黄丘区特色治理开发小流域土壤侵蚀变化对景观格局演变的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.006

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 4165-4176.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.006

黄丘区特色治理开发小流域土壤侵蚀变化对景观格局演变的响应

罗佳茹¹, 李斌斌², 张风宝^1,3*, 丛佩娟², 王海燕², 杨明义^1,3

¹西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²水利部水土保持监测中心, 北京 100053;
³中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2021-05-03 修回日期:2021-08-23 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2022-06-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: fbzhang@nwsuaf.edu.cn
作者简介:罗佳茹, 女, 1996年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail: jiaruluo@nwafu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42077071)和国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0503705)资助

Responses of soil erosion to changes in landscape pattern and its evolution in watershed in the loess hilly region under characteristic management and development

LUO Jia-ru¹, LI Bin-bin², ZHANG Feng-bao^1,3*, CONG Pei-juan², WANG Hai-yan², YANG Ming-yi^1,3

¹State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²Monitoring Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100053, China;
³Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2021-05-03 Revised:2021-08-23 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2022-06-15
Contact: *E-mail: fbzhang@nwsuaf.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077071) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0503705)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究土壤侵蚀与景观格局变化的关系对小流域的治理开发具有重要的指导意义。本研究以实施退耕还林草、生态农业、生态旅游及科技示范的黄土高原安塞南沟特色治理小流域为研究对象,基于GIS平台和通用土壤流失方程,分析小流域1981—2018年景观格局和土壤侵蚀量的时空演化特征,并利用主成分回归法,从斑块类型水平和景观水平两个尺度分析土壤侵蚀模数与3类9个景观格局指标的关系。结果表明: 研究期间,在5种景观类型中,耕地和林地面积的时空变化主导了南沟小流域景观格局的演化,并且影响整个小流域的聚集分散程度;南沟小流域的土壤侵蚀量逐年减少,1981—2018年土壤侵蚀面积减少29.7%,侵蚀模数减少61.2%,且有73.4%的区域土壤侵蚀强度减轻;耕地和林地面积的变化决定了整个小流域土壤侵蚀模数的变化,其景观格局指数的变化方向与该景观类型土壤侵蚀的变化方向一致;退耕还林草工程是流域景观格局变化、土壤侵蚀减轻的主要原因,特色开发治理可以减弱局部地区土壤侵蚀强度。景观类型的合理化配置能有效地防治小流域土壤侵蚀,将其与特色治理开发相结合有助于实现小流域可持续高质量发展。

关键词: 土壤侵蚀, 景观指数, 主成分回归, 通用土壤流失方程(ULSE)

Abstract: Understanding the relationship between soil erosion and the changes in landscape patterns is important for guiding the management and development of watersheds. The Nangou watershed in Ansai County, Shaanxi on the Loess Plateau, is an area with the implement of “Grain for Green”, ecological agriculture, ecological tourism and the demonstration of science and technology for landscape management. We quantified the spatial and temporal variations of landscape pattern and soil erosion from 1981 to 2018 using the GIS and the universal soil loss equation (USLE). The relationship between the soil erosion modulus and nine landscape pattern indices in three categories was analyzed using the principal component analysis at both plot and landscape levels. The results showed that, among the five landscape types, the spatial and temporal changes of cultivated land and woodland dominated the evolution of landscape patterns, which affected the concentration and distribution degree of the whole watershed. Soil erosion in the Nangou watershed decreased annually, with erosion area, erosion modulus and soil erosion intensity decreasing by 29.7%, 61.2%, and 73.4% from 1981 to 2018, respectively. The variation of cultivated land and forest land areas determined the changes of soil erosion modulus of the whole watershed. The change trend of landscape pattern index was consistent with that of soil erosion. “Grain for Green” Project was the major dri-ving force for the changes in the landscape pattern and for the reduction of soil erosion. The characteristic development and management could weaken soil erosion intensity in parts of the study area. The rational configuration of landscape types could effectively control soil erosion in a watershed. The combination of rational configuration and characteristic management could help achieve the goals for sustainable and high quality development of the watershed.

Key words: soil erosion, landscape index, principal component regression, universal soil loss equation (ULSE)

罗佳茹, 李斌斌, 张风宝, 丛佩娟, 王海燕, 杨明义. 黄丘区特色治理开发小流域土壤侵蚀变化对景观格局演变的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4165-4176.

LUO Jia-ru, LI Bin-bin, ZHANG Feng-bao, CONG Pei-juan, WANG Hai-yan, YANG Ming-yi. Responses of soil erosion to changes in landscape pattern and its evolution in watershed in the loess hilly region under characteristic management and development[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(12): 4165-4176.

参考文献

[1] 余新晓, 牛健植, 关文彬, 等. 景观生态学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006 [Yu X-X, Niu J-Z, Guan W-B, et al. Landscape Ecology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006]
[2] 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 赵文武. “源”“汇”景观理论及其生态学意义. 生态学报, 2006, 26(5): 1444-1449 [Chen L-D, Fu B-J, Zhao W-W. Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(5): 1444-1449]
[3] Turner MG. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1989, 3: 385-397
[4] 傅伯杰, 徐延达, 吕一河. 景观格局与水土流失的尺度特征与耦合方法. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7): 673-681 [Fu B-J, Xu Y-D, Lyu Y-H. Scale characteri-stics and coupled research of landscape pattern and soil and water loss. Advances in Earth Science, 2010, 25(7): 673-681]
[5] 傅伯杰, 邱扬, 王军, 等. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用变化对水土流失的影响. 地理学报, 2002, 57(6): 717-722 [Fu B-J, Qiu Y, Wang J, et al. Effect simulations of land use change on the runoff and erosion for a gully catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(6): 717-722]
[6] Wang K, Wang HJ, Shi XZ, et al. Landscape analysis of dynamic soil erosion in Subtropical China: A case study in Xingguo County, Jiangxi Province. Soil & Tilla-ge Research, 2009, 105: 313-321
[7] Zhang SH, Fan WW, Li YQ, et al. The influence of changes in land use and landscape patterns on soil erosion in a watershed. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 574: 34-45
[8] 王计平, 陈利顶, 汪亚峰. 黄土高原地区景观格局演变研究综述. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(5): 535-542 [Wang J-P, Chen L-D, Wang Y-F. Research on landscape pattern change in Loess Plateau: Current status, issues and trends. Advances in Earth Science, 2010, 29(5): 535-542]
[9] 邱扬, 傅伯杰. 异质景观中水土流失的空间变异与尺度变异. 生态学报, 2004, 24(2): 330-337 [Qiu Y, Fu B-J. Spatial variation and scale variation in soil and water loss in heterogeneous landscape: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(2): 330-337]
[10] 游珍, 李占斌, 袁琼. 景观生态学原理在土壤侵蚀学中的应用与实例分析. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12(3): 141-144 [You Z, Li Z-B, Yuan Q. The application of landscape ecology principles in soil erosion and a case analysis. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 12(3): 141-144]
[11] 张建香, 张勃, 张华, 等. 黄土高原的景观格局变化与水土流失研究——以黄土高原马莲河流域为例. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(9): 1513-1525 [Zhang J-X, Zhang B, Zhang H, et al. Landscape pattern change and soil erosion research: Take Malian river basin in Loess Plateau as an example. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(9): 1513-1525]
[12] 康磊, 刘世荣, 刘宪钊. 岷江上游景观格局与土壤侵蚀变化——以杂古脑流域为例. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(1): 23-28 [Kang L, Liu S-R, Liu X-Z. Chang of soil erosion landcape pattern in upper reaches of Minjiang river: A case study at Zagunao watershed. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(1): 23-28]
[13] 王计平, 杨磊, 卫伟, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区景观格局对流域侵蚀产沙过程的影响——斑块类型水平. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5739-5748 [Wang J-P, Yang L, Wei W, et al. Effects of landscape pattern on watershed soil erosion and sediment delivery in hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau of China: Patch class-level. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5739-5748]
[14] 王计平, 杨磊, 卫伟, 等. 黄土丘陵区景观格局对水土流失过程的影响——景观水平与多尺度比较. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5531-5541 [Wang J-P, Yang L, Wei W, et al. Effects of landscape patterns on soil and water loss in the hilly area of Loess Plateau in China: Landscape-level and comparison at multiscale. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5531-5541]
[15] 郭思琪, 韩磊, 赵永华, 等. 秦岭地区土壤侵蚀时空变化及景观格局. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(7): 2167-2176 [Guo S-Q, Han L, Zhao Y-H, et al. Spatiotemporal variation and landscape pattern of soil erosion in Qinling Mountains. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(7): 2167-2176]
[16] 刘宇, 吕一河, 傅伯杰. 景观格局-土壤侵蚀研究中景观指数的意义解释及局限性. 生态学报, 2011, 31(1): 267-275 [Liu Y, Lyu Y-H, Fu B-J. Implication and limitation of landscape metrics in delineating relationship between landscape pattern and soil erosion. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 267-275]
[17] 张斌. 安塞区南沟水土保持示范园建设实践与探索. 水土保持应用技术, 2020(1): 20-22 [Zhang B. Practice and exploration on construction of Nangou soil and water conservation demonstration park in Ansai district. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020(1): 20-22]
[18] 刘宝元, 郭索彦, 李智广, 等. 中国水力侵蚀抽样调查. 中国水土保持, 2013, 34(10): 26-34 [Liu B-Y, Guo S-Y, Li Z-G, et al. Sampling survey of water erosion in China. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2013, 34(10): 26-34]
[19] 胡云华, 刘斌涛, 宋春风, 等. 基于USLE模型的大小凉山地区土壤侵蚀定量研究. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(4): 232-236 [Hu Y-H, Liu B-T, Song C-F, et al. Soil erosion estimation mountain areas of Sichuan province based USLE model. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 36(4): 232-236]
[20] 刘斌涛, 宋春风, 陶和平. 成都市土壤侵蚀定量评价研究. 长江科学院院报, 2016, 33(9): 40-47 [Liu B-T, Song C-F, Tao H-P. Quantitative assessment of soil erosion of Chengdu City. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2016, 33(9): 40-47]
[21] 刘斌涛, 陶和平, 宋春风, 等. 1960—2009年中国降雨侵蚀力的时空变化趋势. 地理研究, 2013, 32(2): 245-256 [Liu B-T, Tao H-P, Song C-F, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of rainfall erosivity in China during 1960 to 2009. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(2): 245-256]
[22] 章文波, 谢云, 刘宝元. 中国降雨侵蚀力空间变化特征. 山地学报, 2003, 21(1): 33-40 [Zhang W-B, Xie Y, Liu B-Y. Spatial distribution of rainfall erosivity in China. Mountain Research, 2003, 21(1): 33-40]
[23] 张科利, 彭文英, 杨红丽. 中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(1): 7-13 [Zhang K-L, Peng W-Y, Yang H-L. Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soil in China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(1): 7-13]
[24] 杨子生. 云南省金沙江流域土壤流失方程研究. 山地学报, 2002, 20(suppl.1): 1-9 [Yang Z-S. Study on soil loss equation in Jinsha River basin of Yunnan Pro-vince. Mountain Research, 2002, 20(suppl.1): 1-9]
[25] 刘宝元, 毕小刚. 北京土壤流失方程. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010 [Liu B-Y, Bi X-G. Soil Loss Equation in Beijing. Beijing: Science Press, 2010]
[26] McCool DK, Brown LC, Foster GR, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1994, 37: 1935-1840
[27] 国土资源部. 土地利用现状分类 (GB/T 21010—2017). 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017 [Ministry of Land and Resources. Current Land Use Classification (GB/T 21010-2017). Beijing: China Standards Press, 2017]
[28] 郭呈全, 陈希镇. 主成分回归的SPSS实现. 统计与决策, 2011(5): 157-159 [Guo C-Q, Chen X-Z. SPSS implementation of principal component regression analysis. Statistics & Decision, 2011(5): 157-159]
[29] 杜娜, 王继军. 县南沟流域农业土地利用/覆被变化浅析. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(6):171-173 [Du N, Wang J-J. Agriculture land use/land cover change of Xiannangou watershed. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16(6):171-173]
[30] 中华人民共和国水利部. 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准(SL 190—2007). 北京: 中华人民共和国水利部, 2008 [Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Standards for Classification and Gradation of Soil Erosion (SL 190-2007). Beijing: Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China, 2008]
[31] 谢永生, 李占斌, 王继军, 等. 黄土高原水土流失治理模式的层次结构及其演变. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(3): 211-214 [Xie Y-S, Li Z-B, Wang J-J, et al. Hierarchy and development of soil and water loss control model in Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(3): 211-214]
[32] 薛梅. 黄土高原小流域综合治理发展浅析. 黑龙江水利科技, 2019, 47(1): 78-79 [Xue M. Preliminary analysis of small river basin comprehensive regulation development in Loess Plateau. Heilongjiang Hydraulic Science and Technology, 2019, 47(1): 78-79]
[33] 钟莉娜, 赵文武, 吕一河, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区景观格局演变特征——以陕西省延安市为例. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12): 3368-3377 [Zhong L-N, Zhao W-W, Lyu Y-H, et al. Analysis of landscape pattern evolution characteristic in the hilly and gully area of loess plateau: A case study in Yan’an City, Shaanxi Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(12): 3368-3377]
[34] 赵宏飞, 何洪鸣, 白春昱, 等. 黄土高原土地利用变化特征及其环境效应. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(7): 49-57 [Zhao H-F, He H-M, Bai C-Y, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of land use change in the Loess Plateau and its environmental effects. China Land Science, 2018, 32(7): 49-57]
[35] Gao P, Deng JC, Chai XK, et al. Dynamic sediment discharge in the Hekou-Longmen region of Yellow River and soil and water conservation implications. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 578: 56-66
[36] Zhang L, Wang JM, Bai ZK, et al. Effects of vegetation on runoff and soil erosion on reclaimed land in an opencast coal mine dump in a loess area. Catena, 2015, 128: 44-53
[37] 刘宇. 景观指数耦合景观格局与土壤侵蚀的有效性. 生态学报, 2017, 37(15): 4923-4935 [Liu Y. Effectiveness of landscape metrics in coupling soil erosion with landscape pattern. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(15): 4923-4935]

黄丘区特色治理开发小流域土壤侵蚀变化对景观格局演变的响应

Responses of soil erosion to changes in landscape pattern and its evolution in watershed in the loess hilly region under characteristic management and development

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹尤淞, 张晨晖, 肖波, 孙福海. 黑土区农田藻藓两类结皮发育对土壤团聚体稳定性和击溅侵蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 892-902.
[2]	舒成博, 沈影利, 刘刚, 张琼, 徐敬华, 郭珍. 南方山区典型小流域桉树人工林种植对水土流失的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1015-1023.
[3]	王佳楠, 贾燕锋, 范昊明. 辽西低山棕壤丘陵区小流域泥沙连通性与土壤侵蚀的空间分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 726-732.
[4]	张晨晖, 肖波, 李胜龙, 王彦峰, 曹尤淞. 东北黑土区农田生物结皮的特征及其对表层土壤崩解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1773-1782.
[5]	吉静怡, 赵允格, 张万涛, 谷康民. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮空间分布的代表性景观指数 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1878-1884.
[6]	郝永佩, 宋晓伟, 徐仪红. Pu同位素示踪技术在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1482-1488.
[7]	莫帅豪, 郑粉莉, 冯志珍, 易祎. 典型黑土区侵蚀-沉积对土壤微生物数量空间分布的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 685-693.
[8]	吉静怡, 赵允格, 杨凯, 张万涛, 高丽倩, 明姣, 王闪闪. 生物结皮分布格局对坡面流水动力特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1015-1022.
[9]	陈峰, 李红波. 基于GIS和RUSLE的滇南山区土壤侵蚀时空演变——以云南省元阳县为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 629-637.
[10]	郭威震, 胡斐南, 谭滔滔, 马任甜, 刘婧芳, 李喆, 赵世伟. 土壤表面电场对黑土团聚体破碎和侵蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2644-2652.
[11]	王晓彤, 张加琼, 杨明义, 王永吉. 榆神府矿区典型小流域侵蚀产沙对退耕还林(草)及煤矿开采的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 1971-1979.
[12]	赵旭, 樊军, 付威. 土壤侵蚀与土地利用方式对黑土地土壤水气传输特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1599-1606.
[13]	王昌辉, 刘青青, 文竹梅, 王子睿, 陈艳芳, 刘博, 王正宁. 红壤侵蚀区植被恢复过程中土壤种子库变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 417-423.
[14]	刘琼玉, 程全国, 魏建兵, 顾广贺. 大兴安岭地区生态系统完整性动态评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 3119-3125.
[15]	谢申琦,高丽倩,赵允格,郭玥微. 模拟降雨条件下生物结皮坡面产流产沙对雨强的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(2): 391-397.