黄土高原生物结皮对SCS-CN模型初损率的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.005

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 4186-4194.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.005

黄土高原生物结皮对SCS-CN模型初损率的影响

谷康民^1,2, 赵允格^2*, 高丽倩², 杨凯^1,2, 孙会^2,3, 郭雅丽^1,2

¹西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
³西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2021-04-06 修回日期:2021-07-23 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2022-06-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:谷康民, 男, 1993年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事生物结皮坡面水文效应和坡面径流模型模拟研究。E-mail: 18335464187@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(41830758,41571268)资助

Effects of biological soil crusts on the initial abstraction ratio of SCS-CN model in the Loess Plateau

GU Kang-min^1,2, ZHAO Yun-ge^2*, GAO Li-qian², YANG Kai^1,2, SUN Hui^2,3, GUO Ya-li^1,2

¹College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
³College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2021-04-06 Revised:2021-07-23 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2022-06-15
Contact: *E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
Supported by:
Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41830758, 41571268)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水文模型是水文过程研究的有效工具,初损率(λ)是径流模型SCS-CN模型的参数,对模拟流域水文过程具有重要意义。为了确定生物结皮对λ的影响,提高该模型在黄土高原生物结皮广泛分布的退耕地的预测精度,本研究以陕西省定边县鹰窝山涧流域不同盖度的生物结皮坡面为对象,采用模拟降雨试验,分析土壤潜在最大入渗量(S)与实际入渗量(F)的关系,以及生物结皮盖度对λ的影响,并修订了λ;在此基础上,采用陕西省安塞县纸坊沟流域生物结皮径流小区的模拟降雨试验数据校验了参数修订后的模型。结果表明: 生物结皮坡面S与F的关系式为: S/F=2.5×60/T(其中T为降雨历时);模型参数λ与生物结皮盖度(C_BSC)呈极显著负相关关系,二者关系式为: λ=0.0791×e^{(-0.015×C_BSC}),R²=0.60;较λ取标准值,依生物结皮盖度修订λ后,SCS-CN模型Nash效率系数提高338.7%,合格率提升16.1%。研究结果为黄土高原生物结皮坡面λ的确定提供了科学依据,对准确评估黄土高原退耕还林(草)工程的水文效应具有重要意义。

关键词: 生物结皮, 盖度, SCS-CN模型, 初损率, 径流模型

Abstract: Hydrological model is an effective tool for hydrological research. The initial abstraction ratio (λ) is a key parameter of SCS-CN model, a commonly used runoff model of great significance to simulate the hydrological process at the watershed scale. In order to examine the effects of biological soil crusts (biocrusts) on λ and improve the accuracy of the model used in the restored grasslands where biocrusts widely presented in the Loess Plateau region, we firstly determined the relationship between the amount of the potential maximum infiltration (S) and the amount of the actual infiltration (F), and then investigated the effects of biocrust coverage on λ by using the simulated rainfall experiment in the Yingwoshanjian watershed in Dingbian County, Shaanxi Province. The revised model was verified by the runoff results of the simulated rainfall experiments in the Zhifanggou watershed in Ansai County, Shaanxi Province. The results showed that the relationship between S and F on biocrust slope was described as S/F=2.5×60/T (where T was the rainfall duration). There was a negative correlation between λ and biocrust coverage (C_BSC) described as λ=0.0791×e^{(-0.015×C_BSC}), R²=0.60. Compared with that using the standard value of λ, the efficiency coefficient of the model was increased by 338.7% and the qualified rate was increased by 16.1% after revising λ according to the biocrust coverage. The results provided a scientific basis for the calibration of λ on biocrust slopes in the Loess Plateau region, and were of great significance to accurately assess the hydrological effects of the implementation of the “Grain for Green” Program on the Loess Plateau.

Key words: biological soil crust, coverage, SCS-CN model, initial abstraction ratio, runoff model

谷康民, 赵允格, 高丽倩, 杨凯, 孙会, 郭雅丽. 黄土高原生物结皮对SCS-CN模型初损率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4186-4194.

GU Kang-min, ZHAO Yun-ge, GAO Li-qian, YANG Kai, SUN Hui, GUO Ya-li. Effects of biological soil crusts on the initial abstraction ratio of SCS-CN model in the Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(12): 4186-4194.

参考文献

[1] 刘国彬, 上官周平, 姚文艺, 等. 黄土高原生态工程的生态成效. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(1): 11-19 [Liu G-B, Shangguan Z-P, Yao W-Y, et al. Ecological effects of soil conservation in Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(1): 11-19]
[2] 王占礼, 邵明安, 常庆瑞. 黄土高原降雨因素对土壤侵蚀的影响. 西北农业大学学报, 1998, 26(4): 101-105 [Wang Z-L, Shao M-A, Chang Q-R. Effects of rainfall factors on soil erosion in Loess Plateau. Acta Universitatis Agriculturalis Boreali-Occidentalis, 1998, 26(4): 101-105]
[3] 陈仁升, 康尔泗, 杨建平, 等. 水文模型研究综述. 中国沙漠, 2003, 23(3): 15-23 [Chen R-S, Kang E-S, Yang J-P, et al. Research review of hydrological modeling. Journal of Desert Research, 2003, 23(3): 15-23]
[4] Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Compara-tive assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 242: 275-301
[5] Ponce VM, Hawkins RH. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1996, 1: 11-19
[6] Tyagi JV, Mishra SK, Singh R, et al. SCS-CN based time-distributed sediment yield model. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 352: 388-403
[7] Deshmukh DS, Chaube UC, Hailu AE, et al. Estimation and comparison of curve numbers based on dynamic land use land cover change, observed rainfall-runoff data and land slope. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 492: 89-101
[8] Tessema SM, Lyon SW, Setegn SG, et al. Effects of different retention parameter estimation methods on the prediction of surface runoff using the SCS curve number method. Water Resources Management, 2014, 28: 3241-3254
[9] Mishra SK, Chaudhary A, Shrestha, et al. Experimental verification of the effect of slope and land use on SCS runoff curve number. Water Resources Management, 2014, 28: 3407-3416
[10] US Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Washington DC, USA: US Department of Agriculture, 1972
[11] Elhakeem M, Papanicolaou AN. Estimation of the runoff curve number via direct rainfall simulator measurements in the state of Iowa, USA. Water Resources Management, 2009, 23: 2455-2473
[12] Mishra SK, Sahu RK, Eldho TI, et al. An improved I_a-S relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resources Management, 2006, 20: 643-660
[13] 周淑梅, 雷廷武. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域SCS-CN方法初损率取值研究. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20): 4240-4247 [Zhou S-M, Lei T-W. Calibration of SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio of a typical small watershed in the Loess Hilly-Gully region. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(20): 4240-4247]
[14] 邓景成, 高鹏, 穆兴民, 等. 模拟降雨条件下黄土区SCS模型的参数率定. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(5): 205-210 [Deng J-C, Gao P, Mu X-M, et al. Study on calibrating parameters of SCS model in Loess area under simulated rainfall. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(5): 205-210]
[15] 赵允格, 许明祥, 王全九, 等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮理化性状初报. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(8): 1429-1434 [Zhao Y-G, Xu M-X, Wang Q-J, et al. Physical and chemical properties of soil bio-crust on rehabilitated grassland in hilly Loess Plateau of China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(8): 1429-1434]
[16] Rodríguez-Caballero E, Cantón Y, Chamizo S, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on surface roughness and implications for runoff and erosion. Geomorphology, 2012, 145/146: 81-89
[17] Liu F, Zhang GH, Sun L, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on soil detachment process by overland flow in the Loess Plateau of China. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2016, 41: 875-883
[18] Kidron GK, Wang Y, Herzberg M. Exopolysaccharides may increase biocrust rigidity and induce runoff generation. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 588: 125081
[19] 谷康民, 杨凯, 赵允格, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮对坡面产流及SCS-CN模型CN值的影响. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1): 132-137 [Gu K-M, Yang K, Zhao Y-G, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts’ coverage on slope runoff and the CN value of SCS-CN model in hilly Loess Plateau region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(1): 132-137]
[20] Prakash P. Grazing management in temperate grassland of Kumaun Himalaya for soil water conservation. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 2013, 5: 345-349
[21] Fischer C, Roscher C, Jensen B, et al. How do earthworms, soil texture and plant composition affect infiltration along an experimental plant diversity gradient in grassland? PLoS One, 2014, 9(2): e98987
[22] 赵允格, 许明祥, 王全九, 等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮对土壤理化性状的影响. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 441-448 [Zhao Y-G, Xu M-X, Wang Q-J, et al. Impact of biological soil crust on soil physical and chemical properties of rehabilitated grassland in hilly Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(3): 441-448]
[23] 水利部水文局. 水文情报预报规范: GB/T 22482—2008. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000 [Bureau of Hydrology, Ministry of Water Resources. Standard for Hydrologic Information and Hydrological Forecasting: GB/T 22482-2008. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2000]
[24] 徐赞, 吴磊, 吴永祥, 等. SCS-CN模型改进及其径流预测. 水利水运工程学报, 2018(3): 32-39 [Xu Z, Wu L, Wu Y-X, et al. Improvement and runoff prediction of SCS-CN model. Hydro-science and Engineering, 2018(3): 32-39]
[25] 孙福海, 肖波, 张鑫鑫, 等. 黄土高原生物结皮覆盖对土壤积水入渗特征的影响及其模型模拟. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 48(10): 82-91 [Sun F-H, Xiao B, Zhang X-X, et al. Effects of biocrusts covering on soil water infiltration characteristics on the Loess Plateau and its simulation. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Natural Science, 2020, 48(10): 82-91]
[26] 李宁宁, 张光辉, 王浩, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区生物结皮对土壤抗蚀性能的影响. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(1): 42-48 [Li N-N, Zhang G-H, Wang H, et al. Soil anti-erodibility influenced by biological crusts in Loess Hilly and Gully region. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(1): 42-48]
[27] 杨凯, 赵军, 赵允格, 等. 生物结皮坡面不同降雨历时的产流特征. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(23): 135-141 [Yang K, Zhao J, Zhao Y-G, et al. Characteristics of runoff on biological soil crust slope in different rainfall durations. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(23): 135-141]
[28] 秦宁强, 赵允格. 生物土壤结皮对雨滴动能的响应及削减作用. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(9): 2259-2264 [Qin N-Q, Zhao Y-G. Responses of biological soil crust to and its relief effect on raindrop kinetic energy. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(9): 2259-2264]
[29] 张鑫, 张青峰, 周阳阳, 等. 不同坡度黄土微地形条件下SCS-CN模型参数研究. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(2): 74-77 [Zhang X, Zhang Q-F, Zhou Y-Y, et al. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data on microtopographic surfaces of different gradient loess slopes. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(2): 74-77]

黄土高原生物结皮对SCS-CN模型初损率的影响

Effects of biological soil crusts on the initial abstraction ratio of SCS-CN model in the Loess Plateau

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵允格, 吉静怡, 张万涛, 明姣, 黄琬雲, 高丽倩. 黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 739-748.
[2]	明姣, 杨光, 赵允格, 马昕昕, 孙会, 乔羽. 放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1555-1562.
[3]	赵楠, 赵颖慧, 邹海凤, 白晓红, 甄贞. 1990—2020年黑龙江省植被覆盖度的时空变化趋势及驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1320-1330.
[4]	奎国娴, 史常青, 杨建英, 李瑞鹏, 魏广阔, 刘佳琪. 内蒙古草原区植被覆盖度时空演变及其驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2713-2722.
[5]	郭玥微, 赵允格, 钱煦坤, 万杨卓群, 王闪闪. 黄土高原三种耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异及机理 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1738-1746.
[6]	庞景文, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 江熳, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 毛乌素沙地区域尺度生物结皮有机碳 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1755-1763.
[7]	江熳, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 庞景文, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 不同降水条件下生物结皮覆盖对沙地土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1764-1772.
[8]	张冠华, 易亮, 孙宝洋, 李建明, 沈盛彧. 亚热带苔藓结皮对土壤-微生物-胞外酶化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1791-1800.
[9]	刘哲, 叶兴旺, 王吉平, 程永韬, 钱隆, 肖敬尚, 吴丽. 生物结皮胞外多糖理化特性及菌群结构的季节动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1801-1809.
[10]	钟香艳, 石辉, 李旋, 赵一键. 物理结皮和生物结皮的斥水特征及其对水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1843-1852.
[11]	淡晨希, 张琼, 刘畅, 郭珍, 刘刚. 生物结皮与草本植物共生坡面的产流-入渗过程特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1853-1860.
[12]	郭雅丽, 赵允格, 高丽倩, 杨凯, 孙会, 谷康民. 黄土丘陵区草本植物覆盖下生物结皮对坡面径流流速的削减作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1871-1877.
[13]	石明明, 王喆, 周秉荣, 杨鑫光, 孙玮婕. 青藏高原草地退化特征及其与气候因子的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3271-3278.
[14]	林妍敏, 李文慧, 南雄雄, 张俊华, 胡志瑞, 倪细炉, 王芳. 基于地理探测器的宁夏贺兰山植被覆盖度时空分异及驱动因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3321-3327.
[15]	叶璇, 康帅直, 赵永华, 韩磊, 项曦明, 李帆. 陕北黄土高原植被恢复与生态系统服务的时空关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2760-2768.