
应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2392-2400.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.029
所属专题: 专家见解
丛佳仪1,2, 李新正1,2,3,4, 徐勇1,2,3,4*
收稿日期:2024-01-02
接受日期:2024-05-22
出版日期:2024-09-18
发布日期:2025-03-18
通讯作者:
* E-mail: xuyong@qdio.ac.cn
作者简介:丛佳仪, 男, 2000年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事大型底栖动物生态学。E-mail: congjiayi@qdio.ac.cn
基金资助:CONG Jiayi1,2, LI Xinzheng1,2,3,4, XU Yong1,2,3,4*
Received:2024-01-02
Accepted:2024-05-22
Online:2024-09-18
Published:2025-03-18
摘要: 物种分布模型是一种基于环境条件和物种分布数据预测物种在不同环境中的分布范围和适宜生境的模型工具,主要包括关联模型、机理模型和机理-关联混合模型。在海洋领域,物种分布模型已被广泛应用于预测鱼类、哺乳类和藻类等海洋生物的分布,但在大型底栖动物中的应用还比较匮乏。大型底栖动物作为海洋生态系统的重要组成部分,研究其分布规律对生态保护和资源管理具有重要意义。本文对物种分布模型的常用方法进行了总结,介绍了不同模型在预测海洋大型底栖动物分布中的研究案例,重点介绍了关联模型和机理模型在分析气候变化对海洋大型底栖动物分布影响中的应用,阐述了物种分布模型面临的挑战以及发展前景。随着遥感技术和建模方法的不断进步,物种分布模型将在海洋生态学研究中发挥更加重要的作用,为应对气候变化和保护海洋生物多样性提供科学依据。
丛佳仪, 李新正, 徐勇. 物种分布模型在海洋大型底栖动物分布预测中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2392-2400.
CONG Jiayi, LI Xinzheng, XU Yong. Application of species distribution models in predicting the distribution of marine macrobenthos[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(9): 2392-2400.
| [1] Elith J, Leathwick JR. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systema-tics, 2009, 40: 677-697 [2] Engel M, Mette T, Falk W. Spatial species distribution models: Using Bayes inference with INLA and SPDE to improve the tree species choice for important European tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 507: 119983 [3] Hellegers M, Ozinga WA, van Hinsberg A, et al. Eva-luating the ecological realism of plant species distribution models with ecological indicator values. Ecography, 2020, 43: 161-170 [4] Lecocq T, Harpke A, Rasmont P, et al. Integrating intraspecific differentiation in species distribution models: Consequences on projections of current and future climatically suitable areas of species. Diversity and Distributions, 2019, 25: 1088-1100 [5] Pellissier L, Pradervand JN, Pottier J, et al. Climate-based empirical models show biased predictions of butterfly communities along environmental gradients. Ecography, 2012, 35: 684-692 [6] Trew BT, Early R, Duffy JP, et al. Using near-ground leaf temperatures alters the projected climate change impacts on the historical range of a floristic biodiversity hotspot. Diversity and Distributions, 2022, 28: 1282-1297 [7] Fairbanks RG, Sverdlove M, Free R, et al. Vertical-distribution and isotopic fractionation of living planktonic-foraminifera from the Panama basin. Nature, 1982, 298: 841-844 [8] Beca-Carretero P, Teichberg M, Winters G, et al. Projected rapid habitat expansion of tropical seagrass species in the Mediterranean Sea as climate change progresses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 555376 [9] Gallon RK, Robuchon M, Leroy B, et al. Twenty years of observed and predicted changes in subtidal red seaweed assemblages along a biogeographical transition zone: Inferring potential causes from environmental data. Journal of Biogeography, 2014, 41: 2293-2306 [10] Li JJ, Huang SH, Liu ZY, et al. Climate-driven range shifts of brown seaweed Sargassum horneri in the Northwest Pacific. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2020, 7: 570881 [11] Mendoza-Segura C, Fernandez E, Beca-Carretero P. Predicted changes in the biogeographical range of Gracilaria vermiculophylla under present and future climate scenarios. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11: 367 [12] Neiva J, Assis J, Fernandes F, et al. Species distribution models and mitochondrial DNA phylogeography suggest an extensive biogeographical shift in the high-intertidal seaweed Pelvetia canaliculata. Journal of Biogeography, 2014, 41: 1137-1148 [13] Brun P, Kiorboe T, Licandro P, et al. The predictive skill of species distribution models for plankton in a changing climate. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22: 3170-3181 [14] Jensen LO, Mousing EA, Richardson K. Using species distribution modelling to predict future distributions of phytoplankton: Case study using species important for the biological pump. Marine Ecology, 2017, 38: e12427 [15] Zhang ZX, Mammola S, Xian WW, et al. Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of ichthyoplankton in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Diversity and Distributions, 2020, 26: 126-137 [16] Asch RG, Sobolewska J, Chan K. Assessing the reliability of species distribution models in the face of climate and ecosystem regime shifts: Small pelagic fishes in the California current system. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2022, 9: 711522 [17] Champion C, Brodie S, Coleman MA. Climate-driven range shifts are rapid yet variable among recreationally important coastal-pelagic fishes. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2021, 8: 622299 [18] Fennie HW, Seary R, Muhling BA, et al. An anchovy ecosystem indicator of marine predator foraging and reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2023, 290: 20222326 [19] Harishchandra A, Xue HJ, Salinas S, et al. Thermal physiology integrated species distribution model predicts profound habitat fragmentation for estuarine fish with ocean warming. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12: 21781 [20] Karp MA, Brodie S, Smith JA, et al. Projecting species distributions using fishery-dependent data. Fish and Fisheries, 2023, 24: 71-92 [21] Schickele A, Goberville E, Leroy B, et al. European small pelagic fish distribution under global change scenarios. Fish and Fisheries, 2021, 22: 212-225 [22] Su S, Du J, Chen B, et al. Impact of climate change on the potential habitat distributions of eight pelagic fishes in the coastal waters of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42: 4834-4846 [23] 刘尊雷, 杨林林, 袁兴伟, 等. 基于集成模型的小黄鱼越冬群体适宜生境及其环境影响因素. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 2076-2086 [24] El-Gabbas A, Van Opzeeland I, Burkhardt E, et al. Dynamic species distribution models in the marine realm: Predicting year-round habitat suitability of Baleen whales in the Southern Ocean. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2021, 8: 802276 [25] Pendleton DE, Holmes EE, Redfern J, et al. Using modelled prey to predict the distribution of a highly mobile marine mammal. Diversity and Distributions, 2020, 26: 1612-1626 [26] Thorne LH, Baird RW, Webster DL, et al. Predicting fisheries bycatch: A case study and field test for pilot whales in a pelagic longline fishery. Diversity and Distributions, 2019, 25: 909-923 [27] Tobena M, Prieto R, Machete M, et al. Modeling the potential distribution and richness of cetaceans in the azores from fisheries observer program data. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2016, 3: 202 [28] Robinson LM, Elith J, Hobday AJ, et al. Pushing the limits in marine species distribution modelling: Lessons from the land present challenges and opportunities. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2011, 20: 789-802 [29] Robinson NM, Nelson WA, Costello MJ, et al. A systematic review of marine-based species distribution models (SDMs) with recommendations for best practice. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2017, 4: 421 [30] 李新正. 我国海洋大型底栖生物多样性研究及展望: 以黄海为例. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(6): 676-684 [31] 李新正, 刘录三, 李宝泉, 等. 中国海洋大型底栖生物研究与实践. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2010 [32] Pillay D. Ecosystem engineering by thalassinidean crustaceans: Response variability, contextual dependencies and perspectives on future research. Diversity, 2019, 11: 64 [33] 张敬怀, 李小敏, 方宏达, 等. 珠江口海洋疏浚物倾倒区及附近海域大型底栖生物群落健康评价. 热带海洋学报, 2010, 29(5): 119-124 [34] 丁敬坤, 薛素燕, 李加琦, 等. 基于大型底栖动物的桑沟湾不同养殖区底栖生境健康评价. 中国水产科学, 2020, 27(12): 1393-1401 [35] 丁敬坤, 张雯雯, 李阳, 等. 胶州湾底栖生态系统健康评价: 基于大型底栖动物生态学特征. 渔业科学进展, 2020, 41(2): 20-26 [36] Guidetti P, Modena M, La Mesa G, et al. Composition, abundance and stratification of macrobenthos in the marine area impacted by tar aggregates derived from the Haven oil-spill (Ligurian Sea, Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2000, 40: 1161-1166 [37] Chatzinikolaou E, Mandalakis M, Damianidis P, et al. Spatio-temporal benthic biodiversity patterns and pollution pressure in three Mediterranean touristic ports. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 624: 648-660 [38] Simboura N, Reizopoulou S. A comparative approach of assessing ecological status in two coastal areas of Eastern Mediterranean. Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7: 455-468 [39] 蔡立哲. 大型底栖动物污染指数(MPI). 环境科学学报, 2003, 23(5): 625-629 [40] Pinto R, Patrício J, Baeta A, et al. Review and evaluation of estuarine biotic indices to assess benthic condition. Ecological Indicators, 2009, 9: 1-25 [41] 杨晓龙, 杨超杰, 胡成业, 等. 物种分布模型在海洋潜在生境预测的应用研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 2063-2072 [42] Kearney MR, Wintle BA, Porter WP. Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conservation Letters, 2010, 3: 203-213 [43] Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 2000, 135: 147-186 [44] 郭彦龙, 赵泽芳, 乔慧捷, 等. 物种分布模型面临的挑战与发展趋势. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(12): 1292-1305 [45] Kearney M, Porter W. Mechanistic niche modelling: Combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 334-350 [46] Dormann CF, Schymanski SJ, Cabral J, et al. Correlation and process in species distribution models: Bridging a dichotomy. Journal of Biogeography, 2012, 39: 2119-2131 [47] Methorst J, Boehning-Gaese K, Khaliq I, et al. A framework integrating physiology, dispersal and land-use to project species ranges under climate change. Journal of Avian Biology, 2017, 48: 1532-1548 [48] DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM. Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2005, 36: 147-168 [49] Ni J. Biome models: Main principles and applications. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2002, 26: 481-488 [50] Razgour O. Beyond species distribution modeling: A landscape genetics approach to investigating range shifts under future climate change. Ecological Informatics, 2015, 30: 250-256 [51] Rougier T, Lassalle G, Drouineau H, et al. The combined use of correlative and mechanistic species distribution models benefits low conservation status species. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0139194 [52] Reiss H, Cunze S, Konig K, et al. Species distribution modelling of marine benthos: A North Sea case study. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2011, 442: 71-86 [53] Luan J, Zhang CL, Xu BD, et al. Modelling the spatial distribution of three Portunidae crabs in Haizhou Bay, China. PLoS One, 2018, 13(11): e0207457 [54] Drewnik A, Weslawski JM, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M. Benthic Crustacea and Mollusca distribution in Arctic fjord: Case study of patterns in Hornsund, Svalbard. Oceanologia, 2017, 59: 565-575 [55] Meissner K, Fiorentino D, Schnurr S, et al. Distribution of benthic marine invertebrates at northern latitudes: An evaluation applying multi-algorithm species distribution models. Journal of Sea Research, 2014, 85: 241-254 [56] Noble MM, Harasti D, Fulton CJ, et al. Identifying spatial conservation priorities using traditional and local ecological knowledge of iconic marine species and ecosystem threats. Biological Conservation, 2020, 249: 108709 [57] Zellmer AJ, Claisse JT, Williams CM, et al. Predicting optimal sites for ecosystem restoration using stacked-species distribution modeling. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2019, 6: 3 [58] 颜明艳, 李琼珍, 宋洁, 等. 基于MAXENT模型评估北部湾潮间带中国鲎和圆尾鲎稚鲎的潜在地理分布及种群保育对策. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3100-3109 [59] 邢衍阔, 王林龙, 刘敏, 等. 基于物种分布模型的全球绿海龟空间分布及洄游廊道预测. 中国水产科学, 2021, 28(10): 1337-1345 [60] 邢衍阔, 康斌, 鹿志创, 等. 气候变化条件下太平洋丽龟的适宜生境及其变化. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2267-2273 [61] Wright MK, Pompe LR, Mishra DR, et al. Hawksbill presence and habitat suitability of a marine reserve in Honduras. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 225: 106204 [62] Xu Y, Ma L, Sui J, et al. Potential effects of climate change on the habitat suitability of macrobenthos in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2022, 174: 113238 [63] Xu Y, Ma L, Sui J, et al. Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of echinoderms in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2023, 194: 115246 [64] Ceylan Y, Gül S. Potential habitats of an alien species (Asterias rubens Linnaeus, 1758) in the Black Sea: Its current and future distribution patterns. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29: 19563-19571 [65] Russell BD, Connell SD, Mellin C, et al. Predicting the distribution of commercially important invertebrate stocks under future climate. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12): e46554 [66] Brown LA, Furlong JN, Brown KM, et al. Oyster reef restoration in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Effect of artificial substrate and age on nekton and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage use. Restoration Ecology, 2014, 22: 214-222 [67] Hespanhol H, Cezon K, Felicisimo AM, et al. How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? Ecology and Evolution, 2015, 5: 5443-5455 [68] Torres LG, Sutton PJH, Thompson DR, et al. Poor transferability of species distribution models for a pelagic predator, the grey petrel, indicates contrasting habitat preferences across ocean basins. PLoS One, 2015, 10(3): e0120014 [69] Rodriguez L, Garcia JJ, Carreno F, et al. Integration of physiological knowledge into hybrid species distribution modelling to improve forecast of distributional shifts of tropical corals. Diversity and Distributions, 2019, 25: 715-728 [70] Marques DA, Jones FC, Di Palma F, et al. Experimental evidence for rapid genomic adaptation to a new niche in an adaptive radiation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2: 1128-1138 [71] Chen Y, Gao Y, Huang X, et al. Incorporating adaptive genomic variation into predictive models for invasion risk assessment. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2024, 18: 100299 [72] Gallego R, Dennis TE, Basher Z, et al. On the need to consider multiphasic sensitivity of marine organisms to climate change: A case study of the Antarctic acorn barnacle. Journal of Biogeography, 2017, 44: 2165-2175 [73] Schulte PM. The effects of temperature on aerobic metabolism: Towards a mechanistic understanding of the responses of ectotherms to a changing environment. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2015, 218: 1856-1866 [74] Gamliel I, Buba Y, Guy-Haim T, et al. Incorporating physiology into species distribution models moderates the projected impact of warming on selected Mediterranean marine species. Ecography, 2020, 43: 1090-1106 [75] Bosch-Belmar M, Giommi C, Milisenda G, et al. Integrating functional traits into correlative species distribution models to investigate the vulnerability of marine human activities to climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 799: 149351 [76] Marchessaux G, Bosch-Belmar M, Cilenti L, et al. The invasive blue crab Callinectes sapidus thermal response: Predicting metabolic suitability maps under future warming Mediterranean scenarios. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2022, 9: 1055404 [77] Stephenson F, Gladstone-Gallagher RV, Bulmer RH, et al. Inclusion of biotic variables improves predictions of environmental niche models. Diversity and Distributions, 2022, 28: 1373-1390 [78] Bennington S, Rayment W, Dawson S. Putting prey into the picture: Improvements to species distribution models for bottlenose dolphins in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2020, 653: 191-204 [79] Liu S, Tian Y, Liu Y, et al. Development of a prey-predator species distribution model for a large piscivorous fish: A case study for Japanese Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius and Japanese anchovy Engraulis japonicus. Deep-Sea Research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2023, 207: 105227 [80] Zhang Y, Zhang C, Xu B, et al. Impacts of trophic interactions on the prediction of spatio-temporal distribution of mid-trophic level fishes. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 138: 108826 [81] Zhang C, Chen Y, Xu B, et al. Comparing the prediction of joint species distribution models with respect to characteristics of sampling data. Ecography, 2018, 41: 1876-1887 [82] Fitzpatrick MC, Sanders NJ, Ferrier S, et al. Forecasting the future of biodiversity: A test of single- and multi-species models for ants in North America. Ecography, 2011, 34: 836-847 [83] Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 2008, 319: 948-952 [84] Gallardo B, Zieritz A, Aldridge DC. The importance of the human footprint in shaping the global distribution of terrestrial, freshwater and marine invaders. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0125801 |
| [1] | 朱文聪, 赵秋兰, 刘亚龙, 全先奎. 兴安落叶松根系非结构性碳水化合物对气候变暖的响应及种源差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(8): 2547-2555. |
| [2] | 刘亚美, 吴荣军, 郭欢, 赵嘉诚, 冯兆忠. 基于SIF的光响应机理模型在华北平原冬小麦总初级生产力与产量估算中的适用性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2233-2244. |
| [3] | 马婷, 杨光磊, 王紫娟. 气候变化下中国3种桫椤科植物的分布格局变迁及优先保护区域识别 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2257-2270. |
| [4] | 许树涛, 李超骕, 杨华杰. 中国主要地级及以上城市空间形态与极端高温事件的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2343-2352. |
| [5] | 杨阳, 王宝荣, 陈骥, 方临川, 王云强, 安韶山. 土壤胞外酶对全球变化响应研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2441-2452. |
| [6] | 张云, 杨艺婷, 文晓晨, 张万涛, 朱许可, 马理辉. 2000—2020年黄土高原植被净初级生产力的时空变化及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 1991-1999. |
| [7] | 金睿, 罗肇河, 刘璇, 刘锦荃, 苏尚柯, 杜虹, 杜建国, 康建华, 胡文佳. 中国近海具刺环胺藻分布及其对气候变化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 2020-2030. |
| [8] | 李栋, 梁斐斐, 牛淼, 张秀敏, 孔舒, 陈琳琳, 陈静, 王娇. 山东省南四湖夏秋季大型底栖动物β多样性格局及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 2061-2071. |
| [9] | 陈晓霞, 石福孙, 陶伯山, 李婧怡, 马文宝. 四川大沟流域优势树种径向生长及其对气候的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1449-1458. |
| [10] | 吕文璇, 高露双, 李军锋, 王佳茜, 李国雷, 张志艺, 张昕宇, 李思杰. 气候变化背景下栓皮栎在中国的适生区格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1466-1476. |
| [11] | 何晓茜, 李攀, 丁虎, 李晶, 王金枝, 崔丽娟, 晏智锋. 河口湿地碳氮耦合过程与调控 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1685-1696. |
| [12] | 冯娟, 买吾拉夏·木巴热克, 刘卫平. 玛纳斯河流域植被生态质量变化及驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 1134-1140. |
| [13] | 韩越, 张建英, 陈丽娟, 贾龙. 阿拉善高原拟步甲科昆虫的潜在适生区预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 1239-1246. |
| [14] | 刘一丹, 黄海广, 李晓兰, 李雪华. 毛乌素沙地归一化植被指数时空演变及其驱动力:以内蒙古乌审旗为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(3): 805-813. |
| [15] | 谢涵琦, 张庆吉, 马小雪, 田琳琳. 气候变化对凤眼莲在长江中下游地区潜在适生区的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(3): 917-925. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
辽公网安备21010302000574号
辽ICP备05000862号-2
版权所有 © 《应用生态学报》编辑部