中亚热带米槠人工林土壤微生物残体碳对凋落物和根系碳输入的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202401.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 微生物残体碳(MNC)是稳定土壤碳库的重要来源,探讨亚热带森林土壤微生物残体碳对地上(凋落物)、地下(根系)碳输入的响应对评估全球生态系统土壤碳贮量具有重要意义。本研究以福建三明森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站的米槠人工林为对象,设置去除根系(NR)、去除地上凋落物(NL)、无凋落物输入(即去除地上凋落物和地下根系输入,NI)、添加双倍地上凋落物(DL)4个处理,以无处理为对照(CK),7年后采集0~10 cm土层土壤样品,探究凋落物和根系输入变化下MNC含量及MNC对土壤有机碳贡献的变化特征。结果表明: 1)与CK相比,NR处理下MNC、细菌残体碳(BNC)和真菌残体碳(FNC)分别降低了15.9%、20.2%和14.5%,其他处理无显著变化。2)与CK相比,NR、NL、NI和DL处理未对BNC、FNC和MNC的土壤有机碳贡献率产生显著影响。3)相关性分析和路径分析结果显示,植物碳输入变化通过改变土壤中的底物有效性和微生物群落结构直接或间接改变了土壤中微生物残体碳的含量。表明在维持中亚热带人工林土壤MNC方面,根系输入碳比地上植物来源碳更重要。

关键词: 微生物残体碳, 土壤有机碳, 凋落物, 根系, 米槠人工林

Abstract: Microbial necromass carbon (MNC) is a crucial source for stable soil carbon pool, and understanding its response to carbon inputs from both aboveground (litter) and belowground (roots) in subtropical forest soils is essential for assessing soil carbon stocks in global ecosystems. In a Castanopsis carlesii plantation at the Sanming Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station in Fujian Province, we conducted an experiment with five treatments, including root removal (NR), aboveground litter removal (NL), no litter input (removals of both aboveground litter and roots, NI), double aboveground litter addition (DL), and control (CK). After seven years, we collected soil samples in the 0-10 cm soil layer to examine changes in MNC content and its contribution to soil organic carbon (SOC). Results showed that NR treatment reduced MNC, bacterial necromass carbon (BNC), and fungal necromass carbon (FNC) by 15.9%, 20.2%, and 14.5%, respectively, while other treatments did not induce significant changes. The NR, NL, NI, and DL treatments did not affect the contributions of BNC, FNC, and MNC to SOC. Correlation and path analyses revealed that litter and root carbon input treatments could alter the MNC content directly or indirectly through changing soil available substrates and microbial community structure. Our results suggested that roots exert a stronger influence on the maintenance of MNC than aboveground carbon source in the mid-subtropical plantations.

Key words: microbial necromass carbon, soil organic carbon, litter, root, Castanopsis carlesii plantation

王翠娟, 刘小飞, 杨柳明, 贾淑娴. 中亚热带米槠人工林土壤微生物残体碳对凋落物和根系碳输入的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 177-185.

WANG Cuijuan, LIU Xiaofei, YANG Liuming, JIA Shuxian. Response of soil microbial necromass carbon to litter and root carbon inputs in a mid-subtropical Castanopsis carlesii plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(1): 177-185.

参考文献

[1] Bonan GB. Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 2008, 320: 1444-1449
[2] Pan YD, Birdsey RA, Fang JY, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science, 2011, 333: 988-993
[3] Woodwell GM, Whittaker RH, Reiners WA, et al. The biota and the world carbon budget. Science, 1978, 199: 141-146
[4] Post WM, William RE, Paul JZ, et al. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 1982, 298: 156-159
[5] Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, et al. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature, 2000, 408: 184-187
[6] C′ordova SC, Olk DC, Dietzel RN, et al. Plant litter quality affects the accumulation rate, composition, and stability of mineral-associated soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 125: 115-124
[7] Cusack DF, Halterman SM, Tanner EVJ, et al. Deca-dal-scale litter manipulation alters the biochemical and physical character of tropical forest soil carbon. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124: 199-209
[8] Feng JG, He KY, Zhang QF, et al. Changes in plant inputs alter soil carbon and microbial communities in forest ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28: 3426-3440
[9] Liang C, Amelung W, Lehmann J, et al. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25: 3578-3590
[10] Buckeridge KM, Creamer C, Whitaker J. Deconstructing the microbial necromass continuum to inform soil carbon sequestration. Functional Ecology, 2022, 36: 1396-1410
[11] Whalen ED, Grandy AS, Sokol NW, et al. Clarifying the evidence for microbial and plant-derived soil organic matter, and the path toward a more quantitative understanding. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28: 7167-7185
[12] Camenzind T, Mason-Jones K, Mansour I, et al. Formation of necromass-derived soil organic carbon determined by microbial death pathways. Nature Geoscience, 2023, 16: 115-122
[13] Angst G, Mueller KE, Nierop KGJ, et al. Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 156: 108189
[14] Zhang GL, Bai JH, Wang W, et al. Plant invasion reshapes the latitudinal pattern of soil microbial necromass and its contribution to soil organic carbon in coastal wetlands. Catena, 2023, 222: 106859
[15] Liu XF, Lin TC, Vadeboncoeur MA, et al. Root litter inputs exert greater influence over soil C than does aboveground litter in a subtropical natural forest. Plant and Soil, 2019, 444: 489-499
[16] Villarino SH, Pinto P, Jackson RB, et al. Plant rhizodeposition: A key factor for soil organic matter formation in stable fractions. Science Advances, 2021, 7: eabd3176
[17] Sokol NW, Bradford MA. Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input. Nature Geoscience, 2018, 12: 46-53
[18] 贾淑娴. 凋落物和根系输入变化对米槠天然林和人工林土壤微生物残体碳的影响. 硕士论文. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2020
[19] 元晓春, 林伟盛, 蒲晓婷, 等. 更新方式对亚热带森林土壤溶液可溶性有机质数量及化学结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(6): 1845-1852
[20] 张可欣, 倪银祥, 杜琳, 等. 杉木和米槠人工林土壤可溶性碳组分动态及其对凋落叶输入的响应. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(2): 260-266
[21] Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19: 703-707
[22] Joergensen RG. The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: Calibration of the k(EN) value. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28: 33-37
[23] Zhang XD, Ameling W. Gas chromatographic determination of muramic acid, glucosamine, mannosamine, and galactosamine in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28: 1201-1206
[24] 于颖超, 张心昱, 戴晓琴, 等. 亚热带红壤区森林土壤剖面微生物残体碳分布及影响因素. 生态学报, 2022, 42(3): 1108-1117
[25] Wang BR, An SS, Liang C, et al. Microbial necromass as the source of soil organic carbon in global ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 162: 108422
[26] Wan XH, Huang ZQ, He ZM, et al. Soil C:N ratio is the major determinant of soil microbial community structure in subtropical coniferous and broadleaf forest plantations. Plant and Soil, 2015, 387: 103-116
[27] Clemmensen KE, Bahr A, Ovaskainen O, et al. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest. Science, 2013, 339: 1615-1618
[28] Li XJ, Xie JS, Zhang QF, et al. Substrate availability and soil microbes drive temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon mineralization to warming along an elevation gradient in subtropical Asia. Geoderma, 2020, 364: 114198
[29] Li LD, Wilson CB, He HB, et al. Physical, biochemical, and microbial controls on amino sugar accumulation in soils under long-term cover cropping and no-tillage farming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 135: 369-378
[30] Cui J, Zhu ZK, Xu XL, et al. Carbon and nitrogen recycling from microbial necromass to cope with C:N stoichiometric imbalance by priming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 142: 107720
[31] Fierer N, Strickland MS, Liptzin D, et al. Global patterns in belowground communities. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 1238-1249
[32] Hicks LC, Lajtha K, Rousk J. Nutrient limitation may induce microbial mining for resources from persistent soil organic matter. Ecology, 2021, 102: e03328
[33] Strickland MS, Rousk J. Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils: Methods, controls, and ecosystem implications. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42: 1385-1395
[34] He HB, Zhang W, Zhang XD, et al. Temporal responses of soil microorganisms to substrate addition as indicated by amino sugar differentiation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 1155-1161
[35] Schweigert M, Herrmann S, Miltner A, et al. Fate of ectomycorrhizal fungal biomass in a soil bioreactor system and its contribution to soil organic matter formation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 88: 120-127
[36] Dove NC, Stark JM, Newman GS, et al. Carbon control on terrestrial ecosystem function across contrasting site productivities: The carbon connection revisited. Ecology, 2019, 100: e02695
[37] Huang ZQ, Liao LP, Wang SL, et al. Allelopathy of phenolics from decomposing stump-roots in replant Chinese fir woodland. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2000, 26: 2211-2219
[38] Kramer C, Trumbore S, Fröberg M, et al. Recent (<4 year-old) leaf litter is not a major source of microbial carbon in a temperate forest mineral soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42: 1028-1037
[39] Jackson RB, Lajtha K, Crow SE, et al. The ecology of soil carbon: Pools, vulnerabilities, and biotic and abio-tic controls. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2017, 48: 419-445
[40] Sokol NW, Sanderman J, Bradford MA. Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: Integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25: 12-24
[41] Frey SD. Mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of soil organic matter dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2019, 50: 237-259
[42] Hu YT, Zheng Q, Noll L, et al. Direct measurement of the in situ decomposition of microbial-derived soil orga-nic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 141: 107660
[43] Treseder KK. Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: A meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11: 1111-1120
[44] Dijkstra FA, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, et al. Rhizosphere priming: A nutrient perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2013, 4: 216
[45] Crow SE, Lajtha K, Filley TR, et al. Sources of plant-derived carbon and stability of organic matter in soil: Implications for global change. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15: 2003-2019
[46] Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac MF. Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation. Plant and Soil, 2005, 269: 341-356
[47] Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S, et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 2011, 478: 49-56
[48] Guo ZM, Zhang XY, Dungait JAJ, et al. Contribution of soil microbial necromass to SOC stocks during vegetation recovery in a subtropical karst ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 761: 143945
[49] Sinsabaugh RL, Turner BL, Talbot JM, et al. Stoichio-metry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils. Ecolo-gical Monographs, 2016, 86: 172-189