湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区表土孢粉与植被的关系

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202412.004

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 3359-3368.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202412.004

湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区表土孢粉与植被的关系

李永飞¹, 向建军², 李蓓蓓^3*, 李欣怡¹, 夏仕榕¹, 廖博儒⁴, 叶良涛⁵

¹吉首大学旅游学院生态旅游湖南省重点实验室, 湖南张家界 427000;
²八大公山国家级自然保护区管理处, 湖南桑植 427100;
³南京信息工程大学科技史与气象文明研究院, 南京 210044;
⁴吉首大学土木工程与建筑学院, 湖南张家界 427000;
⁵安徽师范大学生态与环境学院, 安徽芜湖 241000

收稿日期:2024-06-23 接受日期:2024-09-11 出版日期:2024-12-18 发布日期:2025-06-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: libeibei-sd@163.com
作者简介:李永飞, 男, 1976年生, 博士, 教授。主要从事环境演变与孢粉学研究。E-mail: lyfei_123@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42067061,41972193)、湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(2021JJ30555)和生态旅游湖南省重点实验室开放基金项目(STLY2205,STLV19011)

Relationship between surface pollen and their vegetation in Hupingshan National Nature Reserve, Hunan Province, China

LI Yongfei¹, XIANG Jianjun², LI Beibei^3*, LI Xinyi¹, XIA Shirong¹, LIAO Boru⁴, YE Liangtao⁵

¹Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Tourism, Schoole of Tourism, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, Hunan, China;
²Administration Bureau of Badagongshan National Nature Reserve, Sangzhi 427100, Hunan, China;
³Institute of Technological History and Meteorological Civilization, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
⁴School of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, Hunan, China;
⁵School of Ecology and Environment, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China

Received:2024-06-23 Accepted:2024-09-11 Online:2024-12-18 Published:2025-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 壶瓶山国家级自然保护区生物多样性丰富,区系组成复杂,受人类活动干扰明显,植被次生性强,建群种优势度不高,其孢粉组合特征复杂多样。本文研究了壶瓶山34个样点表土孢粉组合特征及其与植被的关系。结果表明: 孢粉组合中木本植物含量(84.4%)占绝对优势,木本植物花粉与非木本植物花粉比值约为5.4,孢粉浓度为149157粒·g^-1。常绿阔叶林花粉组合难以反映母体植被植物组成特征;落叶阔叶林花粉组合只能部分反映母体植被特征;常绿落叶阔叶混交林、山顶灌丛草甸和玉米地花粉组合可以较好地反映母体植被植物组成规律,群落优势种和建群种在花粉组合中能够得到较好的体现。栲属/柯属、水青冈属、漆树属、鹅耳枥属/榛属、杜鹃花科和山矾属花粉具低代表性,松属、桦木属和青冈属花粉具超代表性。花粉百分含量的聚类分析和降趋势对应分析,能较好地区分山顶灌丛草甸、常绿阔叶林和落叶阔叶林,但常绿落叶阔叶混交林与常绿阔叶林和落叶阔叶林均存在部分重叠现象。孢粉组合对母体植被的指示性差异明显,这主要受孢粉代表性、植被斑块化特征、地形地势、地方小气候和人类活动等多重因素影响。

关键词: 壶瓶山国家级自然保护区, 表土孢粉, 孢粉组合, 植被

Abstract: Hupingshan National Nature Reserve, located in Hunan Province, South Central China, is characterized by rich biodiversity, complex floral composition, pronounced human perturbation, dominant secondary vegetation, low dominance of constructive species, and complex and diverse pollen assemblage characteristics. We explored the relationship between surface pollen assemblages and vegetation characteristics using 34 samples. The results showed that arboreal pollen accounted for 84.4% of the total. The AP/NAP (AP: arboreal pollen, NAP: nonarboreal pollen) ratio was roughly 5.4. The pollen concentration was 149157 grains·g^-1. Evergreen broadleaved pollen assemblages did not reflect the local vegetational community. Pollen assemblages of deciduous broadleaf forest were partly consistent with plant community composition. Deciduous-evergreen broadleaf mixed forest, shrub-meadow and corn field pollen assemblages corresponded well with their local vegetational community. Local dominant species and constructive species abundances were well represented in pollen assemblages. Castanopsis/Lithocarpus, Fagus, Toxicodendron, Carpinus/Corylus, Ericaceae, and Symplocos were under-represented, whereas Pinus, Betula and Cyclobalanopsis were over-represented pollen taxa. Based on cluster analysis and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA), the shrub-meadow, evergreen broadleaf forest and deciduous broadleaf forest could be well distinguished by pollen spectra, except deciduous-evergreen broadleaf mixed forest, or evergreen broadleaved forest and deciduous broadleaved forest. The significant discrepancy in consistency between pollen assemblages and vegetation community was chiefly impacted by pollen representativeness, vegetation patchy characteristics, topography, local climate, and human activities.

Key words: Hupingshan National Nature Reserve, surface pollen, pollen assemblages, vegetation

李永飞, 向建军, 李蓓蓓, 李欣怡, 夏仕榕, 廖博儒, 叶良涛. 湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区表土孢粉与植被的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(12): 3359-3368.

LI Yongfei, XIANG Jianjun, LI Beibei, LI Xinyi, XIA Shirong, LIAO Boru, YE Liangtao. Relationship between surface pollen and their vegetation in Hupingshan National Nature Reserve, Hunan Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(12): 3359-3368.

参考文献

[1] Adojoh OC, Marret F, Duller R, et al. Stages of palaeoenvironmental evolution, climate and sea level change of the Niger Delta, east Equatorial Atlantic: Novelty from elemental tracers, sedimentary facies and pollen records. The Holocene, 2023, 33: 781-790
[2] 王开发, 王宪曾. 孢粉学概论. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1983
[3] Senn C, Tinner W, Felde VA, et al. Modern pollen-vegetation-plant diversity relationships across large environmental gradients in northern Greece. The Holocene, 2022, 32: 159-173
[4] Boutahar A, Gonzalez PC, Picone RM, et al. Modern pollen-vegetation relationship in the Rif mountains (Northern Morocco). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2023, 310: 104828
[5] Lee J, Jun CP, Yi S, et al. Modern pollen-climate relationships and their application for pollen-based quantitative climate reconstruction of the mid-Holocene on the southern Korean Peninsula. The Holocene, 2022, 32: 127-136
[6] Cui QY, Zhao Y, Qin F, et al. Characteristics of the modern pollen assemblages from different vegetation zones in Northeast China: Implications for pollen-based climate reconstruction. Science China Earth Sciences, 2019, 62: 1564-1577
[7] Han DX, Gao CY, Li YH, et al. Potential in paleoclimate reconstruction of modern pollen assemblages from natural and human-induced vegetation along the Heilongjiang River basin, NE China. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 745: 141121
[8] Guo C, Ma YZ, Li DD, et al. Modern pollen and its relationship with vegetation and climate in the Mu Us Desert and surrounding area, northern China: Implications of palaeoclimatic and palaeocological reconstruction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2020, 547: 109699
[9] Zhao YJ, Li YC, Zhang Z, et al. Relationship between modern pollen assemblages and vegetation in the Bashang typical steppe region of North China. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 135: 108581
[10] Huang XZ, Chen XM, Du X. Modern pollen assemblages from human-influenced vegetation in northwestern China and their relationship with vegetation and climate. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2018, 27: 767-780
[11] Zhang WS, An CB, Li YC, et al. Modern pollen assemblages and their relationships with vegetation and climate on the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2023, 15: 327-343
[12] Ma LY, Li ZG, Xu QH, et al. Modern pollen assemblages from the hinterland of the Tibetan Plateau and their significance for reconstructions of past vegetation. Boreas, 2023, 53: 42-55
[13] Cao CQ, Wang NN, Li WJ, et al. Modern pollen thresholds for tree presence on the eastern Tibetan Plateau and their potential application. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2024, 639: 112066
[14] Fang YM, Bunting MJ, Ma CM, et al. Are modern pollen assemblages from soils and mosses the same? A comparison of natural pollen traps from subtropical China. Catena, 2022, 209: 105790
[15] Su MJ, Wang NN, Dong HR, et al. Influence of human impacts on modern pollen assemblages and an assessment of their reliability in reconstructing climate in eastern China. Quaternary International, 2023, 670: 45-54
[16] 龙香月, 黄康有, 陈聪, 等. 华南亚热带武夷山地区垂直植被带表土孢粉散布规律. 热带地理, 2023, 43(6): 1005-1020
[17] 李永飞, 夏中林, 沈华东, 等. 峨眉山世界遗产地表土孢粉组合及其生态和古环境启示. 生态学报, 2020, 40(1): 181-201.
[18] Chi CT, Xiao XY, Jia BY. Modern vegetation-climate relationships for pollen assemblages across the mountainous regions of southwestern China: Implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2024, 644: 112211
[19] Zhang WC, Li CH, Lu HY, et al. Relationship between surface pollen assemblages and vegetation in Luonan Basin, Eastern Qinling Mountains, Central China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24: 427-445
[20] Fang YM, Ma CM, Mao LM, et al. Surface pollen spectra from Shennongjia Mountains, central China: An interpretation aid to Quaternary pollen deposits. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2014, 214: 40-50
[21] 倪健, 陈瑜, Herzschuh U, 等. 中国第四纪晚期孢粉记录整理. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(8): 1000-1005
[22] Yao SC, Li CH, Chen YS, et al. Moisture conditions during the Younger Dryas and 4.2 ka event as revealed from a subalpine peat record in the Luoxiao Mountains, southern China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2022, 305: 104747
[23] 张国珍, 杨道德. 湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区科学考察报告集. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2004
[24] 张国珍, 张代贵. 湖南壶瓶山植物志. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2008
[25] 张玉荣, 张国珍, 钟武洪, 等. 壶瓶山国家级自然保护区森林植物群落类型及特征. 湖南林业科技, 2005, 32(1): 14-18
[26] Faegri K, Kaland PE, Krzywinski K. A Textbook of Pollen Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1989
[27] 中国科学院植物研究所, 华南植物研究所. 中国热带亚热带被子植物花粉形态. 北京: 科学出版社, 1982
[28] 王伏雄, 钱南芬, 张玉龙, 等. 中国植物花粉形态. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995
[29] 唐领余, 毛礼米, 舒军武, 等. 中国第四纪孢粉图鉴. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017
[30] 舒军武, 黄小忠, 徐德克, 等. 新版Tilia软件: 中文指南和使用技巧. 古生物学报, 2018, 57(2): 260-272
[31] 刘会平, 谢玲娣. 神农架南坡常见花粉的R值研究. 华中师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 1998, 32(4): 495-497
[32] 李文漪. 中国北、中亚热带晚第四纪植被与环境研究. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1993
[33] 姚祖驹, 李文漪. 广西苗儿山现代花粉雨研究//李文漪, 姚祖驹, 等. 中国北、中亚热带晚第四纪植被与环境研究. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1993
[34] Liu HY, Xing QR, Jia ZK, et al. An outline of Quaternary development of Fagus forest in China: Palynological and ecological perspectives. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 2003, 198: 249-259
[35] 郑卓, 黄康有, 许清海, 等. 中国表土花粉与建群植物地理分布的气候指示性对比. 中国科学D辑, 2008, 38(6): 701-714
[36] 舒军武. 日本本州北部白神山地圆齿水青冈林(Fagus crenata)表土花粉分析及水青冈属花粉的代表性. 微体古生物学报, 2012, 29(3): 213-225
[37] 刘会平, 唐晓春, 王开发, 等. 神农架北坡表土常见花粉的R值研究. 地理科学, 2001, 21(4): 378-380
[38] 李旭, 刘金陵. 四川西昌螺髻山全新世植被与环境变化. 地理学报, 1988, 43(1): 44-51
[39] 许清海, 王子惠, 徐全洪, 等. 长白山岳桦林带泥炭沼泽孢粉分析及其意义. 地理科学, 1994, 14(2): 186-192

湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区表土孢粉与植被的关系

Relationship between surface pollen and their vegetation in Hupingshan National Nature Reserve, Hunan Province, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄羡, 余新晓, 贾国栋, 常晓敏, 孙立博. 林分密度对小叶杨人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1035-1042.
[2]	淡晨希, 张琼, 刘刚, 夏小林. 暴雨条件下黄土高原坡面灌草植被与生物结皮对水土流失和水动力特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1091-1098.
[3]	冯平, 杨旺, 李建柱, 杨妮娟, 段嘉程. 滦河流域植被覆盖变化及其对自然和人为因素的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1222-1232.
[4]	花艺玮, 孟丹, 胡非凡, 赵月, 张聪聪, 李小娟. 城市化背景下京津冀地区遥感植被物候的变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 693-702.
[5]	许静, 杨龙, 王俊坚, 孙中宇. 无人机植被遥感中可见光相机色温对植被指数计算的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 729-737.
[6]	周诗祺, 吴洁玲, 吴泽华, 林强, 习杰, 周琴, 查轩. 不同植被恢复模式下退化红壤团聚体特征及土壤分离速率的差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 868-876.
[7]	张煦庭, 张维敏, 潘宇鹰, 权文婷, 李美荣, 何慧娟, 周辉. 2001—2020年黄河流域陕西段植被生长时空格局及驱动因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 341-352.
[8]	仇小月, 李健星, 陶旺兰, 王志英, 郭屹立, 陆树华, 李先琨, 黄甫昭. 喀斯特峰丛洼地不同植被恢复阶段优势植物水分利用效率 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 445-451.
[9]	黎国庆, 张春亢, 张显云, 杨正, 雄峰, 文鹏帆, 杨庆骅. 核温度植被干旱指数对东北地区城市化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(1): 208-218.
[10]	赵瑜琦, 赵鹏云, 许泽海, 李志刚. 2002—2022年气候变化和人类活动对山西省植被恢复的贡献 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(1): 219-226.
[11]	潘森源, 周俏薇, 李景刚, 孙传谆. 基于空间滞后模型的粤北地区植被固碳变化的气候影响机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(1): 227-237.
[12]	安韶山, 胡洋, 王宝荣. 黄土高原植被恢复中土壤有机碳稳定机制研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2413-2422.
[13]	马艳, 陈铁喜, 陈鑫, 肖寅渺, 周圣杰, 汪生珍. 东非高原1982—2020年叶面积指数的变化趋势及归因分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2561-2570.
[14]	张健, 郝占庆. 不该遗忘的刘慎谔: 动态地植物学思想对当前植被生态学与生物多样性研究的启示 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2631-2638.
[15]	杨钧, 王瑞霞, 王俊, 于双, 杨博, 王文强, 杨君珑, 李小伟. 毛乌素沙地不同恢复年限柠条固沙林微生物群落特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(7): 1807-1814.