欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 3327-3338.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202511.002

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

修复措施对中国退化草地土壤有机碳组分的影响

郭子华1,2,3, 郝欢欢1,2,3, 马洁1,2,3, 周澳1,2,3, 崔清亮1,2,3, 陈晓鹏1,2,3, 赵祥1,2,3*   

  1. 1山西农业大学草业学院, 山西晋中 030801;
    2草地生态保护与乡土草种质创新山西省重点实验室, 山西晋中 030801;
    3山西右玉黄土高原草地生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 山西右玉 037200
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-05 接受日期:2025-09-12 出版日期:2025-11-18 发布日期:2026-06-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: sxndzhaox@126.com
  • 作者简介:郭子华, 女, 1997年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事草地生态与修复研究。E-mail: 1097389588@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32271682)

Effects of restoration measures on soil organic carbon fractions in degraded grasslands in China

GUO Zihua1,2,3, HAO Huanhuan1,2,3, MA Jie1,2,3, ZHOU Ao1,2,3, CUI Qingliang1,2,3, CHEN Xiaopeng1,2,3, ZHAO Xiang1,2,3*   

  1. 1College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, Shanxi, China;
    2Shanxi Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecological Protection and Native Grass Germplasm Innovation, Jinzhong 030801, Shanxi, China;
    3National Observation and Research Station for the Grassland Ecosystem on the Loess Pla-teau in Youyu, Youyu 037200, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2025-06-05 Accepted:2025-09-12 Online:2025-11-18 Published:2026-06-18

摘要: 补播、施肥和围封是常见的退化天然草地修复措施,土壤有机碳组分是衡量退化草地恢复过程中碳周转与固持的核心指标,明确不同修复措施对土壤有机碳组分的差异化影响,可为草地修复措施的选择提供科学依据。本研究整合73篇文献269对数据,分析了补播、施肥和围封3种修复措施对我国天然草地土壤有机碳组分的影响。结果表明: 补播显著增加草地土壤总有机碳18.7%、可溶性有机碳12.4%和易氧化有机碳17.7%;施肥显著增加土壤易氧化有机碳15.5%和轻组有机碳11.5%,但显著降低微生物生物量碳15.5%;围封显著增加土壤可溶性有机碳12.7%、微生物生物量碳17.8%和颗粒有机碳14.7%,但显著降低土壤轻组有机碳含量9.7%。不同环境条件下补播均显著提升土壤有机碳含量,围封显著提升土壤微生物生物量碳,施肥对土壤有机碳组分的影响则呈现出较强的不确定性。相关性分析表明,随土壤总有机碳含量增加,土壤可溶性有机碳、轻组有机碳、矿质结合有机碳显著增加,但微生物生物量碳、易氧化有机碳和颗粒有机碳无显著变化;土壤含水量与铵态氮含量是影响退化草地恢复过程中土壤有机碳变化的关键因素。

关键词: 退化草地, 补播, 施氮, 围栏封育, 土壤有机碳组分, meta分析

Abstract: Reseeding, fertilization, and fencing are widely used restoration measures for degraded natural grasslands. Soil organic carbon fractions serve as key indicators for evaluating carbon turnover and sequestration during the restoration of degraded grasslands. Clarifying the impacts of various restoration measures on soil organic carbon fractions can provide a scientific basis for selecting appropriate restoration strategies. Based on 269 data pairs from 73 papers, we evaluated the effects of three restoration measures-reseeding, fertilization, and fencing-on soil organic carbon fractions in degraded natural grasslands in China. The results showed that reseeding significantly increased soil total organic carbon by 18.7%, dissolved organic carbon by 12.4%, and easily oxidizable carbon by 17.7%. Fertilization significantly increased easily oxidizable carbon by 15.5% and light fraction organic carbon by 11.5%, but significantly reduced microbial biomass carbon by 15.5%. Fencing significantly increased dissolved organic carbon by 12.7%, microbial biomass carbon by 17.8%, and particulate organic carbon by 14.7%, while significantly reduced light fraction organic carbon by 9.7%. Under different environmental conditions, reseeding significantly enhanced soil organic carbon content, whereas fencing markedly enhanced soil microbial biomass carbon. In contrast, the effects of fertilization on soil organic carbon fractions exhibited considerable uncertainty. Correlation analysis indicated that soil dissolved organic carbon, light fraction organic carbon, and mineral associated organic carbon significantly increased with increasing total soil organic carbon content, whereas microbial biomass carbon, easily oxidizable carbon, and particulate organic carbon remained relatively stable. Soil moisture and ammonium content are key factors influencing changes in soil organic carbon during the restoration of degraded grasslands.

Key words: degraded grassland, reseeding, nitrogen fertilization, fencing, soil organic carbon fraction, meta-analysis