[1] Violle C, Navas M, Vile D, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional. Oikos, 2007, 116: 882-892 [2] 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 徐丽, 等. 生态系统性状对宏生态研究的启示与挑战. 生态学报, 2020, 40(8): 2507-2522 [3] Shipley B, De Bello F, Cornelissen JHC, et al. Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology. Oecologia, 2016, 180: 923-931 [4] Webb CT, Hoeting JA, Ames GM, et al. A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13: 267-283 [5] Funk JL, Larson JE, Ames GM, et al. Revisiting the Holy Grail: Using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes. Biological Reviews, 2017, 92: 1156-1173 [6] He NP, Liu CC, Piao SL, et al. Ecosystem traits lin-king functional traits to macroecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 34: 200-210 [7] He NP, Yan P, Liu CC, et al. Predicting ecosystem productivity based on plant community traits. Trends in Plant Science, 2023, 28: 43-53 [8] Kattge J, Knorr W, Raddatz T, et al. Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global-scale terrestrial biosphere models. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15: 976-991 [9] Farquhar GD. Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 1989, 323: 357-367 [10] Luo XZ, Chen JM, Liu J, et al. Comparison of big-leaf, two-big-leaf, and two-leaf upscaling schemes for evapotranspiration estimation using coupled carbon-water modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2018, 123: 207-225 [11] McGill BJ. The what, how and why of doing macroecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2019, 28: 6-17 [12] Huang MT, Piao SL, Ciais P, et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 3: 772-779 [13] Zhang JH, Hedin LO, Li MX, et al. Leaf N:P ratio does not predict productivity trends across natural terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology, 2022, 103: e3789 [14] Malhi Y, Girardin CAJ, Goldsmith GR, et al. The variation of productivity and its allocation along a tropical elevation gradient: A whole carbon budget perspective. New Phytologist, 2017, 214: 1019-1032 [15] McGill BJ. Matters of scale. Science, 2010, 328: 575-576 [16] Liu CC, Li Y, Yan P, et al. How to improve the predictions of plant functional traits on ecosystem functioning? Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 622260 [17] Muscarella R, Uriarte M. Do community-weighted mean functional traits reflect optimal strategies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 283: 20152434 [18] Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94: 13730-13734 [19] Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 2004, 85: 2630-2637 [20] Yang J, Cao M, Swenson NG. Why functional traits do not predict tree demographic rates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 33: 326-336 [21] Lieth H. Modeling the primary productivity of the world//Lieth H, Whittaker RH, eds. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975: 237-263 [22] Boysen-Jensen P. The substance production of plants. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1932 [23] Watson DJ. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy, 1952, 4: 101-145 [24] Monsi M, Saeki T. On the light factor in plant communities and its importance for substance production. Japanese Journal of Botany, 1953, 14: 22-52 [25] 方精云, 柯金虎, 唐志尧, 等. 生物生产力的“4P”概念、估算及其相互关系. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(4): 414-419 [26] Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E, et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 2010, 329: 834-838 [27] Falge E, Baldocchi D, Tenhunen J, et al. Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113: 53-74 [28] Monteith J. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1972, 9: 747-766 [29] Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience, 2004, 54: 547-560 [30] Gu L, Post WM, Baldocchi DD, et al. Characterizing the seasonal dynamics of plant community photosynthesis across a range of vegetation types//Noormets A, ed. Phenology of Ecosystem Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009: 35-58 [31] Rosenzweig ML. Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: Prediction from climatological data. The American Naturalist, 1968, 102: 67-74 [32] Lieth H, Whittaker RH. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975 [33] Uchijima Z, Seino H. Agroclimatic evaluation of net primary productivity of natural vegetations (1) Chikugo model for evaluating net primary productivity. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 1985, 40: 343-352 [34] Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, et al. Net primary production in tropical forests: An evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecological Applications, 2001, 11: 371-384 [35] Brovkin V, Bendtsen J, Claussen M, et al. Carbon cycle, vegetation, and climate dynamics in the Holocene: Experiments with the CLIMBER-2 model. Global Biogeo-chemical Cycles, 2002, 16: 1-20 [36] Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Castro K, Wright SJ, et al. Differences in leaf traits, leaf internal structure, and spectral reflectance between two communities of lianas and trees: Implications for remote sensing in tropical environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113: 2076-2088 [37] Zhao MS, Heinsch FA, Nemani RR, et al. Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 95: 164-176 [38] Jenkins J, Richardson AD, Braswell B, et al. Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 143: 64-79 [39] Ruimy A, Kergoat L, Bondeau A, et al. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Analysis of differences in light absorption and light-use efficiency. Global Change Biology, 1999, 5: 56-64 [40] Pei YY, Dong JW, Zhang Y, et al. Evolution of light use efficiency models: Improvement, uncertainties, and implications. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 317: 108905 [41] Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 1980, 149: 78-90 [42] Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI, et al. Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: Results from six dynamic glo-bal vegetation models. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7: 357-373 [43] Smith B, Warlind D, Arneth A, et al. Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 2027-2054 [44] Fisher RA, Muszala S, Verteinstein M, et al. Taking off the training wheels: The properties of a dynamic vegetation model without climate envelopes. Geoscientific Model Development, 2015, 8: 3293-3357 [45] Thonicke K, Spessa A, Prentice IC, et al. The influence of vegetation, fire spread and fire behaviour on biomass burning and trace gas emissions: Results from a process-based model. Biogeosciences, 2010, 7: 1991-2011 [46] Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Lawrence DM, et al. Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: Biological nitrogen fixation as a case study. Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10: 044016 [47] Reich PB. Key canopy traits drive forest productivity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279: 2128-2134 [48] Peng YK, Bloomfield KJ, Prentice IC. A theory of plant function helps to explain leaf-trait and productivity responses to elevation. New Phytologist, 2020, 226: 1274-1284 [49] Fyllas NM, Bentley LP, Shenkin A, et al. Solar radiation and functional traits explain the decline of forest primary productivity along a tropical elevation gradient. Ecology Letters, 2017, 20: 730-740 [50] Bahar NHA, Ishida FY, Weerasinghe LK, et al. Leaf-level photosynthetic capacity in lowland Amazonian and high-elevation Andean tropical moist forests of Peru. New Phytologist, 2017, 214: 1002-1018 [51] Wang H, Prentice IC, Davis TW, et al. Photosynthetic responses to altitude: An explanation based on optimality principles. New Phytologist, 2017, 213: 976-982 [52] Wang H, Prentice IC, Keenan TF, et al. Towards a universal model for carbon dioxide uptake by plants. Nature Plants, 2017, 3: 734-741 [53] He NP, Liu CC, Tian M, et al. Variation in leaf anatomical traits from tropical to cold-temperate forests and linkage to ecosystem functions. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32: 10-19 [54] Barry KE, Pinter GA, Strini JW, et al. A graphical null model for scaling biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109: 1549-1560 [55] Šímová I, Storch D. The enigma of terrestrial primary productivity: Measurements, models, scales and the diversity-productivity relationship. Ecography, 2017, 40: 239-252 [56] Zhang Y, He NP, Li MX, et al. Community chlorophyll quantity determines the spatial variation of grassland productivity. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 801: 149567 [57] Yan P, Li MX, Yu GR, et al. Plant community traits associated with nitrogen can predict spatial variability in productivity. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 140: 109001 [58] Jackson RB, Sperry JS, Dawson TE. Root water uptake and transport: Using physiological processes in global predictions. Trends in Plant Science, 2000, 5: 482-488 [59] Croft H, Chen JM, Luo XZ, et al. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23: 3513-3524 [60] LeBauer DS, Treseder KK. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology, 2008, 89: 371-379 [61] Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428: 821-827 [62] He JS, Wang ZH, Wang X, et al. A test of the generality of leaf trait relationships on the Tibetan Plateau. New Phytologist, 2006, 170: 835-848 [63] Moore S, Adu-Bredu S, Duah-Gyamfi A, et al. Forest biomass, productivity and carbon cycling along a rainfall gradient in West Africa. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24: 496-510 [64] 李颖, 何念鹏, 刘聪聪. 植物功能性状网络: 概念体系发展与应用进展. 生态学报, 2024, 44(18): 7944-7961 [65] Yan P, He NP, Yu KL, et al. Integrating multiple plant functional traits to predict ecosystem productivity. Communications Biology, 2023, 6: 239 [66] van der Plas F, Schröder-Georgi T, Weigelt A, et al. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem pro-perties and long-term ecosystem functioning. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4: 1602-1611 [67] Hagan JG, Henn JJ, Osterman WH. Plant traits alone are good predictors of ecosystem properties when used carefully. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7: 332-334 [68] 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 张佳慧, 等. 植物性状研究的机遇与挑战: 从器官到群落. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19): 6787-6796 [69] Li Y, He NP. Innovations and prospectives of multidimensional trait integration. New Phytologist, 2024, 244: 337-340 [70] Jing X, Muys B, Bruelheide H, et al. Above- and belowground complementarity rather than selection drives tree diversity-productivity relationships in European forests. Functional Ecology, 2021, 35: 1756-1767 [71] Anderegg WR. Spatial and temporal variation in plant hydraulic traits and their relevance for climate change impacts on vegetation. New Phytologist, 2015, 205: 1008-1014 [72] Bruelheide H, Dengler J, Purschke O, et al. Global trait-environment relationships of plant communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2: 1906-1917 [73] Moreno-Martínez Á, Camps-Valls G, Kattge J, et al. A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 218: 69-88 [74] Šímová I, Violle C, Kraft NJ, et al. Shifts in trait means and variances in North American tree assemblages: Species richness patterns are loosely related to the functional space. Ecography, 2015, 38: 649-658 [75] 于贵瑞, 于福波, 于宗绪, 等. 宏观生态系统科学研究的思维维度和认知尺度及多学科坐标体系. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 327-340 [76] Su YJ, Guo QH, Jin SC, et al. The development and evaluation of a backpack LiDAR system for accurate and efficient forest inventory. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 18: 1660-1664 [77] Yan ZB, Guo ZF, Serbin SP, et al. Spectroscopy outperforms leaf trait relationships for predicting photosynthetic capacity across different forest types. New Phyto-logist, 2021, 232: 134-147 [78] Ma HZ, Mo LD, Crowther TW, et al. The global distribution and environmental drivers of aboveground versus belowground plant biomass. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2021, 5: 1110-1122 |