欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 1996, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (s1): 45-50.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

火烧和放牧影响下羊草草地微气候的比较研究

王仁忠1, 祝廷成2   

  1. 1. 东北师范大学国家草地生态工程实验, 长春130024;
    2. 萨斯卡切温大学作物与植物生态学系, 加拿大
  • 收稿日期:1995-05-18 修回日期:1996-03-20 出版日期:1996-12-25 发布日期:1996-12-25
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目

Comparative study on microclimate of Aneurolepidium chinense grassland under burning and grazing

Wang Renzhong1, Zhu Tingcheng2   

  1. 1. Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
    2. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Received:1995-05-18 Revised:1996-03-20 Online:1996-12-25 Published:1996-12-25

摘要: 对羊草草地火烧、未火烧、过度放牧和禁牧区植物群落温度、土壤温度、土壤湿度、大气温度、相对湿度进行了测定.结果表明,白天火烧区群落温度比未火烧区低2.5~5℃,而夜晚则高于未火烧区0.1~1℃.白天火烧区土壤温度比未火烧区高5~7.5℃,夜晚为1~2.5℃.过牧区群落温度与禁牧区差异不显着,但过牧区土壤温度基本高于禁牧区,土壤湿度小于禁牧区.同一区中,白天群落温度变化为低处大于高处,夜晚则相反,而白天土壤温度为表层大于深层,夜晚则基本为深层大于表层.

关键词: 火烧, 过度放牧, 微气候, 羊草草地, 黄河三角洲, 土壤呼吸, 降雨变化, 光合作用, 滨海湿地

Abstract: The canopy temperature, soil temperature, soil humidity, air temperature and relativehumidity are measured at burned, unburned, overgraing and ungrazing plots of Aneurolepidium chinense grassland. The results show that at daytime, the canopy temperature atburned plot is about 2.5~5 ℃ lower than that at unburned one, but about 0.1~1 ℃ higher at night. The soil temperature at burned plot is about 5~7.5℃ higher than that at unburned one at daytime, but about 1~ 2.5℃ higher at night. No significant difference ofcanopy temperature is found between overgrazing and ungrazing plots, but soil temperature at overgazing plot is higher than that at ungrazing one. At the same plot, the temperature of lower canopy is higher than that of higher one at daytime, but lower at night.Soil surface layer has a higher temperature than the deeper layers at daytime, but has alower one at night.

Key words: Burning, Overgrazing, Microclimate, Aneurolepidium chinense grassland, photosynthesis, soil respiration, change in precipitation amount, coastal wetland, the Yellow River Delta