亚热带巨尾桉凋落树皮的分解特征

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.008

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 2325-2334.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.008

亚热带巨尾桉凋落树皮的分解特征

康婷婷¹, 钟全林^1,2,3*, 梁锋娜¹, 杨彬峰¹, 徐朝斌^2,3, 程栋梁^1,2,3, 姚舒舒¹, 赖雁南¹

¹福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007;
²湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地, 福州 350007;
³福建师范大学福建省植物生理生态重点实验室, 福州 350007

收稿日期:2025-03-25 接受日期:2025-05-28 出版日期:2025-08-18 发布日期:2026-02-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: qlzhong@126.com
作者简介:康婷婷, 女, 1999年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事森林资源与环境管理研究。E-mail: 2878577596@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32371859,31971643,32071555)、中央财政项目(闽2023TG29)、福建省科技厅中央引导地方专项(2024L3009)、福建省科技厅产学合作项目(2023N5006)和福建省科技厅重点项目(2021FKJ29,2023FKJ29,2024FKJ26)

Decomposition characteristics of bark litter in subtropical Eucalyptus plantations

KANG Tingting¹, ZHONG Quanlin^1,2,3*, LIANG Fengna¹, YANG Binfeng¹, XU Chaobin^2,3, CHENG Dongliang^1,2,3, YAO Shushu¹, LAI Yannan¹

¹College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
²State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Humid Subtropical Mountain Ecology, Fuzhou 350007, China;
³Fujian Province Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China

Received:2025-03-25 Accepted:2025-05-28 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2026-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究选择巨尾桉纯林(对照)、巨尾桉与杉木(桉杉)混交林、巨尾桉与福建柏(桉柏)混交林以及巨尾桉与杉木、福建柏(桉杉柏)混交林4种林分,将巨尾桉新鲜凋落桉树树皮放置于4种林分中,在540 d的分解周期内,每隔60 d回收一次分解袋,研究分解袋中残留凋落树皮的干重以及碳、氮、磷、纤维素和木质素含量,分析凋落桉树树皮的分解特征、主场效应以及养分释放动态及关键驱动因子。结果表明: 混交林的凋落桉树树皮分解速率均显著高于桉树纯林,主场效应指数为负值,其中以桉杉混交林的分解最快,桉杉柏混交林次之,桉柏混交林略高于桉树纯林。3种混交林均促进了凋落桉树树皮分解过程中有机碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)的矿化及纤维素的降解,但对凋落桉树树皮木质素的分解影响较小,并伴随着C/N、C/P、N/P的下降和木质素/N的提升。在凋落桉树树皮分解过程中,有机碳和纤维素在主场与客场均表现为持续释放模式,N和P则呈现“释放-积累-释放”模式。养分残留量、化学计量比、难分解物含量共同解释了凋落桉树树皮分解变异的76.6%,其中,较高的C残留量会加速桉树树皮的分解,而较高的P残留率和C/N、N/P值会抑制分解。桉杉混交林对巨尾桉凋落桉树树皮的分解具有显著促进作用,建议未来桉树林林分结构改造时可优先考虑桉杉混交林。

关键词: 凋落桉树树皮分解, 主场效应, 养分释放, 桉针混交林, 亚热带

Abstract: Senesced bark litter of Eucalyptus collected from pure Eucalyptus plantation was placed in four stand types, including pure Eucalyptus urophylla plantation (control), E. urophylla-Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed plantation (Eucalyptus-Cunninghamia), E. urophylla-Fokienia hodginsii mixed plantation (Eucalyptus-Fokienia), and E. urophylla-C. lanceolata-F. hodginsii mixed plantation (Eucalyptus-Cunninghamia-Fokienia). During a 540-day decomposition period, litterbags were retrieved every 60 days to measure remaining dry mass and the contents of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), cellulose, and lignin. We analyzed decomposition characteristics, home-field advantage (HFA), nutrient release, and key drivers in mixed plantations. The results showed that decomposition rates in the mixed plantations were significantly higher than in the pure plantation, with negative HFA indices. Decomposition was fastest in the Eucalyptus-Cunninghamia mixed plantation, followed by the Eucalyptus-Cunninghamia-Fokienia mixed plantation and the Eucalyptus-Fokienia mixed plantation, which slightly exceeded the pure plantation. The three Eucalyptus-conifer mixed plantations promoted the mineralization of C, N, P, and the degradation of cellulose during bark litter decomposition, but had little effect on lignin degradation, accompanied by decreases in C/N, C/P, N/P and an increase in lignin/N. During the decomposition process, C and cellulose showed a continuous release pattern in both home and away fields, while N and P exhibited a “release-accumulation-release” pattern. Nutrient remaining amounts, stoichiometric ratios, and recalcitrant compound contents collectively explained 76.6% of the variation in bark litter decomposition. Higher C remaining amount is positively related with decomposition, while higher P remaining rate, C/N, and N/P negatively related with decomposition. The Eucalyptus-Cunninghamia mixed plantation significantly enhanced the decomposition of Eucalyptus bark litter. In future structural transformations of Eucalyptus plantations, it is recommended that Eucalyptus-Cunninghamia mixed plantation be prioritized.

Key words: Eucalyptus bark litter decomposition, home-field advantage (HFA), nutrient release, Eucalyptus-conifer mixed plantation, subtropical zone

康婷婷, 钟全林, 梁锋娜, 杨彬峰, 徐朝斌, 程栋梁, 姚舒舒, 赖雁南. 亚热带巨尾桉凋落树皮的分解特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(8): 2325-2334.

KANG Tingting, ZHONG Quanlin, LIANG Fengna, YANG Binfeng, XU Chaobin, CHENG Dongliang, YAO Shushu, LAI Yannan. Decomposition characteristics of bark litter in subtropical Eucalyptus plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(8): 2325-2334.

参考文献

[1] Zhao XX, Tian QX, Michelsen A, et al. Global pattern in terrestrial leaf litter decomposition: The effects of climate, litter chemistry, life form, growth form and mycorrhizal association. Agricultural and Forest Meteoro-logy, 2025, 362: 110368-110379
[2] Wu QX, Ni X, Sun XY, et al. Substrate and climate determine terrestrial litter decomposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025, 122: 4122-4130
[3] 周庭宇, 肖洋, 黄庆阳, 等. 森林凋落物分解的研究进展与展望. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 44-51
[4] Austin AT, Ballaré CL. Dual role of lignin in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 4618-4622
[5] 赵小祥, 朱彬彬, 田秋香, 等. 叶片凋落物分解的主场优势研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 597-607
[6] Fanin N, Lin D, Freschet GT, et al. Home-field advantage of litter decomposition: From the phyllosphere to the soil. New Phytologist, 2021, 231: 1353-1358
[7] Zhu MH, Fanin N, Wang QK, et al. High functional breadth of microbial communities decreases home-field advantage of litter decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 188: 109232-109243
[8] Austin AT, Vivanco L, González-Arzac A, et al. There’s no place like home? An exploration of the mechanisms behind plant litter-decomposer affinity in terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 2014, 204: 307-314
[9] 王阳, 王雪峰, 张伟东. 土壤线虫群落对森林凋落物分解主场效应的作用. 生态学报, 2018, 38(21): 7840-7849
[10] Palozzi JE, Lindo Z. Are leaf litter and microbes team players? Interpreting home-field advantage decomposition dynamics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124: 189-198
[11] Hunt HW, Ingham ER, Coleman DC, et al. Nitrogen limitation of production and decomposition in prairie, mountain meadow, and pine forest. Ecology, 1988, 69: 1009-1016
[12] Gholz HL, Wedin DA, Smitherman SM, et al. Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: Toward a global model of decomposition. Global Change Biology, 2000, 6: 751-765
[13] Bradford MA, Berg B, Maynard DS, et al. Understan-ding the dominant controls on litter decomposition. Journal of Ecology, 2016, 104: 229-238
[14] 吴兴澳, 侯满福, 刘雨婷, 等. 桉树林种植年限对林下植物及其种间关联的影响. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(3): 736-744
[15] 罗佳, 周小玲, 陈建华, 等. 桉树人工林土壤养分对凋落物分解的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(11): 132-139
[16] Handa IT, Aerts R, Berendse F, et al. Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes. Nature, 2014, 509: 218-221
[17] 张培, 庞圣江, 杨保国, 等. 不同混交模式对桉树林分生长、凋落物量和土壤养分的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021, 49(2): 31-37
[18] 李金金, 张健, 张阿娟, 等. 不同密度巨桉人工林林下植物多样性及根际土壤化感物质. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2175-2184
[19] 朱琪, 邓海燕, 马安琪, 等. 不同混交比例桉树-红锥混交林对林下植被和土壤肥力的影响研究. 林业与环境科学, 2024, 40(4): 70-79
[20] 李艳红, 杨万勤, 罗承德, 等. 桉-桤不同混合比例凋落物分解过程中土壤动物群落动态. 生态学报, 2013, 33(1): 159-167
[21] Yang K, Zhu JJ, Zhang WW, et al. Litter decomposition and nutrient release from monospecific and mixed litters: Comparisons of litter quality, fauna and decomposition site effects. Journal of Ecology, 2022, 110: 1673-1686
[22] 李奥欣, 侯新村, 曾加佳, 等. 桉树油化学成分分析及α-松油醇的化感作用. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2195-2201
[23] 王程成, 韦冰, 姚婧梅, 等. 三峡库区城镇河流凋落物分解对不同城镇化率的响应. 生态学报, 2025, 45(6): 1-13
[24] 刘小丽. 巨桉人工混交林混合凋落物分解特征. 硕士论文. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2023
[25] Prescott CE. Litter decomposition: What controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry, 2010, 101: 133-149
[26] Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Allison SD, et al. Plant traits and wood fates across the globe: Rotted, burned, or consumed? Global Change Biology, 2009, 15: 2431-2449
[27] Háttenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2005, 36: 191-218
[28] 周成城, 黄霞, 谢德金, 等. 基于GC-MS的福建柏萜类挥发物及其器官差异分析. 福建农林大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021, 50(2): 216-222
[29] 向元彬, 黄从德, 胡庭兴, 等. 不同密度巨桉人工林凋落物分解过程中基质质量的变化. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 43(4): 65-72
[30] He W, Ma ZY, Pei J, et al. Effects of predominant tree species mixing on lignin and cellulose degradation during leaf litter decomposition in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Forests, 2019, 10: 360-369
[31] 郭嘉龙, 张丽仙, 杨丽, 等. 不同发育阶段杉木凋落物分解过程中难分解物质的动态特征. 江西农业大学学报, 2024, 46(6): 1488-1497
[32] Cepáková Š, Frouz J. Changes in chemical composition of litter during decomposition: A review of published ¹³C NMR spectra. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2015, 15: 805-815
[33] Meier CL, Bowman WD. Links between plant litter chemistry, species diversity, and below-ground ecosystem function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105: 19780-19785
[34] 刘文飞, 樊后保, 沈芳芳, 等. 连续年龄序列桉树人工林凋落物分解的研究. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(6): 132-136
[35] 郝建, 莫慧华, 黄弼昌, 等. 西南桦和尾巨桉凋落叶分解及其与土壤性质的相关性. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(2): 202-208
[36] 董学德, 高鹏, 李腾, 等. 土壤微生物群落对麻栎-刺槐混交林凋落物分解的影响. 生态学报, 2021, 41(6): 2315-2325
[37] Giweta M. Role of litter production and its decomposition, and factors affecting the processes in a tropical forest ecosystem: A review. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 2020, 44: 11-23
[38] Liu J, Liu XY, Song QN, et al. Synergistic effects: A common theme in mixed-species litter decomposition. New Phytologist, 2020, 227: 757-765
[39] Berg B, McClaugherty C. Role of chemical constituents in regulating decay rates and stable fractions: Effects of initial and changing chemical composition on decomposition and organic matter accumulation// Berg B, McClaugherty C. Plant Litter: Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020: 129-163
[40] Ostertag R, Restrepo C, Dalling JW, et al. Litter decomposition rates across tropical montane and lowland forests are controlled foremost by climate. Biotropica, 2022, 54: 309-326
[41] 张悦, 张艺凡, 马怡波, 等. 森林生态系统凋落物分解影响因素研究进展. 环境生态学, 2023, 5(4): 45-56
[42] Zhang MH, Cheng XL, Geng QH, et al. Leaf litter traits predominantly control litter decomposition in streams worldwide. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2019, 28: 1469-1486
[43] Háttenschwiler S, Jørgensen HB. Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. Journal of Ecology, 2010, 98: 754-763
[44] Cotrufo MF, Soong JL, Horton AJ, et al. Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss. Nature Geoscience, 2015, 8: 776-779
[45] Waring BG. A meta-analysis of climatic and chemical controls on leaf litter decay rates in tropical forests. Ecosystems, 2012, 15: 999-1009
[46] Zhang Z, Wang ZY, Ye SM, et al. Dynamic changes of soil aggregate-associated phosphorus adsorption-desorption characteristics in a chronosequence of Chinese fir plantations. Soil and Tillage Research, 2025, 249: 106479-106492

亚热带巨尾桉凋落树皮的分解特征

Decomposition characteristics of bark litter in subtropical Eucalyptus plantations

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘爱平, 王小红, 孙杰, 范爱连, 贾林巧, 姚晓东, 林成芳, 陈光水. 湿润亚热带森林类型转换对土壤有机碳矿化的影响及其非生物调控因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(5): 1371-1379.
[2]	查满丽, 李帅军, 王翠娟, 林伟盛, 刘小飞, 钟羡芳, 郭剑芬. 亚热带米槠天然林土壤性质和真菌群落对降雨减少的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(5): 1380-1386.
[3]	马璐璐, 左倩倩, 焦泽彬, 赵杼祺, 胡振宏. 黄土高原木质残体分解的主场效应及其对干旱的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(5): 1398-1406.
[4]	杨漫婷, 郑美扬, 林松, 杜芳芳, 张峰, 童根平, 傅伟军. 梅花鹿长期活动对植物群落及土壤有机碳累积变化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 811-818.
[5]	李金凤, 王晖, 尤业明, 王健, 童秀丽, 胡佳佳, 明安刚, 陈琳, 刘世荣. 南亚热带人工林树种配置对根际土壤生物有效磷的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1492-1500.
[6]	韩子琛, 郭强, 夏允, 杨柳明, 范跃新, 杨玉盛. 亚热带三种林分土壤酶活性和酶化学计量比特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1501-1508.
[7]	李佳玉, 施秀珍, 李帅军, 王振宇, 王建青, 邹秉章, 王思荣, 黄志群. 杉木人工林和天然次生林林龄对土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 339-346.
[8]	宋佳雨, 陈相标, 陈仕东, 熊德成, 杨智杰. 台风“杜苏芮”对亚热带森林土壤呼吸的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(12): 3386-3392.
[9]	纪永康, 马楠, 张慧, 李翠环, 马元丹, 武启骞, 李彦. 降水季节性分配对亚热带森林土壤氮矿化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 186-194.
[10]	张雅婷, 叶旺敏, 熊德成, 吴晨, 黄锦学, 陈仕东, 杨智杰. 杉木幼树光合特性与生长的季节变化及其对土壤增温的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 195-202.
[11]	吴欣阳, 邵静, 陈晓萍, 李锦隆, 胡丹丹, 钟全林, 程栋梁. 武夷山不同海拔阔叶树叶片养分含量及再吸收效率 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2305-2313.
[12]	李澳归, 蔡世锋, 罗素珍, 王小红, 曹丽荣, 王雪, 林成芳, 陈光水. 亚热带常绿阔叶林62种木本植物凋落叶碳氮磷化学计量特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1153-1160.
[13]	张宇辉, 陈娟, 胥超, 熊德成, 杨智杰, 陈仕东, 毛超. 增温对亚热带格氏栲天然林凋落物可溶性有机质数量和结构的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 946-954.
[14]	毛超, 林伟盛, 胥超, 刘小飞, 熊德成, 杨智杰, 陈仕东. 土壤增温降低亚热带森林土壤可溶性有机碳数量和质量 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 623-630.
[15]	刘妍霁, 刘子恺, 金圣圣, 邓慧玉, 沈菊培, 贺纪正. 亚热带森林土壤氨氧化微生物和反硝化微生物功能基因丰度对氮磷输入的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 639-646.