不同植被恢复模式下退化红壤团聚体特征及土壤分离速率的差异

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202503.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不同植被恢复模式下的土壤具有不同的团聚体特征和抗侵蚀性能,然而,目前尚不清楚植被恢复模式如何影响团聚体特征和土壤分离速率。本研究以福建省长汀县马尾松低效林地5种植被恢复模式(封禁模式,M₁;风水林模式,M₂;全坡面播草模式,M₃;低效林改造模式,M₄;条沟草灌带模式,M₅)为对象,以侵蚀裸地(CK)为对照,分析不同恢复模式下土壤团聚体和土壤分离速率的变化特征及其影响因素。结果表明: 1)与CK相比,各植被恢复模式下土壤分离速率显著降低了84.7%~98.6%,有机质显著提升了140.2%~869.4%。2)在5种植被恢复模式中,M₁的团聚体稳定性最差,其水稳性大团聚体含量(WR_0.25)、团聚体平均重量直径(MWD)、几何平均直径(GMD)显著低于M₂、M₃、M₅模式,分形维数(D)、水稳性团聚体破坏率(PAD)显著高于M₂、M₃、M₅模式。而M₅的土壤分离速率仅为CK的1.4%,土壤团聚体稳定性表现最佳,其WR_0.25、MWD、GMD显著高于其他模式,D显著低于其他模式。3)土壤有机质与土壤团聚体稳定性密切相关,其中,土壤有机质与WR_0.25、MWD和GMD呈正相关,与D和PAD呈负相关。4)土壤分离速率随WR_0.25上升呈指数函数下降。综上,植被恢复导致的土壤有机质含量提升对水稳性大团聚体形成、土壤分离速率降低起到关键作用,条沟草灌带模式是南方红壤区值得推广的植被恢复模式。

关键词: 红壤, 植被恢复模式, 土壤团聚体, 土壤分离速率

Abstract: Soil aggregate traits and anti-erosion ability vary across different vegetation restoration modes. However, it remained unclear how vegetation restoration modes affect soil aggregate characteristics and soil detachment rate. We examined the variations in soil aggregate and soil detachment rate as well as the influencing factors in the low growth efficiency Pinus massoniana forests of Changting County, Fujian Province under five restoration modes, i.e, closure management (M₁), geomantic forest (M₂), planting grass on the whole slope (M₃), low growth efficiency forest transformation (M₄), and the strip grass-shrub belt mode (M₅), with the eroded bare land as the control (CK). The results showed that: 1) Soil detachment rate was significantly decreased by 84.7% to 98.6% under all vegetation restoration modes, while soil organic matter content was significantly increased by 140.2% to 869.4%. 2) The aggregate stability in M₁ was the lowest among the five vegetation restoration modes, and water stable macroaggregates (WR_0.25), mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean diameter (GMD) were significantly lower in M₁ mode than those in M₂, M₃, and M₅, while the fractal dimension (D) and the water-stable aggregate destruction rate (PAD) were significantly higher than the M₂, M₃, and M₅. Soil detachment rate of M₅ was 1.4% of CK, with the highest soil aggregate stability. The WR_0.25, MWD, and GMD in M₅ were significantly higher, while D was significantly lower than that in other modes. 3) Soil organic matter content was closely related with aggregate stability. Soil organic matter content had a positive correlation with WR_0.25, MWD, and GMD, but a negative correlation with D and PAD. 4) Soil detachment rate declined exponentially with the increases of WR_0.25. In summary, the increases in soil organic matter content induced by vegetation restoration played a key role in the formation of water-stable macroaggregates and the reduction in soil detachment rate. We recommend the strip grass-shrub belt mode for vegetation restoration in the red soil regions of southern China.

Key words: red soil, vegetation restoration mode, soil aggregate, soil detachment rate

周诗祺, 吴洁玲, 吴泽华, 林强, 习杰, 周琴, 查轩. 不同植被恢复模式下退化红壤团聚体特征及土壤分离速率的差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 868-876.

ZHOU Shiqi, WU Jieling, WU Zehua, LIN Qiang, XI Jie, ZHOU Qin, ZHA Xuan. Differences in soil aggregates characteristics and soil detachment rate in degraded red soil among different vegetation restoration modes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(3): 868-876.

参考文献

[1] Yu ZH, Zheng YY, Zhang JB, et al. Importance of soil interparticle forces and organic matter for aggregate stability in a temperate soil and a subtropical soil. Geoderma, 2020, 362: 114088
[2] Barthès B, Roose E. Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion: Validation at several levels. Catena, 2002, 47: 133-149
[3] Owoputi L, Stolte W. Soil detachment in the physically based soil erosion process: A review. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 1995, 38: 1099-1110
[4] 冯梦蝶, 陈展鹏, 何丙辉, 等. 不同土壤容重水平下喀斯特黄壤分离能力水动力学特性. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2): 1-7
[5] 耿韧, 张光辉, 洪大林, 等. 我国水蚀区坡耕地土壤分离能力的空间分布与影响因素. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3): 156-161
[6] Fattet M, Fu Y, Ghestem M, et al. Effects of vegetation type on soil resistance to erosion: Relationship between aggregate stability and shear strength. Catena, 2011, 87: 60-69
[7] Peng L, Tang CJ, Zhang XY, et al. Quantifying the effects of root and soil properties on soil detachment capacity in agricultural land use of southern China. Forests, 2022, 13: 1788
[8] Yao C, Zhang QW, Lu C, et al. Variations in soil detachment by rill flow during crop growth stages in sloping farmlands on the Loess Plateau. Catena, 2022, 216: 106375
[9] Wang GH, Dong YF, Rong L, et al. The influence of vegetation restoration on soil quality in abandoned farmlands in the Yuanjiang dry-hot valley. Catena, 2024, 242: 108109
[10] 李秋嘉, 薛志婧, 周正朝. 宁南山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体养分特征及微生物特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 137-145
[11] Bai YH, Zha X, Chen SF. Effects of the vegetation restoration years on soil microbial community composition and biomass in degraded lands in Changting County, China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020, 31: 1295-1308
[12] 中华人民共和国农业部. 土壤pH的测定: NY/T 1377—2007. 北京: 中国农业出版社. 2007
[13] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2020: 30-34
[14] 刘多森, 李伟波. 土壤容重和孔隙度的简易测定法. 土壤通报, 1983(4): 44-47
[15] 魏亚飞, 王辉, 谭帅, 等. 套种对南方红壤坡耕地经济果园土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1617-1624
[16] 杨培岭, 罗远培, 石元春. 用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征. 科学通报, 1993, 38(20): 1896-1899
[17] Tisdall JM, Oades JM. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Journal of Soil Science, 1982, 33: 141-163
[18] 姜兴雪, 查瑞波, 毛兰花, 等. 花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地不同治理模式土壤抗蚀性评价. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(6): 31-37
[19] Liu JR, Zhao CX, Li CN, et al. Mixed planting mode is the best measure to restore soil quality in alpine mines. Soil and Tillage Research, 2024, 244: 106209
[20] Bai YX, Zhou YC, Du JJ, et al. Tree species identity affects nutrient accumulation and stoichiometric in soil aggregates in mixed plantations of subtropical China. Catena, 2024, 236: 107752
[21] 常松涛, 查轩, 黄少燕, 等. 地面覆盖条件下雨强和坡度对红黏土坡面侵蚀过程的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6): 79-85
[22] 杨静, 张耀艺, 谭思懿, 等. 中亚热带不同树种对土壤团聚体组成及其碳、氮含量的影响. 林业科学, 2022, 58(4): 51-61
[23] 刘中良, 宇万太. 土壤团聚体中有机碳研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(2): 447-455
[24] 区晓琳, 陈志彪, 陈志强, 等. 亚热带侵蚀红壤区植被恢复过程中土壤团聚体化学计量特征. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(5): 1156-1167
[25] Zhong ZK, Wu SJ, Lu XQ, et al. Organic carbon, nitrogen accumulation, and soil aggregate dynamics as affected by vegetation restoration patterns in the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 2021, 196: 104867
[26] 谢锦升, 杨玉盛, 陈光水, 等. 植被恢复对退化红壤团聚体稳定性及碳分布的影响. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2): 702-709
[27] Mustafa A, Xu MG, Ali Shah SA, et al. Soil aggregation and soil aggregate stability regulate organic carbon and nitrogen storage in a red soil of southern China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 270: 110894
[28] Gao GN, Huang XM, Xu HC, et al. Conversion of pure Chinese fir plantation to multi-layered mixed plantation enhances the soil aggregate stability by regulating microbial communities in subtropical China. Forest Ecosystems, 2022, 9: 100078
[29] Li JY, Yuan XL, Ge L, et al. Rhizosphere effects promote soil aggregate stability and associated organic carbon sequestration in rocky areas of desertification. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 304: 107126
[30] LeBissonnais Y, Prieto I, Roumet C, et al. Soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean and tropical agro-ecosystems: Effect of plant roots and soil characteristics. Plant and Soil, 2018, 424: 303-317
[31] Baumert VL, Vasilyeva NA, Vladimirov AA, et al. Root exudates induce soil macroaggregation facilitated by fungi in subsoil. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2018, 6: 140
[32] 林立文, 邓羽松, 王金悦, 等. 南亚热带人工林种植对赤红壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3647-3656
[33] Lu J, Zheng FL, Li GF, et al. The effects of raindrop impact and runoff detachment on hillslope soil erosion and soil aggregate loss in the Mollisol region of northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016, 161: 79-85
[34] Xiao L, Yao KH, Li P, et al. Increased soil aggregate stability is strongly correlated with root and soil properties along a gradient of secondary succession on the Loess Plateau. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 143: 105671
[35] Wan WJ, Tan JD, Wang Y, et al. Responses of the rhizosphere bacterial community in acidic crop soil to pH: Changes in diversity, composition, interaction, and function. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 700: 134418
[36] Juma G, Zhang Y, Liu Q, et al. Allelopathic effects of native plant species Dicranopteris dichotoma on invasive species Bidens pilosa and Eupatorium Catarium. Allelopathy Journal, 2019, 48: 45-58
[37] Liu HM, Liang MF, Yang QS, et al. Responses of tree seedlings to understory filtering by the recalcitrant fern layer in a subtropical forest. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 1033731
[38] Wang JY, Deng YS, Li DY, et al. Soil aggregate stability and its response to overland flow in successive Eucalyptus plantations in subtropical China. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 807: 151000
[39] Ekwue EI. The effects of soil organic matter content, rainfall duration and aggregate size on soil detachment. Soil Technology, 1991, 4: 197-207
[40] 王军光, 李朝霞, 蔡崇法, 等. 集中水流内红壤分离速率与团聚体特征及抗剪强度定量关系. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(6): 1133-1140
[41] Zhao Z, Shi P, Bai LL, et al. Vegetation patterns affect soil aggregate loss during water erosion. Land Degradation & Development, 2024, 35: 936-948
[42] Wei SC, Zhang XP, McLaughlin NB, et al. Impact of soil water erosion processes on catchment export of soil aggregates and associated SOC. Geoderma, 2017, 294: 63-69
[43] Wang CG, Li HR, Xue SB, et al. How root and soil properties affect soil detachment capacity in different grass-shrub plots: A flume experiment. Catena, 2023, 229: 107221
[44] Chabrerie O, Laval K, Puget P, et al. Relationship between plant and soil microbial communities along a successional gradient in a chalk grassland in north-western France. Applied Soil Ecology, 2003, 24: 43-56