欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 3387-3396.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202511.025

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

青山湖源头流域景观格局对河流总氮浓度的影响

杨紫清1, 徐佳妮1, 邢梦潇1, 刘东鑫1, 王成1, 邬建红1,2*, 何圣嘉1,2, 姜培坤1,2   

  1. 1浙江农林大学环境与资源学院/碳中和学院, 杭州 311300;
    2浙江省土壤修复与质量提升重点实验室, 杭州 311300
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-11 接受日期:2025-09-10 出版日期:2025-11-18 发布日期:2026-06-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: wujianhong@zafu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨紫清, 女, 2000年, 硕士研究生。主要从事面源污染与生态治理研究。E-mail: ziqing.yang.edu@outlook.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42201122,42277045)

Influence of landscape patterns on riverine nitrogen concentrations in Qingshan Lake headwater watershed

YANG Ziqing1, XU Jiani1, XING Mengxiao1, LIU Dongxin1, WANG Cheng1, WU Jianhong1,2*, HE Shengjia1,2, JIANG Peikun1,2   

  1. 1College of Environment and Resources/College of Carbon Neutrality, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China;
    2Key Laboratory of Soil Remediation and Quality Improvement of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 311300, China
  • Received:2025-04-11 Accepted:2025-09-10 Online:2025-11-18 Published:2026-06-18

摘要: 研究江河源头流域景观格局与水质的关系,有助于制定可持续景观发展政策以保护水源区水质。本研究以青山湖源头流域为研究对象,基于2023—2024年间流域内25个水质监测断面的数据,采用偏最小二乘法(PLSR)、非参数突变点分析和bootstrap方法,定量评估景观格局对丰水期、平水期和枯水期河流氮营养盐浓度的影响。结果表明: 研究区不同子流域景观优势度和景观破碎度差异较大;景观空间负荷对比指数(LWLI)>0.50的高值区主要分布在“源”景观面积占比大的低海拔缓坡区域,<0.10的低值区主要分布在以林地为主的中高海拔山区。最优PLSR模型分别解释了丰水期、平水期和枯水期总氮(TN)浓度变异的60.6%、69.7%和78.3%。变量重要性(VIP)分析结果表明,LWLI是全年影响TN浓度变化的关键景观因子;建设用地占比主要影响丰水期TN浓度;草地占比和最大斑块指数在平水期影响较大;林地占比则在枯水期影响较大。LWLI和建设用地占比对TN浓度有正效应,而草地占比、最大斑块指数和林地占比对TN浓度有明显的负效应。当LWLI值超过0.35时,丰水期河流中TN浓度突变的累积概率超过95.0%,河流水质恶化的风险加剧。优化景观格局可有效控制非点源污染,从而改善源头流域的水质。

关键词: 景观格局, 氮污染, 景观空间负荷对比指数, 偏最小二乘法, 非参数突变点分析

Abstract: Understanding the relationship between landscape patterns and water quality in river headwater watersheds is essential for developing sustainable landscape policies to protect water quality in water source areas. With the Qingshan Lake headwater watershed as the research object and based on the data of 25 water sampling sites between 2023 and 2024, we used the partial least squares regression (PLSR), non-parametric change-point analysis and bootstrap methods to quantitatively assess the impacts of landscape patterns on riverine nitrogen concentration during high-flow, normal-flow, and low-flow periods. The results showed that there were significant differences in landscape dominance and fragmentation among different sub-watersheds. High landscape weighted load index (LWLI) values (>0.50) were predominantly observed in low-altitude, gently sloping areas were characterized by extensive “source” landscapes, whereas low LWLI value (<0.10) were mainly distributed in mid-altitude regions dominated by forests. The optimal PLSR model accounted for 60.6%, 69.7%, and 78.3% of the variance in total nitrogen (TN) concentrations during the high-flow, normal-flow, and low-flow periods, respectively. Variable importance in projection (VIP) analysis revealed that LWLI was the dominant landscape factor driving TN concentrations throughout the year. The proportion of build-up land primarily affected TN concentrations during the high-flow period, while the proportion of grassland and the largest patch index had more substantial effects during the normal-flow period. During the low-flow period, the proportion of forest land emerged as the most dominant factor. LWLI and the proportion of construction land exerted positive effects on TN concentrations, whereas the proportion of grassland, the largest patch index, and the proportion of forest land exhibited negative effects. When the LWLI value exceeded 0.35, the cumulative probability of abrupt changes in TN concentration during the high-flow period exceeded 95.0%, thereby elevating the risk of water quality degradation. Optimizing landscape patterns could effectively control non-point source pollution and improve water quality in headwater watersheds.

Key words: landscape pattern, nitrogen pollution, landscape weighted load index, partial least squares regression, nonparametric change-point analysis