南京市城乡交错带景观格局研究

应用生态学报 ›› 2003, Vol. ›› Issue (8): 1363-1368.

南京市城乡交错带景观格局研究

陈彩虹^1,2,3, 胡锋², 张落成²

1. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 南京 210008;
2. 南京农业大学, 南京 210095;
3. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2000-10-23 修回日期:2001-09-07
通讯作者: 张落成
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程资助项目(KZCX2SW31803)

Landscape pattern of Nanjing urban-rural ecotone

CHEN Caihong^1,2,3, HU Feng², ZHANG Luochen²

1. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
2. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
3. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100093, China

Received:2000-10-23 Revised:2001-09-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 依据景观生态学理论,选取典型样区,在遥感和地理信息系统的支持下,分析了南京市城乡交错带的景观生态特征.结果表明,东部样区以景观多样性、优势度和破碎度较低为基本特征,林地等自然嵌块体的面积和平均周长较大,而平均分维数、平均伸长指数和分离度较低,菜地和水田嵌块体的平均面积也高于南部样区;南部样区景观多样性及优势度高,嵌块体数目多,景观破碎化较严重,居民点及工矿用地和水域的密度高、总面积及周长大,居民点及工矿用地和道路的平均面积也较高.探讨了两个样区嵌块体面积与分维数、嵌块体数目之间的关系,指出城乡交错带不同类型嵌块体景观特征及生态意义.

关键词: 城乡交错带, 景观格局, 南京市

Abstract: Landscape ecological characteristics of the urban-rural ecotone of Nanjing City were studied by using remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) techniques. Two representative study regions with the same area were chosen in the eastern and southern part of the city. The urban-rural fringe of both east (URFE) and south region (URFS) can be divided into three zones: fringe-paraurban zone, transition zone and pararural zone. URFE was basically characterized by low landscape diversity, dominance and fragmentation. The forest patches in URFE had larger area and average perimeter, while their average fractal dimension, average stretched index and separated degree were lower. The average area of vegetable land and paddy land was larger than that of south region. URFS showed higher landscape diversity, dominance and fragmentation, more and higher density of patches. The area and the perimeter of water and architectural patches in URFSwere also larger than that of URFE. The relationship between patch area and fractal dimension, stretched index and fractal dimension, patch number and area were discussed. The function and contributing factors of each type of patches, especially forestland, and the landscape characteristics and the ecological significance of corridors including road, river, and city wall of urban rural fringe were also analyzed.

Key words: Urban-rural ecotone, Landscape pattern, Nanjing city

中图分类号:

TV984

陈彩虹, 胡锋, 张落成. 南京市城乡交错带景观格局研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, (8): 1363-1368.

CHEN Caihong, HU Feng, ZHANG Luochen. Landscape pattern of Nanjing urban-rural ecotone[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, (8): 1363-1368.

[1]	黎贝, 焦胜, 周敏, 周媛. “城市-街区”尺度下绿地景观格局对雨洪滞蓄效能的影响研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 533-542.
[2]	谢卓洪, 雷敏, 刘利杰, 莫燕卿, 战国强, 刘萍. 珠三角城市群景观生态格局评价与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2481-2488.
[3]	连虎刚, 曲张明, 刘春芳, 贺扬希. 北方防沙带河西走廊段景观格局时空演变及其防风固沙服务响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2518-2526.
[4]	张峻铭, 孙永玉, 周姗, 邱昕腾, 孙仕仙, 欧朝蓉. 2000—2020年金沙江干热河谷景观生态风险的时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2767-2776.
[5]	盛菲, 刘士余, 张婷, 余敏琪. 濂水流域降雨变化和景观格局演变的径流效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 196-202.
[6]	李月辉, 胡远满, 王正文. 山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程与景观生态学 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 249-256.
[7]	吉静怡, 赵允格, 张万涛, 谷康民. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮空间分布的代表性景观指数 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1878-1884.
[8]	刘澄静, 角媛梅, 徐秋娥, 杨艳芬, 丁银平, 刘志林. 哈尼梯田景观格局对地表水δ¹⁸O海拔效应的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 1083-1090.
[9]	元冰瑜, 高建华, 池源, 扎边, 龚照辉. 1990—2020年江苏省海岸带景观生态状况指数跨尺度时空特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 489-499.
[10]	邱彩琳, 邱宁, 张天洁. 建设用地扩张对区域文化景观时空演变的影响——以广东省韩江三角洲为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3065-3074.
[11]	文疆回, 李瑞. 贵州省生态系统服务价值时空演变及其对景观格局变化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3075-3086.
[12]	吴晗, 陈晓冰, 姜波, 秦梓城, 刘思佳, 刘俊杰. 秸秆还田对甘蔗地土壤优先流运动特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 141-148.
[13]	董芊芊, 刘垚燚, 曾鹏, 孙凤云, 张然, 田恬, 车越. 城市三维景观格局特征与社会环境因子的交互影响: 基于增强回归树 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3311-3320.
[14]	李迪康, 刘淼, 李春林, 胡远满, 王聪, 刘冲. 我国城市大气环境与周边区域二维和三维景观格局关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1593-1602.
[15]	高彬嫔, 李琛, 吴映梅, 郑可君, 武燕. 川滇生态屏障区景观生态风险评价及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1603-1613.