放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202306.011

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1555-1562.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202306.011

放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响

明姣^1,2,3, 杨光⁴, 赵允格^1,2*, 马昕昕^1,2,3, 孙会⁵, 乔羽⁶

¹中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²中科院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
⁴吴起县气象局, 陕西吴起 717600;
⁵西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
⁶西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2022-10-24 接受日期:2023-04-11 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-12-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:明姣, 女, 1987年生, 博士研究生。主要从事生物结皮土壤水文过程研究。E-mail: mingjiaowodeshijie@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41830758,41907056)和中国科学院“西部之光”交叉团队-重点实验室合作研究专项(2019)

Effects of grazing on soil water recharge of rehabilitated grassland under natural rainfall on the Loess Pla-teau, Northwest China

MING Jiao^1,2,3, YANG Guang⁴, ZHAO Yunge^1,2*, MA Xinxin^1,2,3, SUN Hui⁵, QIAO Yu⁶

¹The Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
⁴Wuqi Meteorological Bureau, Wuqi 717600, Shaanxi, China;
⁵College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
⁶College of Natural Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2022-10-24 Accepted:2023-04-11 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 降雨是影响土壤水分补给和坡面产流的关键因素,放牧可改变地表覆被特征和表层土壤结构,进而影响坡面产流和土壤水分补给。目前鲜有研究关注放牧对土壤水分补给的影响。本研究通过围栏放牧试验,定位监测自然降雨条件下土壤水分动态,对比了不同放牧强度(G1～G5:2.2、3.0、4.2、6.7、16.7羊·hm^-2)下地表覆被、土壤理化属性和降雨土壤水分补给特征。结果表明: 放牧显著影响植被和生物结皮盖度,与不放牧样地(NG)相比,G1～G5放牧强度下植被盖度降低8.3%～16.4%,G2放牧强度下生物结皮盖度较NG增加106.9%。G1～G5放牧强度下地表粗糙度增加53.1%～152.5%,G5放牧强度下生物结皮厚度降低24.1%。土壤湿润锋速随降雨强度增加而降低,G2放牧强度下0～5 cm土层湿润锋速在不同降雨条件下(降雨量18.0～70.3 mm)与NG相比降低60.0%～83.3%。放牧对土壤湿润锋速的影响与生物结皮盖度和0～5 cm土壤容重显著相关。放牧未显著影响黄土高原降雨条件下土壤水分补给速率。综上,G2放牧可通过增加藻结皮盖度,延长土壤水分在表层土壤的运移时间,有益于干扰后表层土壤微生态环境恢复。本研究结果可为“后退耕时代”黄土高原退耕草地水分管理提供科学依据。

关键词: 生物结皮, 土壤水分, 入渗, 湿润锋速, 土壤水分补给

Abstract: Rainfall is critical to the regulation of slope runoff and soil water recharge. Grazing affects land cover and soil structure, with consequence on slope runoff generation and soil water recharge. Little attention has been paid to the effects of rainfall on soil water recharge caused by grazing. In this study, we examined land covers and soil water contents under different grazing intensities (G1-G5: 2.2, 3.0, 4.2, 6.7, 16.7 sheep·hm^-2) and no grazing sites (NG), aiming to analyze soil water recharge under natural rainfall conditions after grazing. The results showed that grazing exerted significant effects on vegetation and biocrust coverage. The vegetation coverage was decreased by 8.3%-16.4% under G1-G5 grazing, while the biocrust coverage was increased by 106.9% under G2 grazing compared to NG. The soil surface roughness under G1-G5 grazing was increased by 53.1%-152.5%, and the thickness of biocrust was decreased by 24.1% under G5. Soil wetting front velocity decreased with increasing rainfall intensity, and that of 0-5 cm layer under the G2 grazing intensity decreased by 60.0% to 83.3% under rainfall between 18.0 mm and 70.3 mm compared to NG. The effect of grazing on soil wetting front velocity was significantly related to biocrust coverage and soil bulk density of 0-5 cm soil layer. Generally, grazing did not affect soil water recharge rates of the slope grassland on the Loess Plateau. G2 grazing may prolong the migration time of soil water in the surface layer by increasing the coverage of cyanobacteria biocrusts, which may be beneficial to the restoration of soil microenvironment. Our results provided scientific basis for water management in the enclosure grassland of the Loess Plateau in the “post-conversion era”.

Key words: biocrust, soil moisture, infiltration, wetting front velocity, soil water recharge

明姣, 杨光, 赵允格, 马昕昕, 孙会, 乔羽. 放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1555-1562.

MING Jiao, YANG Guang, ZHAO Yunge, MA Xinxin, SUN Hui, QIAO Yu. Effects of grazing on soil water recharge of rehabilitated grassland under natural rainfall on the Loess Pla-teau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(6): 1555-1562.

参考文献

[1] 刘国彬, 上官周平, 姚文艺, 等. 黄土高原生态工程的生态成效. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(1): 11-19
[2] Chen YP, Wang KB, Lin YS, et al. Balancing green and grain trade. Nature Geoscience, 2015, 8: 739-741
[3] Feng XM, Li JX, Cheng W, et al. Evaluation of AMSR-E retrieval by detecting soil moisture decrease following massive dryland re-vegetation in the Loess Plateau, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 196: 253-264
[4] 邵明安, 贾小旭, 王云强, 等. 黄土高原土壤干层研究进展与展望. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(1): 14-22
[5] Wang YQ, Shao MA, Zhu YJ, et al. A new index to quantify dried soil layers in water-limited ecosystems: A case study on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geoderma, 2018, 322: 1-11
[6] 李晋波, 姚楠, 赵英, 等. 不同放牧条件下锡林郭勒典型草原土壤水分分布特征及降水入渗估算. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 1033-1042
[7] Wood MK, Blackburn WH. Grazing systems: Their influence on infiltration rates in the Rolling Plains of Texas. Journal of Range Management, 1981, 34: 331-335
[8] 樊才睿, 张成福, 史小红, 等. 草甸草原不同放牧强度草地土壤水分入渗特征. 节水灌溉, 2020(3): 27-32
[9] Zhao Y, Peth S, Krümmelbein J, et al. Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in Inner Mongolia grassland. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 205: 241-254
[10] Döbert TF, Bork EW, Apfelbaum S, et al. Adaptive multi-paddock grazing improves water infiltration in Canadian grassland soils. Geoderma, 2021, 401: 115314
[11] Fernándeza DM, Arroyo AI, Herrero J, et al. Livestock grazing effect on the hydraulic properties of gypseous soils in a Mediterranean region. Catena, 2021, 207: 105697
[12] 宋美娟, 徐长林, 王琳, 等. 放牧家畜对东祁连山高寒灌丛草地枯落物层及水文功能的影响. 草业科学, 2021, 38(9): 1683-1693
[13] Bai Y, Wu J, Pan Q, et al. Positive linear relationship between productivity and diversity: Evidence from the Eurasian steppe. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 44: 1023-1034
[14] 侯东杰, 乔鲜果, 高趁光, 等. 内蒙古典型草原枯落物的生态水文效应. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 559-565
[15] 石亚芳, 赵允格, 李晨辉, 等. 踩踏干扰对生物结皮土壤渗透性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(10): 3227-3234
[16] 李海燕, 白锦保, 薛清. 陕西省延安市草原承包的现状及存在问题和建议. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2011, 32(7): 65-66
[17] 陈芙蓉, 程积民, 刘伟, 等. 不同干扰对黄土高原典型草原土壤有机碳的影响. 草地学报, 2012, 20(2): 298-304
[18] 赵凌平, 谭世图, 白欣, 等. 封育和放牧对黄土高原典型草原繁殖更新的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 44(9): 27-34
[19] 冯宏珠, 崔志峰, 杨明耀. 延安北部七县牧草栽培的几点思考. 草业科学, 2005, 22(4): 63-65
[20] 李雪转, 樊贵盛. 土壤有机质含量对土壤入渗能力及参数影响的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(3): 188-190
[21] 李雪转. 非充分供水土壤水分入渗规律的试验研究与过程模拟. 博士论文. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2010
[22] 樊才睿, 李畅游, 贾克力, 等. 不同放牧制度下呼伦湖流域草原植被冠层截留. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14): 4716-4724
[23] 谷康民, 赵允格, 张子辉, 等. 模拟放牧干扰对黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面土壤水分入渗的影响. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1827-1834
[24] 刘翔, 周宏飞, 刘昊, 等. 不同类型生物土壤结皮覆盖下风沙土的入渗特征及模拟. 生态学报, 2016, 36(18): 5820-5826
[25] 王国鹏, 肖波, 李胜龙, 等. 黄土高原藓结皮覆盖土壤的穿透阻力特征及其影响因素. 土壤, 2021, 53(1): 173-182
[26] Franzluebbers AJ. Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth. Soil and Tillage Research, 2002, 66: 197-205
[27] 安彬, 肖薇薇, 张淑兰, 等. 1960—2017年黄土高原不同等级降水日数和强度时空变化特征. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 714-723

放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响

Effects of grazing on soil water recharge of rehabilitated grassland under natural rainfall on the Loess Pla-teau, Northwest China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵允格, 吉静怡, 张万涛, 明姣, 黄琬雲, 高丽倩. 黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 739-748.
[2]	吴绍雄, 张勇勇, 赵文智, 康文蓉, 田子晗. 基于COSMIC模型的宇宙射线中子反演荒漠-绿洲区土壤水分 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2445-2452.
[3]	杨浩, 王文龙, 娄义宝, 冯兰茜, 朱亚男. 黄土塬沟壑区典型植被沟头土壤渗透性和抗剪强度特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1862-1870.
[4]	南益聪, 杨永刚, 王泽青, 周杨, 苏巧梅. 煤矸石对矿区土壤特性与植物生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1253-1262.
[5]	郭玥微, 赵允格, 钱煦坤, 万杨卓群, 王闪闪. 黄土高原三种耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异及机理 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1738-1746.
[6]	庞景文, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 江熳, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 毛乌素沙地区域尺度生物结皮有机碳 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1755-1763.
[7]	江熳, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 庞景文, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 不同降水条件下生物结皮覆盖对沙地土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1764-1772.
[8]	张冠华, 易亮, 孙宝洋, 李建明, 沈盛彧. 亚热带苔藓结皮对土壤-微生物-胞外酶化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1791-1800.
[9]	刘哲, 叶兴旺, 王吉平, 程永韬, 钱隆, 肖敬尚, 吴丽. 生物结皮胞外多糖理化特性及菌群结构的季节动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1801-1809.
[10]	王闪闪, 赵允格, 明姣, 张子辉, 郭雅丽. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮群落组成与水分入渗的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1819-1826.
[11]	谷康民, 赵允格, 张子辉, 吉静怡, 郭雅丽. 模拟放牧干扰对黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面土壤水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1827-1834.
[12]	张冠华, 易亮, 丁文峰, 王一然, 牛俊, 李建明, 孙宝洋. 三峡库区苔藓生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1835-1842.
[13]	钟香艳, 石辉, 李旋, 赵一键. 物理结皮和生物结皮的斥水特征及其对水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1843-1852.
[14]	淡晨希, 张琼, 刘畅, 郭珍, 刘刚. 生物结皮与草本植物共生坡面的产流-入渗过程特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1853-1860.
[15]	岳艳鹏, 成龙, 孙迎涛, 庞营军, 吴波, 石麟, 何金军, 贾晓红. 毛乌素沙地生物结皮覆盖区土壤水分收支变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1861-1870.