松嫩平原两种趋异类型羊草对干旱胁迫的生理响应

应用生态学报 ›› 2002, Vol. ›› Issue (9): 1109-1112.

松嫩平原两种趋异类型羊草对干旱胁迫的生理响应

周婵, 杨允菲, 李建东

东北师范大学草地研究所, 教育部植被生态科学重点实验室, 长春 130024

收稿日期:2001-11-30 修回日期:2002-03-15 出版日期:2002-09-15
通讯作者: 杨允菲
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(G1999043407);国家自然科学基金资助项目(30070137,39770536).

Physiological response of two divergent Leymus chinensis types to drought stress in the Songnen Plain

ZHOU Chan, YANG Yunfei, LI Jiandong

Institute of Grassland Science, Northeast Normal University; Key Laboratory for Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, P.R.China, Changchun 130024

Received:2001-11-30 Revised:2002-03-15 Online:2002-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用盆栽实验,对灰绿和黄绿两种趋异类型羊草(Leymus chinensis(Trin.)Tzvel.)幼苗期用聚乙二醇(PEG)胁迫进行干旱生理指标测定.结果表明,在干旱胁迫下,灰绿型羊草和黄绿型羊草的电解质外渗率、脯氨酸、植株含水率、植株鲜重、SO₄^2-、NO₃^-之间均有显著或极显著差异.灰绿型羊草叶片电解质外渗率和叶绿素含量的b值均大于黄绿型羊草,而植株含水率的b值则小于黄绿型羊草.灰绿型羊草脯氨酸含量均大于黄绿型羊草.因子分析表明,脯氨酸是两种趋异类型羊草干旱胁迫生理反应的主要因子.两种趋异类型羊草在生理响应中均体现出耐旱能力,但灰绿型羊草的耐旱能力比黄绿型更强.两种趋异类型羊草在耐旱生理上有明显分化.

关键词: 羊草, 灰绿型, 黄绿型, 干旱胁迫, 盆栽实验, 幼苗期, 定量分析

Abstract: The physiological response of two divergent Leymus chinensis types (grey-green type and yellow-green type) to drought stress was studied by pot experiment. At seedling stage, some physiological indexes of the plants and leaves were measured by taking the divergent types under stress of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Quantitative analyses showed that under drought stress,the electrolyte leakage rate,proline content,water content,fresh weight,and SO₄^2- and NO₃^- contents of two divergent types varied significantly. According to the simulating results by equation y=a+bx, the b values of electrolyte leakage rate and chlorophyll content were higher in grey-green type than in yellow-green type, and the b value of water content of grey-green type was lower than that of yellow-green type. The proline content of grey-green type was higher than that of yellow-green type. Factor analyses showed that proline was the most important factor of physiological response to drought stress of the two types. The two types of L. chinensis had certain capabilities of drought resistance, but the capability of grey-green type was greater than that of yellow-green type. Therefore, the physiological characteristics of drought resistance were significantly differentiated.

中图分类号:

Q948

周婵, 杨允菲, 李建东. 松嫩平原两种趋异类型羊草对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, (9): 1109-1112.

ZHOU Chan, YANG Yunfei, LI Jiandong . Physiological response of two divergent Leymus chinensis types to drought stress in the Songnen Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, (9): 1109-1112.

参考文献

[1] Cui J-Z(崔继哲),Qu L-Y(曲来叶),Zhu Y-G(祖元刚).2000.Genetic diversity and differentiation of two ecotypes of Leymus chinensis populations in microhabitat-allozyme analysis.Acta Ecol Sin(生态学报),20(3):434～439(in Chinese)
[2] Jia S-X(贾慎修).1987.Forage Floras of China. Beijing:Agricultural Press.19～35(in Chinese)
[3] Liu C-H(刘春华),Su J-K(苏加楷),Huang W-H(黄文惠).1993.Studies on the physiological indicators evaluating the salt tolerance of grasses.Acta Prata Sin(草业学报),2(1):46～54(in Chinese)
[4] Ma Z-R(马宗仁),Guo B(郭博).1991.Study on the accumulation of free proline of Elymus breviaristatus and E.Sibiricus under the water stress. Grassl China(中国草地),13(4):12～16(in Chinese)
[5] Merrell OJ.1981.Evolutionary Genetics. London: Longman. 283～287
[6] Qian J(钱吉),Ma Y-H(马玉虹),Ren W-W(任文伟),et al.2000.Comparative study on ecotype differentiation of Leymus chinensis in different geographic populations at moleculat level. Acta Ecol Sin(生态学报),20(3):440～443(in Chinese)
[7] Ren W-W(任文伟),Qian J(钱吉),Ma J(马骏),et al.2000.Comparative study of Leymus chinensis's water content and free proline of different consistency PEG. Acta Ecol Sin(生态学报),20(2):349～352(in Chinese)
[8] Ren W-W(任文伟), Qian J(钱吉), Zheng S-Z(郑师章).1997.Comparison of characteristics of different provenance Leymus chinensis grown under different water-stress conditions. Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报),8(2):157～160(in Chinese)
[9] Turesson G.1992.The species and the variety as ecological unit.Hereditas,3:100～113
[10] Wang B-S(王保山),Zhao K-F(赵可夫).1995.Comparison of extractive methods of Na and K in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol Commun(植物生理学通讯),31(1):50～52(in Chinese)
[11] Wang D-L(王德利),Wang Z-W(王正文),Zhang X-J(张喜军).1999.The comparison of photosynthetic physiological characteristics between the two divergent Leymus chinensis types. Acta Ecol Sin(生态学报),19(6):837～843(in Chinese)
[12] Yang Y-F(杨允菲),Zheng H-Y(郑慧莹),Li J-D(李建东).1997.Comparative study on characters of two divergent types of the clone population Leymus chinensis in the songnen plain of China. Acta Bot Sin(植物学报),39(11):1058～1064(in Chinese)
[13] Zhang D-Z(张殿忠),Wang P-H(汪沛洪),Zhao H-X(赵会贤).1990.Determination of the content of free proline in wheat leaves.Plant Physiol Commun(植物生理学通讯),26(4):62～65(in Chinese)
[14] Zhang X-Z(张宪政).1994.Experimental Technology of Plant Physiology.Shenyang:Liaoning Science & Technology Press.66～69(in Chinese)
[15] Zhang Z-L(张志良).1994.Experimental guide of plant physiology. Beijing:China High Education Press.12～14(in Chinese)
[16] Zhao K-F(赵可夫).1993.Salt-resistance Physiology of Plant.Beijing:China Science & Technology.222～223(in Chinese)
[17] Zhou Y(周英).1977.Comparative observation of nutritious organ of Leymus chinensis.J Haerbin Normal School(哈尔滨师范学院学报),(1):62～63(in Chinese)