[1] 徐秋桐, 孔樟良, 章明奎. 不同有机废弃物改良新复垦耕地的综合效果评价. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2): 567-576 [2] Liang C, Schimel JP, Jastrow JD. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology, 2017, 2: 17105 [3] Chen H, Li DJ, Xiao KC, et al. Soil microbial processes and resource limitation in karst and non-karst forests. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32: 1400-1409 [4] Abay P, Gong L, Luo Y, et al. Soil extracellular enzyme stoichiometry reveals the nutrient limitations in soil microbial metabolism under different carbon input manipulations. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 913: 169793 [5] Siedt M, Schäffer A, Smith KEC, et al. Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 751: 141607 [6] Shahbaz M, Kuzyakov Y, Heitkamp F. Decrease of soil organic matter stabilization with increasing inputs: Mechanisms and controls. Geoderma, 2017, 304: 76-82 [7] Luo L, Li L, Raza A, et al. Organic fertilizer and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens promote soil N availability via changing different mineralization-immobilization turnover rates in acidic soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2024, 366: 108950 [8] Chen YL, Du ZL, Weng Z, et al. Formation of soil organic carbon pool is regulated by the structure of dissolved organic matter and microbial carbon pump efficacy: A decadal study comparing different carbon management strategies. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29: 5445-5459 [9] 金晓明, 于良斌, 张颖琪, 等. 群落演替对呼伦贝尔草地两种优势植物繁殖分配及生态化学计量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 787-793 [10] Li SL, Cui YX, Xia ZQ, et al. The mechanism of the dose effect of straw on soil respiration: Evidence from enzymatic stoichiometry and functional genes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 168: 108636 [11] Li SL, Cui YX, Xia ZQ, et al. Microbial nutrient limitations limit carbon sequestration but promote nitrogen and phosphorus cycling: A case study in an agroecosystem with long-term straw return. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 870: 161865 [12] Li JW, Deng L, Penuelas J, et al. C:N:P stoichiometry of plants, soils, and microorganisms: Response to altered precipitation. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29: 7051-7071 [13] Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, et al. Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 93: 1-7 [14] Xiao KQ, Liang C, Wang ZM, et al. Beyond microbial carbon use efficiency. National Science Review, 2024, 11: nwae059 [15] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000 [16] Dong XL, Singh BP, Li GT, et al. Biochar increased field soil inorganic carbon content five years after application. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 186: 36-41 [17] Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19: 703-707 [18] 黄懿梅, 安韶山, 曲东, 等. 两种测定土壤微生物量氮方法的比较初探. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(6): 830-835 [19] He ZL, Wu J, O‘Donnell AG, et al. Seasonal responses in microbial biomass carbon, phosphorus and sulphur in soils under pasture. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1997, 24: 421-428 [20] Sparling GP. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Australia Journal of Soil Research, 1992, 30: 195-207 [21] DeForest JL. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 1180-1186 [22] Sinsabaugh RL, Turner BL, Talbot JM, et al. Stoichio-metry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils. Ecolo-gical Monographs, 2016, 86: 172-189 [23] Luo GW, Li L, Friman VP, et al. Organic amendments increase crop yields by improving microbe-mediated soil functioning of agroecosystems: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124: 105-115 [24] Hao JH, Zhang X, Zong SJ, et al. Biochar as a highly efficient adsorption carrier for sewage sludge-derived nutrients and biostimulants: Component fixation and mecha-nism. Biochar, 2024, 6: 42 [25] Yang X, Sun Q, Yuan J, et al. Successive corn stover and biochar applications mitigate N2O emissions by altering soil physicochemical properties and N-cycling-rela-ted enzyme activities: A five-year field study in Northeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022, 340: 108183 [26] Kalu S, Seppänen A, Mganga KZ, et al. Biochar reduced the mineralization of native and added soil organic carbon: Evidence of negative priming and enhanced microbial carbon use efficiency. Biochar, 2024, 6: 7 [27] Liang F, Li BZ, Vogt RD, et al. Straw return exacerbates soil acidification in major Chinese croplands. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2023, 198: 107176 [28] Ma TF, He XH, Chen SG, et al. Long-term organic-inorganic fertilization regimes alter bacterial and fungal communities and rice yields in paddy soil. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13: 890712 [29] Du YD, Cui BJ, Zhang Q, et al. Effects of manure fertilizer on crop yield and soil properties in China: A meta-analysis. Catena, 2020, 193: 104617 [30] Zuccarini P, Sardans J, Asensio L, et al. Altered activities of extracellular soil enzymes by the interacting global environmental changes. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29: 2067-2091 [31] Song JJ, Song JH, Xu W, et al. Straw return with ferti-lizer improves soil CO2 emissions by mitigating microbial nitrogen limitation during the winter wheat season. Catena, 2024, 241: 108050 [32] 夏文建, 柳开楼, 张丽芳, 等. 长期施肥对红壤稻田土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(3): 628-637 [33] 李增强, 张贤, 王建红, 等. 化肥减施对紫云英还田土壤活性有机碳和碳转化酶活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4): 525-534 [34] Xiao W, Chen X, Jing X, et al. A meta-analysis of soil extracellular enzyme activities in response to global change. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 123: 21-32 [35] Cui YX, Moorhead DL, Peng SS, et al. Predicting microbial nutrient limitations from a stoichiometry-based threshold framework. The Innovation Geoscience, 2024, 2: 100048 [36] Ma ZB, Liang T, Fu HR, et al. Long-term green manuring increases soil carbon sequestration via decreasing qCO2 caused by lower microbial phosphorus limitation in a dry land field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2024, 374: 109142 [37] Zhou GP, Fan KK, Li GL, et al. Synergistic effects of diazotrophs and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil biological nitrogen fixation after three decades of fertilization. iMeta, 2023, 2: e81 [38] Liu XQ, Liu HR, Zhang YS, et al. Straw return drives soil microbial community assemblage to change metabo-lic processes for soil quality amendment in a rice-wheat rotation system. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 185: 109131 [39] Cui YX, Moorhead DL, Wang XX, et al. Decreasing microbial phosphorus limitation increases soil carbon release. Geoderma, 2022, 419: 115868 [40] Huang XY, Li YX, Lin HY, et al. Flooding dominates soil microbial carbon and phosphorus limitations in Po-yang Lake wetland, China. Catena, 2023, 232: 107468 [41] Jiao S, Yang YF, Xu YQ, et al. Balance between community assembly processes mediates species coexistence in agricultural soil microbiomes across eastern China. ISME Journal, 2020, 14: 202-216 [42] Malik AA, Puissant J, Buckeridge KM, et al. Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 3591 |