放牧后羊草和芦苇叶组织转化的比较

应用生态学报 ›› 2002, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 573-576.

放牧后羊草和芦苇叶组织转化的比较

刘颖, 王德利, 王旭, 巴雷, 孙伟

东北师范大学草地研究所, 植被生态学教育部重点实验室, 长春 130024

收稿日期:2001-07-02 修回日期:2001-10-26 出版日期:2002-05-15
通讯作者: 王德利
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划(G2000018606);国家自然科学基金资助项目(30070545)

Comparison of leaf tissue turnover for Leymus chinensis and Phragmites communis after grazing

LIU Ying, WANG Deli, WANG Xu, BA Lei, SUN Wei

Key Laboratory for Vegetation Ecology of Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024

Received:2001-07-02 Revised:2001-10-26 Online:2002-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用组织转化理论与分析方法,对羊草与芦苇在放牧后的叶组织转化进行了比较研究.结果表明,整个生长季内,除5月份外,芦苇的绿叶数大于羊草,羊草的绿叶长大于芦苇;2种禾草的叶片发生率和伸长率均在生长初期最大,以后逐渐降低,萎蔫率正好相反;芦苇叶片寿命短,叶组织转化快,叶组织物质积累呈抛物线型增长,如果不及时利用,会造成资源的浪费,羊草叶片寿命较长,叶组织转化慢.可以通过不同的利用方式和时间来改善羊草草地的质量.

关键词: 放牧, 羊草, 芦苇, 叶组织转化, 比较

Abstract: Leaf tissue turnover of Leymus chinensis and Phragmites communis after grazing was studied by application of theory and method of tissue turnover in this paper. The results showed that the number of living leaf of P. communis was larger than that of L.chinensis, but the length of living leaf of L. chinensis was larger than that of P. communis during the whole growth period. Both of the leaf appearance rate and the leaf elongation rate of L. chinensis and P. communis were largest at first, and then they decreased gradually. The rate of leaf wither and leaf senescence were in the converse trend. The leaf lifespan of P. communis was shorter than that of L.chinensis. The velocity of leaf tissue turnover of P. communis was faster than that of L. chinensis. There would be a great loss if the leaf tissue of L. chinensis were not used in time. The quality of grasslands could be improved by different utilization ways and periods.

Key words: Grazing, Leymus chinensis, Phragmites communis, Leaf tissue turnover, Comparison

中图分类号:

Q948
Q142

刘颖, 王德利, 王旭, 巴雷, 孙伟. 放牧后羊草和芦苇叶组织转化的比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, (5): 573-576.

LIU Ying, WANG Deli, WANG Xu, BA Lei, SUN Wei . Comparison of leaf tissue turnover for Leymus chinensis and Phragmites communis after grazing[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, (5): 573-576.

参考文献

[1] Chang H-N(常会宁),Xia J-X(夏景新),Tang S-M(汤胜民),et al.1996.Comparison between the leaf growth dynamics of Lolium perenne and Bromus inermis.Pratacult Sci(草业科学),13(1):8～11(in Chinese)
[2] Chapman DF,Lemaire G.1993.Morphogenetic and structural determinants of plant regrowth after defoliation.In:Baker MJ ed.Grasslands for Our World.Welling:SIN Publishing.55～64
[3] Davies A.1974.Leaf tissue remaining after cutting and regrowth in perennial ryegrass.J British Grassl Soc,82:165～172
[4] Davies A.1988.The regrowth of grass swards.In:Grass Crop.London:Chapman and Hill Ltd.85～117
[5] Fan F-C(樊奋成),Wang P(王培),Xia J-X(夏景新),et al.1994.A study on the leaf tissue turnover of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repems under different grazing system.Acta Agrestia Sin(草地学报),2(1):22～29(in Chinese)
[6] Hepp C,Miline JA,Illius AW,et al.1996.The effect of summer management of perennial ryegrass-dominant swards on plant and animal responses in the autumn when grazed by sheep Ⅰ.Tissue turnover and sward structure.Grass and Forage Sci,51:250～259
[7] Hodgson J.1990.Grazing Management.Longman Group (FE) Limited.45～47
[8] Hodgson J,Illius AW.1996.The Ecology and Management of Grazing System.CAB International,Wallingford,UK.
[9] Liu Y(刘颖),Wang D-L(王德利),Wang X(王旭),et al.2001.Studies on the leaf regrowth dynamic of three grasses in Leymus chinensis grassland under different grazing intensities.Acta Pratacult Sin(草业学报),10(4):40～46(in Chinese)
[10] Wang D-L(王德利).2001.The response characteristics of grassland vegetation structure to grazing intensities with cows.J Northeast Nor Univ(东北师范大学学报),(3):73～79 (in Chinese)
[11] Wang D-L(王德利),Lu X-L(吕新龙),Luo W-D(罗卫东).1996.Analysis to effects of different grazing density on rangeland vegetation.Acta Pratacult Sin(草业学报),5(2):28～33 (in Chinese)
[12] Wang R-Z(王仁忠).1997.Biomass formation dynamics of Leymus chinensis population affected by grazing.Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报),8(5):505～509 (in Chinese)
[13] Wang R-Z(王仁忠).1998.A study on the effects of grazing and mowing disturbances in Leymus chinensis grassland in Songnen Plain.Acta Ecol Sin(生态学报),18(2):210～213 (in Chinese)
[14] Woledge J.1997.The effects of shading during vegetative and reproductive growth on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves in a grass sward.Ann Biol,73:229～237
[15] Xia J-X(夏景新),Chang H-N(常会宁),Li Z-J(李志坚).1996.Comparative effects of cutting on tissue turnovers of Fescue/Ryegrass and Smooth bromegrass.Grassland China(中国草地),5:17～20(in Chinese)
[16] Xia J-X(夏景新).1995.Leaf regrowth dynamics of Lolium perenne and Bromus inermis and the relationship between management of grassland.Pratacult Sci(草业科学),12(1):9～12(in Chinese)
[17] Zhu L(朱琳),Huang W-H(黄文惠),Su J-K(苏加楷).1995.Effect of different grazing intensities on the number of leaf characteristics of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repems.Acta Agrestia Sin(草地学报),3(4):297～304 (in Chinese)