不同倍性猕猴桃的适生区预测及生态位分化

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.014

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 3167-3176.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.014

不同倍性猕猴桃的适生区预测及生态位分化

刘彩艳^1,2, 李大卫³, 杨石建^1,2, 潘志立^2,4, 金若涵^1,2, 陈芳^1,2, 郭雯^1,2*

¹云南省植物繁殖适应与进化生态学重点实验室, 昆明 650500;
²云南大学生态与环境学院, 昆明 650500;
³中国科学院武汉植物园, 武汉 430074;
⁴云南大学资源植物研究院, 昆明 650504

收稿日期:2021-03-19 接受日期:2021-06-03 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2022-03-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: guowen@ynu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘彩艳,女,1995年生,硕士研究生。主要从事多倍体植物分布区分化的适应性生理生态机制研究。E-mail: liucaiyan0319@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31800334,31760114)和云南省科技厅基础研究计划项目(2019FD004,202101AT070180)资助

Potential suitable area and niche shift of different ploidy kiwifruit

LIU Cai-yan^1,2, LI Da-wei³, YANG Shi-jian^1,2, PAN Zhi-li^2,4, JIN Ruo-han^1,2, CHEN Fang^1,2, GUO Wen^1,2*

¹Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plant Reproductive Adaption and Evolutionary Ecology, Kunming 650500, China;
²College of Ecology & Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China;
³Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
⁴Economic Plant Institute, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China

Received:2021-03-19 Accepted:2021-06-03 Online:2021-09-15 Published:2022-03-15
Contact: * E-mail: guowen@ynu.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31800334, 31760114) and the Fundamental Research Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2019FD004, 202101AT070180)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 多倍体与2倍体植物之间的生态位分化是多倍体植物成功建立的重要条件。2倍体、4倍体和6倍体猕猴桃分布在不同的地区,目前尚不明确不同倍性猕猴桃之间是否发生了明显的生态位分化,也不明确影响不同倍性猕猴桃生态位的主要环境因子。本研究通过文献查阅和野外调查收集不同倍性猕猴桃的自然分布点,利用最大熵模型预测不同倍性猕猴桃在当前气候条件下的潜在适生区及影响其分布的主导气候因子,并通过生态位一致性检验评估不同倍性猕猴桃间的生态位差异。结果表明: 不同倍性猕猴桃的潜在适生区存在明显差异,2倍体猕猴桃的高适生区集中在海拔较低的湖南丘陵;4倍体猕猴桃的高适生区大部分与2倍体重叠,但有部分向贵州北部、重庆东部区域偏移;6倍体猕猴桃的高适生区则集中分布在贵州大部、湖南西北部、湖北西南部和陕西南部。6倍体猕猴桃明显向高海拔、高纬度地区偏移,并且有更广的高适生区面积。生态位一致性检验证明,2倍体与4倍体猕猴桃有重叠的生态位,而2倍体与6倍体、4倍体与6倍体猕猴桃之间均发生了明显的生态位分化。最冷月最低温(Bio6)和最干月降雨量(Bio14)是影响不同倍性猕猴桃生态位分化的主要环境因素。多倍体猕猴桃在较低的Bio6和Bio14下能保持较高的存在概率,表明多倍体猕猴桃能占据低温、干旱的极端生态位。

关键词: 多倍化, 猕猴桃, 生态位分化, 最大熵模型, 环境因素

Abstract: Niche shift between polyploid and diploid plants is an important requirement for the success of polyploid. Diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid of kiwifruit distribute in different areas. Whether there is obvious niche differentiation and the major environmental factors which could influence the ecological niche of different ploidy kiwifruits are still unknown. Based on the natural distribution information collected from literature and by field works, the maximum entropy model (MaxEnt) was used to predict the potentially suitable ranges and the major climatic factors affecting distribution of different ploidy kiwifruits. Niche divergence between different ploidy kiwifruits was quantified by niche identity test. The results showed that there were obvious differences in the potential suitable areas of different ploidy kiwifruits. Diploid occurred in lower altitude Hunan foothills. Tetraploid nearly overlapped with diploid but tended to northern Guizhou and eastern Chongqing. Hexaploid were centered in Guizhou Plateau, northwestern Hunan, southwestern Hubei and southern Shanxi. Hexaploid kiwifruits preferred higher altitudes and latitudes. In addition, the hexaploid had wider highly suitable areas. Results of niche identity test showed overlapped niches between diploid and tetraploid, and different niches between diploid/tetraploid and hexaploid kiwifruits. Minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio6) and precipitation of the driest month (Bio14) were key environmental factors driving the niche shift of ploidy kiwifruits. Polyploid kiwifruits could maintain a higher probability of existence under lower Bio6 and Bio14, which indicated more extreme niche in cold and arid mountains for polyploids.

Key words: polyploidization, kiwifruit, niche shift, maximum entropy model, environmental factor

刘彩艳, 李大卫, 杨石建, 潘志立, 金若涵, 陈芳, 郭雯. 不同倍性猕猴桃的适生区预测及生态位分化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3167-3176.

LIU Cai-yan, LI Da-wei, YANG Shi-jian, PAN Zhi-li, JIN Ruo-han, CHEN Fang, GUO Wen. Potential suitable area and niche shift of different ploidy kiwifruit[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(9): 3167-3176.

参考文献

[1] Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, et al. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106: 13875-13879
[2] Van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K. The evolutio-nary significance of polyploidy. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2017, 18: 411-424
[3] Soltis DE, Buggs RJA, Doyle JJ, et al. What we still don't know about polyploidy. Taxon, 2010, 59: 1387-1403
[4] Levin DA. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon, 1975, 24: 35-43
[5] Ramsey J, Ramsey TS. Ecological studies of polyploidy in the 100 years following its discovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2014, 369, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0352
[6] Li WL, Berlyn GP, Ashton PMS. Polyplolds and their structural and physiological characteristics relative to water deficit in Betula papyrifera (Betulaceae). American Journal of Botany, 1996, 83: 15-20
[7] Glennon KL, Ritchie ME, Segraves KA. Evidence for shared broad-scale climatic niches of diploid and polyploid plants. Ecology Letters, 2014, 17: 574-582
[8] te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, et al. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany, 2012, 109: 19-45
[9] Cheng J, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Autopolyploidy-driven range expansion of a temperate-originated plant to pan-tropic under global change. Ecological Monographs, 2021, 91, doi: 10.1002/ecm.1445
[10] Visser V, Molofsky J. Ecological niche differentiation of polyploidization is not supported by environmental diffe-rences among species in a cosmopolitan grass genus. American Journal of Botany, 2015, 102: 36-49
[11] Broennimann O, Fitzpatrick MC, Pearman PB, et al. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeo-graphy, 2012, 21: 481-497
[12] Phillips SJ, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive eva-luation. Ecography, 2008, 31: 161-175
[13] 李国庆, 刘长成, 刘玉国, 等. 物种分布模型理论研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33(16): 4827-4835 [Li G-Q, Liu C-C, Liu Y-G, et al. Advances in theoretical issues of species distribution models. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(16): 4827-4835]
[14] 肖麒, 章梦婷, 吴翼, 等. 基于生态位模型的外来入侵种克氏原螯虾在中国的适生区预测. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 309-318 [Xiao Q, Zhang M-T, Wu Y, et al. Prediction of potential distribution of the invasive species Procambarus clarkii in China based on ecological niche models. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 309-318]
[15] 王庆莉, 王茹琳, 张利平, 等. 基于MaxEnt模型的川西高原松茸气候生态适宜性与潜在分布. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7), doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.013 [Wang Q-L, Wang R-L, Zhang L-P, et al. Climatic ecological suitability and potential distribution of Tricholoma matsutake in western Sichuan Plateau, China based on MaxEnt model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7), doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.013]
[16] 王婧如, 王明浩, 张晓玮, 等. 同倍体杂交物种紫果云杉的生态位分化及其未来潜在分布区预测. 林业科学, 2018, 54(6): 63-72 [Wang J-R, Wang M-H, Zhang X-W, et al. The ecological divergence and projection of future potential distribution of homoploid hybrid species Picea purpurea. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(6): 63-72]
[17] Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution, 2008, 62: 2868-2883
[18] Dellinger AS, Essl F, Hojsgaard D, et al. Niche dynamics of alien species do not differ among sexual and apomictic flowering plants. New Phytologist, 2016, 209: 1313-1323
[19] Li GQ, Zhang XP, Huang JH, et al. Afforestation and climatic niche dynamics of black locust (Robinia pseu-doacacia). Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 407: 184-190
[20] Wu H, Ma T, Kang M, et al. A high-quality Actinidia chinensis (kiwifruit) genome. Horticulture Research, 2019, 6, doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0202-y
[21] 黄宏文, 龚俊杰, 王圣梅, 等. 猕猴桃属(Actinidia)植物的遗传多样性. 生物多样性, 2000, 8(1): 1-12 [Huang H-W, Gong J-J, Wang S-M, et al. Genetic diversity in the genus Actinidia. Biodiversity Science, 2000, 8(1): 1-12]
[22] Li DW, Liu YF, Zhong CH, et al. Morphological and cytotype variation of wild kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis complex) along an altitudinal and longitudinal gradient in central-west China. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 164: 72-83
[23] 黄韦. 中华猕猴桃/美味猕猴桃复合体自然居群倍性变异格局的研究. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2009 [Huang W. Studies on Ploidy Variance Pattern of Natural Populations in Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis/Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa complex. Master Thesis. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2009]
[24] 曾华, 李大卫, 黄宏文. 中华猕猴桃和美味猕猴桃的倍性变异及地理分布研究. 武汉植物学研究, 2009, 27(3): 312-317 [Zeng H, Li D-W, Huang H-W. Distribution pattern of ploidy variation of Actinidia chinensis and A. deliciosa. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 2009, 27(3): 312-317]
[25] 闫春林. 中华猕猴桃复合体染色体倍性与cpDNA单倍型的地理分布变异. 硕士论文. 武汉: 中国科学院武汉植物园, 2016 [Yan C-L. Geographic Distribution of Variation in Chromosome Ploidy and cpDNA Haplotype in Actinidia chinensis Complex. Master Thesis. Wuhan: Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016]
[26] Li L, Zhang J, Lu ZQ, et al. Genomic data reveal two distinct species from the widespread alpine ginger Roscoea tibetica Batalin (Zingiberaceae). Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2020, 58, doi: 10.1111/jse.12596
[27] Zhao JL, Gugger PF, Xia YM, et al. Ecological divergence of two closely related Roscoea species associated with late quaternary climate change. Journal of Biogeo-graphy, 2016, 43: 1990-2001
[28] 王运生, 谢丙炎, 万方浩, 等. ROC曲线分析在评价入侵物种分布模型中的应用. 生物多样性, 2007, 15(4): 365-372 [Wang Y-S, Xie B-Y, Wan F-H, et al. Application of ROC curve analysis in evaluating the performance of alien species' potential distribution models. Biodiversity Science, 2007, 15(4): 365-372]
[29] Zhang K, Yao L, Meng J, et al. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential geographical distribution of two peony species under climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634: 1326-1334
[30] 王茹琳, 王明田, 罗家栋, 等. 基于MaxEnt模型的美味猕猴桃在中国气候适宜性分析. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 34(3): 522-531 [Wang R-L, Wang M-T, Luo J-D, et al. The analysis of climate suita-bility and regionalization of Actinidia deliciosa by using MaxEnt model in China. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University: Natural Science, 2019, 34(3): 522-531]
[31] Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. ENMTools: A toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography, 2010, 33: 607-611
[32] Schoener TW. The anolis lizards of bimini: Resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology, 1968, 49: 704-726
[33] 张杰, 敖子强, 吴永明, 等. 中华猕猴桃(Actinidia chinensis)在中国的适生性及其潜在地理分布模拟预测. 热带地理, 2017, 37(2): 218-225 [Zhang J, Ao Z-Q, Wu Y-M, et al. Prediction of potential geographic distribution of Actinidia chinensis in China based on maximum entropy niche model and ArcGIS. Tropical Geography, 2017, 37(2): 218-225]
[34] 王茹琳, 李庆, 何仕松, 等. 中华猕猴桃在中国潜在分布及其对气候变化响应的研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(1): 27-37 [Wang R-L, Li Q, He S-S, et al. Potential distribution of Actinidia chinensis in China and its predicted responses to climate change. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(1): 27-37]
[35] Marchant DB, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Patterns of abiotic niche shifts in allopolyploids relative to their progenitors. New Phytologist, 2016, 212: 708-718
[36] López-Jurado J, Mateos-Naranjo E, Balao F. Niche divergence and limits to expansion in the high polyploid Dianthus broteri complex. New Phytologist, 2019, 222: 1076-1087
[37] López-Alvarez D, Manzaneda AJ, Rey PJ, et al. Environmental niche variation and evolutionary diversification of the Brachypodium distachyon grass complex species in their native circum-Mediterranean range. American Journal of Botany, 2015, 102: 1073-1088
[38] Thompson KA, Husband BC, Maherali H. Climatic niche differences between diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany, 2014, 101: 1868-1875
[39] Muoz-Pajares AJ, Perfectti F, Loureiro J, et al. Niche differences may explain the geographic distribution of cytotypes in Erysimum mediohispanicum. Plant Biology, 2018, 20: 139-147
[40] Decanter L, Colling G, Elvinger N, et al. Ecological niche differences between two polyploid cytotypes of Saxi-fraga rosacea. American Journal of Botany, 2020, 107: 423-435
[41] Van de Peer Y, Ashman TL, Soltis PS, et al. Polyploidy: An evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times. Plant Cell, 2020, doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa015
[42] Rice A, Smarda P, Novosolov M, et al. The global biogeography of polyploid plants. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 3: 265-273
[43] Wan JZ, Chen LX, Gao S, et al. Ecological niche shift between diploid and tetraploid plants of Fragaria (Rosaceae) in China. South African Journal of Botany, 2019, 121: 68-75
[44] 屈振江, 周广胜. 中国主栽猕猴桃品种的气候适宜性区划. 中国农业气象, 2017, 38(4): 257-266 [Qu Z-J, Zhou G-S. Regionalization of climatic suitability for major kiwifruit cultivars in China. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2017, 38(4): 257-266]
[45] 王雅美, 张蜀宁, 郑于莉, 等. 四倍体不结球白菜抗寒基因表达及生理生长特性. 南京农业大学学报, 2014, 37(5): 41-46 [Wang Y-M, Zhang S-N, Zheng Y-L, et al. Expression of cold-related genes and physiological characteristics of the diploid and tetraploid non-heading Chinese cabbage. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014, 37(5): 41-46]
[46] Manzaneda AJ, Rey PJ, Bastida JM, et al. Environmental aridity is associated with cytotype segregation and polyploidy occurrence in Brachypodium distachyon (Poaceae). New Phytologist, 2012, 193: 797-805
[47] Zhang WW, Song J, Wang M, et al. Divergences in hydraulic architecture form an important basis for niche differentiation between diploid and polyploid species in NE China. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37: 604-616
[48] 高敏霞, 杨俊, 程春振, 等. 猕猴桃抗旱研究进展. 东南园艺, 2019, 7(5): 63-68 [Gao M-X, Yang J, Cheng C-Z, et al. Research progress on drought resis-tance in kiwifruit. Southeast Horticulture, 2019, 7(5): 63-68]
[49] 林苗苗, 孙世航, 齐秀娟, 等. 猕猴桃抗寒性研究进展. 果树学报, 2020, 37(7): 1073-1079 [Lin M-M, Sun S-H, Qi X-J, et al. Advances in research of cold resistance in kiwifruit. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(7): 1073-1079]
[50] Rey PJ, Manzaneda AJ, Alcantara JM. The interplay between aridity and competition determines colonization ability, exclusion and ecological segregation in the heteroploid Brachypodium distachyon species complex. New Phytologist, 2017, 215: 85-96
[51] Pandit MK, Pocock MJO, Kunin WE. Ploidy influences rarity and invasiveness in plants. Journal of Ecology, 2011, 99: 1108-1115
[52] 裴艳刚, 马利, 岁立云, 等. 不同猕猴桃品种对溃疡病菌的抗性评价及其利用. 果树学报, 2021, 38, doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20200574 [Pei Y-G, Ma L, Sui L-Y, et al. Resistance evaluation of kiwifruit cultivars to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and utilization. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20200574]
[53] 李黎, 钟彩虹, 李大卫, 等. 猕猴桃细菌性溃疡病的研究进展. 华中农业大学学报, 2013, 32(5): 124-133 [Li L, Zhong C-H, Li D-W, et al. Research progress about bacterial canker disease of kiwifruit. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013, 32(5): 124-133]

不同倍性猕猴桃的适生区预测及生态位分化

Potential suitable area and niche shift of different ploidy kiwifruit

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵允格, 吉静怡, 张万涛, 明姣, 黄琬雲, 高丽倩. 黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 739-748.
[2]	张辉盛, 徐琳, 吕韦韦, 周昱, 王卫锋, 高瑞贺, 崔绍朋, 张志伟. 扶桑绵粉蚧多维气候生态位保守性与入侵风险 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1649-1658.
[3]	左一帆, 何宇凡, 王璐, 洒威, 尚千涵, 梁健, 王乐, 李忠虎. 东亚地区羊肚菌属物种响应气候变化的地理分布格局变迁 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 777-786.
[4]	尹再芳, 孙洪刚, 谭梓峰, 刘威. 混交林生产力研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3135-3143.
[5]	李佳奇, 黄亚楠, 石培君, 李志. 陕北黄土区大气降水同位素特征及其水汽来源 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1459-1465.
[6]	刘超, 霍宏亮, 田路明, 董星光, 徐家玉, 齐丹, 张莹, 曹玉芬. 不同气候情景下木梨潜在地理分布格局变化的预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 4073-4079.
[7]	薛银浩, 刘卓苗, 王昊, 赵建. 海洋酸化对微藻关键生理过程的调控机制及环境因素的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3969-3978.
[8]	王静, 周广胜. 中国毛葡萄和刺葡萄分布的气候适宜性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 97-103.
[9]	孔维尧, 李欣海, 邹红菲. 最大熵模型在物种分布预测中的优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(6): 2116-2128.
[10]	王茹琳, 郭翔, 李庆, 王明田, 游超. 四川省猕猴桃溃疡病潜在分布预测及适生区域划分 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4222-4230.
[11]	库永丽, 徐国益, 赵骅, 董天旺, 曹翠玲. 微生物肥料对猕猴桃高龄果园土壤改良和果实品质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2532-2540.
[12]	刘超, 霍宏亮, 田路明, 董星光, 齐丹, 张莹, 徐家玉, 曹玉芬. 基于MaxEnt模型不同气候变化情景下的豆梨潜在地理分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3696-3704.
[13]	吴文, 李月辉, 胡远满, 陈龙, 熊在平. 不同营林面积情景下鹿科动物的潜在生境分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2705-2713.
[14]	董静瑞, 水柏年, 胡成业, 水玉跃, 杜肖, 田阔. 温州南部沿岸海域主要鱼类的生态位及种间联结性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5): 1699-1706.
[15]	郭杰, 刘小平, 张琴, 张东方, 谢彩香, 刘霞. 基于Maxent模型的党参全球潜在分布区预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3): 992-1000.