[1] Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. Stomatal conduc-tance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature, 1979, 282: 424-426 [2] Knapp AK, Smith WK. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses during sun/shade transitions in subalpine plants: influence on water use efficiency. Oecologia, 1987, 74: 62-67 [3] Lawson T, Blatt MR. Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology, 2014, 164: 1556-1570 [4] Matthews JSA, Vialet-Chabrand S, Lawson T. Diurnal variation in gas exchange: The balance between carbon fixation and water loss. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174: 614-623 [5] Vialet-Chabrand S, Matthews JSA, McAusland L, et al. Temporal dynamics of stomatal behavior: Modeling and implications for photosynthesis and water use. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174: 603-613 [6] Xiong DL, Douthe C, Flexas J. Differential coordination of stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and leaf hydraulic conductance in response to changing light across species. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2017, 41: 436-450 [7] McAusland L, Vialet-Chabrand SR, Davey P, et al. Effects of kinetics of light-induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. New Phytologist, 2016, 211: 1209-1220 [8] Durand M, Brendel O, Bure C, et al. Altered stomatal dynamics induced by changes in irradiance and vapour pressure deficit under drought: Impacts on the whole plant transpiration efficiency of poplar genotypes. New Phytologist, 2019, 222: 1789-1802 [9] Faralli M, Cockram J, Ober E, et al. Genotypic developmental and environmental effects on the rapidity of gs in wheat: Impacts on carbon gain and water-use efficiency. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 492 [10] Eyland D, Wesemael JV, Lawson T, et al. The impact of stomatal kinetics on diurnal photosynthesis and water use efficiency under fluctuating light. Plant Physiology, 2021, 186: 998-1012 [11] Matthews JS, Vialet-Chabrand SR, Lawson T. Acclimation to fluctuating light impacts the rapidity and diurnal rhythm of stomatal conductance. Plant Physiology, 2018, 176: 1939-1951 [12] Kardiman R, Raebild A. Relationship between stomatal density, size and speed of opening in Sumatran rainforest species. Tree Physiology, 2018, 38: 696-705 [13] Haworth M, Marino G, Cosentino SL, et al. Increased free abscisic acid during drought enhances stomatal sensitivity and modifies stomatal behaviour in fast growing giant reed (Arundo donax L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018, 147: 116-124 [14] Gerardin T, Douthe C, Flexas J, et al. Shade and drought growth conditions strongly impact dynamic responses of stomata to variations in irradiance in Nicotiana tabacum. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018, 153: 188-197 [15] Drake PL, Froend RH, Franks PJ. Smaller, faster stomata: Scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64: 495-505 [16] Elliot-Kingston C, Haworth M, Yearsley JM, et al. Does size matter? Atmospheric CO2 may be a stronger driver of stomatal closing rate than stomatal size in taxa that diversified under low CO2. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1253 [17] Carter R, Woolfenden H, Baillie A, et al. Stomatal opening involves polar, not radial, stiffening of guard cells. Current Biology, 2017, 27: 2974-2983 [18] Papanatsiou M, Petersen J, Henderson L, et al. Optogenetic manipulation of stomatal kinetics improves carbon assimilation, water use, and growth. Science, 2019, 363: 1456-1459 [19] Rescode DV, Loik ME, Smith R, et al. Genetic variation in circadian regulation of nocturnal stomatal conductance enhances carbon assimilation and growth. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2016, 39: 3-11 [20] Yamori W, Kusumi K, Iba K, et al. Increased stomatal conductance induces rapid changes to photosynthetic rate in response to naturally fluctuating light conditions in rice. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2020, 43: 1230-1240 [21] 李庆康, 马克平. 植物群落演替过程中植物生理生态学特性及其主要环境因子的变化. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(1): 9-19 [22] Raven JA. Speedy small stomata? Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65: 1415-1424 [23] 李真真, 张莉, 李思, 等. 玉米叶片气孔及花环和维管束结构对水分胁迫的响应. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(10): 2944-2950 [24] 覃凤飞, 李强, 崔棹茗, 等. 越冬期遮阴条件下3个不同秋眠型紫花苜蓿品种叶片解剖结构与其光生态适应性. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 333-345 [25] Xu Z, Zhou G. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2008, 59: 3317-3325 [26] Henry C, John GP, Pan RH, et al. A stomatal safety-efficiency trade-off constrains responses to leaf dehydration. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 3398 [27] Franks PJ, Farquhar GD. The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas exchange control. Plant Physiology, 2007, 143: 78-87 [28] Qu M, Hamdani S, Li W, et al. Rapid stomatal response to fluctuating light: An under explored mechanism to improve drought tolerance in rice. Functional Plant Biology, 2016, 43: 727-738 [29] Whitehead D, Teskey RO. Dynamic response of stomata to changing irradiance in loblolly pine. Tree Physiology, 1995, 15: 245-251 [30] 罗丹丹, 王传宽, 金鹰. 植物应对干旱胁迫的气孔调节. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4333-4343 |