云南省不同气候带蚯蚓分布特征

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202502.031

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 569-577.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202502.031

云南省不同气候带蚯蚓分布特征

罗庆睿^1,2,3, 李红阳^1,2,3, 肖艳兰^1,2,3, 字玉奋^1,2,3, 段昌群^1,2,3, 刘嫦娥^1,2,3*

¹云南大学生态与环境学院, 云南省高原山地生态与退化环境修复重点实验室, 昆明 650500;
²滇中生态敏感区生态功能修复云南省野外科学观测研究站/云南省高原湖泊生态修复及流域管理国际联合研究中心/云南省生态文明建设智库, 昆明 650091;
³西南联合研究生院/国际河流与生态安全研究所, 昆明 650500

收稿日期:2024-07-01 接受日期:2024-11-21 出版日期:2025-02-18 发布日期:2025-08-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: change@ynu.edu.cn
作者简介:罗庆睿, 女, 2000年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土壤生态修复研究。E-mail: r200010212022@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32260315)和云南省基础研究计划重点项目(202201AS070016,202201BF070001-002,202203AC100002)

Distribution characteristics of earthworms in different climatic zones of Yunnan Province, Southwest China.

LUO Qingrui^1,2,3, LI Hongyang^1,2,3, XIAO Yanlan^1,2,3, ZI Yufen^1,2,3, DUAN Changqun^1,2,3, LIU Chang’e^1,2,3*

¹Yunnan Key Laboratory for Plateau Mountain Ecology and Restoration of Degraded Environments & School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China;
²Central Yunnan Field Scientific Station for Restoration of Ecological Function/Yunnan International Joint Research Center of Plateau Lake Ecological Restoration and Watershed Management/Yunnan Think Tank for Ecological Civilization Construction, Kunming 650091, China;
³Southwestern United Graduate School/Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Kunming 650500, China

Received:2024-07-01 Accepted:2024-11-21 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 大型土壤动物蚯蚓对土壤生态功能具有重要影响。本研究采集了云南省6个气候带的1984个蚯蚓样本,探讨云南省蚯蚓的空间分布特征。结果表明: 神女辛石蚓和梯形流蚓为云南省优势蚯蚓物种。云南省温带地区的蚯蚓物种最多,其次为北热带、北亚热带、中亚热带、高原气候带和南亚热带;蚯蚓密度表现为高原气候带(70.7 ind·m^-2)>温带(62.4 ind·m^-2)>北亚热带(55.9 ind·m^-2)>北热带(37.7 ind·m^-2)>中亚热带(37.7 ind·m^-2)>南亚热带(22.7 ind·m^-2);蚯蚓生物量为北亚热带(27.4 g·m^-2)>北热带(24.5 g·m^-2)>南亚热带(19.1 g·m^-2)>温带(17.0 g·m^-2)>中亚热带(15.3 g·m^-2)>高原气候带(12.5 g·m^-2)。不同的气候带类型直接影响蚯蚓生物量,此外,土壤含水率、有机质、全氮等土壤特性对蚯蚓群落也有显著影响。

关键词: 蚯蚓, 土壤质量, 种群构成, 空间分布特征, 气候带

Abstract: Earthworms, as large soil animals, play a crucial role in soil ecological functions. We investigated the spatial distribution characteristics of earthworms by collecting 1984 earthworm individuals from six climatic zones in Yunnan Province. The results showed that Octolasion tyrtaeum and Aporrectodea trapezoides were the dominant earthworm species in Yunnan Province. The highest diversity of earthworm species was found in the temperate zone, followed by the northern tropics, northern subtro-pics, central subtropics, plateau climatic zone, and southern subtropics. In terms of density, the order was plateau climatic zone (70.7 ind·m^-2) > temperate zone (62.4 ind·m^-2) > northern subtropics (55.9 ind·m^-2) > northern tropics (37.7 ind·m^-2) > central subtropics (37.7 ind·m^-2) > southern subtropics (22.7 ind·m^-2). Regarding biomass, the order was northern subtropics (27.4 g·m^-2) > northern tropics (24.5 g·m^-2) > southern subtropics (19.1 g·m^-2) > temperate zone (17.0 g·m^-2) > central subtropics (15.3 g·m^-2) > plateau climatic zone (12.5 g·m^-2). Climate zones exerted a direct influence on the biomass of earthworms. Furthermore, soil characteristics, including soil moisture, organic matter, and total nitrogen content significantly impacted earthworm communities.

Key words: earthworm; soil quality; population composition; spatial distribution characteristics; climatic zone

罗庆睿, 李红阳, 肖艳兰, 字玉奋, 段昌群, 刘嫦娥. 云南省不同气候带蚯蚓分布特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 569-577.

LUO Qingrui, LI Hongyang, XIAO Yanlan, ZI Yufen, DUAN Changqun, LIU Chang’e. Distribution characteristics of earthworms in different climatic zones of Yunnan Province, Southwest China.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(2): 569-577.

参考文献

[1] Hullot O, Lamy I, Tiziani R, et al. The effect of earthworms on plant response in metal contaminated soil focusing on belowground-aboveground relationships. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 274, DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116499
[2] Yuvaraj A, Karmegam N, TripathiI S, et al. Environment-friendly management of textile mill wastewater sludge using epigeic earthworms: Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and metallothionein production. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 254, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109813
[3] Mueller KE, Eisenhauer N, Reich PB, et al. Light, earthworms, and soil resources as predictors of diversity of 10 soil invertebrate groups across monocultures of 14 tree species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 92: 184-198
[4] Desie E, Van Meerbeek K, De Wandeler H, et al. Posi-tive feedback loop between earthworms, humus form and soil pH reinforces earthworm abundance in European forests. Functional Ecology, 2020, 34: 2598-2610
[5] Mathieu J, Reynolds JW, Fragoso CE, et al. Global worming: Massive invasion of North America by earthworms revealed [EB/OL]. (2022-06-30)[2023-12-06]https://www.researchgate.net/signup.SignUp.html
[6] Siebert J, Eisenhauer N, Poll C, et al. Earthworms modulate the effects of climate warming on the taxon richness of soil meso- and macrofauna in an agricultural system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 278: 72-80
[7] Helen RP, Carlos AG, Marie LCB, et al. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science, 2019, 366: 480-485
[8] Meshcheryakova EN, Berman DI. Cold hardiness and geographic distribution of earthworms (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae, Moniligastridae). Entomological Review, 2014, 94: 486-497
[9] Singh S, Sharma A, Khajuria K, et al. Soil properties changes earthworm diversity indices in different agro-ecosystem. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 20, DOI: 10.1186/s12898-020-00296-5
[10] Rutgers M, Orgiazzi A, Gardi C, et al. Mapping earthworm communities in Europe. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016, 97: 98-111
[11] Johnston AS, Sibly RM, Thorbek P. Forecasting tillage and soil warming effects on earthworm populations. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55: 1498-1509
[12] Eisenhauer N, Milcu A, Sabais AC, et al. Plant community impacts on the structure of earthworm communities depend on season and change with time. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 2430-2443
[13] Hodson ME, Corstanjeb R, Jones DT, et al. Earthworm distributions are not driven by measurable soil properties. Do they really indicate soil quality? PLoS One, 2021, 16(8): e0241945
[14] Xie T, Wang M, Chen W, et al. Impacts of urbanization and landscape patterns on the earthworm communities in residential areas in Beijing. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 626: 1261-1269
[15] 段旭, 陶云, 段长春. 云南省细网格气候区划及气候代表站选取. 大气科学学报, 2011, 34(3): 336-342
[16] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 土地利用现状分类(GB/T 21010—2017). 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017
[17] 赵琦, 蒋际宝, 张曾鲁, 等. 海南岛蚯蚓物种组成及其系统发育分析. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 11-21
[18] Cao SP, Tan C, Wang H, et al. Distribution and influencing factors of terrestrial earthworms in Nanniwan wetland. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32: 80-84
[19] Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 1949, 163: 688-688
[20] Pielou EC. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. New York: Wiley, 1970
[21] Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press, 1949
[22] Jorgensen, Sven Erik J, Brian F, et al. Encyclopedia of Ecology. Oxford: Academic Press, 2008: 2209-2210
[23] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000: 100-125
[24] Ginestet C. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 2011, 174: 245-246
[25] Lefcheck JS. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systema-tics. Methods in Ecology & Evolution, 2016, 7, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12512
[26] 孙静. 中国远盲属蚯蚓分类学及分子系统发育研究. 博士论文. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2013
[27] He X, Liu S, Wang J, et al. Disturbance intensity overwhelms propagule pressure and litter resource in controlling the success of Pontoscolex corethrurus invasion in the tropics. Biological Invasions, 2020, 22: 1705-1721
[28] 蒋际宝. 中国巨蚓科蚯蚓分类与分子系统发育研究. 博士论文. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2016
[29] 蒋际宝, 邱江平. 中国巨蚓科蚯蚓的起源与演化. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(10): 1074-1082
[30] Darmawan A, Atmowidi T, Manalu W, et al. Land-use change on Mount Gede, Indonesia, reduced native earthworm populations and diversity. Australian Journal of Zoology, 2017, 65: 217-225
[31] Phillips HR, Guerra CA, Bartz ML, et al. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science, 2019, 366: 480-485
[32] Tiunov AV, Hale CM, Holdsworth AR, et al. Invasion patterns of Lumbricidae into the previously earthworm-free areas of northeastern Europe and the western Great Lakes region of North America. Biological Invasions, 2006, 8: 1223-1234
[33] Nieminen M, Ketoja E, Mikola J, et al. Local land use effects and regional environmental limits on earthworm communities in Finnish arable landscapes. Ecological Applications, 2011, 21: 3162-3177
[34] Acharya P, Mishra CS, Humanities BI. Evaluation of certain important biochemical parameters of four tropical earthworms in response to soil moisture and temperature variations. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2020, 41: 788-795
[35] Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ. Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. 3rd Ed. New York: Springer, 1996: 1-20
[36] Singh J, Schadler M, Demetrio W, et al. Climate change effects on earthworms: A review. Soil Organi-sms, 2019, 91: 113-137
[37] Schon NL, Mackay AD, Gray RA, et al. Influence of earthworm abundance and diversity on soil structure and the implications for soil services throughout the season. Pedobiologia, 2017, 62: 41-47
[38] Wandeler HD, Sousa-Silva R, Ampoorter E, et al. Dri-vers of earthworm incidence and abundance across European forests. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2016, 99: 167-178
[39] Zhang C, Dai J, Lavelle P. Effects of a native earthworm species (Amynthas morrisi) and Eisenia fetida on metal fractions in a multi-metal polluted soil from South China. Acta Oecologica, 2020, 102, DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2019.103503
[40] Jänsch S, Steffens L, Höfer H, et al. State of knowledge of earthworm communities in German soils as a basis for biological soil quality assessment. Soil Organisms, 2013, 85: 215-233
[41] Lavelle P, Decaëns T, Aubert M, et al. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002
[42] Maleki S, Beheshti-Alagha A, Ranjbar F, et al. Impact of different co-composted poultry manures on the chemical and biological quality of the calcareous soil. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20: 12041-12052
[43] Fisichelli NA, Frelich LE, Reich PB, et al. Linking direct and indirect pathways mediating earthworms, deer, and understory composition in Great Lakes forests. Biological Invasions, 2012, 15: 1057-1066
[44] Mathieu J, Davies TJ. Glaciation as an historical filter of below-ground biodiversity. Journal of Biogeography, 2014, 41: 1204-1214
[45] 张宁, 廖燕, 孙福来, 等. 不同土地利用方式下的蚯蚓种群特征及其与土壤生物肥力的关系. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(2): 364-372
[46] Shylesh Chandran MS, Sujatha S, Mohan M, et al. Earthworm diversity at Nilgiri biosphere reserve, Wes-tern Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2012, 21: 3343-3353

云南省不同气候带蚯蚓分布特征

Distribution characteristics of earthworms in different climatic zones of Yunnan Province, Southwest China.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	肖远业, 张守涛, 张孟豪, 钟鹤森, 许炜晴, 李馨妤, 毛润乾, 张池. 光伏-蚯蚓模式与有机物料施用对土壤质量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 995-1002.
[2]	滕雅琳, 李伟明, 王东升, 梁喜欢, 陈金, 叶成龙, 刘满强, 胡水金. 接种蚯蚓条件下施用玄武岩粉对红壤和黄棕壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1003-1012.
[3]	邱裕丰, 唐荣贵, 沈玉叶, 陈有超, 刘益宏, 蔡延江. 不同密度蚯蚓对毛竹林土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 819-827.
[4]	刘若文, 翟俊杰, 王兴. 蚯蚓与土壤健康的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 637-646.
[5]	夏佳慧, 王邵军, 罗双, 李瑞, 杨胜秋, 兰梦杰, 郭晓飞. 蚯蚓与丛枝菌根真菌接种对石漠化土壤碳组分积累与分配的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2176-2186.
[6]	王倩, 袁川, 张亚峰, 胡彦婷, 王一, 郭立, 刘琴, 蔡忠银. 林冠穿透雨空间异质性及其时间稳定性特征的全球量化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1543-1552.
[7]	崔鑫涛, 肖谋良, 赵玉枭, 吴愉萍, 吴碧波, 齐琳, 李和孟, 余朝旭, 鲁顺保, 张艳杰, 葛体达. 基于土壤质量指数法的枇杷园土壤健康评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(10): 2775-2784.
[8]	赵玉枭, 肖谋良, 崔鑫涛, 鲁顺保, 王双, 祝贞科, 张艳杰, 葛体达. 非粮化耕地土壤健康评价: 以浙江省宁波市东吴镇为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(10): 2785-2793.
[9]	苟国花, 樊军, 王茜, 周明星, 杨学亭. 基于最小数据集的青藏高原南北部不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1360-1366.
[10]	白金珂, 李笑雨, 王力. 1980s与2020s青藏高原南部土壤质量变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1367-1374.
[11]	史多鹏, 叶子壮, 李惠通, 吕慎强, 王林权, 周春菊. 生物炭和氮肥配施对夏玉米-冬小麦轮作体系耕层土壤质量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 442-450.
[12]	庞景文, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 江熳, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 毛乌素沙地区域尺度生物结皮有机碳 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1755-1763.
[13]	阿拉萨, 高广磊, 丁国栋, 张英, 曹红雨, 杜宇佳. 土壤微生物膜生理生态功能研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1885-1892.
[14]	蒋丛泽, 受娜, 高玮, 马仁诗, 沈禹颖, 杨宪龙. 青藏高原东北缘不同土地利用类型土壤质量综合评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3279-3286.
[15]	滕慧颖, 耿艳楼, 张恒硕, 查同刚. 冀北土石山区不同土地利用类型土壤质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3046-3054.