欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12): 2117-2122.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

合肥市区城市森林景观格局分析

  

  1. 安徽农业大学森林利用学院|合肥230036
  • 出版日期:2003-12-20 发布日期:2003-12-15

Analysis of urban forest landscape pattern in Hefei

  • Online:2003-12-20 Published:2003-12-15

摘要: 运用3S技术在分析合肥景观特点的基础上,研究了合肥市区17.6km^2范围内的城市森林景观特点及与其它景观单元间关系。结果表明,主要景观要素分为建筑与硬质铺装表面、城市森林斑块、一般绿地、道路、水面五大类景观背景为建筑及铺装表面,占总面积的73.13%;道路为典型的廊道景观,约占6.89%;研究区城市森林斑块共408块,计161.16hm^2,占总面积的9.8%,平均面积0.396hm^2、最大面积12hm^2,斑块形状复杂、近圆度小,其中48%的班块属于面积<500m^2的小班块,>1hm^2的城市森林班块只占8.6%;水面斑块147块,计149.93hm^2,占总面积的8.54%,平均面积1.02hm^2,最大面积16hm^2;一般绿地斑块255块,计39.74hm^2,占2.26%,最大面积3.86hm^2,平均面积0.1558hm^2.Shanlnon—Weiner景观多样性指数和均匀度均偏低,分别为0.9284和0.5768。另外,城市森林与一般绿地两类景观要素的总优势度达0.39,由于这两类景观斑块的尺度变化范围大,比较破碎,小尺度的斑块所占比例高,又主要集中在西区,分布不均匀,故对环境的影响作用受到限制,文中引用自然森林的内部生境概念,确定合肥城市森林斑块出现内部环境的l临界面积为9800m^2,研究区拥有城市森林的内部生境总面积为31.69hm^2,仅为城市森林面积的19.7%,不利于对物种提供更多的生境,提出应用内部生境的大小来划分城市森林斑块,建立城市森林小班块—中斑块—大斑块—特大斑块的尺度等级体系,据此提出,研究区各尺度的城市森林斑块面积比为2:2:2:3。同时提出合肥东北部应增加城市森林面积,尽可能建设1.5~3.0hm^2的片状城市森林。

关键词: 季风常绿阔叶林, 土壤有机碳, 全氮, 空间异质性, 鼎湖山

Abstract: Based on the theory and methodology of landscape ecology,the landscape pattern of the study area(17.6 km )in the downtown of Hefei was analyzed by using the techniques of RS,GPS and GIS.The object was to provide a
comprehensive method to study urban forest structure and its function in environm ental improvement.The results showed that there were 5 major landscape elements,i.e.,building and hard pavement sudace,water,road,
urban forest,and general green 1and in the area The landscape matrix was building and pavement surface,occupied 73.13% of tota1 1and.Road was the typical corridor element in the city and occupied 6.89% .Green 1and
occupied 1 1.44% ,in which,urban forest patch occupied 9 18% .There were 408 urban forest patches ,with an area of 161.16 hm .The average area of the patch was 0.396 hm ,and the m aximum area was 12 hm .48%
of urban forest patch was identified as small scale patches with < 500 m of area.and onlY 8.6% of them was larger than 1 hm .The number of general green 1and patch was 255,with an area of 39.74 hm2,which account—
ed f0r 2.26% of 1and area。and its average and maximum area was 0.1558 hm and 3.86 hm ,respectively. There were 147 water patches,with an area of 149.93 hm ,and occupied 8.54% of lan d,and the average and
maximum area of the patch was 1.02 hm and 16 hm ,respectively.In the study area ,both of the Shannon Weiner landscape diversity index and evenness were 1ow ,only 0.928 and 0.576,res pectively. In addition,the
dominance of urban fores t patch and general green land was 0.39,showing that the two landscape elements had acertain influence on the environment of the study area.The concept of interior habitat for forest was introduced
in this paper,which was employed to make a scale class system of urban forest patch.The threshold area with interior habitat for urban forest patch was 9800m .and there was 31.69hm of intefior habitat of urban forest in
tota1.which occupied 19.7% of the total area of urban forest patch.This situation was not favorable for providing more habitats to support species diversity. It’s suggested that the concept of interior habitat co uld be em —
ployed to identify urban forest patch,and a scale system of small scale patch of urban forest—middle patch—large patch—extra 1arge patch was build in the paper.Based on this system.the ratio of different scalas of urban forest
patch in the study area should be 2:2:2:3.The authors also suggested that larger pieces (1.5~3.0 hm )of urban fores t patch should be built,and more urban forests should be es tablished in the northeas tern part of the city
in the future.

Key words: monsoon evergreen broadleaf forest, soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, spatial heterogeneity, Dinghushan.