种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.027

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 191-200.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.027

种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响

李春越¹, 常顺¹, 钟凡心¹, 薛英龙¹, 苗雨¹, 王益^2*, 党廷辉³

¹陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院, 西安 710119;
²中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710061;
³中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2020-07-16 接受日期:2020-11-01 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: wangyi@ieecas.cn
作者简介:李春越, 女, 1978年生, 博士, 副教授。主要从事土壤生态研究。E-mail: chunyue_li@snnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
陕西省自然科学基金项目(2019JM-518)、国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0501602)、国家自然科学基金项目(41501255,41671269)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项(GK201603073)

Effects of fertilization and planting patterns on soil aggregate and carbon distribution in farmland of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China

LI Chun-yue¹, CHANG Shun¹, ZHONG Fan-xin¹, XUE Ying-long¹, MIAO Yu¹, WANG Yi^2*, DANG Ting-hui³

¹School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China;
²Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China;
³Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2020-07-16 Accepted:2020-11-01 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-07-15
Contact: * E-mail: wangyi@ieecas.cn
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China (2019JM-518), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0501602), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501255, 41671269) and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (GK201603073).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以长武黄土高原农业生态试验站33年长期定位试验处理为研究对象,选取撂荒(R)、小麦连作(CK/W)、小麦玉米轮作(L),小麦连作选取单施氮肥(N)、单施磷肥(P)、施氮磷肥(NP)、单施有机肥(M)、氮肥配施有机肥(NM)、磷肥配施有机肥(PM)、氮磷肥配施有机肥(NPM)共10种不同种植模式和施肥田间处理,运用干湿筛法和TOC法,分析长期不同施肥和种植模式下黄土旱塬农田土壤力稳性和水稳性团聚体数量、稳定性、各粒级团聚体中全碳和有机碳的分布特征,以及各粒级团聚体对碳分布的贡献。结果表明: 力稳性团聚体以>0.25 mm大团聚体为主,含量>67%,施肥使其减少;连作减少了微团聚体,而轮作增加了微团聚体且其效果大于施肥处理。水稳性团聚体以<0.25 mm微团聚体为主,含量>61%;施肥和耕作均减少了水稳性微团聚体。不同施肥方式和种植模式均降低了团聚体破坏率(PAD),增加了大团聚体(R_0.25)含量。施用有机肥显著提高了力稳性团聚体各粒级中全碳和有机碳含量;连作和轮作增加了各粒级团聚体中全碳含量,但轮作显著降低了有机碳含量。单施氮、磷肥使土壤全碳含量降低,而氮磷复合肥和有机肥使土壤全碳含量显著增加;种植模式对全碳的影响较施肥处理小,连作和轮作使土壤全碳增加。除单施氮、磷肥外,复合施肥和施用有机肥使土壤有机碳显著增加;不同种植模式对土壤有机碳的影响小于施肥处理,轮作使有机碳含量降低。微团聚体对土壤全碳和有机碳的贡献率最大,可达21.2%~33.6%;不同施肥和种植模式使微团聚体全碳的贡献率增加,施肥处理中NP和NPM显著增加了微团聚体的全碳和有机碳贡献率,轮作对微团聚体全碳和有机碳的增加趋势贡献最显著。

关键词: 种植模式, 施肥, 黄土高原, 土壤团聚体, 碳分布

Abstract: Based on a long-term experiment in the Changwu Agro-ecological Experimental Station in Xianyang, Shaanxi, China, we examined the effects of fertilization and planting patterns on soil aggregate quantity, aggregate stability and total carbon and organic carbon distribution in different aggregate fractions through dry and wet sieving methods, as well as the TOC combustion method. There were ten treatments, including uncultivated (R), wheat continuous cropping (CK/W), wheat-corn rotation (L), and nitrogen fertilizer (N), phosphorus fertilizer (P), nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer (NP), organic fertilizer (M), nitrogen and organic fertilizer (NM), phosphorus and organic fertilizer (PM), nitrogen and phosphorus and organic fertilizer (NPM) for CK/W. The results showed that fertilizer application and planting patterns affected soil aggregate distribution and stability, the contents and contribution rates of total C and organic C. Force-stable aggregate was mainly constituted by >0.25 mm aggregate (>67%), which was reduced by fertilization. Continuous cropping decreased micro-aggregate while rotation facilitated it and the effect was larger than fertilization. Water-stable aggregate was mainly comprised of micro-aggregate (<0.25 mm), the contribution of which was larger than 61%. Both fertilizer application and planting pattern reduced water-stable micro-aggregate. Fertilizer application and planting pattern decreased the percentage of aggregate destruction rate (PAD) and increased macro-aggregate (>0.25 mm, R_0.25) content. Organic fertilizer significantly improved total C and organic C concentrations in all the fractions of force-stable aggregates. Continuous cropping and rotation cropping increased total C concentration in all the aggregate fractions while rotation cropping significantly decreased organic C concentration. Single N and P fertilization decreased soil total C concentration, while mixed application of N and P fertilizers, and organic fertilizer significantly increased soil total C concentration. The effect of planting patterns on soil total C was lower than that of fertilization. Both continuous cropping and rotation cropping increased soil total C. Mixed application of N and P fertilizers, and organic fertilizer signifi-cantly increased soil organic C concentration while single N and P fertilization decreased it. The effect of planting patterns on soil organic C was lower than that of fertilization, while rotation cropping did not facilitate soil organic C. Micro-aggregate was the most notable size fraction to total carbon and organic C, with the contribution being 21.2%-33.6%. Fertilization and planting pattern increased the contribution rate of micro-aggregate in soil total C. NP and NPM significantly increased the contribution rate of micro-aggregate in soil total C and soil organic C. The effect of rotation cropping was most obvious in driving the contribution rate of micro-aggregate in soil total C and soil organic C.

Key words: planting pattern, fertilization, Loess Plateau, soil aggregate, carbon distribution

李春越, 常顺, 钟凡心, 薛英龙, 苗雨, 王益, 党廷辉. 种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 191-200.

LI Chun-yue, CHANG Shun, ZHONG Fan-xin, XUE Ying-long, MIAO Yu, WANG Yi, DANG Ting-hui. Effects of fertilization and planting patterns on soil aggregate and carbon distribution in farmland of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1): 191-200.

参考文献

[1] Crowther TW, Todd-Brown KE, Rowe CW, et al. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature, 2017, 540: 104-108
[2] Zhao J, Chen S, Hu R, et al. Aggregate stability and size distribution of red soils under different land uses integrally regulated by soil organic matter, and iron and aluminum oxides. Soil and Tillage Research, 2017, 167: 73-79
[3] Paul BK, Vanlauwe B, Ayuke F, et al. Medium-term impact of tillage and residue management on soil aggregate stability, soil carbon and crop productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2013, 164: 14-22
[4] 胡廷飞, 王辉, 谭帅. 再生水灌溉模式对土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(1): 143-151 [Hu T-F, Wang H, Tan S. Distribution characteristics of soil aggregates and their associated organic carbon under different irrigation modes with reclaimed water. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(1): 143-151]
[5] 宋丽萍, 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 等. 苜蓿-作物轮作模式对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(1): 27-35 [Song L-P, Luo Z-Z, Li L-L, et al. Effects of lucerne-crop rotation patterns on soil aggregate stability and soil organic carbon. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(1): 27-35]
[6] Marschner P, Kandeler E, Marschner B. Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35: 453-461
[7] 张丽莉, 武志杰, 陈利军, 等. 不同种植制度土壤氧化还原酶活性和动力学特征. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(1): 343-347 [Zhang L-L, Wu Z-J, Chen L-J, et al. Soil oxidoreductase activity and its kinetic characteri-stics under different cropping system. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009, 18(1): 343-347]
[8] 陈朝, 吕昌河, 范兰, 等. 土地利用变化对土壤有机碳的影响研究进展. 生态学报, 2011, 31(18): 5358-5371 [Chen C, Lyu C-H, Fan L, et al. Effects of land use change on soil organic carbon: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(18): 5358-5371]
[9] 贾豪, 严宁珍, 程永毅, 等. 渝东南农田土壤有机碳空间分布特征及影响因素. 核农学报, 2019, 33(6): 1256-1263 [Jia H, Yan N-Z, Chen Y-Y, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and influence factors of soil organic carbon in farmland in Southeast Chongqing. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(6): 1256-1263]
[10] 李玮, 陈欢, 曹承富, 等. 不同施肥模式对砂姜黑土团聚体特征及有机碳的影响. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(32): 64-72 [Li W, Chen H, Cao C-F, et al. Effects of fertilization patterns on lime concretion black soil aggregate characteristics and organic carbon. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(32): 64-72]
[11] 井大炜, 王明友, 张红, 等. 鸡粪对芸豆土壤有机碳氧化稳定性与碳库管理指数的影响. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(8): 192-200 [Jing D-W, Wang M-Y, Zhang H, et al. Effects of chicken manure co-applied with nitrogen fertilizer on soil organic carbon oxidation stability and carbon pool management index in kidney bean/maize rotation soil. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(8): 192-200]
[12] 张凤华, 王建军. 不同轮作模式对土壤团聚体组成及有机碳分布的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(4): 113-116 [Zhang F-H, Wang J-J. Effect of planting patterns on organic carbon and soil aggregate composition. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(4): 113-116]
[13] 李廷亮, 李顺, 谢英荷, 等. 不同施肥措施对晋南旱塬麦田土壤碳氮变化的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(11): 43-49 [Li T-L, Li S, Xie Y-H, et al. Effect of different fertilization patterns on soil carbon and nitrogen changes of dryland wheat field in Southern Shanxi of China. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(11): 43-49]
[14] 毛霞丽, 陆扣萍, 何丽芝, 等. 长期施肥对浙江稻田土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布的影响. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 828-838 [Mao X-L, Lu K-P, He L-Z, et al. Effects of long-term fertilizer application on distribution of aggregates and aggregate-associated organic carbon in paddy soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4): 828-838]
[15] 陆琪, 马红彬, 俞鸿千, 等. 轮牧方式对荒漠草原土壤团聚体及有机碳特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 3028-3038 [Lu Q, Ma H-B, Yu H-Q, et al. Effects of rotational grazing methods on soil aggregates and organic carbon characteristics in desert steppe. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(9): 3028-3038]
[16] Du ZL, Ren TS, Hu CS, et al. Soil aggregate stability and aggregate-associated carbon under different tillage systems in the North China Plain. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12: 2114-2123
[17] 齐中凯, 赵诣, 黄智勇, 等. 不同施肥措施对华北平原土壤有机碳的影响. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(6): 271-277 [Qi Z-K, Zhao Y, Huang Z-Y, et al. Impacts of different fertilization measures on soil organic carbon in the North China Plain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(6): 271-277]
[18] 魏艳春, 马天娥, 魏孝荣, 等. 黄土高原旱地不同种植系统对土壤水稳性团聚体及碳氮分布的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(2): 305-313 [Wei Y-C, Ma T-E, Wei X-R, et al. Effects of cropping systems on distribution of water-stable aggregates and organic carbon and nitrogen in soils in semiarid farmland of the Loess Plateau. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2016, 35(2): 305-313]
[19] 吕欣欣, 丁雪丽, 张彬, 等. 长期定位施肥和地膜覆盖对棕壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳含量的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(1): 1-10 [Lyu X-X, Ding X-L, Zhang B, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization and plastic-mulching on the stability and organic carbon contents of brown soil aggregates. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2018, 35(1): 1-10]
[20] 冷延慧, 汪景宽, 李双异. 长期施肥对黑土团聚体分布和碳储量变化的影响. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(12): 2171-2177 [Leng Y-H, Wang J-K, Li S-Y. Effects of long-term fertilization on aggregates size distribution and carbon stock in black soil. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(12): 2171-2177]
[21] Du Z, Ren T, Hu C, et al. Transition from intensive tillage to no-till enhances carbon sequestration in microaggregates of surface soil in the North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research, 2015, 146: 26-31
[22] Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K, et al. Aggregation and soil organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1998, 62: 1367-1377
[23] 孙彩丽, 薛萐, 刘国彬, 等. 黄土区不同施肥对土壤颗粒及微团聚体组成的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3): 550-561 [Sun C-L, Xue S, Liu G-B, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil particles and microaggregate distribution in the loess area. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(3): 550-561]
[24] Huang R, Lan ML, Liu J, et al. Soil aggregate and organic carbon distribution at dry land soil and paddy soil: The role of different straws returning. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24: 27942-27952
[25] 张鹏, 周泉, 黄国勤. 冬季不同种植模式对稻田土壤团聚体及其有机碳的影响. 核农学报, 2019, 33(12): 2430-2438 [Zhang P, Zhou Q, Huang G-Q. Effects of winter different planting patterns on soil aggregates and organic carbon in paddy fields. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(12): 2430-2438]
[26] 荣勤雷, 李若楠, 黄绍文, 等. 不同施肥模式下设施菜田土壤团聚体养分和微生物量特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(7): 1084-1096 [Rong Q-L, Li R-N, Huang S-W, et al. Characteristics of nutrients and microbial biomass in soil aggregates under different fertilization modes in greenhouse vegetable production. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(7): 1084-1096]
[27] Hom R, Taubner H, Wuttke M, et al. Soil physical properties related to soil structure. Soil and Tillage Research, 1994, 30: 187-216
[28] 张亚杰, 钱慧慧, 刘坤平, 等. 施肥对玉米/大豆套作土壤活性有机碳组分及碳库管理指数的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(3): 29-36 [Zhang Y-J, Qian H-H, Liu K-P, et al. Effect of fertilization on soil active organic carbon and carbon pool management index under maize/soybean intercropping condition. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(3): 29-36]
[29] 段建南, 李旭霖, 王改兰. 黄土高原土壤变化及其过程模拟. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001 [Duan J-N, Li X-L, Wang G-L. Soil Variation and Its Process Simulation on the Loess Plateau. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001]
[30] 朱利群, 杨敏芳, 徐敏轮, 等. 不同施肥措施对我国南方稻田表土有机碳含量及固碳持续时间的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(1): 87-95 [Zhu L-Q, Yang M-F, Xu M-L, et al. Effects of different fertilization modes on paddy field topsoil organic carbon content and carbon sequestration duration in South China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(1): 87-95]
[31] 刘杰, 马艳婷, 王宪玲, 等. 渭北旱塬土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响. 环境科学, 2019, 40(7): 3361-3368 [Liu J, Ma Y-T, Wang X-L, et al. Impact of land use type on the stability and organic carbon content of soil aggregates in the Weibei dryland. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(7): 3361-3368]

种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响

Effects of fertilization and planting patterns on soil aggregate and carbon distribution in farmland of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卢国伟, 王琦璇, 杨继松, 孙丹丹, 王志康, 周迪, 管博, 于君宝, 宁凯. 黄河三角洲稻田退耕还湿对土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 705-712.
[2]	谢京瑾, 许秋月, 何敏, 夏允, 范跃新, 杨柳明. 中亚热带森林更新方式对土壤团聚体磷组分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 330-338.
[3]	熊涵, 刘彦伶, 李渝, 张雅蓉, 黄兴成, 杨叶华, 朱华清, 蒋太明. 长期不同施肥模式对黄壤旱地土壤细菌群落结构和土壤养分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1949-1956.
[4]	王娇, 关欣, 黄苛, 段萱, 陈波翰, 张伟东, 杨庆朋. 酸雨和根系去除对杉木和火力楠人工林土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 937-945.
[5]	吴应明, 韩璐, 刘柯言, 胡旭, 付照琦, 陈立欣. 晋西黄土区不同土壤水分条件下刺槐和侧柏人工林的水分利用来源 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 588-596.
[6]	刘莲莲, 尚妍萌, 张杰, 李廷亮, 谢英荷, 谢钧宇, 李丽娜, 洪坚平. 不同施肥处理对晋南旱塬麦田土壤微生物功能多样性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 671-678.
[7]	韩星, 于海洋, 郑宁国, 葛超荣, 姚槐应. 茶园氧化亚氮排放研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 805-814.
[8]	王依瑞, 王彦辉, 段文标, 李平平, 于澎涛, 甄理, 李志鑫, 尚会军. 黄土高原刺槐人工林郁闭度对林下植物多样性特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 305-314.
[9]	裴亚楠, 吕卫光, 郭涛, 白娜玲, 李双喜, 张娟琴, 张海韵, 张翰林. 秸秆还田配施促腐菌剂对土壤团聚体及其养分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3357-3363.
[10]	王鹏, 温明霞, 金龙飞, 刘烽, 陆麒, 曹明奡, 黄贝, 吴韶辉. 不同施肥处理对柑橘根围土壤质量及丛枝菌根定殖的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2805-2812.
[11]	邓米林, 叶桂萍, 胥超, 宛颂, 贺纪正, 林永新. 天然林转人工林对亚热带森林土壤团聚体中亚硝酸盐还原基因丰度的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 25-30.
[12]	石丽红, 唐海明, 文丽, 程凯凯, 李超, 李微艳, 肖小平. 长期不同施肥模式对南方双季稻田生态系统净碳汇效应和经济收益的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2450-2456.
[13]	董振洁, 郭亚茹, 侯琳. 秦岭华山松营养诊断与林地施肥 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2051-2056.
[14]	王彦峰, 肖波, 汪万福, 余星兴, 张雪. 黄土高原北部水蚀风蚀交错区苔藓多样性及苔藓结皮发育的微生境特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1729-1737.
[15]	温慧娴, 赵西宁, 高飞. 黄土高原不同降水量区苹果园土壤干燥化效应及生产水足迹模 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1927-1936.