青藏高原东北部祁连圆柏径向生长对不同类型干旱的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202208.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究祁连圆柏径向生长对不同时期(生长季前2—4月和生长季5—7月)气候因子的响应及面对不同类型(高温、缺水、高温+缺水)干旱事件的弹性(抵抗力和恢复力)变化,利用青藏高原东北部17个采样点的祁连圆柏树轮宽度资料,分析径向生长与不同时期气候因子的相关性,探究高低海拔祁连圆柏面对各类干旱事件的弹性差异。结果表明:祁连圆柏径向生长与干旱指数呈显著正相关,与生长季温度呈负相关(P<0.1)。祁连圆柏面对不同时期干旱事件的弹性存在显著差异,生长季前发生的干旱事件中,低海拔圆柏的抵抗力比高海拔增高2.3%,恢复力降低25.1%;生长季干旱事件中,低海拔圆柏的抵抗力比高海拔降低23.7%,恢复力增高107.1%。祁连圆柏面对缺水型干旱时恢复力更强,均值达到1.68,而面对高温型干旱时祁连圆柏的抵抗力更强,均值达到1.43。未来我国西部高山祁连圆柏,尤其是处于低海拔区的,其径向生长受到全球变暖造成的极端干旱事件的影响会更加显著。

关键词: 青藏高原东北部, 祁连圆柏, 弹性, 生长季, 干旱

Abstract: To study the responses of radial growth of Juniperus przewalskii to climate factors of the different periods (pre-growing season (February-April), growing season (May-July)), and the vulnerability (resistance, R_T; recovery, R_C) of J. przewalskii to different drought events (precipitation, temperature and the both caused), we used tree ring width data of J. przewalskii from 17 sampling sites across the northeastern Tibetan Plateau to analyze the correlation between radial growth and climate factors of different periods, and the vulnerability in different drought events. The results showed that radial growth of J. przewalskii had significant positive correlation with drought index and negative correlation with temperature in the growing season (P<0.1). The vulnerability of J. przewalskii to drought events of different periods had significant difference. In the pre-growing season drought events, the R_T of J. przewalskii at low altitude was 2.3% higher than that at high altitude, the R_C of J. przewalskii at low altitude was 25.1% lower than that at high altitude. For drought events in the growing season, the R_T of J. przewalskii at low altitude was 23.7% lower than that at high altitude, the R_C of J. przewalskii at low altitude was 107.1% higher than that at high altitude. The mean R_C(1.68) of J. przewalskii in precipitation-caused drought events was strong, while the mean R_T(1.43) of J. przewalskii in temperature-caused drought events was strong. The growth of J. przewalskii, especially for that at low altitude, would be largely limited by drought caused by global warming in the future.

Key words: northeastern Tibetan Plateau, Juniperus przewalskii, vulnerability, growing season, drought

徐贺年, 王江林, 彭小梅, 任子健. 青藏高原东北部祁连圆柏径向生长对不同类型干旱的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2097-2104.

XU He-nian, WANG Jiang-lin, PENG Xiao-mei, REN Zi-jian. Responses of radial growth of Juniperus przewalskii to different droughts over the northeastern Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(8): 2097-2104.

参考文献

[1] Vicente-Serrano SM, Quiring SM, Peña-Gallardo M, et al. A review of environmental droughts: Increased risk under global warming? Earth-Science Reviews, 2019, 201: 102953
[2] 张法伟, 李红琴, 李英年, 等. 青藏高原高寒草甸气温、降水和地上净初级生产力变化的周期特征. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(3): 525-530
[3] Ji ZM, Kang SC. Double-nested dynamical downscaling experiments over the Tibetan Plateau and their projection of climate change under two RCP Scenarios. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2013, 70: 1278-1290
[4] Zhou BT, Wen QH, Xu Y, et al. Projected changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in China by the CMIP5 multimodel ensembles. Journal of Climate, 2014, 27: 6591-6611
[5] Jiang ZH, Song J, Li L, et al. Extreme climate events in China: IPCC-AR4 model evaluation and projection. Climatic Change, 2012, 110: 385-401
[6] 赵东升, 吴绍洪, 郑度, 等. 青藏高原生态气候因子的空间格局. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(5): 1153-1159
[7] 陈德亮, 徐柏青, 姚檀栋, 等. 青藏高原环境变化科学评估: 过去、现在与未来. 科学通报, 2015, 60(32): 3025-3035
[8] 李林, 李晓东, 校瑞香, 等. 青藏高原东北部气候变化的异质性及其成因. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(7): 1496-1505
[9] 贺敏慧, 杨保, 秦春, 等. 青藏高原东北部与南部地区树木径向生长对气候要素的响应——以祁丰和林周树轮为例. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(4): 1117-1123
[10] 周广胜, 马风云, 肖春旺. 施水量变化对毛乌素沙地优势植物形态与生长的影响. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(1): 69-76
[11] 申红艳, 李林, 董安详, 等. 树轮指示的柴达木盆地近539 a旱涝变化特征. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(4): 1059-1064
[12] 张芬, 勾晓华, 苏军德, 等. 祁连山东部不同树龄油松径向生长对气候的响应. 冰川冻土, 2011, 33(3): 634-639
[13] 刘兰娅, 勾晓华, 张芬, 等. 升温对祁连山东部青海云杉径向生长的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3576-3584
[14] 路明. 祁连山东部不同针叶树种径向生长监测研究. 硕士论文. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016
[15] Liu WH, Gou XH, Yang MX, et al. Drought reconstruction in the Qilian Mountains over the last two centuries and its implications for large-scale moisture patterns. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2009, 26: 621-629
[16] Wang XF, Yang B, Ljungqvist FC. the vulnerability of Qilian juniper to extreme drought events. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 1191
[17] 李雁, 梁尔源, 邵雪梅. 柴达木盆地东缘青海云杉树轮细胞结构变化特征及其对气候的指示. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(3): 524-532
[18] Ault TR. On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 2020, 368: 256-260
[19] Sheppard PR. Dendroclimatology: Extracting climate from trees. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 2010, 1: 343-352
[20] Shao XM, Wang SZ, Zhu HF, et al. A 3585-year ring-width dating chronology of Qilian juniper from the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Iawa Journal, 2009, 30: 379-394
[21] Yang B, Qin C, Wang JL, et al. A 3500-year tree-ring record of annual precipitation on the northeastern Tibe-tan Plateau. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111: 2903-2908
[22] Cook E. A Time Series Analysis Approach to Tree Ring Standardization (Dendroclimatology, Forestry, Dendroclimatology, Autoregressive Process). PhD Thesis. Tucson: The University of Arizona, 1985
[23] Fang OY, Qiu HY, Zhang QB. Species-specific drought resilience in juniper and fir forests in the central Himalayas. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106615
[24] Lloret F, Keeling EG, Sala A. Components of tree resilience: Effects of successive low-growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests. Oikos, 2011, 120: 1909-1920
[25] Zhang LN, Jiang Y, Zhao SD, et al. Relationships between tree age and climate sensitivity of radial growth in different drought conditions of Qilian Mountains, Northwestern China. Forests, 2018, 9: 135
[26] 张军周. 祁连山树木形成层活动及年内径向生长动态监测研究. 硕士论文. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016
[27] Wu XC, Liu HY, Wang YF, et al. Prolonged limitation of tree growth due to warmer spring in semi-arid mountain forests of Tianshan, northwest China. Environmental Research Letters, 2013, 8: 024016
[28] Liu HY, Williams AP, Allen CD, et al. Rapid warming accelerates tree growth decline in semi-arid forests of Inner Asia. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19: 2500-2510
[29] Hartl-Meier C, Zang C, Dittmar C, et al. Vulnerability of Norway spruce to climate change in mountain forests of the European Alps. Climate Research, 2014, 60: 119-132
[30] Gao LL, Gou XH, Deng MX, et al. Assessing the influences of tree species, elevation and climate on tree-ring growth in the Qilian Mountains of northwest China. Trees, 2017, 31: 393-404
[31] 王玲玲, 勾晓华, 夏敬清, 等. 树木形成层活动及其影响因素研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3761-3770
[32] Zhang JZ, Gou XH, Alexander MR, et al. Drought limits wood production of Juniperus przewalskii even as growing seasons lengthens in a cold and arid environment. Catena, 2021, 196: 104936
[33] Zhang JZ, Gou XH, Pederson N, et al. Cambial pheno-logy in Juniperus przewalskii along different altitudinal gradients in a cold and arid region. Tree Physiology, 2018, 38: 840-852
[34] Hisashi A, Takahisa N, Yasuhiro U, et al. Temporal water deficit and wood formation in Cryptomeria japonica. Tree Physiology, 2003, 23: 859-863
[35] Vieira J, Carvalho A, Campelo F. Tree growth under climate change: Evidence from xylogenesis timings and kinetics. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 90
[36] Marcotti E, Amoroso MM, Rodríguez-Catón M, et al. Growth resilience of Austrocedrus chilensis to drought along a precipitation gradient in Patagonia, Argentina. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 496: 119388
[37] Li Y, Zhang QB, Fang OY, et al. Recovery time of juniper trees is longer in wet than dry conditions on the Tibetan Plateau in the past two centuries. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 497: 119514
[38] Williams AP, Seager R, Abatzoglou JT, et al. Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012-2014. Geophysical Research Letters, 2015, 42: 6819-6828
[39] Cook BI, Ault TR, Smerdon JE. Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains. Science Advances, 2015, 1: 1400082
[40] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Global Warming of 1.5 ℃, An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 ℃ above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Path-Ways[EB/OL]. (2018-12-16) [2021-09-13]. https://www.ipcc.ch/2018/10/08/summary-for-policymakers-of-ipcc-special-report-on-global-warming-of-1-5c-approved-by-governments/