黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202403.011

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 739-748.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202403.011

黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征

赵允格^1,2*, 吉静怡², 张万涛^1,2, 明姣², 黄琬雲¹, 高丽倩^1,2

¹西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2023-09-26 修回日期:2024-01-18 出版日期:2024-03-18 发布日期:2024-06-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:赵允格, 女, 1971年生, 博士, 研究员。主要从事生物土壤结皮生态功能、退化修复研究。E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划课题(2022YFF1300802)、中国科学院“西部之光”人才培养计划项目(XAB2022YW01)和国家自然科学基金重点项目(41830758)

Characteristics of spatial and temporal variability in the distribution of biological soil crusts on the Loess Plateau, China

ZHAO Yunge^1,2*, JI Jingyi², ZHANG Wantao^1,2, MING Jiao², HUANG Wanyun¹, GAO Liqian^1,2

¹College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2023-09-26 Revised:2024-01-18 Online:2024-03-18 Published:2024-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生物土壤结皮(生物结皮)是黄土高原广泛分布的生物地被物,在调节生态系统稳定性和多功能性方面具有重要作用。目前黄土高原生物结皮区域分布特征鲜有报道,限制了该区生物结皮生态功能的评估。本研究基于课题组2009—2020年间5次黄土高原不同降水量带388个样点的生物结皮分布特征调研资料,分析了该区不同退耕年限、降水量、地形(坡向和坡位)和退耕方式(还乔、还灌和还草)下生物结皮的盖度、组成及其影响因素。在此基础上,借助机器学习和空间建模方法,绘制了黄土高原250 m×250 m分辨率生物结皮及组成分布图,分析了黄土高原生物结皮区域空间分布特征。结果表明: 黄土高原地区林草地的生物结皮平均盖度为47.3%,其中,藻结皮占25.5%,藓结皮占19.7%,地衣结皮占2.1%,具有明显的时空变化特征。在时间上,对特定区域,生物结皮盖度随封禁年限的延长呈波动式下降,其中,藻结皮和藓结皮盖度呈明显的反向波动。在年内,生物结皮盖度在湿润季节略高于干旱季节。在空间上,风沙区生物结皮盖度较高,且以藻结皮为主,土石山区生物结皮盖度较低。降水量和退耕方式显著影响生物结皮盖度和组成的空间分布,坡向和坡位的影响相对较小。生物结皮的空间分布与土壤有机碳、pH和质地有关。本研究描述了黄土高原区域生物结皮分布的时空分异特征,可为该区生物结皮研究提供数据支持。

关键词: 生物结皮, 随机森林, 环境因素, 分布格局, 空间预测

Abstract: Biological soil crust (biocrust) is widely distributed on the Loess Plateau and plays multiple roles in regulating ecosystem stability and multifunctionality. Few reports are available on the distribution characteristics of biocrust in this region, which limits the assessment of its ecological functions. Based on 388 sampling points in different precipitation zones on the Loess Plateau from 2009 to 2020, we analyzed the coverage, composition, and influencing factors of biocrust across different durations since land abandonment, precipitation levels, topography (slope aspect and position), and utilization of abandoned slopelands (shrubland, forest, and grassland). On this base, with the assistance of machine learning and spatial modeling methods, we generated a distribution map of biocrust and its composition at a resolution of 250 m × 250 m, and analyzed the spatial distribution of biocrust on the Loess Plateau. The results showed that the average biocrust coverage in the woodlands and grasslands was 47.3%, of which cyanobacterial crust accounted for 25.5%, moss crust 19.7%, and lichen crust 2.1%. There were significant temporal and spatial variations. Temporally, the coverage of biocrust in specific regions fluctuated with the extension of the abandoned durations and coverage of cyanobacterial crust, while moss crust showed a reverse pattern. In addition, the coverage of biocrust in the wet season was slightly higher than that in the dry season within a year. Spatially, the coverage of biocrusts on the sandy lands area on the Loess Plateau was higher and dominated by cyanobacterial crusts, while the coverage was lower in the hilly and gully area. Precipitation and utilization of abandoned land were the major factors driving biocrust coverage and composition, while slope direction and position did not show obvious effect. In addition, soil organic carbon content, pH, and texture were related to the distribution of biocrust. This study uncovered the spatial and temporal variability of biocrust distribution, which might provide important data support for the research and management of biocrust in the Loess Plateau region.

Key words: biocrust, random forest, environmental factor, distribution pattern, spatial prediction

赵允格, 吉静怡, 张万涛, 明姣, 黄琬雲, 高丽倩. 黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 739-748.

ZHAO Yunge, JI Jingyi, ZHANG Wantao, MING Jiao, HUANG Wanyun, GAO Liqian. Characteristics of spatial and temporal variability in the distribution of biological soil crusts on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(3): 739-748.

参考文献

[1] Weber B, Belnap J, Büdel B, et al. What is a biocrust? A refined, contemporary definition for a broadening research community. Biological Reviews, 2022, 97: 1768-1785
[2] Belnap J, Büdel B. Biological soil crusts as soil stabilizers// Weber B, Büdel B, Belnap J, eds. Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016: 305-320
[3] Bowker MA, Reed SC, Maestre FT, et al. Biocrusts: The living skin of the earth. Plant and Soil, 2018, 429: 1-7
[4] 李新荣, 谭会娟, 回嵘, 等. 中国荒漠与沙地生物土壤结皮研究. 科学通报, 2018, 63(23): 2320-2334
[5] 胡春宏, 张晓明. 黄土高原水土流失治理与黄河水沙变化. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51(1): 1-11
[6] 赵允格, 许明祥, 王全九, 等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮对土壤理化性状的影响. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 441-448
[7] 王一贺, 赵允格, 李林, 等. 黄土高原不同降雨量带退耕地植被-生物结皮的分布格局. 生态学报, 2016, 36(2): 377-386
[8] 杨凯, 赵允格, 马昕昕. 黄土丘陵区生物土壤结皮层水稳性. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(1): 173-177
[9] Zhao YG, Xu MX. Runoff and soil loss from revegetated grasslands in the hilly Loess Plateau region, China: Influence of biocrust patches and plant canopies. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2013, 18: 387-393
[10] Gao LQ, Bowker MA, Xu MX, et al. Biological soil crusts decrease erodibility by modifying inherent soil properties on the Loess Plateau, China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 105: 49-58
[11] 肖波, 赵允格, 邵明安. 陕北水蚀风蚀交错区两种生物结皮对土壤理化性质的影响. 生态学报, 2007, 27(11): 4662-4670
[12] 卜崇峰, 张朋, 叶菁, 等. 陕北水蚀风蚀交错区小流域苔藓结皮的空间特征及其影响因子. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(3): 490-499
[13] Yang K, Zhao YG, Gao LQ, et al. Nonlinear response of hydrodynamic and soil erosive behaviors to biocrust coverage in drylands. Geoderma, 2022, 405: 115457
[14] Qiu DX, Bowker MA, Xiao B, et al. Mapping biocrust distribution in China’s drylands under changing climate. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 905: 167211
[15] Lemke D, Hulme PE, Brown JA, et al. Distribution modelling of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) invasion in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountain Region, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262: 139-149
[16] Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, et al. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 2007, 88: 2783-2792
[17] 张丙昌, 武志芳, 李彬. 黄土高原生物土壤结皮研究进展与展望. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(5): 1123-1131
[18] 杨巧云, 赵允格, 包天莉, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同类型生物结皮下的土壤生态化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2699-2706
[19] 吉静怡, 赵允格, 杨凯, 等. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面产流产沙与其分布格局的关联. 生态学报, 2021, 41(4): 1381-1390
[20] Rozenstein O, Adamowski J. A review of progress in identifying and characterizing biocrusts using proximal and remote sensing. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2017, 57: 245-255
[21] Rodríguez-Caballero E, Román Fernández JR, Chamizo S, et al. Biocrust landscape-scale spatial distribution is strongly controlled by terrain attributes: Topographic thresholds for colonization in a semiarid badland system. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2019, 44: 2771-2779
[22] 张元明, 陈晋, 王雪芹, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠生物结皮的分布特征. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 53-60
[23] 张元明, 王雪芹. 荒漠地表生物土壤结皮形成与演替特征概述. 生态学报, 2010, 30(16): 4484-4492
[24] 吴玉环, 高谦, 于兴华. 生物土壤结皮的分布影响因子及其监测. 生态学杂志, 2003, 22(3): 38-42
[25] 赵允格, 许明祥, Belnap J. 生物结皮光合作用对光温水的响应及其对结皮空间分布格局的解译: 以黄土丘陵区为例. 生态学报, 2010, 30(17): 4668-4675
[26] 陈彦芹, 赵允格, 冉茂勇. 黄土丘陵区藓结皮人工培养方法试验研究. 西北植物学报, 2009, 29(3): 586-592
[27] Starks TL, Shubert LE, Trainor FR. Ecology of soil algae: A review. Phycologia, 1981, 20: 65-80
[28] Bowker MA, Belnap J, Miller ME. Spatial modeling of biological soil crusts to support rangeland assessment and monitoring. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 2006, 59: 519-529
[29] Rodriguez-Caballero E, Belnap J, Büdel B, et al. Dryland photoautotrophic soil surface communities endangered by global change. Nature Geoscience, 2018, 11: 185-189
[30] Eldridge DJ, Guirado E, Reich PB, et al. The global contribution of soil mosses to ecosystem services. Nature Geoscience, 2023, 16: 430-438

黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征

Characteristics of spatial and temporal variability in the distribution of biological soil crusts on the Loess Plateau, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁雪丽, 梁晓霞, 毛晓雅, 柴宝峰, 贾彤. 芦芽山鬼箭锦鸡儿灌丛不同深度土壤细菌群落分布格局及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 381-389.
[2]	袁佳玉, 熊立, 吴志伟, 朱诗豪, 康平, 李顺. 江西省赣州市南康区松材线虫病发生特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 507-515.
[3]	张悦, 马巍格, 刘谷娥, 周全来, 郭佳, 曹伟. 东北半干旱区外来植物入侵现状评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 73-79.
[4]	任孟林, 郭妍, 陈伯轩, 范佳乐, 胡同欣, 孙龙. 红松人工林地表可燃物火蔓延速率预测模型 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2091-2100.
[5]	明姣, 杨光, 赵允格, 马昕昕, 孙会, 乔羽. 放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1555-1562.
[6]	杨玉丽, 肖辉杰, 辛智鸣, 范光鹏, 李俊然, 贾肖肖, 汪立韬. 基于激光雷达与高光谱的荒漠绿洲农田防护林衰退程度评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1043-1050.
[7]	王怡婧, 丁启东, 张俊华, 陈睿华, 贾科利, 李小林. 基于无人机高光谱遥感和机器学习的土壤水盐信息反演 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3045-3052.
[8]	尹再芳, 孙洪刚, 谭梓峰, 刘威. 混交林生产力研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3135-3143.
[9]	董灵波, 梁凯富, 张一帆, 刘兆刚. 基于Landsat 8时间序列数据的翠岗林场森林类型划分 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2339-2346.
[10]	邱婧, 韩安霞, 何春梅, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 罗颖, 李晨璐, 郝占庆. 秦岭优势乔木锐齿槲栎的空间分布格局及种内关联 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2035-2042.
[11]	郭玥微, 赵允格, 钱煦坤, 万杨卓群, 王闪闪. 黄土高原三种耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异及机理 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1738-1746.
[12]	庞景文, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 江熳, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 毛乌素沙地区域尺度生物结皮有机碳 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1755-1763.
[13]	江熳, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 庞景文, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 不同降水条件下生物结皮覆盖对沙地土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1764-1772.
[14]	张冠华, 易亮, 孙宝洋, 李建明, 沈盛彧. 亚热带苔藓结皮对土壤-微生物-胞外酶化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1791-1800.
[15]	刘哲, 叶兴旺, 王吉平, 程永韬, 钱隆, 肖敬尚, 吴丽. 生物结皮胞外多糖理化特性及菌群结构的季节动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1801-1809.