欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 1091-1098.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202504.009

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

暴雨条件下黄土高原坡面灌草植被与生物结皮对水土流失和水动力特征的影响

淡晨希1, 张琼1,2*, 刘刚1,2, 夏小林3   

  1. 1西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院/水土保持研究所, 水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
    2中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
    3水利水资源安徽省重点实验室, 安徽蚌埠 233000
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-14 接受日期:2025-03-04 出版日期:2025-04-18 发布日期:2025-10-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: zqiswc@nwafu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:淡晨希, 男, 1998年生, 博士研究生。主要从事土壤侵蚀机理研究。E-mail: dandcx@foxmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金区域联合基金重点项目(U22A20613)、安徽省自然科学基金水科学联合基金项目(2208085US14)和水利水资源安徽省重点实验室开放研究基金项目(2023SKJ03)

Effects of shrub-grass vegetation and biocrusts on soil and water loss and hydrodynamic characteristics of Loess Plateau slopes under rainstorm conditions

DAN Chenxi1, ZHANG Qiong1,2*, LIU Gang1,2, XIA Xiaolin3   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering/Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A& F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
    2Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Ministry of Water Resources and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
    3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Water Conservancy and Water Resources, Bengbu 233000, Anhui, China
  • Received:2024-10-14 Accepted:2025-03-04 Online:2025-04-18 Published:2025-10-18

摘要: 在黄土高原植被恢复初期,灌草植被显著降低了强降雨引起的水土流失,生物结皮与植被共同影响产流产沙过程,但它们的综合影响常被忽略。本研究通过室内人工模拟短历时、高强度的降雨试验,设置对照(无植被无生物结皮裸地)、草地、灌木、20%覆盖度生物结皮、草地+20%覆盖度生物结皮、灌木+20%覆盖度生物结皮、40%覆盖度生物结皮、草地+40%覆盖度生物结皮和灌木+40%覆盖度生物结皮9个处理,探究灌草植被和生物结皮对产流产沙过程的影响,并揭示其侵蚀动力机制。结果表明: 1)在降雨时间内对照组的产沙量始终最大,灌木、草本和生物结皮都具有良好的减蚀效益。2)灌木和草本植物处理产流量较对照组分别减少了21.9%和18.2%,具有促进土壤水分入渗的作用,而20%和40%盖度生物结皮处理的产流量分别增加了9.5%和17.4%,表现出抑制土壤水分入渗的作用,植被+生物结皮条件下,植被促进土壤水分入渗的作用大于生物结皮抑制土壤水分入渗的作用。3)草地+20%盖度生物结皮处理和所有40%盖度生物结皮处理的径流为缓流,其余处理为急流;各处理平均径流流速和径流动能显著小于对照组,而径流剪切力和阻力系数显著大于对照组,其中草地+40%盖度生物结皮处理的径流剪切力和阻力系数最大,较对照组分别增加了164.5%和213.8%,径流动能最小,较对照组减少了91.9%。综上,在植被生长恢复初期,保留适量生物结皮有益于防治水土流失和维持生态系统稳定,本试验条件下草地+40%盖度生物结皮处理的减蚀效果最好。

关键词: 土壤侵蚀, 径流, 水土流失, 生物结皮, 植被

Abstract: During the initial stages of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, shrub-grass vegetation effectively mitigates soil erosion caused by intense rainfall, while biological soil crusts (biocrust) and vegetation collectively can regulate runoff and sediment yield processes. However, their combined effects are usually overlooked. To quantify the impacts of shrub-grass vegetation and biocrust on runoff-sediment dynamics and to elucidate their synergistic effects on erosion mechanics, we conducted indoor artificial simulations of short-duration, high-intensity rainfall events, with nine treatments: bare soil (CK, no vegetation/biocrust); grassland; shrub; biocrust with 20% coverage; grassland+biocrust with 20% coverage; shrub+biocrust with 20% coverage; biocrust with 40% coverage; grassland + biocrust with 40% coverage; and shrub + biocrust with 40% coverage. The results showed that: 1) During the rainfall events, CK consistently exhibited the highest sediment volume, while the shrub, grass, and biocrust significantly reduced erosion. 2) Compared to the CK, shrub and grass reduced runoff by 21.9% and 18.2%, respectively, which promoted soil moisture infiltration. In contrast, biocrust with 20% and 40% coverage increased runoff by 9.5% and 17.4%, respectively, indicating that biocrusts inhibited infiltration. The positive effect of vegetation on soil infiltration surpassed the negative impact of biocrusts under vegetation+biocrust conditions. 3) The grassland+biocrust with 20% coverage treatment and all treatments with 40% biocrust generated subcritical flow, while other treatments were supercritical flow. All treatments showed lower average flow velocity and flow kinetic energy than CK, but exhibited higher flow shear stress and resistance coefficients. Compared to the CK, the grassland+biocrust with 40% coverage treatment demonstrated the highest runoff shear stress and resistance coefficient, with 164.5% and 213.8% increases, respectively, while the runoff kinetic energy was the lowest, decreasing by 91.9%. These findings suggested that maintaining appropriate biocrust coverage during the early stages of vegetation recovery could be helpful for enhancing soil conservation and ecosystem stability. Under the experimental conditions, the grassland+biocrust with 40% coverage treatment is optimal for soil erosion reduction.

Key words: soil erosion, runoff, soil and water loss, biocrust, vegetation