信息的黄土高原主要灌溉农业分布区生态安全特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3177-3184.
[13]	沈钦炜, 林美玲, 莫惠萍, 黄宇斌, 胡欣雨, 魏凌伟, 郑郁善, 陆东芳. 佛山市生态网络构建及优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3288-3298.
[14]	李涛, 巩雅博, 戈健宅, 齐增湘, 谢水波. 基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2555-2564.
[15]	于贵瑞, 杨萌, 陈智, 张雷明. 大尺度区域生态环境治理及国家生态安全格局构建的技术途径和战略布局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1141-1153.