欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 3339-3352.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202511.012

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

华东南不同稻作模式的生态效率

彭清霞1,2, 林志敏1, 陈贵1, 苏凯1,2, 林文雄1*   

  1. 1福建农林大学农业生态研究所, 福州 350002;
    2福建农林大学数字经济学院, 福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-22 接受日期:2025-09-23 出版日期:2025-11-18 发布日期:2026-06-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: wenxiong181@163.com
  • 作者简介:彭清霞, 女, 1990年生, 博士。主要从事农业生态与可持续发展研究。E-mail: pengqingxia163@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFE0121800,2018YFD0301105)和闽台作物特色种质创制与绿色栽培协同创新中心项目[闽教科(2015)75号]

Ecological efficiency of different rice cropping systems in Southeast China

PENG Qingxia1,2, LIN Zhimin1, CHEN Gui1, SU Kai1,2, LIN Wenxiong1*   

  1. 1Institute of Agroecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
    2College of Digital Economy, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
  • Received:2025-06-22 Accepted:2025-09-23 Online:2025-11-18 Published:2026-06-18

摘要: 本研究以杂交稻、常规水稻品种为材料,于2021—2022年开展了再生稻、单季稻和双季稻3种稻作模式的田间试验,采用密闭静态暗箱温室气体收集、生命周期评价等方法,从产量及其物质分配、温室气体排放、碳氮足迹和碳收支平衡等多维度评估不同稻作模式的生态效率差异。结果表明: 再生稻模式两年平均产量和日均产量最高,双季稻模式产量其次,日均产量最小,单季产量最低,日均产量位居第二。再生稻模式的再生季稻不同部位非结构化合物(NSC)的转运量及转运率显著高于其头季稻、单季稻以及双季稻模式的早稻和晚稻,其对籽粒产量形成的贡献两年各器官平均为7.5%,分别比其头季稻提高19.9%和12.8%,比双季早稻和晚稻提高67.0%和77.0%。与单季稻和双季稻模式相比,再生稻模式2021和2022年CO2排放强度分别降低2.3%~725.0%和6.8%~732.6%,CH4排放强度分别降低31.2%~751.8%和27.6%~746.4%,N2O排放强度分别降低7.4%和4.6%,资源利用效率提高23.5%~24.6%和57.4%~57.5%,日均经济效益提高36.0%~35.7%和81.9%~101.9%。2021和2022年,再生稻模式碳足迹比单季稻分别提高31.2%和11.2%,比双季稻分别降低19.1%和28.2%;氮足迹比单季稻分别提高44.2%和46.8%,比双季稻分别降低10.1%和15.4%。再生稻、单季稻和双季稻的碳收支盈余量分别为24623.5、13342.6和23772.2 kg CO2-eq·hm-2。可见,再生稻模式,特别是再生季稻具有较高日均产量和较低的单位产量温室气体排放强度,实现了产量与碳盈余的高度协同,是华东南产区兼具生态效率与环境友好的稻作模式。

关键词: 再生稻, 单季稻, 双季稻, 产量, 碳收支平衡, 固碳减排, 碳氮足迹

Abstract: We conducted a field experiment on three rice cultivation patterns, namely ratoon rice, single-cropping rice, and double-cropping rice, using hybrid rice and conventional rice varieties as materials in 2021-2022. We evaluated the ecological efficiency differences across rice cultivation patterns from multiple dimensions, including yield and material distribution, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon nitrogen footprint, and carbon balance, using closed static greenhouse gas collection and life cycle assessment methods. The results showed that the ratoon rice pattern had the highest average yield and daily average yield, followed by the double-cropping rice pattern with the lowest daily average yield, and the lowest single-cropping yield ranking second in daily average yield. In the rice ratooning system, non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) translocation amount and translocation rate in various plant parts were significantly higher in ratoon season rice than in its main crop, single-cropping rice, and both early and late crops of double-cropping rice. Across all organs, the average contribution of NSC remobilization to grain yield formation was 7.5% over the two years, being 19.9% and 12.8% higher than that of the main crop and single-cropping rice, respectively, and 67.0% and 77.0% greater than that of early and late rice in the double-cropping system. Compared with the single-cropping and double-cropping, the ratoon rice reduced CO2 emission intensity by 2.3%-725.0% and 6.8%-732.6% in 2021 and 2022, CH4 emission intensity by 31.2%-751.8% and 27.6%-746.4%, N2O emission intensity by 7.4% and 4.6%, resource utilization efficiency by 23.5%-24.6% and 57.4%-57.5%, and daily economic benefits by 36.0%-35.7% and 81.9%-101.9%, respectively. In 2021 and 2022, the carbon footprint of the ratoon rice pattern increased by 31.2% and 11.2% respectively compared to single-cropping rice, and decreased by 19.1% and 28.2% respectively compared to double-cropping rice. The nitrogen footprint increased by 44.2% and 46.8% compared to single-cropping rice, and decreased by 10.1% and 15.4% compared to double-cropping rice. The carbon budget surplus of ratoon, single-cropping, and double-cropping rice were 24623.5, 13342.6, and 23772.2 kg CO2-eq·hm-2, respectively. It is suggested that the ratoon rice, especially the regenerated season rice, has high daily yield and low greenhouse gas emission intensity per unit yield, achieving stronger synergy between yield and carbon surplus, which is a sustainable, ecologically efficient, and environmentally friendly cropping system well-suited to rice production in Southeast China.

Key words: ratoon rice, single-cropping rice, double-cropping rice, yield, carbon budget balance, carbon sequestration and emission reduction, carbon and nitrogen footprint