秦岭森林生态系统服务价值的时空演变

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以1984、2000、2005和2014年的Landsat TM影像为数据源,使用ERDAS软件中的监督分类方法获得秦岭土地利用类型分布图;从时间和空间角度对单位面积生态系统服务价值当量因子进行区域修正,并利用植被覆盖度进行逐像元二次修正后,运用RS和GIS技术计算1984—2014年秦岭森林生态系统服务价值,所得结果利用敏感性指数进行验证.结果表明: 1984—2014年,研究区森林面积约占总面积的77%,耕地和建设用地面积变化最明显;秦岭生态系统总服务价值逐年增长,研究期间共增长1.68×10¹⁷元,增长速率最快的森林生态系统服务价值的贡献率为93.8%,水域和草地的贡献率分别为1.6%和1.3%;生态系统服务价值在空间分布上呈现出随距研究区边界距离增大而增长的状态,且与秦岭土地利用类型的空间分布和单位面积价值基本一致;各项服务功能的年变化率相差不显著,4大生态系统功能中,调节服务价值对生态系统总服务价值的贡献最大(62.7%～65.8%),而气候调节服务价值变化最大,增加4.91×10¹⁶元;敏感性指数均小于1,表明修正后的服务价值指数较稳定,估算结果较可靠.秦岭森林生态系统服务价值巨大,加强森林生态系统的保护是维持秦岭生态系统稳定的有效措施.

关键词: 森林生态系统, 秦岭, 单元格修订, 服务功能, 区域修订

Abstract: Landsat TM images of Mt. Qinling in 1984, 2000, 2005, and 2014 were used to extract land use and land cover type by a supervised classification method in ERDAS software. Equivalent factor of ecosystem service value per unit area was revised regionally in temporal and spatial dimensions, and then was modified pixel by pixel using the vegetation coverage. Forest ecosystem service values from 1984 to 2014 were calculated with RS and GIS techniques, and the results were tested by the sensitivity index. The results showed that from 1984 to 2014, forest area accounted for 77% of the study area, and the area changes in cultivated land and construction land were the most obvious. The total ecosystem service value of Mt. Qinling increased annually and by a total of 1.68×10¹⁷ yuan during the study period. The forest ecosystem service value (its growth rate was the biggest) contributed 93.8% of the overall ecosystem service value, while water and grass ecosystem service value contributed 1.6% and 1.3%, respectively. The ecosystem service value tended to increase with increasing distance from the study area boundary, which was consistent with the spatial distribution and per-unit ecosystem service value of land use types in Mt. Qinling. The annual rate of change of each ecosystem service value was insignificant. Among the four ecosystem functions, the service value of regulation accounted for 62.7%-65.8% of the total ecosystem service value, and the service value of climate regulation showed the most dramatic increase by 4.91×10¹⁶ yuan over the study period. The sensitivity index was <1, which indicated that the modified service value index was stable and the calculated results were reliable. Overall, the forest ecosystem service value in Mt. Qinling was very large, and strengthening forest protection would be an effective measure for maintaining the stability of the Mt. Qinling ecosystem.

Key words: forest ecosystem, Qinling, grid revision, region revision, services

殷莎, 赵永华, 韩磊, 王耀斌, 蔡健. 秦岭森林生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(12): 3777-3786.

YIN Sha, ZHAO Yong-hua, HAN Lei, WANG Yao-bin, CAI Jian. Evaluation of the forest ecosystem service values in Qinling, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(12): 3777-3786.

参考文献

[1] Daily GC. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 2000, 289: 395-396
[2] Chen S, Ju WM, Li XF. Effects of land use change on ecological service value in Changshu city. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16: 93-97
[3] Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, et al. Analysis of historic change in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecological Indicators, 2011, 11: 676-687
[4] Wang Y-K (汪有奎), Guo S-Y (郭生祥), Wang J (汪杰). Estimation of forest ecosystem service value in the Qilian Mountains National Nature Reserve in Gansu of China. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 2013, 33(6): 1905-1911 (in Chinese)
[5] Zhao Z-B (赵忠宝), Li K-G (李克国), Zeng G-J (曾光娟), et al. Evaluation of forest ecosystem service va-lues in Qinhuangdao. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 2012, 26(2): 31-35 (in Chinese)
[6] Zhang P-X (张佩霞), Hou C-M (侯长谋), Hu C-Z (胡成志), et al. Evaluation of forest ecosystem services in Heshan, Guangdong. Tropical Geography (热带地理), 2010, 30(6): 628-632 (in Chinese)
[7] Zhao J-L (赵金龙), Wang L-X (王泺鑫), Han H-R (韩海荣), et al. Research advances and trends in fo-rest ecosystem services value evaluation. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2013, 32(8): 2229-2237 (in Chinese)
[8] Stephen RK. Assessing wildlife and environmental values in cost-benefit analysis. Environmental Management, 1984, 18: 355-363
[9] Loomis JB, Walsh RG. Assessing wildlife and environmental values in cost benefit analysis: State of art. Journal of Environmental Management, 1986, 2: 125-131
[10] Sutton PC, Constanza R. Global estimates of market and nonmarket values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecolo-gical Economics, 2002, 41: 509-527
[11] Yu X-X (余新晓), Lu S-W (鲁绍伟), Jin F (靳芳), et al. The assessment of the forest ecosystem ser-vices evaluation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2005, 25(8): 2096-2102 (in Chinese)
[12] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[13] Xiao Q (肖强), Xiao Y (肖洋), Ouyang Z-Y (欧阳志云), et al. Value assessment of the function of the forest ecosystem services in Chongqing. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2014, 34(1): 216-223 (in Chinese)
[14] Feng Y-M (冯益明), Che K-J (车克钧), Cao X-W (曹秀文), et al.Valuation of eco-service functions of major forest types in Bailongjiang Forest Region of Gansu Province. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (中南林业科技大学学报), 2014, 34(10): 102-107 (in Chinese)
[15] Pan Y-J (潘永军), Chen B-F (陈步峰), Wang B (王兵), et al. Assessment of service functions of fo-rest ecosystem for Guangzhou. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (中南林业科技大学学报), 2013, 33(5): 73-78 (in Chinese)
[16] State Forestry Administration (国家林业局). Specification for assessment of forest ecosystem services in China. Beijing: State Forestry Administration, 2008 (in Chinese)
[17] Robertson GP, Swinton SM. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environment integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2005, 3: 38-46
[18] Zhang B, Li WH, Xie GD. Ecosystem services research in China: Progress and perspective. Ecological Econo-mics, 2010, 69: 1389-1395
[19] Yu ZY, Bi H. The key problems and future direction of ecosystem services research. Energy Proceida, 2011, 5: 64-68
[20] Yu ZY, Bi H. Status quo of research on ecosystem ser-vices value in China and suggestions to future research. Energy Proscenia, 2011, 5: 1044-1048
[21] Sun J. Research advances and trends in ecosystem ser-vices and evaluation in China. Procedia Environment Sciences, 2011, 10: 1791-1796
[22] Xie G-D (谢高地), Zhang C-X (张彩霞), Zhang L-M (张雷明), et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Nature Resources (自然资源学报), 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254 (in Chinese)
[23] Wang WJ, Guo HC, Chuai XW, et al. The impact of land use change on the temporo-spatial variations of ecosystems services value in China and an optimized land use solution. Environment Science & Policy, 2014, 44: 62-72
[24] Yan E-P (严恩萍), Lin H (林辉), Wang G-X (王广兴), et al. Analysis of evolution and driving force of ecosystem service values in the Three Gorges Reservoir region during 1990-2011. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2014, 34(20): 5962-5973 (in Chinese)
[25] Zheng D-F (郑德凤), Zang Z (臧正), Sun C-Z (孙才志). An improved ecosystem service value model and application in ecological economic evaluation. Resources Science (资源科学), 2014, 36(3): 584-593 (in Chinese)
[26] Wu G (吴钢), Xiao H (肖寒), Zhao J-Z (赵景柱), et al. Forest ecosystem service in Changbaishan. Science in China (中国科学), 2001, 31(5): 471-480 (in Chinese)
[27] Zhao T-Q (赵同谦), Ouyang Z-Y (欧阳志云), Zheng H (郑华), et al. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2004, 19(4): 480-491 (in Chinese)
[28] Pei S (裴厦). Flow Processes of Typical Ecosystem Services and Their Value based on Data from Field Station. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Insitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013 (in Chinese)
[29] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局). National Standards of the People’s Republic of China (GB/T 21010-2007). Current Land Use Condition Classification. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2007 (in Chinese)
[30] Zhou D-C (周德成), Luo G-P (罗格平), Xu W-Q (许文强), et al. Dynamics of ecosystem services value in Aksu River watershed in 1960-2008. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2010, 21(2): 399-408 (in Chinese)
[31] Xie G-D (谢高地), Lu C-X (鲁春霞), Leng Y-F (冷允法), et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2003, 18(2): 189-196 (in Chinese)
[32] Xu L-F (徐丽芬), Xu X-G (许学工), Luo T (罗涛), et al. Services based on land use: A case study of Bohai rim. Geographical Research (地理研究), 2012, 31(10): 1775-1784 (in Chinese)
[33] Shi Y, Wang RS, Huang JL, et al. An analysis of the spatial and temporal changes in Chinese terrestrial ecosystem service function. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012, 57: 2120-2131
[34] Bi X-L (毕晓丽), Ge J-P (葛剑平). Evaluating ecosystem service valuation in China based on the IGBP land cover datasets. Journal of Mountain Science (山地学报), 2004, 22(1): 48-53 (in Chinese)
[35] Gutman G, Ignatov A. The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998, 19: 1533-1543
[36] Wu H-Z (吴海珍), A R-H (阿如旱), Guo T-B (郭田保), et al. Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services value in Duolun County of Inner Mongolia based on RS and GIS. Scientia Geographica Sinica (地理科学), 2011, 31(1): 110-116 (in Chinese)
[37] National People’s Congress Standing Committee (全国人民代表大会常务委员会). Forestry Law of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: National People’s Congress Standing Committee, 1984 (in Chinese)