欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1675-1684.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202605.037

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏州城市水网浮游植物功能群时空变化及驱动因子

魏凡凯1,2,3, 徐力刚1,2,3*, 李文轩1,3, 宋涛1,2,3   

  1. 1中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所湖泊与流域水安全全国重点实验室, 南京 211135;
    2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3中国科学院大学南京学院, 南京 211135
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-25 接受日期:2026-04-02 出版日期:2026-05-18 发布日期:2026-11-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: lgxu@niglas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:魏凡凯, 男, 1997年生, 博士研究生。主要从事太湖流域水生态评价研究。E-mail: weifankai21@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFF0807204,2024YFE0106400)、中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所科技计划项目(NIGLAS2022TJ13,NIGLAS2022GS09)和国家自然科学基金项目(U2444221,U2240224)

Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of phytoplankton functional groups in the urban water network of Suzhou, China

WEI Fankai1,2,3, XU Ligang1,2,3*, LI Wenxuan1,3, SONG Tao1,2,3   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China;
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China
  • Received:2025-12-25 Accepted:2026-04-02 Online:2026-05-18 Published:2026-11-18

摘要: 苏州城市水网是典型的平原闸控型河湖复合系统。为明确高度人工干预下浮游植物功能类群的时空演变及其驱动机制,本研究于2022—2023年汛期与非汛期对苏州市域内包括骨干河道、城市内河及湖泊在内的102个采样点进行调查。结果表明:本次研究共鉴定浮游植物8门198种,以绿藻门(42.4%)、硅藻门(25.2%)和蓝藻门(13.1%)为主,识别出包括富营养中温型(M)、混合富营养型(P)、清洁水体硅藻型(J)、静水浮游型(T)、静水适应型(Y)和耐受浑浊型(D)、中营养型(B)在内的14个优势功能类群,平均丰度为6.87×105 cells·L-1,平均生物量为0.09 mg·L-1。苏州水网浮游植物生物量时空差异显著,整体呈现汛期高于非汛期的特征,且Y、D、T、P、B为全域核心优势类群;季节性演替模式受自然节律与人工调控双重驱动,汛期以耐受高营养的M、Lo类群为主,非汛期则向适应中低温及稳定生境的 T、B类群演替,2022年极端高温事件显著增强了Y、T的全年优势度。结构方程模型(SEM)表明,湖泊功能群生物量主要受水温和总磷的正向驱动,而河流功能群受电导率的影响更为显著。本研究阐明了亚热带城市河网浮游植物功能群对多重环境压力的响应机制,可为闸控型河湖系统的生态管理提供理论依据。

关键词: 浮游植物, 功能群, 环境因子, 结构方程模型

Abstract: Suzhou urban water network is a typical plain river-lake composite system regulated by sluices. To clarify the spatiotemporal variations and driving mechanisms of phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs) under intensive anthropogenic interference, we conducted a systematic investigation across 102 sampling sites, including backbone rivers, urban rivers, and lakes, during flood and non-flood seasons from 2022 to 2023. Results showed that a total of 198 species belonging to 8 phyla were identified, with Chlorophyta (42.4%), Bacillariophyta (25.2%), and Cyanophyta (13.1%) as the dominant phyla. Fourteen dominant functional groups were identified, including eutrophic mesothermal (M), mixed eutrophic (P), clear-water diatom (J), stagnant-water planktonic (T), stagnant-water mixotrophic (Y), turbidity-tolerant (D), and mesotrophic (B). The average density and biomass were 6.87×105 cells·L-1 and 0.09 mg·L-1, respectively. Phytoplankton biomass in the Suzhou water network exhibited significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity, being generally higher in the flood season than in the non-flood season. Y, D, T, P, and B were the core dominant groups across the entire region. The seasonal succession was driven by the dual effects of natural rhythms and artificial regulation. The flood season was dominated by the high-nutrient-tolerant groups M and Lo, while the non-flood season shifted toward T and B, which were adapted to mesothermal and stable habitats. The extreme heat event in 2022 significantly enhanced the year-round dominance of thermophilic groups Y and T. Results of structural equation modeling (SEM) indicated that phytoplankton biomass in lakes was primarily driven by water temperature and total phosphorus, whereas electrical conductivity exerted a more significant influence on rivers. This study elucidated the response mechanisms of phytoplankton functional groups to multiple environmental stressors in subtropical urban river networks, providing a theoretical basis for the ecological management of sluice-controlled river-lake systems.

Key words: phytoplankton, functional group, environmental factor, structural equation model