欧洲典型树种展叶始期的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.019

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 788-798.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.019

欧洲典型树种展叶始期的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应

林少植^1,2, 葛全胜¹, 王焕炯^1*

¹中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101;
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2020-09-03 接受日期:2021-01-03 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-09-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: wanghj@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:林少植, 男, 1997年生, 博士研究生。主要从事气候变化与植被物候研究。E-mail: linsz.19b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFA0606103)、国家自然科学基金项目(41871032,41807438)、中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所优秀青年人才基金项目(2018RC101)和中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2018070)资助

Spatiotemporal variations in leaf-out phenology of typical European tree species and their responses to climate change

LIN Shao-zhi^1,2, GE Quan-sheng¹, WANG Huan-jiong^1*

¹Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2020-09-03 Accepted:2021-01-03 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-09-15
Contact: * E-mail: wanghj@igsnrr.ac.cn
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0606103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871032, 41807438), the Outstanding Young Scholars from Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2018RC101) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2018070)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来,全球变暖对植物春季物候期产生了显著影响。很多研究报道了中国地区木本植物春季物候期变化的时空格局,但在同处于北半球温带地区的欧洲则相关研究较少。为了增进物候变化及其对气候变化响应规律的区域对比,本研究利用欧洲地区展叶始期(1980—2014年)数据和相应的气象数据,研究欧洲七叶树、垂枝桦、欧洲山毛榉和夏栎4种典型木本植物展叶始期的时空变化格局,并识别影响物候变化的主要气候因子。结果表明: 1980—2014年,研究区4种植物的展叶始期以3.3～7.5 d·10 a^-1的趋势显著提前。展叶始期自南向北以每纬度2.03～3.19 d的速率推迟,自西向东以每经度0.19～0.80 d的速率推迟(除欧洲山毛榉外),海拔自低到高以2.25～3.44 d·100 m^-1的速率推迟。展叶始期的提前主要与春季温度的增高和冬春季降水量的增加有关,而秋冬季温度的升高对展叶始期有一定的推迟效应。

关键词: 气候变化, 物候, 展叶始期, 欧洲, 生物地理区, 时空变化

Abstract: Over the past decades, global warming significantly affected the spring phenology of plants. Many studies have reported the temporal and spatial patterns of spring phenological changes in China, but relatively less is known for that in Europe, which is also located in the temperate area of the Northern Hemisphere. To facilitate the regional comparison of phenological change and understand its response to climate change, we used the data of first leaf date (FLD) in Europe (1980-2014) and the corresponding meteorological data to examine the spatiotemporal variations in leaf-out phenology of four typical tree species (Aesculus hippocastanum, Betula pendula, Fagus sylvatica, and Quercus robur), and to identify the major climatic factors driving such variations. The results showed that the FLD of the four species in the study area advanced by 3.3-7.5 d·10 a^-1 during 1980-2014. The FLD was delayed at a rate of 2.03-3.19 d per degree of latitude from south to north, of 0.19-0.80 d per degree of longitude from west to East (except for Fagus sylvatica), of 2.25-3.44 d·100 m^-1from low to high elevation. The advances in the FLD were mainly attributed to the increases of temperature in spring and the increases of precipitation in spring and winter. The rise of temperature in autumn and winter would delay FLD.

Key words: climate change, phenology, first leaf date, Europe, biogeographical region, spatiotemporal change

林少植, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 欧洲典型树种展叶始期的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 788-798.

LIN Shao-zhi, GE Quan-sheng, WANG Huan-jiong. Spatiotemporal variations in leaf-out phenology of typical European tree species and their responses to climate change[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(3): 788-798.

参考文献 38

[1]	IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2014
[2]	Chmielewski FM, Rötzer T. Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001, 108: 101-112
[3]	Gonsamo A, Chen JM, Wu C. Citizen science: Linking the recent rapid advances of plant flowering in Canada with climate variability. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: 2239
[4]	Ge Q, Wang H, Rutishauser T, et al. Phenological response to climate change in China: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21: 265-274
[5]	Demarée GR, Rutishauser T. Origins of the word “phenology”. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2009, 90: 291
[6]	Penuelas J, Filella I, Zhang X, et al. Complex spatiotemporal phenological shifts as a response to rainfall changes. New Phytologist, 2004, 161: 837-846
[7]	Körner C, Basler D. Phenology under global warming. Science, 2010, 327: 1461-1462
[8]	Wielgolaski F. Phenological modifications in plants by various edaphic factors. International Journal of Biometeo-rology, 2001, 45: 196-202
[9]	Pletsers A, Caffarra A, Kelleher CT, et al. Chilling temperature and photoperiod influence the timing of bud burst in juvenile Betula pubescens Ehrh. and Populus tremula L. trees. Annals of Forest Science, 2015, 72: 941-953
[10]	Man R, Lu P, Dang Q. Insufficient chilling effects vary among boreal tree species and chilling duration. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1354
[11]	Murray MB, Cannell M, Smith RI. Date of budburst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1989, 26: 693-700
[12]	Wang H, Tao ZX, Wang HJ, et al. Varying temperature sensitivity of bud-burst date at different temperature conditions. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2019, DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01756-4
[13]	Zohner CM, Benito BM, Svenning J, et al. Day length unlikely to constrain climate-driven shifts in leaf-out times of northern woody plants. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6: 1120-1123
[14]	Monier MAE. Phenology of ten common plant species in western Saudi Arabia. Journal of Arid Environments, 1997, 35: 673-683
[15]	Zhang XY, Mark AF, Crystal BS, et al. Monitoring the response of vegetation phenology to precipitation in Africa by coupling MODIS and TRMM instruments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2005, 110: D12
[16]	Keenan TF, Gray J, Friedl MA, et al. Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4: 598-604
[17]	Richardson AD, Keenan TF, Migliavacca M, et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 169: 156-173
[18]	吴晓静, 程昌秀, 乔灿灿, 等. 光温驱动下中国1979—2018年春季物候时空分异规律. 中国科学:地球科学, 2020, 50(10): 1-15 [Wu X-J, Cheng C-X, Qiao C-C, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation of spring phenology in China driven by temperatures and photoperiod from 1979 to 2018. Science China Earth Science, 2020, 50(10): 1-15]
[19]	刘璐, 郭梁, 王景红, 等. 中国北方苹果主产地苹果物候期对气候变暖的响应. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 845-852 [Liu L, Guo L, Wang J-H, et al. Phenological responses of apple tree to climate warming in the main apple production areas in northern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(3): 845-852]
[20]	徐韵佳, 葛全胜, 戴君虎, 等. 近50年中国典型木本植物展叶始期温度敏感度变化及原因. 生态学报, 2019, 39(21): 8135-8143 [Xu Y-J, Ge Q-S, Dai J-H, et al. Variations in temperature sensitivity of leaf unfolding date and their influencing factors for typical woody plants in China over the past 50 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(21): 8135-8143]
[21]	陶泽兴, 仲舒颖, 葛全胜, 等. 1963—2012年中国主要木本植物花期长度时空变化. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 53-63 [Tao Z-X, Zhong S-Y, Ge Q-S, et al. Spatiotemporal variations in flowering duration of woody plants in China from 1963 to 2012. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 53-63]
[22]	Rötzer T, Chmielewski F. Phenological maps of Europe. Climate Research, 2001, 18: 249-257
[23]	Annette M, Tim HS, Nlcole E, et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12: 1969-1976
[24]	Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, et al. Phenological patterns of flowering across biogeographical regions of Europe. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2017, 61: 1347-1358
[25]	Meier U. BBCH-Monograph: Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants. Berlin: Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, 2001
[26]	Mann HB. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econome-trica, 1945, 13: 245-259
[27]	Maronna R, Martin R, Yohai V. Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods. New York: Wiley, 2006
[28]	Salibian-Barrera M, Yohai VJ. A fast algorithm for S-regression estimates. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2006, 15: 414-427
[29]	Wang HJ, Wang H, Ge Q, et al. The interactive effects of chilling, photo period, and forcing temperature on flowering phenology of temperate woody plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 443
[30]	Nanninga C, Buyarski CR, Pretorius AM, et al. Increased exposure to chilling advances the time to budburst in North American tree species. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37: 1727-1738
[31]	R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing r foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, 2016
[32]	Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 2016
[33]	Pohlert T. Trend: Non-Parametric Trend Tests and Change-Point Detection. R Package Version 1.1.2 [EB/OL]. (2020-02-01) [2020-08-08]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trend
[34]	Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Croux C, et al. Robustbase: Basic Robust Statistics R Package Version 0.93-6 [EB/OL]. (2020-01-01) [2020-08-08]. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=robustbase
[35]	Dai J, Wang H, Ge Q. The spatial pattern of leaf phenology and its response to climate change in China. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2014, 58: 521-528
[36]	陶泽兴, 葛全胜, 王焕炯. 1963—2018年中国垂柳和榆树开花始期积温需求的时空变化. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1467-1480 [Tao Z-X, Ge Q-S, Wang H-J. Spatio-temporal variations in the thermal requirement of the first flowering dates of Salix babylonica and Ulmus pumila in China during 1963-2018. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1467-1480]
[37]	王焕炯, 陶泽兴, 葛全胜. 气候波动对西安39种木本植物展叶始期及其积温需求的影响. 植物生态学报, 2020, 43(10): 877-888 [Wang H-J, Tao Z-X, Ge Q-S. Effects of climate variation on the first leaf dates of 39 woody species and their thermal requirements in Xi’an, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 43(10): 877-888]
[38]	Dalmolin ÂC, de Almeida Lobo F, Vourlitis G, et al. Is the dry season an important driver of phenology and growth for two Brazilian savanna tree species with contrasting leaf habits? Plant Ecology, 2015, 216: 407-417

欧洲典型树种展叶始期的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应

Spatiotemporal variations in leaf-out phenology of typical European tree species and their responses to climate change

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王进, 周广胜, 何奇瑾, 周莉. 内蒙古克氏针茅草原净生态系统碳交换的物候特征及遥感监测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 659-668.
[2]	李京忠, 辛振华, 谢潇, 薛冰, 任婉侠. 半干旱区植被覆盖时空变化特征及其对气候变化的响应: 以锡林郭勒盟为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 80-86.
[3]	杨振康, 杨婉蓉, 刘志娟, 高伟达, 任图生, 沈彦俊, 杨晓光. 气候变化对东北三省土壤风蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2429-2435.
[4]	洪辛茜, 孙涛, 陈利顶. 城市化背景下植被物候动态变化及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2436-2444.
[5]	冷鹏, 王建青, 谭云燕, 邵亚军, 王丽燕, 施秀珍, 张国友. 大气CO₂和O₃浓度升高对水稻根际土壤胞外酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2185-2193.
[6]	邢衍阔, 康斌, 鹿志创, 高祥刚, 王震, 田甲申. 气候变化条件下太平洋丽龟的适宜生境及其变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2267-2273.
[7]	邱瑶, 罗涛, 王琼, 蒋思雨. 夏热冬暖地区绿量构成对城市热环境的影响——以福州居住区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1932-1940.
[8]	夏卓异, 苏杰, 尹海伟, 孔繁花. 气候变化背景下中国朱鹮适宜生境时空格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1467-1473.
[9]	张辉盛, 徐琳, 吕韦韦, 周昱, 王卫锋, 高瑞贺, 崔绍朋, 张志伟. 扶桑绵粉蚧多维气候生态位保守性与入侵风险 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1649-1658.
[10]	王子文, 尹进, 王星, 陈越, 毛子昆, 蔺菲, 巩宗强, 王绪高. 辽宁省入侵植物曼陀罗的生境适宜性评价——基于Biomod2组合模型 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1272-1280.
[11]	李春波, 张园, 刘雅各, 吴家兵, 王安志. 长白山自然保护区总初级生产力时空变化特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1341-1348.
[12]	白金珂, 李笑雨, 王力. 1980s与2020s青藏高原南部土壤质量变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1367-1374.
[13]	王世豪, 徐新良, 黄麟, 赵广. 1980s—2010s东北农田土壤养分时空变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 865-875.
[14]	于水, 张晓龙, 刘志娟, 王妍, 沈彦军. 1961—2020年松花江流域极端气候指数的时空变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 1091-1101.
[15]	解晗, 李俊, 同小娟, 张静茹, 刘沛荣, 于裴洋, 胡海洋, 杨铭鑫. 2000—2018年黄河流域森林和草地物候的时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 647-656.