不同草地植物叶功能性状对沙化的响应及适应策略

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.006

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 2379-2387.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.006

不同草地植物叶功能性状对沙化的响应及适应策略

刘万新¹, 蔡江平^2*, 付佳琳³, 冯雪², 李慧², 吕林有⁴, 姜勇⁵, 张玉革¹

¹沈阳大学环境学院, 沈阳 110044;
²中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
³沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院, 沈阳 110161;
⁴辽宁省沙地治理与利用研究所, 辽宁阜新 123000;
⁵河北大学生命科学学院, 河北保定 071002

收稿日期:2025-03-07 接受日期:2025-05-25 出版日期:2025-08-18 发布日期:2026-02-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: jpcai@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:刘万新, 女, 2000年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事植物功能性状及其权衡关系研究。E-mail: 15142380563@163.com
基金资助:
辽宁省应用基础研究计划项目(2023JH2/101700353)、辽宁省自然科学基金项目(2023-MSBA-136, 2023-BSBA-324)和天津市自然科学基金项目(23JCQNJC01140)

Responses of leaf functional traits of different grassland plants to desertification and their adaptation strategies

LIU Wanxin¹, CAI Jiangping^2*, FU Jialin³, FENG Xue², LI Hui², LYU Linyou⁴, JIANG Yong⁵, ZHANG Yuge¹

¹School of Environment, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China;
²Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
³College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China;
⁴Research Institute of Sand Control and Utilization, Fuxin 123000, Liao-ning, China;
⁵ College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China

Received:2025-03-07 Accepted:2025-05-25 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2026-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以辽西北地区章古台天然草地中4个优势种胡枝子、寸草苔、委陵菜和隐子草为研究对象,设置0(对照)、10%、30%、50%、70% 5个加沙水平,研究4个优势种的形态和化学功能性状,分析叶片功能性状对沙化的响应与适应策略。结果表明: 沙化显著影响辽西北天然草地植物的叶片功能性状,并存在显著的物种特异性。随沙化强度增加,寸草苔和委陵菜的比叶面积呈先上升后下降的变化趋势,分别在30%和10%加沙水平下达到最大值;4种植物的叶干物质含量随沙化程度的加剧均呈下降趋势,但变化不显著。沙化显著提高寸草苔和隐子草叶片氮、磷含量,与对照相比,70%加沙处理其氮含量分别升高45.8%和28.2%,磷含量分别升高87.1%和50.3%。4种植物均通过对比叶面积、叶干物质含量、叶片氮含量和磷含量等形态及化学性状的权衡来适应沙化环境;委陵菜表现出“低投入、高收益”的资源保守型策略,胡枝子能维持较稳定的叶片元素含量,两者均表现出较强的沙化适应性。

关键词: 沙化草地, 叶片功能性状, 养分化学计量, 权衡策略, 退化草地恢复

Abstract: We examined the responses of leaf functional traits and their adaptation strategies of four dominant species (Lespedeza davurica, Carex duriuscula, Potentilla chinensis, and Cleistogenes chinensis) to desertification in the Zhanggutai desertified grassland, Liaoning Province. We measured the morphological and chemical functional traits under five desertification levels (0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% of sand addition by mass). The results showed that desertification significantly affected leaf functional traits in the natural grasslands of northwestern Liao-ning, but with significant species-specific difference. With the increases of desertification intensity, specific leaf area of C. duriuscula and P. chinensis increased initially and then decreased, peaking at 30% and 10% sand addition levels, respectively. Leaf dry matter content of the four species all showed a decreasing trend with aggravated desertification, but the changes were not statistically significant. Desertification significantly increased leaf N and P contents of C. duriuscula and C. chinensis, with N content being increased by 45.8% and 28.2%, and P content being increased by 87.1% and 50.3%, respectively under 70% sand addition treatment. The four species adapted to desertification through trade-offs among morphological and chemical traits. P. chinensis exhibited a “low-input, high-benefit” resource-conservative strategy. L. davurica maintained relatively stable leaf nutrient content. Both species exhibited a relatively strong adaptability to desertification.

Key words: desertified grassland, leaf functional trait, nutrient stoichiometry, trade-off strategy, degraded grassland restoration

刘万新, 蔡江平, 付佳琳, 冯雪, 李慧, 吕林有, 姜勇, 张玉革. 不同草地植物叶功能性状对沙化的响应及适应策略[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(8): 2379-2387.

LIU Wanxin, CAI Jiangping, FU Jialin, FENG Xue, LI Hui, LYU Linyou, JIANG Yong, ZHANG Yuge. Responses of leaf functional traits of different grassland plants to desertification and their adaptation strategies[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(8): 2379-2387.

参考文献

[1] Han DM, Wang GQ, Xue BL, et al. Evaluation of semiarid grassland degradation in North China from multiple perspectives. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 112: 41-50
[2] Ma L, Wang Q, Shen ST, et al. Heterogeneity of soil structure and fertility during desertification of alpine grassland in northwest Sichuan. Ecosphere, 2020, 11: e03161
[3] Houérou HNL. Climate change, drought and desertification. Journal of Arid Environments, 1996, 34: 133-185
[4] 徐玲玲, 延昊, 钱拴. 基于MODIS-NDVI的2000—2018年中国北方土地沙化敏感性时空变化. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 925-936
[5] 王国晨, 董新昊, 赵小山, 等. 辽西北沙质荒漠化土地成因及治理对策. 中国资源综合利用, 2022, 40(6): 134-136
[6] He PC, Wright IJ, Zhu SD, et al. Leaf mechanical strength and photosynthetic capacity vary independently across 57 subtropical forest species with contrasting light requirements. New Phytologist, 2019, 223: 607-618
[7] Midolo G, De FP, Hölzel N, et al. Global patterns of intraspecific leaf trait responses to elevation. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25: 2485-2498
[8] 王晓芳, 马红彬, 刘杰, 等. 放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 569-576
[9] 李善家, 王子濠, 苏培玺, 等. 荒漠植物性状权衡策略及功能多样性研究进展. 生态学报, 2022, 42(18): 7308-7320
[10] 王佳智. 刈割和氮磷添加对内蒙古典型草原植物功能性状的影响. 硕士论文. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2023
[11] Westheimer FH. Why nature chose phosphates. Science, 1987, 235: 1173-1178
[12] 杨璐, 依丽米努尔, 朱苗苗, 等. 植物叶片中硫含量测定方法研究. 应用化工, 2015, 44(3): 575-579
[13] 戚德辉, 温仲明, 王红霞, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同功能群植物碳氮磷生态化学计量特征及其对微地形的响应. 生态学报, 2016, 36(20): 6420-6430
[14] Reich PB, Oleksyn J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Procee-dings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101: 11001-11006
[15] Han DM, Wang GQ, Xue BL, et al. Evaluation of semia-rid grassland degradation in North China from multiple perspectives. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 112: 41-50
[16] Chen FS, Zeng DH, Singh AN, et al. Effects of soil moisture and soil depth on nitrogen mineralization process under Mongolian pine plantations in Zhanggutai sandy land, PR China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2005, 16: 101-104
[17] Li FR, Cook S, Geballe GT, et al. Rainwater harvesting agriculture: An integrated system for water management on rainfed land in China’ s semiarid areas. Ambio, 2000, 29: 477-483
[18] 张继义, 赵哈林. 退化沙质草地恢复过程土壤颗粒组成变化对土壤-植被系统稳定性的影响. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(4): 1395-1401
[19] 刘志民. 科尔沁沙地植物繁殖对策. 北京: 气象出版社, 2010: 60-67
[20] 孙英华, 吕林有, 赵艳. 少花蒺藜草入侵风险评估及其防控策略. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(8): 4580-4581
[21] Wang RZ, Lü LY, Cao YZ, et al. Stability of elemental content correlates with plant resistance to soil impove-rishment. Plant and Soil, 2021, 467: 213-226
[22] 曹彦卓. 模拟沙化对科尔沁草地优势植物生长及养分吸收的影响. 硕士论文. 沈阳: 沈阳大学, 2020
[23] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 61-76
[24] 宋彦涛, 周道玮, 李强, 等. 松嫩草地80种草本植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(3): 222-230
[25] 蒋成益, 马明东, 肖玖金. 川西北不同沙化程度草地植物功能性状及其驱动因子. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(5): 965-973
[26] 韩鸿昆. 羊草对土壤沙化与干旱胁迫的生理生态适应机制研究. 硕士论文. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2023
[27] Yan P, He NP, Martínez FM, et al. Plant acquisitive strategies promote resistance and temporal stability of semiarid grasslands. Ecology Letters, 2025, 28: e70110
[28] Kimm H, Ryu Y. Seasonal variations in photosynthetic parameters and leaf area index in an urban park. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2015, 14: 1059-1067
[29] Wright IJ, Groom PK, Lamont BB, et al. Leaf trait relationships in Australian plant species. Functional Plant Biology, 2004, 31: 551-558
[30] 李丹, 康萨如拉, 赵梦颖, 等. 内蒙古羊草草原不同退化阶段土壤养分与植物功能性状的关系. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(10): 991-1002
[31] Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM. The vegetation N:P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33: 1441-1450
[32] 赵一嬴, 李月芬, 王月娇, 等. 草地退化演替阶段羊草叶片碳氮磷化学计量学研究. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(11): 73-77
[33] Wright IJ, Ackerly DD, Frans B, et al. Relationships among ecologically important dimensions of plant trait variation in seven neotropical forests. Annals of Botany, 2007, 99: 1003-1015
[34] Gao Y, Liu J, Wang DJ, et al. Synergy and trade-off between plant functional traits enhance grassland multifunctionality under grazing exclusion in a semi-arid region. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 373: 123877
[35] Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytologist, 2010, 143: 155-162
[36] 王琨. 贵州北盘江喀斯特地区兰科植物叶片功能性状研究. 硕士论文. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2023
[37] 孙露. 内蒙古草甸草原土壤性质及常见植物叶功能性状对氮添加的响应. 硕士论文. 济南: 山东大学, 2022
[38] Cantón Y, Barrio GD, Solé-Benet A, et al. Topographic controls on the spatial distribution of ground cover in the Tabernas badlands of SE Spain. Catena, 2003, 55: 341-365
[39] Niinemets Ü. Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology, 2001, 82: 453-469
[40] Wang RZ, Lü LY, Cao YZ, et al. Stability of elemental content correlates with plant resistance to soil impove-rishment. Plant and Soil, 2021, 467: 1-14

不同草地植物叶功能性状对沙化的响应及适应策略

Responses of leaf functional traits of different grassland plants to desertification and their adaptation strategies

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李梦妮, 蒋勇军, 程钰瑞, 吴泽, 贺秋芳, 李佳彬, 赵春峰, 钱凤. 岩溶区不同石漠化生境优势木本植物叶片功能性状变异及适应策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(3): 762-770.
[2]	陈淼, 刘顺, 许格希, 陈健, 邢红爽, 李非凡, 张淼淼, 曹向文, 史作民. 青藏高原东缘不同植被类型下草本植物叶片碳氮稳定同位素差异及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 877-885.
[3]	邢红爽, 冯秋红, 史作民, 刘顺, 许格希, 陈健, 巩闪闪. 青藏高原东缘川滇高山栎和西南花楸叶片性状对海拔的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 606-614.
[4]	张秀颖, 蔡江平, 王聪, 江志阳, 李慧, 王正文, 姜勇, 张玉革. 不同培肥模式对辽西北沙化草地土壤改良与植被恢复的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 55-61.
[5]	上官虹玉, 王传宽, 全先奎. 兴安落叶松叶化学计量特征与光合性状的权衡及其种源差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1483-1490.
[6]	王星, 杨腾, 毛子昆, 蔺菲, 叶吉, 房帅, 戴冠华, 胡家瑞, 郝占庆, 王绪高, 原作强. 长白山阔叶红松林优势树种叶际真菌群落结构 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2405-2412.
[7]	季飞龙, 李雪华, 李晓兰, 贾美玉, 赵志勇. 退化草地物种种内和种间功能性状变异对放牧的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2371-2378.
[8]	王雪艳, 曹建军, 张小芳, 孔莹莹, 田泓, 李梦天, 许雪赟, 龚毅帆. 地形因子对黄土高原山杏叶片功能性状的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2591-2599.
[9]	周丽丽, 钱瑞玲, 李树斌, 董博微, 陈宝英, 潘辉. 滨海沙地主要造林树种叶片功能性状及养分重吸收特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(7): 2320-2328.
[10]	栗马玲, 宋沼鹏, 刘艳红, 王洪林. 火烧强度对兴安落叶松群落叶片功能性状及功能多样性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4021-4030.
[11]	焦龙, 蔡晓明, 边磊, 罗宗秀, 李兆群, 辛肇军, 陈宗懋. 茉莉酸类化合物:从植物的诱导抗虫防御反应到生长-防御权衡 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3876-3890.
[12]	王辉^1,2;袁宏波¹;徐向宏³;刘淑娟⁴. 黄河源区沙化草地区域景观特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(09): 1665-1670 .