煤矸石对矿区土壤特性与植物生长的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202305.028

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1253-1262.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202305.028

煤矸石对矿区土壤特性与植物生长的影响

南益聪^1,2, 杨永刚^1,2*, 王泽青^1,2, 周杨³, 苏巧梅⁴

¹山西大学环境与资源学院, 太原 030006;
²山西省黄河实验室, 太原 030006;
³中国矿业大学(北京)地球科学与测绘工程学院, 北京 100083;
⁴太原理工大学矿业工程学院, 太原 030024

收稿日期:2022-10-08 接受日期:2023-02-23 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-11-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: yygsxu@126.com
作者简介:南益聪, 女, 1998年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事矿区生态修复、干旱沙区碳循环研究。E-mail: 18735396496@qq.com
基金资助:
山西省“1331工程”重点创新团队计划项目(PY201806)、山西省应用基础研究计划项目(201801D121028)和山西省高等学校科技创新项目(2019L0457, 2019L0463)

Effects of coal gangue on soil property and plant growth in mining area

NAN Yicong^1,2, YANG Yonggang^1,2*, WANG Zeqing^1,2, ZHOU Yang³, SU Qiaomei⁴

¹College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
²Yellow River Laboratory of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030006, China;
³College of Geoscience and Survey Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
⁴College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China

Received:2022-10-08 Accepted:2023-02-23 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文通过室内和室外试验,将不同含量(10%、20%、30%、40%和50%)、不同粒径(0～2、2～5、5～8和8～10 mm)的煤矸石与土壤进行复配,形成具有不同容重(1.3、1.35、1.4、1.45和1.5 g·cm^-3)的新构土壤,探究土壤重构方式对新构土壤水分、团聚体结构稳定性以及黑麦草、紫苜蓿和白车轴草生长特征的影响。结果表明: 土壤饱和含水量(SW)、毛管含水量(CW)和田间持水量(FC)随煤矸石含量、粒径和土壤容重增加而减小。>0.25 mm粒径土壤团聚体(R_0.25)、平均重量直径(MWD)和几何平均直径(GMD)随煤矸石粒径增加大体呈先增加后减少的变化趋势,在煤矸石粒径为2～5 mm达到峰值;R_0.25、MWD和GMD与煤矸石含量呈显著负相关。基于增强回归树(BRT)模型,煤矸石含量对SW、CW和FC的影响较大,对其变异贡献率分别为59.3%、67.0%和40.3%;煤矸石粒径对R_0.25、MWD和GMD的影响最大,对其变异贡献率分别为44.7%、32.3%和62.1%;煤矸石含量对黑麦草、紫苜蓿和白车轴草生长的影响较大,分别可解释其49.9%、17.4%和10.3%的变异。煤矸石含量为30%和粒径为5～8 mm的土壤重构方式下供试植物生长较好。表明煤矸石能够改变新构土壤水分和团聚体结构稳定性,矿区生态修复可优选煤矸石含量为30%和粒径为5～8 mm的土壤重构方式。

关键词: 生态修复, 煤矸石, 土壤水分, 结构稳定性, 增强回归树模型

Abstract: With indoor and outdoor treatments, coal gangue with different ratios (10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50%) and different particle sizes (0-2, 2-5, 5-8 and 8-10 mm) were mixed into soil, and formed reconstructed soil with different soil bulk densities (1.3, 1.35, 1.4, 1.45 and 1.5 g·cm^-3). The effects of soil reconstruction modes on soil water condition, structure stability of aggregate and the growth of Lolium perenne, Medicago sativa, and Trifolium repens were investigated. Soil saturated water (SW), capillary water (CW), and field water capacity (FC) were decreased with increasing coal gangue ratio, particle size, and bulk density of reconstructed soil. >0.25 mm particle size aggregate (R_0.25), mean weight diameter (MWD), and geometric mean diameter (GMD) increased first and then decreased with the increases of coal gangue particle size, reaching the peak at 2-5 mm coal gangue particle size. R_0.25, MWD and GMD were significantly and negatively correlated with coal gangue ratio. Based on boosted regression tree (BRT) model, the coal gangue ratio contributed 59.3%, 67.0% and 40.3% to the variation of SW, CW and FC, respectively, which was a main influencing factor of soil water content. The coal gangue particle size contributed 44.7%, 32.3% and 62.1% to the variation of R_0.25, MWD, and GMD, respecti-vely, which was the greatest influencing factor. Coal gangue ratio had a great effect on the growth of L. perenne, M. sativa, and T. repens, which contributed to 49.9%, 17.4% and 10.3% of their variations, respectively. Soil reconstruction mode of 30% coal gangue ratio and 5-8 mm coal gangue particle size was the best condition for plant growth, indicating that coal gangue could change soil water content and structure stability of aggregate. The soil reconstruction mode of 30% coal gangue ratio and 5-8 mm coal gangue particle size was recommended.

Key words: ecological restoration, coal gangue, soil water content, structure stability of aggregate, boosted regression tree (BRT) model

南益聪, 杨永刚, 王泽青, 周杨, 苏巧梅. 煤矸石对矿区土壤特性与植物生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1253-1262.

NAN Yicong, YANG Yonggang, WANG Zeqing, ZHOU Yang, SU Qiaomei. Effects of coal gangue on soil property and plant growth in mining area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(5): 1253-1262.

参考文献

[1] 杨方亮, 许红娜. “十四五”煤炭行业生态环境保护与资源综合利用发展路径分析. 中国煤炭, 2021, 47(5): 73-82
[2] 胡振琪, 肖武, 赵艳玲. 再论煤矿区生态环境“边采边复”. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(1): 351-359
[3] Li JY, Wang JM. Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 239: 12-25
[4] 白中科, 周伟, 王金满, 等. 再论矿区生态系统恢复重建. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(11): 1-9
[5] Wang LL, Wang F, Wang SF, et al. Analysis of differences in chemical properties of reconstructed soil under different proportions of topsoil substitute materials. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28: 31230-31245
[6] Du T, Wang DM, Bai YJ, et al. Optimizing the formulation of coal gangue planting substrate using wastes: The sustainability of coal mine ecological restoration. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 143: 1-10
[7] 赵陟峰, 王冬梅, 赵廷宁. 保水剂对煤矸石基质上高羊茅生长及营养吸收的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33(16): 5101-5108
[8] Motesharezadeh B, Ahmadiyan E, Alikhani HA, et al. The use of coal gangue as a cultivation bed conditioner in forage maize inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2017, 48: 1266-1279
[9] 储昭霞. 煤矸石协同植物对铜尾矿改良的效果与作用机制研究. 博士论文. 安徽淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2020
[10] Li XL, Gao J, Zhang J, et al. Adaptive strategies to overcome challenges in vegetation restoration to coalmine wasteland in a frigid alpine setting. Catena, 2019, 182: 1-10
[11] 徐良骥, 朱小美, 刘曙光, 等. 不同粒径煤矸石温度场影响下重构土壤水分时空响应特征. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(8): 2304-2310
[12] 徐良骥, 黄璨, 李青青, 等. 煤矸石粒径结构对充填复垦重构土壤理化性质及农作物生理生态性质的影响. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1): 141-148
[13] 柯凯恩, 董晓芸, 周金星, 等. 煤矸石生态基质的制备配方及其肥力特征研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(4): 308-317
[14] 杨永刚, 苏帅, 焦文涛. 煤矿复垦区土壤水动力学特性对下渗过程的影响. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16): 5876-5882
[15] Amezketa E. Soil aggregate stability: A review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 1999, 14: 83-151
[16] Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2008, 77: 802-813
[17] 周杨, 杨永刚. 不同重构方式下古交典型矿区土壤持水性差异研究. 山西大学学报: 自然科学版, 2022, 45(5): 1369-1376
[18] Zhang YD, Liu SR, Ma JM. Water-holding capacity of ground covers and soils in alpine and sub-alpine shrubs in western Sichuan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26: 2775-2782
[19] Zhang Y, E SZ, Wang YA, et al. Long-term manure application enhances the stability of aggregates and aggregate-associated carbon by regulating soil physicochemical characteristics. Catena, 2021, 203: 105342
[20] 杜韬, 王冬梅, 张泽洲, 等. 煤矸石植生基质保水性能对黑麦草生长的影响. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4): 75-84
[21] 毕银丽, 吴福勇, 武玉坤. 接种微生物对煤矿废弃基质的改良与培肥作用. 煤炭学报, 2006, 31(3): 365-368
[22] 米美霞, 邵明安, 武小刚, 等. 煤矸石和钙结石对植物生长和土壤含水量的影响. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(6): 1460-1471
[23] Novak V, Knava K. The influence of stoniness and canopy properties on soil water content distribution: Simulation of water movement in forest stony soil. European Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 131: 1727-1735
[24] 董颖, 李娜, 耿玉清, 等. 添加保水剂对煤矸石基质保水性能的影响. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(3): 114-123
[25] Han XN, Dong Y, Geng YQ, et al. Influence of coal gangue mulching with various thicknesses and particle sizes on soil water characteristics. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 1-10
[26] Le Bissonnais Y. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility. Ⅰ. Theory and metho-dology. European Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 67: 11-21
[27] 刘梦云, 吴健利, 刘丽雯, 等. 黄土台塬土地利用方式对土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性影响. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1564-1576
[28] Lv WC, Qiu Y, Xie ZK, et al. Gravel mulching effects on soil physicochemical properties and microbial community composition in the Loess Plateau, northwestern China. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2019, 94: 1-8
[29] 韩贞贵, 周运超, 任娇娇, 等. 马尾松人工林土壤各粒径团聚体湿筛后的有机碳分配. 生态学报, 2021, 41(23): 9388-9398
[30] 李杨, 仲波, 陈冬明, 等. 不同浓度和多样性的根系分泌物对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(5): 1061-1067
[31] 张静雯. 不同数量黄土改良煤矸石效果及对五种植物生物的影响. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012
[32] 魏彬萌, 李忠徽, 王益权. 渭北旱塬苹果园土壤紧实化现状及成因. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 976-982
[33] 宋楠. 煤矸石山坡面覆盖对土壤改良和植被恢复的影响研究. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012

煤矸石对矿区土壤特性与植物生长的影响

Effects of coal gangue on soil property and plant growth in mining area

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	窦寒梅, 赵锐锋, 陈喜东, 石晶, 王景发, 刘福寿. 西北干旱区国土空间生态修复优先区识别——以黑河流域张掖市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 469-479.
[2]	吴绍雄, 张勇勇, 赵文智, 康文蓉, 田子晗. 基于COSMIC模型的宇宙射线中子反演荒漠-绿洲区土壤水分 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2445-2452.
[3]	明姣, 杨光, 赵允格, 马昕昕, 孙会, 乔羽. 放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1555-1562.
[4]	梁君, 吴天, 周永东, 胡扬杰, 徐开达, 张涛. 乌贼类产卵附着基的类型、功能和应用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 535-546.
[5]	简钰清, 戴钰欣, 黄志彬, 詹昂铄, 李贺诚, 王志芳. 广东省汕头市生态修复关键点识别与差异化规划 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2730-2738.
[6]	张琥顺, 仲霞铭, 熊瑛, 吴晓睿. 生态环境损害赔偿视域下的近海非法捕捞大数据分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2827-2834.
[7]	谷康民, 赵允格, 张子辉, 吉静怡, 郭雅丽. 模拟放牧干扰对黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面土壤水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1827-1834.
[8]	张冠华, 易亮, 丁文峰, 王一然, 牛俊, 李建明, 孙宝洋. 三峡库区苔藓生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1835-1842.
[9]	岳艳鹏, 成龙, 孙迎涛, 庞营军, 吴波, 石麟, 何金军, 贾晓红. 毛乌素沙地生物结皮覆盖区土壤水分收支变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1861-1870.
[10]	石春茂, 罗娅, 杨胜天, 周秋文, 余军林, 刘洋. 干热河谷区不同坡位土壤水分对降雨的响应特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1352-1362.
[11]	陶涛, 马东豪, 吴思聪, 霍亚文, 陈金林, 张佳宝, 张丛志, 谭钧, 潘慧, 马红娇. 外源凹凸棒土添加对半干旱矿区复垦土壤水分涵养功能的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 901-908.
[12]	蒋一飞, 李晓鹏, 宣可凡, 纪景纯, 贾仁浩, 王灿, 刘建立. 宇宙射线中子法在农田土壤水分监测中的适用性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 909-914.
[13]	闫玉玉, 孙彦伟, 刘敏. 基于生态安全格局的上海国土空间生态修复关键区域识别与修复策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3369-3378.
[14]	刘志民, 余海滨, 汪海洋. 科尔沁沙地“山水林田湖草沙”一体化治理原理及实施重点 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3441-3447.
[15]	岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 韦静娴, 卢有朋. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 149-158.