不同施肥条件下秸秆碳在表层和深层土壤团聚体中的分配与固存

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202206.013

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 1475-1481.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202206.013

• 稳定同位素生态学专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

不同施肥条件下秸秆碳在表层和深层土壤团聚体中的分配与固存

段佳茹¹, 王淑颖¹, 李小红¹, 徐香茹², 梅秀文¹, 安婷婷^1*, 汪景宽¹

¹沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院/农业部东北耕地保育重点实验室/土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 沈阳 110866;
²江苏大学农业工程学院, 江苏镇江 212013

收稿日期:2021-09-06 接受日期:2022-04-05 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-12-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: atting@syau.edu.cn
作者简介:段佳茹, 女, 1997年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土壤肥力研究。E-mail: duanjiaru163@163.com
基金资助:
辽宁省科学研究经费(LSNQN202008)、国家自然科学基金项目(41977086)和中国博士后科学基金项目(2021M691316)资助。

Distribution and sequestration of straw carbon in surface and deep soil aggregates under different fertilization treatments

DUAN Jia-ru¹, WANG Shu-ying¹, LI Xiao-hong¹, XU Xiang-ru², MEI Xiu-wen¹, AN Ting-ting^1*, WANG Jing-kuan¹

¹College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Northeast Arable Land Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair/National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, Shenyang 110866, China;
²College of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China

Received:2021-09-06 Accepted:2022-04-05 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长期施肥引起表层和深层土壤水、热、养分和微生物活性的分异,进而影响秸秆碳在土壤中的分解和周转过程。本研究基于沈阳农业大学长期定位实验站,分别将不同施肥处理表层(0～20 cm)和深层(40～60 cm)土壤与¹³C标记秸秆混合进行田间试验,通过分析团聚体中有机碳含量和δ¹³C值,对比秸秆碳在表层和深层土壤团聚体中分配的差异,探讨施肥对秸秆碳在土壤团聚体中固定的影响。结果表明: 与施肥(包括单施氮肥和有机肥配施氮肥)处理相比,不施肥处理分别使表层土壤<0.053 mm和深层土壤>0.25 mm团聚体中秸秆碳含量增加了106.7%和34.2%;秸秆碳对深层土壤>0.053 mm团聚体有机碳的贡献率约为表层土壤的2.0倍;秸秆碳分配到表层土壤>0.25 mm和<0.25 mm团聚体的比例平均分别为22.6%和11.4%,分配到深层土壤的相应比例分别为29.4%和8.8%。总之,秸秆添加促进了深层土壤大团聚体碳源的更新和固存,提高了深层土壤的固碳潜力。

关键词: 团聚体, 秸秆碳, 深层土壤, ¹³C标记, 施肥

Abstract: Long-term fertilization causes the differences in water, heat, nutrients and microbial activities between topsoil and deep soil, with consequences on the decomposition and turnover of straw carbon (C) in soils. At a long-term positioning experimental station in Shenyang Agricultural University, we mixed the topsoil (0-20 cm) and deep soil (40-60 cm) samples from different fertilization treatments with ¹³C-labeled straw for in-situ incubation. We analyzed the content of organic C and its δ¹³C value in soil aggregates, compared the difference in the distribution of straw C between topsoil and deep soil aggregates, and explored the effects of fertilization on the sequestration of straw C in soil aggregates. Compared with fertilization treatments (i.e., single chemical nitrogen fertilizer application and combination of organic manure with nitrogen fertilizer application), the treatment without fertilization increased the content of straw C of <0.053 mm aggregate in the topsoil by 106.7% and that of >0.25 mm aggregate in the deep soil by 34.2%. The contribution percentage of straw C to organic C of >0.053 mm aggregate in the deep soil was about two times of that in the topsoil. About 22.6% and 11.4% of straw C was distributed into the >0.25 mm and <0.25 mm aggregates of topsoil, and about 29.4% and 8.8% of straw C was distributed into the >0.25 mm and <0.25 mm aggregates of deep soil, respectively. In conclusion, straw addition promoted the regeneration and sequestration of carbon in deep soil macroaggregates and increased the carbon sequestration potential of deep soil.

Key words: aggregate, straw carbon, deep soil, ¹³C-labeling, fertilization

段佳茹, 王淑颖, 李小红, 徐香茹, 梅秀文, 安婷婷, 汪景宽. 不同施肥条件下秸秆碳在表层和深层土壤团聚体中的分配与固存[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1475-1481.

DUAN Jia-ru, WANG Shu-ying, LI Xiao-hong, XU Xiang-ru, MEI Xiu-wen, AN Ting-ting, WANG Jing-kuan. Distribution and sequestration of straw carbon in surface and deep soil aggregates under different fertilization treatments[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(6): 1475-1481.

参考文献

[1] 刘中良, 宇万太. 土壤团聚体有机碳研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(2): 447-455
[2] 窦森, 李凯, 关松. 土壤团聚体中有机碳研究进展. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(2): 412-418
[3] Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between micro-aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004, 79: 7-31
[4] Wang W, Chen WC, Wang KR, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on the distribution of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in water-stable aggregates in paddy soil. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2011, 10: 1932-1940
[5] 徐江兵, 李成亮, 何园球, 等. 不同施肥处理对旱地红壤团聚体中有机碳含量及其组分的影响. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(4): 675-682
[6] 李景, 吴会军, 武雪萍, 等. 15年保护性耕作对黄土坡耕地区土壤及团聚体固碳效应的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(23): 4690-4697
[7] Xu XR, Schaeffer S, Sun ZH, et al. Carbon stabilization in aggregate fractions responds to straw input levels under varied soil fertility levels. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 199: 104593
[8] Fontaine S, Barot S, Barré P, et al. Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature, 2007, 450: 277-280
[9] Rumpel C, Kögel-Knabner I. Deep soil organic matter: A key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant and Soil, 2011, 338: 143-158
[10] Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications, 2000, 10: 423-436
[11] Sanaullah M, Chabbi A, Leifeld J, et al. Decomposition and stabilization of root litter in top- and subsoil horizons: What is the difference? Plant and Soil, 2011, 338: 127-141
[12] 刘顺国, 付时丰, 汪景宽, 等. 长期地膜覆盖对棕壤水分含量和储量动态变化的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37(5): 725-728
[13] 汪景宽, 王铁宇, 张旭东, 等. 黑土土壤质量演变初探. I. 不同开垦年限黑土主要质量指标演变规律. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2002, 33(1): 43-47
[14] 赵搏, 丁雪丽, 汪景宽, 等. 地膜覆盖和施肥对棕壤剖面溶解性有机碳分布的影响. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(4): 847-853
[15] 王丰, 任灵玲, 安婷婷, 等. 长期施肥对土壤中氨氧化细菌丰度和种群多样性的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(1): 86-94
[16] 张秀芝, 李强, 高洪军, 等. 长期施肥对黑土水稳性团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(6): 1214-1223
[17] 何瑞清, 王百群, 张燕, 等. 长期施用化肥条件下塿土团聚体中有机碳与养分分布. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(6): 347-351
[18] 陈晓芬, 李忠佩, 刘明, 等. 不同施肥处理对红壤水稻土团聚体有机碳、氮分布和微生物生物量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(5): 950-960
[19] 徐明岗, 张旭博, 孙楠, 等. 农田土壤固碳与增产协同效应研究进展. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1441-1449
[20] 李锐. 中国水土流失基础研究的机遇与挑战. 自然杂志, 2008, 30(1): 6-11
[21] 郝小雨, 马星竹, 周宝库, 等. 长期不同施肥措施下黑土有机碳的固存效应. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(5): 316-321
[22] 高洪军, 彭畅, 张秀芝, 等. 秸秆还田量对黑土区土壤及团聚体有机碳变化特征和固碳效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22): 4613-4622
[23] 李小红, 王淑颖, 程娜, 等. 施肥和土层置换对深层土壤秸秆碳固定与残留的影响. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(5): 1196-1200
[24] 王淑颖, 李小红, 程娜, 等. 地膜覆盖与施肥对秸秆碳氮在土壤中固存的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2): 345-356
[25] Chivenge P, Vanlauwe B, Gentile R, et al. Organic resource quality influences short-term aggregate dynamics and soil organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 657-666
[26] Blaud A, Lerch TZ, Chevallier T, et al. Dynamics of bacterial communities in relation to soil aggregate formation during the decomposition of ¹³C-labelled rice straw. Applied Soil Ecology, 2012, 53: 1-9
[27] Conrad R, Klose M, Yuan Q, et al. Stable carbon isotope fractionation, carbon flux partitioning and priming effects in anoxic soils during methanogenic degradation of straw and soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 49: 193-199
[28] Troyer ID, Amery F, Moorleghem CV, et al. Tracing the source and fate of dissolved organic matter in soil after incorporation of a ¹³C labelled residue: A batch incubation study. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 513-519
[29] 孙元宏, 高雪莹, 赵兴敏, 等. 添加玉米秸秆对白浆土重组有机碳及团聚体组成的影响. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(4): 1009-1017
[30] Schmidt MW, Torn MS, Abiven S, et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 2011, 478: 49-56
[31] 王兴, 祁剑英, 井震寰, 等. 长期保护性耕作对稻田土壤团聚体稳定性和碳氮含量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24): 121-128
[32] 王碧胜, 于维水, 武雪萍, 等. 不同耕作措施下添加秸秆对土壤有机碳及其相关因素的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(6): 1176-1187
[33] 王旭东, 陈鲜妮, 王彩霞, 等. 农田不同肥力条件下玉米秸秆腐解效果. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(10): 252-257
[34] 曹莹菲, 张红, 赵聪, 等. 秸秆腐解过程中结构的变化特征. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(5): 976-984
[35] 宋佳, 黄晶, 高菊生, 等. 冬种绿肥和秸秆还田对双季稻区土壤团聚体和有机质官能团的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 564-570
[36] An TT, Schaeffer S, Zhuang J, et al. Dynamics and distribution of ¹³C-labeled straw carbon by microorganisms as affected by soil fertility levels in the Black Soil region of Northeast China. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2015, 51: 605-613
[37] Dick DP, Goncalves CN, Dalmolin RSD, et al. Characteristics of soil organic matter of different Brazilian ferralsols under native vegetation as a function of soil depth. Geoderma, 2005, 124: 319-333
[38] Li N, Long JH, Han XZ, et al. Molecular characterization of soil organic carbon in water-stable aggregate fractions during the early pedogenesis from parent material of Mollisols. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20: 1869-1880

不同施肥条件下秸秆碳在表层和深层土壤团聚体中的分配与固存

Distribution and sequestration of straw carbon in surface and deep soil aggregates under different fertilization treatments

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卢国伟, 王琦璇, 杨继松, 孙丹丹, 王志康, 周迪, 管博, 于君宝, 宁凯. 黄河三角洲稻田退耕还湿对土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 705-712.
[2]	谢京瑾, 许秋月, 何敏, 夏允, 范跃新, 杨柳明. 中亚热带森林更新方式对土壤团聚体磷组分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 330-338.
[3]	熊涵, 刘彦伶, 李渝, 张雅蓉, 黄兴成, 杨叶华, 朱华清, 蒋太明. 长期不同施肥模式对黄壤旱地土壤细菌群落结构和土壤养分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1949-1956.
[4]	倪惠菁, 储昊煜, 苏文会, 范少辉. 经营强度对毛竹林土壤团聚体稳定性和碳氮磷分布的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 928-936.
[5]	王娇, 关欣, 黄苛, 段萱, 陈波翰, 张伟东, 杨庆朋. 酸雨和根系去除对杉木和火力楠人工林土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 937-945.
[6]	刘莲莲, 尚妍萌, 张杰, 李廷亮, 谢英荷, 谢钧宇, 李丽娜, 洪坚平. 不同施肥处理对晋南旱塬麦田土壤微生物功能多样性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 671-678.
[7]	韩星, 于海洋, 郑宁国, 葛超荣, 姚槐应. 茶园氧化亚氮排放研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 805-814.
[8]	裴亚楠, 吕卫光, 郭涛, 白娜玲, 李双喜, 张娟琴, 张海韵, 张翰林. 秸秆还田配施促腐菌剂对土壤团聚体及其养分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3357-3363.
[9]	陈天, 程瑞梅, 沈雅飞, 肖文发, 王丽君, 孙鹏飞, 张萌, 李璟. 氮添加对三峡库区马尾松人工林土壤团聚体有机氮组分和氮矿化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2601-2609.
[10]	王鹏, 温明霞, 金龙飞, 刘烽, 陆麒, 曹明奡, 黄贝, 吴韶辉. 不同施肥处理对柑橘根围土壤质量及丛枝菌根定殖的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2805-2812.
[11]	邓米林, 叶桂萍, 胥超, 宛颂, 贺纪正, 林永新. 天然林转人工林对亚热带森林土壤团聚体中亚硝酸盐还原基因丰度的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 25-30.
[12]	石丽红, 唐海明, 文丽, 程凯凯, 李超, 李微艳, 肖小平. 长期不同施肥模式对南方双季稻田生态系统净碳汇效应和经济收益的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2450-2456.
[13]	董振洁, 郭亚茹, 侯琳. 秦岭华山松营养诊断与林地施肥 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2051-2056.
[14]	张喆, 黄永珍, 张超, 叶绍明, 王晟强. 不同林龄杉木人工林土壤团聚体磷素分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 939-948.
[15]	童晨晖, 王辉, 谭帅, 魏亚飞, 胡廷飞, 张先登, 刘立豪. 亚热带丘岗区经果林种植对红壤团聚体稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 1012-1020.